Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Superselection Rules in Quantum Theory: Logical Status of the Restrictions on States and Observables.

Todd Gilmore

Published Jan 1, 1977• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Superselection rules in quantum theory: Part I. A new proposal for state restriction violation

Todd Gilmore, James L Park

Foundations of Physics•Aug 1, 1979•4 citations

Superselection rules in quantum theory: Part II. Subensemble selection

Todd Gilmore, James L Park

Foundations of Physics•Oct 1, 1979•3 citations

Probability-conserving transformations and superselection rules in quantum theory

Lochlainn O'Raifeartaigh, G. Rasche

Annals of Physics•Nov 1, 1963•8 citations

Vector states on algebras of observables and superselection rules

V. N. Sushko, S. S. Khoruzhii

Theoretical and Mathematical Physics•Sep 1, 1970•19 citations

Superselection Rules from Measurement Theory

Shogo Tanimura

In quantum theory, physically measurable quantities of a microscopic system are represented by self-adjoint operators. However, not all of the self-adjoint operators correspond to measurable quantities. The superselection rule is a criterion to distinguish measurable quantities. Any measurable quantity must obey the superselection rules. By contraposition, any quantity which does not obey the superselection rules cannot be measured. Although some of superselection rules were proved, the raizon d'être of the superselection rules has been still obscure. In this paper we deduce the superselection rules from an assumption on symmetry property of measurement process. We introduce the notion of covariant indicator, which is a macroscopic observable whose value indicates the value of a microscopic object observable. We prove that if an object system has a quantity that is conserved during the measurement process, other quantities that do not commute with the conserved quantity are non-measurable by the covariant indicator. Our derivation of superselection rules is compared with the uncertainty relation under the restriction by a conservation law. An implication of the color superselection rule for the color confinement is discussed. It is also argued that spontaneous symmetry breaking enables a measurement that the superselection rule prohibits.

arXiv:1112.5701•Dec 24, 2011•4 citations

Quantum entanglement theory in the presence of superselection rules

Norbert Schuch, Frank Verstraete, J. I. Cirac

Superselection rules severely constrain the operations which can be implemented on a distributed quantum system. While the restriction to local operations and classical communication gives rise to entanglement as a nonlocal resource, particle number conservation additionally confines the possible operations and should give rise to a new resource. In Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 087904 (2004) we showed that this resource can be quantified by a single additional number, the superselection-induced variance $(\mathrm{SIV})$, without changing the concept of entanglement. In this paper, we give the results on pure states in greater detail; additionally, we provide a discussion of mixed-state nonlocality with superselection rules where we consider both formation and distillation. Finally, we demonstrate that $\mathrm{SIV}$ is indeed a resource, i.e., that it captures how well a state can be used to overcome the restrictions imposed by the superselection rule.

arXiv:quant-ph/0404079•Physical Review A•Oct 15, 2004•104 citations
In quantum theory, physically measurable quantities of a microscopic system are represented by self-adjoint operators. However, not all of the self-adjoint operators correspond to measurable quantities. The superselection rule is a criterion to distinguish measurable quantities. Any measurable quantity must obey the superselection rules. By contraposition, any quantity which does not obey the superselection rules cannot be measured. Although some of superselection rules were proved, the raizon d'être of the superselection rules has been still obscure. In this paper we deduce the superselection rules from an assumption on symmetry property of measurement process. We introduce the notion of covariant indicator, which is a macroscopic observable whose value indicates the value of a microscopic object observable. We prove that if an object system has a quantity that is conserved during the measurement process, other quantities that do not commute with the conserved quantity are non-measurable by the covariant indicator. Our derivation of superselection rules is compared with the uncertainty relation under the restriction by a conservation law. An implication of the color superselection rule for the color confinement is discussed. It is also argued that spontaneous symmetry breaking enables a measurement that the superselection rule prohibits.
Superselection rules severely constrain the operations which can be implemented on a distributed quantum system. While the restriction to local operations and classical communication gives rise to entanglement as a nonlocal resource, particle number conservation additionally confines the possible operations and should give rise to a new resource. In Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 087904 (2004) we showed that this resource can be quantified by a single additional number, the superselection-induced variance (SIV)(\mathrm{SIV})(SIV), without changing the concept of entanglement. In this paper, we give the results on pure states in greater detail; additionally, we provide a discussion of mixed-state nonlocality with superselection rules where we consider both formation and distillation. Finally, we demonstrate that SIV\mathrm{SIV}SIV is indeed a resource, i.e., that it captures how well a state can be used to overcome the restrictions imposed by the superselection rule.