Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Foundations of Physics

Superselection rules in quantum theory: Part II. Subensemble selection

Todd Gilmore, James L Park

Published Oct 1, 1979• 3 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/bf00711106

Related papers

Superselection rules in quantum theory: Part I. A new proposal for state restriction violation

Todd Gilmore, James L Park

Foundations of Physics•Aug 1, 1979•4 citations

Probability-conserving transformations and superselection rules in quantum theory

Lochlainn O'Raifeartaigh, G. Rasche

Annals of Physics•Nov 1, 1963•8 citations

Superselection Rules in Quantum Theory: Logical Status of the Restrictions on States and Observables.

Todd Gilmore

•Jan 1, 1977•0 citations

On superselection rules in Bohm–Bell theories

Samuel Colin, Thomas Durt, Roderich Tumulka

The meaning of superselection rules in Bohm–Bell theories (i.e., quantum theories with particle trajectories) is different from that in orthodox quantum theory. More precisely, there are two concepts of superselection rule, a weak and a strong one. Weak superselection rules exist both in orthodox quantum theory and in Bohm–Bell theories and represent the conventional understanding of superselection rules. We introduce the concept of strong superselection rule, which does not exist in orthodox quantum theory. It relies on the clear ontology of Bohm–Bell theories and is a sharper and, in the Bohm–Bell context, more fundamental notion. A strong superselection rule for the observable G asserts that one can replace every state vector by a suitable statistical mixture of eigenvectors of G without changing the particle trajectories or their probabilities. A weak superselection rule asserts that every state vector is empirically indistinguishable from a suitable statistical mixture of eigenvectors of G . We establish conditions on G for both kinds of superselection. For comparison, we also consider both kinds of superselection in theories of spontaneous wavefunction collapse.

arXiv:quant-ph/0509177•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Nov 30, 2006•17 citations

Superselection rules, quasi-particles and macroscopic quantum systems

Jason Edward Bradshaw

•Jan 1, 1996•0 citations

Observation and superselection in quantum mechanics

Nicolaas P. Landsman

arXiv:hep-th/9411173•Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics•Apr 1, 1995•37 citations
The meaning of superselection rules in Bohm–Bell theories (i.e., quantum theories with particle trajectories) is different from that in orthodox quantum theory. More precisely, there are two concepts of superselection rule, a weak and a strong one. Weak superselection rules exist both in orthodox quantum theory and in Bohm–Bell theories and represent the conventional understanding of superselection rules. We introduce the concept of strong superselection rule, which does not exist in orthodox quantum theory. It relies on the clear ontology of Bohm–Bell theories and is a sharper and, in the Bohm–Bell context, more fundamental notion. A strong superselection rule for the observable G asserts that one can replace every state vector by a suitable statistical mixture of eigenvectors of G without changing the particle trajectories or their probabilities. A weak superselection rule asserts that every state vector is empirically indistinguishable from a suitable statistical mixture of eigenvectors of G . We establish conditions on G for both kinds of superselection. For comparison, we also consider both kinds of superselection in theories of spontaneous wavefunction collapse.