Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Annals of Physics

Probability-conserving transformations and superselection rules in quantum theory

Lochlainn O'Raifeartaigh, G. Rasche

Published Nov 1, 1963• 8 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/0003-4916(63)90351-8

Related papers

Superselection rules in quantum theory: Part II. Subensemble selection

Todd Gilmore, James L Park

Foundations of Physics•Oct 1, 1979•3 citations

Superselection rules in quantum theory: Part I. A new proposal for state restriction violation

Todd Gilmore, James L Park

Foundations of Physics•Aug 1, 1979•4 citations

Superselection Rules in Quantum Theory: Logical Status of the Restrictions on States and Observables.

Todd Gilmore

•Jan 1, 1977•0 citations

Superselection rules, quasi-particles and macroscopic quantum systems

Jason Edward Bradshaw

•Jan 1, 1996•0 citations

Superselection Rules from Measurement Theory

Shogo Tanimura

In quantum theory, physically measurable quantities of a microscopic system are represented by self-adjoint operators. However, not all of the self-adjoint operators correspond to measurable quantities. The superselection rule is a criterion to distinguish measurable quantities. Any measurable quantity must obey the superselection rules. By contraposition, any quantity which does not obey the superselection rules cannot be measured. Although some of superselection rules were proved, the raizon d'être of the superselection rules has been still obscure. In this paper we deduce the superselection rules from an assumption on symmetry property of measurement process. We introduce the notion of covariant indicator, which is a macroscopic observable whose value indicates the value of a microscopic object observable. We prove that if an object system has a quantity that is conserved during the measurement process, other quantities that do not commute with the conserved quantity are non-measurable by the covariant indicator. Our derivation of superselection rules is compared with the uncertainty relation under the restriction by a conservation law. An implication of the color superselection rule for the color confinement is discussed. It is also argued that spontaneous symmetry breaking enables a measurement that the superselection rule prohibits.

arXiv:1112.5701•Dec 24, 2011•4 citations

On superselection rules in Bohm–Bell theories

Samuel Colin, Thomas Durt, Roderich Tumulka

The meaning of superselection rules in Bohm–Bell theories (i.e., quantum theories with particle trajectories) is different from that in orthodox quantum theory. More precisely, there are two concepts of superselection rule, a weak and a strong one. Weak superselection rules exist both in orthodox quantum theory and in Bohm–Bell theories and represent the conventional understanding of superselection rules. We introduce the concept of strong superselection rule, which does not exist in orthodox quantum theory. It relies on the clear ontology of Bohm–Bell theories and is a sharper and, in the Bohm–Bell context, more fundamental notion. A strong superselection rule for the observable G asserts that one can replace every state vector by a suitable statistical mixture of eigenvectors of G without changing the particle trajectories or their probabilities. A weak superselection rule asserts that every state vector is empirically indistinguishable from a suitable statistical mixture of eigenvectors of G . We establish conditions on G for both kinds of superselection. For comparison, we also consider both kinds of superselection in theories of spontaneous wavefunction collapse.

arXiv:quant-ph/0509177•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Nov 30, 2006•17 citations
In quantum theory, physically measurable quantities of a microscopic system are represented by self-adjoint operators. However, not all of the self-adjoint operators correspond to measurable quantities. The superselection rule is a criterion to distinguish measurable quantities. Any measurable quantity must obey the superselection rules. By contraposition, any quantity which does not obey the superselection rules cannot be measured. Although some of superselection rules were proved, the raizon d'être of the superselection rules has been still obscure. In this paper we deduce the superselection rules from an assumption on symmetry property of measurement process. We introduce the notion of covariant indicator, which is a macroscopic observable whose value indicates the value of a microscopic object observable. We prove that if an object system has a quantity that is conserved during the measurement process, other quantities that do not commute with the conserved quantity are non-measurable by the covariant indicator. Our derivation of superselection rules is compared with the uncertainty relation under the restriction by a conservation law. An implication of the color superselection rule for the color confinement is discussed. It is also argued that spontaneous symmetry breaking enables a measurement that the superselection rule prohibits.
The meaning of superselection rules in Bohm–Bell theories (i.e., quantum theories with particle trajectories) is different from that in orthodox quantum theory. More precisely, there are two concepts of superselection rule, a weak and a strong one. Weak superselection rules exist both in orthodox quantum theory and in Bohm–Bell theories and represent the conventional understanding of superselection rules. We introduce the concept of strong superselection rule, which does not exist in orthodox quantum theory. It relies on the clear ontology of Bohm–Bell theories and is a sharper and, in the Bohm–Bell context, more fundamental notion. A strong superselection rule for the observable G asserts that one can replace every state vector by a suitable statistical mixture of eigenvectors of G without changing the particle trajectories or their probabilities. A weak superselection rule asserts that every state vector is empirically indistinguishable from a suitable statistical mixture of eigenvectors of G . We establish conditions on G for both kinds of superselection. For comparison, we also consider both kinds of superselection in theories of spontaneous wavefunction collapse.