Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

APS

Exact and approximate solutions of the nuclear pairing problem

Alexander Volya, Vladimir Zelevinsky, B. ALEX BROWN

Published Oct 1, 2000• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Study of approximations in the nuclear pairing-force problem

H.C. Pradhan, Yukihisa Nogami, J. Law

Nuclear Physics A•Feb 1, 1973•283 citations

Exact Solutions for Some Nuclear Many-Body Problems

Feng Pan, Jerry Paul Draayer

Annals of Physics•Jan 1, 1999•20 citations

The nuclear pairing problem: new perspectives

Vladimir Zelevinsky, Alexander Volya

arXiv:nucl-th/0411064•Nuclear Physics A•Apr 1, 2005•11 citations

Exact solution of the nuclear pairing problem

Volya, A, B. ALEX BROWN, Zelevinsky, V

A method is developed for exact treatment of the general pairing problem in a finite Fermi-system. The method is based on SU(2) quasispin algebras that are present in the problem. We show examples of practical applications of the method and its comparison with approximate treatments.

•Nov 21, 2000•62 citations

A STOCHASTIC PARAMETRISATION OF THE SPECTRA OF THE NUCLEAR PAIRING HAMILTONIAN

HERVÉ MOLIQUE, J. Dudek

In this article we present a method to parametrise the exact solutions to the nuclear pairing problem, for realistic large-scale many-body spaces. This new approach allows for rapid and quite accurate estimates of the pairing influence on the excitation energies of the nucleus, treated in the standard mean-field approximation.

International Journal of Modern Physics E•Feb 1, 2004•0 citations

PARTICLE-PARTICLE HOLE-HOLE TDA – AND BEYOND – FOR THE NUCLEAR PAIRING HAMILTONIAN

HERVÉ MOLIQUE, J. Dudek

A comparison of different seniority zero solutions to the picket-fence model for the nuclear pairing hamiltonian problem is performed. These solutions are calculated, in the normal regime, within the self-consistent Random Phase Approximation (SCRPA) and various simplifications of this formalism, and also with the Tamm-Dancoff approach in the particle-particle-hole-hole channel (pphh-TDA). The latter formalism represents a first approximation to the earlier developped so-called P-Symmetric Many-Body method (PSY-MB). In the superfluid regime, the solutions are compared with the BCS results. By comparing the results with the exact ones, obtained by the Richardson method, it is shown that the PSY-MB method provides a powerful tool in solving the problem with good accuracy both in the normal and the superfluid regime, for single-particle space sizes adapted to typical nuclear structure calculations.

International Journal of Modern Physics E•Feb 1, 2007•0 citations
A comparison of different seniority zero solutions to the picket-fence model for the nuclear pairing hamiltonian problem is performed. These solutions are calculated, in the normal regime, within the self-consistent Random Phase Approximation (SCRPA) and various simplifications of this formalism, and also with the Tamm-Dancoff approach in the particle-particle-hole-hole channel (pphh-TDA). The latter formalism represents a first approximation to the earlier developped so-called P-Symmetric Many-Body method (PSY-MB). In the superfluid regime, the solutions are compared with the BCS results. By comparing the results with the exact ones, obtained by the Richardson method, it is shown that the PSY-MB method provides a powerful tool in solving the problem with good accuracy both in the normal and the superfluid regime, for single-particle space sizes adapted to typical nuclear structure calculations.