Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:nucl-th/0411064 · Nuclear Physics A

The nuclear pairing problem: new perspectives

Vladimir Zelevinsky, Alexander Volya

Published Apr 1, 2005• 11 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2005.02.047

Related papers

Exact and approximate solutions of the nuclear pairing problem

Alexander Volya, Vladimir Zelevinsky, B. ALEX BROWN

APS•Oct 1, 2000•0 citations

Study of approximations in the nuclear pairing-force problem

H.C. Pradhan, Yukihisa Nogami, J. Law

Nuclear Physics A•Feb 1, 1973•283 citations

Thermo field dynamics in the treatment of the nuclear pairing problem at finite temperature

Osvaldo Civitarese, A. L. DePaoli

The European Physical Journal A•Sep 1, 1992•15 citations

The measurement problem in QM: two comments and a possible solution

R. S. Mackintosh

Bell suggested that a new perspective on quantum mechanics was needed. We propose a solution of the measurement problem based on a reconsideration of the nature of particles. The solution is presented with an idealized model involving non-locality or non-separability, identified in 1927 by Einstein and implicit in the standard interpretation of single slit (or hole) diffraction. Considering particles as being localizable entities leads to an `induced collapse model', a parameter-free alternative to spontaneous collapse models, that affords a new perspective on, \emph{inter alia}, nuclear decay.

arXiv:1903.10292•Jan 23, 2019•0 citations

VARIATIONAL APPROACH TO THE NUCLEAR PAIRING-CORRELATION PROBLEM

Sven Wahlborn

•Jan 1, 1965•0 citations

New Approaches to Nuclear Pairing Problem through the Pfaffian and Grassmann Algebra(Research)

Makito Oi, T. Mizusaki

日本物理學會誌•Oct 5, 2014•0 citations
Bell suggested that a new perspective on quantum mechanics was needed. We propose a solution of the measurement problem based on a reconsideration of the nature of particles. The solution is presented with an idealized model involving non-locality or non-separability, identified in 1927 by Einstein and implicit in the standard interpretation of single slit (or hole) diffraction. Considering particles as being localizable entities leads to an `induced collapse model', a parameter-free alternative to spontaneous collapse models, that affords a new perspective on, \emph{inter alia}, nuclear decay.