Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Applied Soft Computing

Decision-making in cognitive paradoxes with contextuality and quantum formalism

Ishwarya M.S., Aswani Kumar Cherukuri

Published Jul 3, 2020• 16 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106521

Related papers

Quantum Information Processing in Human Cognition: Bridging Quantum Phenomena, Neural Dynamics, and Decision‐Making

Hamidreza Namazi, Arvindhan M, Helena Chytilova +1 more

ABSTRACT Recent advances at the intersection of quantum physics, neuroscience, and cognitive science have renewed interest in whether quantum phenomena and quantum‐inspired formalisms can inform models of human cognition and decision‐making. While classical neural and computational models explain many aspects of perception and behavior, they face limitations in accounting for contextuality, order effects, probabilistic reasoning violations, ambiguity resolution, and rapid information integration. This review synthesizes evidence and theoretical frameworks linking quantum‐related principles to cognition, with emphasis on quantum sensing in biological systems, molecular and subcellular quantum‐relevant mechanisms, quantum‐to‐classical transition pathways, quantum‐inspired models of perception and decision‐making, and quantum‐inspired computational approaches. It also extends beyond the probabilistic arm of quantum cognition by considering emerging equilibrium‐based and causal‐logical theories, including mental equilibrium, brain‐universe similarity, mind‐light‐matter unity, quantum emergence, and quantum intelligence. Throughout, the review distinguishes physically instantiated quantum mechanisms from abstract quantum‐like formalisms that model contextuality, mental entanglement, and non‐separable cognitive dynamics without requiring sustained macroscopic quantum coherence in the brain. Finally, it identifies methodological challenges and future directions for advancing quantum cognitive science toward experimentally testable and biologically meaningful theories.

Advanced Quantum Technologies•Jun 1, 2026•1 citation

Quantum Models of Cognition and Decision

William H. Batchelder, Hans Colonius, Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Sep 14, 2018•0 citations

Contextuality, incompatibility, and intra-system entanglement of mental markers: From cognition and decision making to medicine

Andrei Yu. Khrennikov, Felix Benninger, Oded Shor +1 more

Over the past two decades, quantum-like modeling (QLM) has emerged as a powerful framework for describing non-classical features of cognition and decision-making. Rather than assuming physical quantum processes in the brain, QLM employs the Hilbert space formalism to model contextuality, incompatibility of mental observables, and entanglement-like correlations. In this paper, we develop a quantum-informational model of mental markers within the broader information field approach. We propose that, under conditions of information overload and limited cognitive resources, individuals primarily respond not to detailed semantic content but to compact content labels - mental markers - carrying cognitive and affective components. We formalize mental markers as structured quantum-like states and analyze the nonclassical correlations between their cognitive and affective components using the Contextuality-Incompatibility-Entanglement triad. Special attention is given to intra-system entanglement between rational (cognitive) evaluation and emotional (affective) coloring, accounting for context-dependent judgments, order effects, and affect-driven decision shifts. Illustrative examples with psychological interpretation and experimental perspectives are provided. Appendix B briefly discusses neurobiological analogues of information overload in neural networks, highlighting structural parallels with the proposed marker-based framework; coupling to the origin and diagnostics of neurological diseases is analyzed. The paper contributes to QLM by distinguishing inter-system and intra-system entanglement and by demonstrating that cognitive-affective entanglement constitutes a fundamental structural feature of mental markers in socially mediated information environments.

Biosystems•Jun 24, 2026•2 citations

A survey of quantum-like approaches to decision making and cognition

Mehrdad Ashtiani, Mohammad Abdollahi Azgomi

Mathematical Social Sciences•Mar 3, 2015•96 citations

Insights from quantum cognitive models for organizational decision making.

Lee C. White, Emmanuel M. Pothos, Jerome R. Busemeyer

Organizational decision making is often explored with theories from the heuristics and biases research program, which have demonstrated great value as descriptions of how people in organizations make decisions. Nevertheless, rational analysis and classical probability theory are still seen by many as the best accounts of how decisions should be made and classical probability theory is the preferred framework for cognitive modelling for many researchers. The focus of this work is quantum probability theory, an alternative probabilistic framework. Results in decision making, which appear paradoxical from a perspective of classical probability theory, may make perfect sense if one adopts quantum probability theory. We review some cognitive models of decision making based on quantum probability theory. Each of these models is based on a challenge to prescription from classical probability theory. The transition from labeling a particular behavior as irrational, by classical probability standards, to (potentially) rational (or, at any rate, not fallacious), raises interesting possibilities, including that of characterizing certain heuristics in formal, probabilistic terms.

Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition•Nov 24, 2014•25 citations

Quantum-like modeling: cognition, decision making, and rationality

Andrei Yu. Khrennikov

Mind & Society•Nov 1, 2020•21 citations
ABSTRACT Recent advances at the intersection of quantum physics, neuroscience, and cognitive science have renewed interest in whether quantum phenomena and quantum‐inspired formalisms can inform models of human cognition and decision‐making. While classical neural and computational models explain many aspects of perception and behavior, they face limitations in accounting for contextuality, order effects, probabilistic reasoning violations, ambiguity resolution, and rapid information integration. This review synthesizes evidence and theoretical frameworks linking quantum‐related principles to cognition, with emphasis on quantum sensing in biological systems, molecular and subcellular quantum‐relevant mechanisms, quantum‐to‐classical transition pathways, quantum‐inspired models of perception and decision‐making, and quantum‐inspired computational approaches. It also extends beyond the probabilistic arm of quantum cognition by considering emerging equilibrium‐based and causal‐logical theories, including mental equilibrium, brain‐universe similarity, mind‐light‐matter unity, quantum emergence, and quantum intelligence. Throughout, the review distinguishes physically instantiated quantum mechanisms from abstract quantum‐like formalisms that model contextuality, mental entanglement, and non‐separable cognitive dynamics without requiring sustained macroscopic quantum coherence in the brain. Finally, it identifies methodological challenges and future directions for advancing quantum cognitive science toward experimentally testable and biologically meaningful theories.
Over the past two decades, quantum-like modeling (QLM) has emerged as a powerful framework for describing non-classical features of cognition and decision-making. Rather than assuming physical quantum processes in the brain, QLM employs the Hilbert space formalism to model contextuality, incompatibility of mental observables, and entanglement-like correlations. In this paper, we develop a quantum-informational model of mental markers within the broader information field approach. We propose that, under conditions of information overload and limited cognitive resources, individuals primarily respond not to detailed semantic content but to compact content labels - mental markers - carrying cognitive and affective components. We formalize mental markers as structured quantum-like states and analyze the nonclassical correlations between their cognitive and affective components using the Contextuality-Incompatibility-Entanglement triad. Special attention is given to intra-system entanglement between rational (cognitive) evaluation and emotional (affective) coloring, accounting for context-dependent judgments, order effects, and affect-driven decision shifts. Illustrative examples with psychological interpretation and experimental perspectives are provided. Appendix B briefly discusses neurobiological analogues of information overload in neural networks, highlighting structural parallels with the proposed marker-based framework; coupling to the origin and diagnostics of neurological diseases is analyzed. The paper contributes to QLM by distinguishing inter-system and intra-system entanglement and by demonstrating that cognitive-affective entanglement constitutes a fundamental structural feature of mental markers in socially mediated information environments.
Organizational decision making is often explored with theories from the heuristics and biases research program, which have demonstrated great value as descriptions of how people in organizations make decisions. Nevertheless, rational analysis and classical probability theory are still seen by many as the best accounts of how decisions should be made and classical probability theory is the preferred framework for cognitive modelling for many researchers. The focus of this work is quantum probability theory, an alternative probabilistic framework. Results in decision making, which appear paradoxical from a perspective of classical probability theory, may make perfect sense if one adopts quantum probability theory. We review some cognitive models of decision making based on quantum probability theory. Each of these models is based on a challenge to prescription from classical probability theory. The transition from labeling a particular behavior as irrational, by classical probability standards, to (potentially) rational (or, at any rate, not fallacious), raises interesting possibilities, including that of characterizing certain heuristics in formal, probabilistic terms.