Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Mind & Society

Quantum-like modeling: cognition, decision making, and rationality

Andrei Yu. Khrennikov

Published Nov 1, 2020• 21 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/s11299-020-00240-6

Related papers

Quantum-like model of cognitive decision making and information processing

Andrei Yu. Khrennikov

Biosystems•Nov 30, 2008•95 citations

Quantum-Like Models of Cognition and Decision Making with Theory of Open Quantum Systems

Andrei Yu. Khrennikov, Masanari Asano

•Sep 1, 2026•0 citations

Quantum cognition models of ethical decision-making in human behavior simulation

Levent Yılmaz

•Sep 25, 2017•0 citations

Statistical and subjective interpretations of probability in quantum-like models of cognition and decision making

Emmanuel E. Haven, Andrei Yu. Khrennikov

Journal of Mathematical Psychology•Mar 9, 2016•38 citations

Decision Making and Modelling in Cognitive Science

Sisir Roy

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2016•11 citations

Insights from quantum cognitive models for organizational decision making.

Lee C. White, Emmanuel M. Pothos, Jerome R. Busemeyer

Organizational decision making is often explored with theories from the heuristics and biases research program, which have demonstrated great value as descriptions of how people in organizations make decisions. Nevertheless, rational analysis and classical probability theory are still seen by many as the best accounts of how decisions should be made and classical probability theory is the preferred framework for cognitive modelling for many researchers. The focus of this work is quantum probability theory, an alternative probabilistic framework. Results in decision making, which appear paradoxical from a perspective of classical probability theory, may make perfect sense if one adopts quantum probability theory. We review some cognitive models of decision making based on quantum probability theory. Each of these models is based on a challenge to prescription from classical probability theory. The transition from labeling a particular behavior as irrational, by classical probability standards, to (potentially) rational (or, at any rate, not fallacious), raises interesting possibilities, including that of characterizing certain heuristics in formal, probabilistic terms.

Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition•Nov 24, 2014•25 citations
Organizational decision making is often explored with theories from the heuristics and biases research program, which have demonstrated great value as descriptions of how people in organizations make decisions. Nevertheless, rational analysis and classical probability theory are still seen by many as the best accounts of how decisions should be made and classical probability theory is the preferred framework for cognitive modelling for many researchers. The focus of this work is quantum probability theory, an alternative probabilistic framework. Results in decision making, which appear paradoxical from a perspective of classical probability theory, may make perfect sense if one adopts quantum probability theory. We review some cognitive models of decision making based on quantum probability theory. Each of these models is based on a challenge to prescription from classical probability theory. The transition from labeling a particular behavior as irrational, by classical probability standards, to (potentially) rational (or, at any rate, not fallacious), raises interesting possibilities, including that of characterizing certain heuristics in formal, probabilistic terms.