Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Synthese Library/Synthese library

A Phenomenological Ontology for Physics: Merleau-Ponty and QBism

Michel Bitbol

Published Jan 1, 2020• 33 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-030-46973-3_11

Related papers

Merleau-Ponty’s phenomenological perspective on quantum mechanics

Pablo Pellegrini

Continental Philosophy Review•Nov 16, 2021•13 citations

Merleau-Ponty’s Phenomenology as a Hermeneutic Framework for Quantum Mechanics

Leonardo Colletti, Pablo Pellegrini

Axiomathes•Apr 25, 2019•5 citations

A Phenomenology of Identity: QBism and Quantum (Non-)Particles

Michel Bitbol

Synthese Library/Synthese library•Jan 1, 2023•1 citation

Mutual Recognition in the Philosophy of Physics: QBism, Phenomenology, Hegel

George Webster

Recent discussions of QBism have turned increasingly toward the question of its ontology. I argue that key insights into QBism's ontology of agency can be identified by reconstructing its response to Wigner's friend paradox. I clarify the relation between two formulations of that response: one grounded in the claim that quantum states are agents' personal probability assignments, and another grounded in the injunction to treat all users of quantum theory as agents on equal footing. Once disambiguated, these formulations reveal an implicit commitment to a mutually recognitive conception of agency, according to which the agential status of a user of quantum theory depends constitutively on the acknowledgement of other agents. This analysis clarifies what is at stake in recent QBist engagements with phenomenology - namely, the search for a more philosophically robust account of this conception of agency. I show how Merleau-Ponty's account of intersubjectivity underpins the recognitive structure implicated in QBism before tracing these themes to Hegel's account of mutual recognition. By locating QBism within a longstanding tradition of mutual recognition, I claim that we not only illuminate its theoretical structure but also open up novel conceptual resources for the rigorous articulation and justification of its ontology.

physics.hist-phCross-listedarXiv:2608.17472•Aug 19, 2026•0 citations

QBism from a Phenomenological Point of View: Husserl and QBism

Laura de la Tremblaye

Synthese Library/Synthese library•Jan 1, 2020•23 citations

A QBist Reads Merleau-Ponty

Rüdiger Schack

Following earlier works by Michel Bitbol and Laura de la Tremblaye, which examine QBism from the perspective of phenomenology, this chapter explores points of contact between QBism and Maurice Merleau-Ponty's essay The intertwining—the chiasm .

arXiv:2212.11094•Routledge eBooks•Nov 20, 2023•5 citations
Recent discussions of QBism have turned increasingly toward the question of its ontology. I argue that key insights into QBism's ontology of agency can be identified by reconstructing its response to Wigner's friend paradox. I clarify the relation between two formulations of that response: one grounded in the claim that quantum states are agents' personal probability assignments, and another grounded in the injunction to treat all users of quantum theory as agents on equal footing. Once disambiguated, these formulations reveal an implicit commitment to a mutually recognitive conception of agency, according to which the agential status of a user of quantum theory depends constitutively on the acknowledgement of other agents. This analysis clarifies what is at stake in recent QBist engagements with phenomenology - namely, the search for a more philosophically robust account of this conception of agency. I show how Merleau-Ponty's account of intersubjectivity underpins the recognitive structure implicated in QBism before tracing these themes to Hegel's account of mutual recognition. By locating QBism within a longstanding tradition of mutual recognition, I claim that we not only illuminate its theoretical structure but also open up novel conceptual resources for the rigorous articulation and justification of its ontology.