Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Routledge eBooks

Phenomenology and QBism

Philipp Berghofer, Harald A. Wiltsche

Published Nov 20, 2023• 9 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.4324/9781003259008

Related papers

Introducing QBism

Christopher A. Fuchs

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2014•11 citations

QBism

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Oct 8, 2018•0 citations

QBism Is Not So Simply Dismissed

Ali Barzegar

arXiv:2006.02790•Foundations of Physics•May 19, 2020•23 citations

A Critic Looks at QBism

Guido Bacciagaluppi

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2014•9 citations

Phenomenology and Experiments

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Jul 1, 1999•1 citation

QBism, phenomenology, and contextual quantum realism

Igor Evgenievich Pris

A critique of phenomenological interpretation of quantum Bayesianism (QBism) is offered, in particular, the position of M. Bitbol and L. de La Tremblay, which removes remnants of scientific realism from QBism and adopts a radically phenomenological first person point of view. It is shown that phenomenological view of quantum mechanics cannot explain cognition of quantum reality and behavior of real quantum systems, because the ultimate reality for phenomenology is autonomous phenomena, which, in fact, do not exist. Our proposed contextual quantum realism (CQR) does not invert, as the mentioned authors do, but rejects, the traditional relation between experience and reality. By reinterpreting QBism, our CQR removes remnants of phenomenology from it, but in such a way as not to fall into the other extreme – metaphysical realism.

Siberian Journal of Philosophy•May 12, 2023•1 citation
A critique of phenomenological interpretation of quantum Bayesianism (QBism) is offered, in particular, the position of M. Bitbol and L. de La Tremblay, which removes remnants of scientific realism from QBism and adopts a radically phenomenological first person point of view. It is shown that phenomenological view of quantum mechanics cannot explain cognition of quantum reality and behavior of real quantum systems, because the ultimate reality for phenomenology is autonomous phenomena, which, in fact, do not exist. Our proposed contextual quantum realism (CQR) does not invert, as the mentioned authors do, but rejects, the traditional relation between experience and reality. By reinterpreting QBism, our CQR removes remnants of phenomenology from it, but in such a way as not to fall into the other extreme – metaphysical realism.