Synopsis In principle, the quantum coherence properties of any collision experiment should be affected by unavoidable classical uncertainties. However, they seem to produce no observable effect. This mystery can be solved by introducing the concept of “coherence length” which, in addition, provides a way to control and modify the aforementioned quantum properties. Finally, we discuss different methods to achieve a transition between coherent and incoherent collisions, evaluating their strengths and weaknesses.
Synopsis In principle, the quantum coherence properties of any collision experiment should be affected by unavoidable classical uncertainties. However, they seem to produce no observable effect. This mystery can be solved by introducing the concept of “coherence length” which, in addition, provides a way to control and modify the aforementioned quantum properties. Finally, we discuss different methods to achieve a transition between coherent and incoherent collisions, evaluating their strengths and weaknesses.
The fundamental indication of the departure of quantum mechanics from the classical world is the so-called quantum coherence.Typically, we define it as the characteristic of systems which are in a superposition of states yielding interference patterns in certain kinds of experiments.In addition to its captivating philosophical implications, quantum coherence turned out to be a valuable tool in different areas, ranging from quantum information to biology, where it was used to describe several fundamental processes.Here, we go one step further to study how classical uncertainties in a mixture of similar states reduce quantum coherence in quantum scattering theory.To this end, we deal with different examples, all of them with roots in the widely studied Feynman's two-slit thought experiment.We finally propose an operational and intuitive definition of the concept of coherence length whose implications largely transcend the simplicity of the corresponding mathematical development, as it is demonstrated when applied to the analysis of some recent atomic and molecular processes.
The principle of superposition is one of the main building blocks of quantum physics and has tremendous consequences both for our fundamental understanding of nature and for technological applications. In particular, the existence of coherent superposition leads to the concept of unavoidable quantum uncertainty. The role played by this "coherent" uncertainty within thermodynamics, as well as its relationship to classical lack of knowledge, is the main subject of this thesis. In Part I we study thermodynamic limitations of processing quantum coherence within a resource-theoretic framework. Using the time-translation symmetry that arises from the first law of thermodynamics, we find constraints on possible manipulations of coherence and prove their irreversibility due to the second law. We also generalise to the quantum domain Szilard's concept of converting information into work. Namely, we show how, in the presence of a heat bath, coherence of a system can be exploited to perform mechanical work. Finally, we analyse the effect that coherence has on the structure of the thermodynamic arrow of time, i.e., on the set of states into which a given state can freely evolve under thermodynamic constraints. In Part II we focus on the interplay between quantum and classical uncertainty manifested in uncertainty relations. We show that separating the total uncertainty into these two distinct components leads to a new type of "fixed-entropy" uncertainty relation. We also analyse how classical ignorance affects the structure of states that minimise the unavoidable uncertainty arising from the noncommutativity of two observables. Finally, we study error-disturbance trade-off relations and, by proving that quantum uncertainty can be simultaneously maximised for any two observables, we clarify the unphysical nature of state-dependent relations.
The notion of measurement is of both foundational and instrumental significance in quantum mechanics, and coherence destroyed by measurements (decoherence) lies at the very heart of quantum to classical transition. Qualitative aspects of this spirit have been widely recognized and analyzed ever since the inception of quantum theory. However, axiomatic and quantitative investigations of coherence are attracting great interest only recently with several figures of merit for coherence introduced [Baumgratz, Cramer, and Plenio, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 140401 (2014)]. While these resource theoretic approaches have many appealing and intuitive features, they rely crucially on various notions of incoherent operations which are sophisticated, subtle, and not uniquely defined, as have been critically assessed [Chitambar and Gour, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 030401 (2016)]. In this paper, we elaborate on the idea that coherence and quantum uncertainty are dual viewpoints of the same quantum substrate, and address coherence quantification by identifying coherence of a state (with respect to a measurement) with quantum uncertainty of a measurement (with respect to a state). Consequently, coherence measures may be set into correspondence with measures of quantum uncertainty. In particular, we take average quantum Fisher information as a measure of quantum uncertainty, and introduce the corresponding measure of coherence, which is demonstrated to exhibit desirable properties. Implications for interpreting quantum purity as maximal coherence, and quantum discord as minimal coherence, are illustrated.
Many counterfactual predictions are made by quantum theory, such as quantum tunneling and violations of Bell’s inequalities. Experimental verifications of these predictions demonstrate that quantum theory is reliable for the microscopic world. Despite its widespread application, consistent theoretical interpretations of quantum theory remain a challenge. Recently, Aharonov et al. proposed several new and intriguing counterfactuals based on quantum weak measurement and interaction-free measurement, such as the quantum violation of the pigeonhole principle and the departure of physical properties from particles, also known as the quantum Cheshire cat effect. These counterfactuals garnered considerable interest. Although no common consensus has been reached, many pioneering experiments have already been conducted in light of these theoretical proposals. Furthermore, these counterfactuals and the key concepts underlying them, weak measurement and interaction-free measurement, open up a whole new way of thinking about and understanding the strange quantum theory. Herein, our aim is to provide a unified perspective on these counterfactuals. The theoretical ideas, particularly the fundamental quantum concepts underlying these counterfactuals, are the focus of our attention. First, we present concise and insightful introductions to weak measurement and interaction-free measurement, which are the two key fundamental constructions for discussing all of the following quantum counterfactuals. Next, we discuss the quantum violation of the pigeonhole principle in depth, explicitly demonstrating that the key idea leading to the violation is destructive quantum interference between the possible paths of two particles traveling along the same path. Then, two key proposals of the quantum Cheshire cat effect are examined based on weak values of certain physical properties. Both proposals are built around interaction-free measurement, and the departure of physical properties from their bodies is realized based on the quantum Zeno effect. After introducing the weak measurement and weak value, the non-locality in the quantum Cheshire cat effect can be dismissed, and the physical properties leave the body continuously with infinitesimal quantum amplitudes. Meanwhile, during the departure, the total property in the entire space remains invariant. Finally, we present our conclusion on quantum counterfactuals, arguing that when coherent processes are endowed with concrete physical properties, counterfactuals are unavoidable. Throughout our discussions, we try to elaborate on the key roles played by the quantum concepts, quantum amplitudes, and quantum coherence in these counterfactuals. The idea behind weak measurement and weak value is that information about a coherent process can be obtained with sufficiently weak coupling. In other words, a quantum coherent process becomes observable with a weak measurement and even acquires a specific property quantified by a weak value. When compared to our conventional understanding of quantum coherent processes, this is a mind-boggling viewpoint. The idea behind interaction-free measurement is that weak amplitudes can cause large system evolution even if they cannot transport the body of the system, which is also astonishing! This demonstrates the enormous power of infinitesimal quantum amplitudes in quantum communication and computation. Therefore, all quantum counterfactuals provide new perspectives to further investigate these fundamental quantum concepts.
We report the first experimental observation of quantum Talbot effects with single photons and entangled photon pairs. Both the first- and second-order quantum Talbot self-images are observed experimentally. They exhibit unique properties, which are different from those produced by coherent and incoherent classical light sources. In particular, our experiments show that the revival distance of two-photon Talbot imaging is twice the usual classical Talbot length and there is no net improvement in the resolution, due to the near-field effect of Fresnel diffraction, which is different from the case of previous proof-of-principle quantum lithography experiments in the far field.
There are many striking phenomena which are attributed to ‘quantum coherence’. It is natural to wonder if there are new quantum coherence effects waiting to be discovered which could lead to interesting results and perhaps even practical applications. A useful starting point for such discussions is a definition of ‘quantum coherence’. In this article I give a definition of quantum coherence and use a number of illustrations to explore the implications of this definition. I point to topics of current interest in the fields of cosmology and quantum computation where questions of quantum coherence arise, and I emphasize the impact that interactions with the environment can have on quantum coherence.