Many counterfactual predictions are made by quantum theory, such as quantum tunneling and violations of Bell’s inequalities. Experimental verifications of these predictions demonstrate that quantum theory is reliable for the microscopic world. Despite its widespread application, consistent theoretical interpretations of quantum theory remain a challenge. Recently, Aharonov et al. proposed several new and intriguing counterfactuals based on quantum weak measurement and interaction-free measurement, such as the quantum violation of the pigeonhole principle and the departure of physical properties from particles, also known as the quantum Cheshire cat effect. These counterfactuals garnered considerable interest. Although no common consensus has been reached, many pioneering experiments have already been conducted in light of these theoretical proposals. Furthermore, these counterfactuals and the key concepts underlying them, weak measurement and interaction-free measurement, open up a whole new way of thinking about and understanding the strange quantum theory. Herein, our aim is to provide a unified perspective on these counterfactuals. The theoretical ideas, particularly the fundamental quantum concepts underlying these counterfactuals, are the focus of our attention. First, we present concise and insightful introductions to weak measurement and interaction-free measurement, which are the two key fundamental constructions for discussing all of the following quantum counterfactuals. Next, we discuss the quantum violation of the pigeonhole principle in depth, explicitly demonstrating that the key idea leading to the violation is destructive quantum interference between the possible paths of two particles traveling along the same path. Then, two key proposals of the quantum Cheshire cat effect are examined based on weak values of certain physical properties. Both proposals are built around interaction-free measurement, and the departure of physical properties from their bodies is realized based on the quantum Zeno effect. After introducing the weak measurement and weak value, the non-locality in the quantum Cheshire cat effect can be dismissed, and the physical properties leave the body continuously with infinitesimal quantum amplitudes. Meanwhile, during the departure, the total property in the entire space remains invariant. Finally, we present our conclusion on quantum counterfactuals, arguing that when coherent processes are endowed with concrete physical properties, counterfactuals are unavoidable. Throughout our discussions, we try to elaborate on the key roles played by the quantum concepts, quantum amplitudes, and quantum coherence in these counterfactuals. The idea behind weak measurement and weak value is that information about a coherent process can be obtained with sufficiently weak coupling. In other words, a quantum coherent process becomes observable with a weak measurement and even acquires a specific property quantified by a weak value. When compared to our conventional understanding of quantum coherent processes, this is a mind-boggling viewpoint. The idea behind interaction-free measurement is that weak amplitudes can cause large system evolution even if they cannot transport the body of the system, which is also astonishing! This demonstrates the enormous power of infinitesimal quantum amplitudes in quantum communication and computation. Therefore, all quantum counterfactuals provide new perspectives to further investigate these fundamental quantum concepts.
Many counterfactual predictions are made by quantum theory, such as quantum tunneling and violations of Bell’s inequalities. Experimental verifications of these predictions demonstrate that quantum theory is reliable for the microscopic world. Despite its widespread application, consistent theoretical interpretations of quantum theory remain a challenge. Recently, Aharonov et al. proposed several new and intriguing counterfactuals based on quantum weak measurement and interaction-free measurement, such as the quantum violation of the pigeonhole principle and the departure of physical properties from particles, also known as the quantum Cheshire cat effect. These counterfactuals garnered considerable interest. Although no common consensus has been reached, many pioneering experiments have already been conducted in light of these theoretical proposals. Furthermore, these counterfactuals and the key concepts underlying them, weak measurement and interaction-free measurement, open up a whole new way of thinking about and understanding the strange quantum theory. Herein, our aim is to provide a unified perspective on these counterfactuals. The theoretical ideas, particularly the fundamental quantum concepts underlying these counterfactuals, are the focus of our attention. First, we present concise and insightful introductions to weak measurement and interaction-free measurement, which are the two key fundamental constructions for discussing all of the following quantum counterfactuals. Next, we discuss the quantum violation of the pigeonhole principle in depth, explicitly demonstrating that the key idea leading to the violation is destructive quantum interference between the possible paths of two particles traveling along the same path. Then, two key proposals of the quantum Cheshire cat effect are examined based on weak values of certain physical properties. Both proposals are built around interaction-free measurement, and the departure of physical properties from their bodies is realized based on the quantum Zeno effect. After introducing the weak measurement and weak value, the non-locality in the quantum Cheshire cat effect can be dismissed, and the physical properties leave the body continuously with infinitesimal quantum amplitudes. Meanwhile, during the departure, the total property in the entire space remains invariant. Finally, we present our conclusion on quantum counterfactuals, arguing that when coherent processes are endowed with concrete physical properties, counterfactuals are unavoidable. Throughout our discussions, we try to elaborate on the key roles played by the quantum concepts, quantum amplitudes, and quantum coherence in these counterfactuals. The idea behind weak measurement and weak value is that information about a coherent process can be obtained with sufficiently weak coupling. In other words, a quantum coherent process becomes observable with a weak measurement and even acquires a specific property quantified by a weak value. When compared to our conventional understanding of quantum coherent processes, this is a mind-boggling viewpoint. The idea behind interaction-free measurement is that weak amplitudes can cause large system evolution even if they cannot transport the body of the system, which is also astonishing! This demonstrates the enormous power of infinitesimal quantum amplitudes in quantum communication and computation. Therefore, all quantum counterfactuals provide new perspectives to further investigate these fundamental quantum concepts.
Abstract One of the common conceptions of nature, typically derived from the experiences with classical systems, is that attributes of the matter coexist with the substance. In the quantum regime, however, the quantum particle itself and its physical property may be in spatial separation, known as the quantum Cheshire cat effect. While there have been several reports to date on the observation of the quantum Cheshire cat effect, all such experiments are based on first-order interferometry and destructive projection measurement, thus allowing simple interpretation due to measurement-induced disturbance and also subject to trivial interpretation based on classical waves. In this work, we report an experimental observation of the quantum Cheshire cat effect with noninvasive weak quantum measurement as originally proposed. The use of the weak-measurement probe has allowed us to identify the location of the single photon and that of the disembodied polarization state in a quantum interferometer. The weak-measurement probe based on two-photon interference makes our observation unable to be explained by classical physics. We furthermore elucidate the quantum Cheshire cat effect as quantum interference of the transition amplitudes for the photon and the polarization state which are directly obtained from the measurement outcomes or the weak values. Our work not only reveals the true quantum nature of Cheshire cat effect but also sheds light on a comprehensive understanding for the counter-intuitive quantum phenomena.
In this article, we will examine new fundamental aspects of "emergence" and "information" using novel approaches to quantum mechanics which originated from the group around Aharonov. The two-state vector formalism provides a complete description of pre- and post-selected quantum systems and has uncovered a host of new quantum phenomena which were previously hidden. The most important feature is that any weak coupling to a pre- and post-selected system is effectively a coupling to a "weak value" which is given by a simple expression depending on the two-state vector. In particular, weak values, are the outcomes of so called "weak measurements" which have recently become a very powerful tool for ultra-sensitive measurements. Using weak values, we will show how to separate a particle from its properties, not unlike the Cheshire cat story: "Well! I've often seen a cat without a grin," thought Alice; "but a grin without a cat! It's the most curious thing I ever saw in all my life!" Next, we address the question whether the physics on different scales "emerges" from quantum mechanics or whether the laws of physics at those scales are fundamental. We show that the classical limit of quantum mechanics is a far more complicated issue; it is in fact dramatically more involved and it requires a complete revision of all our intuitions. The revised intuitions can then serve as a guide to finding novel quantum effects. Next we show that novel experimental aspects of contextuality can be demonstrated with weak measurements and these suggest new restrictions on hidden variable approaches. Next we emphasize that the most important implication of the Aharonov-Bohm effect is the existence of non-local interactions which do not violate causality. Finally, we review some generalizations of quantum mechanics and their implications for "emergence" and "information." First, we review an alternative approach to quantum evolution in which each moment of time is viewed as a new "universe" and time evolution is given by correlations between different moments. Next, we present a new solution to the measurement problem involving future boundary conditions placed on the universe as a whole. Finally, we introduce another fundamental approach to quantum evolution which allows for tremendous richness in the types of allowable Hamiltonians.
Interest in weak values has grown steadily since their introduction in 1988, driven by developments in quantum measurement theory and increasing attention to the foundational issues at the heart of quantum mechanics. This thesis undertakes a philosophical investigation into the nature and implications of weak values, with a particular focus on their interpretation and role in creating and resolving quantum paradoxes. Overall, we argue that sequential weak values offer novel conceptual tools for assessing logical consistency in an atemporal fashion, ultimately motivating a shift toward a fundamentally relation-based ontology. Chapter 1 begins by establishing the conceptual and philosophical foundations of the thesis. We argue that performing this conceptual analysis of weak values requires a philosophical methodology informed by the structure of quantum theory and the foundational questions it poses. In Chapter 2, we provide a critical exploration of weak measurement theory and weak values, outlining their historical foundations and development, the experimental context, and interpretative challenges. Through a detailed analysis of paradoxes related to weak values such as the nested interferometer and the quantum Cheshire cat, the chapter argues that weak values reveal spatiotemporally discontinuous trajectories which conflict with classical intuition about particles and their trajectories. We contend that weak values are inherently contextual, as their significance arises in the context of the pre- and post- selections of the system. Chapter 3 develops an original account of ‘particle presence' across time, building on metaphysical notions of persistence. This chapter proposes a way of recovering continuity in paradoxes such as the three-box gendankenexperiment. Our framework offers a means of assessing the persistence of particles through spacetime via sequential weak values which we argue test the logical consistency of propositions across time. We then explore the implications for temporality, developing the key argument of this chapter: presence is defined across durations of time, rather than in discrete spacetime. This raises the possibility of presence without a well-defined causal order. In Chapter 4, the insights developed in the previous chapters are extended to a consideration of Relational Quantum Mechanics (RQM), addressing the longstanding issue of a lack of intersubjective agreement in relational interpretations. Given RQM's rejection of absolutism, this chapter critiques existing attempts at bridging perspectives and proposes a new route to empirical confirmation grounded in the persistence and reliability of observer's memory records. Our two- step model, consisting of internal confirmation via sequential weak values and then a consistency check from a second observer, offers a new approach to confirmation in RQM without rejecting the non-absolutist core of the interpretation. Sequential weak values are re-interpreted as atemporal probes available to the informational observer, distinct from its physical counterpart. This atemporal nature allows them to establish logical consistency across the observer's records and assign credence to them without presupposing a classical temporal order. These results suggest an ontology grounded in primitive relations, rather than one built on temporally ordered events. Chapter 4 thus builds on the contextuality arguments of earlier chapters: just as weak values reveal measurement outcomes to be context-dependent, their sequential and time-symmetric structure exposes temporal contextuality, challenging classical assumptions about fixed causal order and reinforcing the case for a non-classical, relation-based ontology. Finally, in Chapter 5, we conclude by summarising our key results and giving a list of open questions.
Here we report a type of dynamic effect that is at the core of the so called "counterfactual computation" and especially "counterfactual communication" quantum effects that have generated a lot of interest recently. The basic feature of these counterfactual setups is the fact that particles seem to be affected by actions that take place in locations where they never (more precisely, only with infinitesimally small probability) enter. Specifically, the communication/computation takes place without the quantum particles that are supposed to be the information carriers travelling through the communication channel or entering the logic gates of the computer. Here we show that something far more subtle is taking place: It is not necessary for the particle to enter the region where the controlling action takes place; it is enough for the controlled property of the particle, (i.e., the property that is being controlled by actions in the control region), to enter that region. The presence of the controlled property, without the particle itself, is possible via a quantum Cheshire Cat type effect in which a property can be disembodied from the particle that possesses it. At the same time, we generalize the quantum Cheshire Cat effect to dynamical settings, in which the property that is "disembodied" from the particle possessing it propagates in space, and leads to a flux of "disembodied" conserved quantities.
The field of quantum mechanics has revolutionised physics as a subject. Areas such as information theory, computer science and physical sensing have all been affected by the tremendous successes of various quantum protocols. In this thesis I present my contribution to the development of such non-classical protocols. In classical communication theory a message is always carried by physical particles that interact with a transmitter, after which they travel to a receiver. In this thesis I outline a quantum protocol which allows a receiver to obtain a message without receiving any physical object or particles that have interacted with the transmitter—that is, counterfactually. I build my protocol for counterfactual communication on the principles of interaction-free measurements, ensuring that information always propagates in the opposite direction to the protocol particles. The protocol shows how quantum mechanics breaks the previous premise of communication theory. From the perspective of local observers, it is a beautiful manifestation of the non-locality of interaction-free measurements. Furthermore, it is highly robust against experimental errors and external disturbances. The majority of this part of the thesis is based on my published article ‘Quantum counterfactual communication without a weak trace’ [Phys. Rev. A 94, 062303 (2016)]. Previous to my work, Salih et al. attempted to design a counterfactual communication protocol [Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 170502 (2013)]. This protocol has been highly controversial. As counterfactual phenomena impose restrictions on the inter-measurement paths of quantum particles, and the physical reality of such paths lacks description in the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics, an extension of current quantum theory is required to facilitate a discussion. In this thesis I present an operational and interpretation-independent methodology, enabling the discussion of inter-measurement paths of quantum particles. I start by considering the interferometers of counterfactual protocols, making the basic assumption that any quantum evolution naturally involves uncontrolled weak interactions. I then show how the Fisher information of these weak interactions, available at the output of counterfactual experiments, can be used to discuss the pre-measurement past of the particles. Based on this analysis, the protocol developed by Salih et al. is found to strongly violate counterfactuality. However, my protocol is more flexible in that it allows particles to propagate in the opposite direction to the message. This leads to counterfactuality being satisfied—even in the presence of large experimental errors. These results are observed both analytically and numerically. This part of the thesis is based on my article ‘Evaluation of counterfactuality in counterfactual communication protocols’ [Phys. Rev. A 96, 062316 (2017)]. The numerical methods are inspired by another of my publications: ‘Protocol for fermionic positive-operator-valued measures’ [Phys. Rev. A 96, 052305 (2017)]. Finally, as the Fisher information measure is found to be useful in evaluating counterfactual protocols, I extend my work by investigating the quantum Fisher information in experiments with general discrete quantum circuits. I prove that the quantum Fisher information of a two-level interaction in a quantum circuit can be expressed by a simple formula. Under certain phase-relations, the formula provides a straightforward connection between the abstract concept of the inter-measurement wavefunction and the quantum Fisher information at the output. With regard to how the information obtained from a certain volume of space influences our perception of classical objects, I argue that the quantum Fisher information measure is highly useful in describing quantum objects. If this measure is applied to observers with a limited set of the experimental measurement outcomes, a quantum object can appear to follow non-classical discontinuous paths. This supports the remarkable conclusion that our perception of the past of a quantum object is subjectively dependent on the measurement we conduct on it.
Entanglement and nonlocality are studied in the framework of pre-/postselected ensembles with the aid of weak measurements and the two-state-vector formalism. In addition to the EPR–Bohm experiment, we revisit the Hardy and Cheshire Cat experiments, whose entangled pre- or postselected states give rise to curious phenomena. We then turn to even more peculiar phenomenon suggesting “emerging correlations” between independent preand postselected ensembles of particles. This can be viewed as a quantum violation of the classical “pigeonhole principle.” Introduction It is seldom acknowledged that seven years before the celebrated Bell paper [1], Bohm and Aharonov [2] published an analysis of the EPR paradox [3]. They suggested an experimental setup, based on Compton scattering, for testing nonlocal correlations between the polarizations of two annihilation photons. In 1964, Bell proposed his general inequality, thereby excluding local realism. During the same time, Aharonov et al. constructed the foundations of a time-symmetric formalism of quantum mechanics [4]. While Bell's proof utilizes entanglement to demonstrate nonlocal correlations,wewill describe inwhat follows the emergence of nonlocal correlations between product states. For this purpose, however, we shall invoke weak measurements of pre- and postselected ensembles. In classical mechanics, initial conditions of position and velocity for every particle fully determine the time evolution of the system. Therefore, trying to impose an additional final condition would lead either to redundancy or to inconsistency with the initial conditions. This is radically different in quantum mechanics. Because of the uncertainty principle, an initial state vector does not fully determine, in general, the outcome of a future measurement. However, adding a final (backward-evolving) state vector results in a more complete description of the quantum system in between these two boundary conditions, which has a bearing on the determination of measurement outcomes. The basis for this time-symmetric formulation of quantum mechanics was laid down by Aharonov, Bergman, and Lebowitz (ABL), who derived a symmetric probability rule concerning measurements performed on systems, while taking into account the final state of the system, in addition to the usual initial state [4].