© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

Terms Privacy Legal Notice

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General

Kochen–Specker vectors

Mladen Pavičić

Published Apr 6, 2005• 10 citations

Abstract

Some reference citations in the text of this paper are incorrect and should be amended as listed below. The reference list is correct as published. Page 1579, line 5: [23, 34, 38, 39] should read [23, 34, 35, 36] Page 1579, line 9: [40] should read [37] Page 1580, line 8: [31, 33, 35] should read [31, 33, 38] Page 1580, line 14: [36] should read [39] Page 1580, line 36: [36] should read [39] Page 1580, line 38: [37] should read [40] Page 1580, line 42: [38] should read [35] Page 1581, line 3 of caption: [33, 35] should read [33, 38] Page 1583, line 12: [41] should read [42] Page 1587, line 9: [39] should read [36] Page 1587, line 11: [39] should read [36] Page 1587, line 18: [38, 39] should read [35, 36] Page 1587, line 37: [39] should read [36] Page 1589, line 18: [39, 46, 47] should read [36, 46, 47] Page 1590, line 2: [39] should read [36] age 1590, line 3: [39] should read [36]

DOI: 10.1088/0305-4470/38/16/c01

Related papers

Decoherence effects in interacting qubits under the influence of various environments

Sumanta Das, G. S. Agarwal

Some factors of 2 and 4 are incorrect in the previously published version of this paper. On page 4, in the line below equation (15), and on page 8, in the line below equation (26), the factor 2Γ A (2Γ B ) should be replaced by Γ A (Γ B ). On page 5, just below equation (16), the in-text equations should now read as: Here τ = Γ t and Ω 1 = [(2 v /Γ) 2 - 1] 1/2 . In figure 5, the label on the x -axis should be Γ t and in the caption to this figure v /4Γ should be replaced by v /Γ. These corrections do not affect the conclusions of the paper.

Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics•Nov 4, 2009•2 citations

Gopalakrishnan, Martin, and Demler Reply:

Sarang Gopalakrishnan, Ivar Martin, Eugene Demler

A Reply to the Comments by M. Sandbrink et al. and R. Lifshitz.

Physical Review Letters•Aug 13, 2014•2 citations

Reply to the letter of A. F. Suchkov

S A Kovalenko, S P Semin

Soviet Journal of Quantum Electronics•Oct 31, 1991•0 citations

Publisher's Note: Integrable optical-fiber source of polarization-entangled photon pairs in the telecom band [Phys. Rev.73, 052301 (2006)]

Xiaoying Li, Chuang Liang, Kim Fook Lee +3 more

This paper was published online on 3 May 2006 with several typographical errors. On page 3, the seventh line in the caption of Fig. There are two errors on page 5: in the left-hand column, the tenth line in the second paragraph should read as ''0.4 nm by the super-Gaussian-shaped... ;'' in the right-hand column, the third line should read as ''... about 0.07 pairs/pulse 19.'' On page 6, Ref. 19, the fifth line should read as ''idler channel... ;'' the ninth line should read as ''strengths of the RS... .

Physical Review A•May 17, 2006•2 citations

Reply to the comment by C.Camacho on PRL, v.77, p.5433

Alexander Gutin, Victor Abkevich, Eugene I. Shakhnovich

In this brief reply we point out to some misconceptions in C.Camacho's comment (cond-mat/9701210).

arXiv:cond-mat/9703230•Mar 26, 1997•0 citations

Publisher's Note: Dynamics of SU(1,1) coherent states for the damped harmonic oscillator [Phys. Rev. A79, 054103 (2009)]

Jeong Ryeol Choi, Kyu Hwang Yeon

with production errors on pages 2 and 3. On page 2, the last line in the right-hand column should read as "played in Fig. 2͑dЈ͒, it is clear…."On page 3, the fourth line of the caption to Fig. 2

Physical Review A•Jun 9, 2009•0 citations

Some reference citations in the text of this paper are incorrect and should be amended as listed below. The reference list is correct as published. Page 1579, line 5: [23, 34, 38, 39] should read [23, 34, 35, 36] Page 1579, line 9: [40] should read [37] Page 1580, line 8: [31, 33, 35] should read [31, 33, 38] Page 1580, line 14: [36] should read [39] Page 1580, line 36: [36] should read [39] Page 1580, line 38: [37] should read [40] Page 1580, line 42: [38] should read [35] Page 1581, line 3 of caption: [33, 35] should read [33, 38] Page 1583, line 12: [41] should read [42] Page 1587, line 9: [39] should read [36] Page 1587, line 11: [39] should read [36] Page 1587, line 18: [38, 39] should read [35, 36] Page 1587, line 37: [39] should read [36] Page 1589, line 18: [39, 46, 47] should read [36, 46, 47] Page 1590, line 2: [39] should read [36] age 1590, line 3: [39] should read [36]

Some factors of 2 and 4 are incorrect in the previously published version of this paper. On page 4, in the line below equation (15), and on page 8, in the line below equation (26), the factor 2Γ A (2Γ B ) should be replaced by Γ A (Γ B ). On page 5, just below equation (16), the in-text equations should now read as: Here τ = Γ t and Ω 1 = [(2 v /Γ) 2 - 1] 1/2 . In figure 5, the label on the x -axis should be Γ t and in the caption to this figure v /4Γ should be replaced by v /Γ. These corrections do not affect the conclusions of the paper.

This paper was published online on 3 May 2006 with several typographical errors. On page 3, the seventh line in the caption of Fig. There are two errors on page 5: in the left-hand column, the tenth line in the second paragraph should read as ''0.4 nm by the super-Gaussian-shaped... ;'' in the right-hand column, the third line should read as ''... about 0.07 pairs/pulse 19.'' On page 6, Ref. 19, the fifth line should read as ''idler channel... ;'' the ninth line should read as ''strengths of the RS... .