Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Proceedings of the Optical Society of Korea Conference

Comparison of BB84 with SARG04 quantum cryptography protocol in optical fiber

Youn-Chang Jeong, Yong‐Su Kim, Yoon-Ho Kim

Published Jan 1, 2009• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Fiber and free-space practical decoy state QKD for both BB84 and SARG04 protocols

Sellami Ali, Mohamed Ridza Wahiddin

The European Physical Journal D•Aug 26, 2010•15 citations

Quantum cryptography on optical fiber networks

Paul D. Townsend

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 1998•3 citations

An experimental comparison of BB84 and SARG04 quantum key distribution protocols

Youn-Chang Jeong, Yong‐Su Kim, Yoon-Ho Kim

SARG04 uses the same quantum states and the same measurement bases with BB84 protocol, but SARG04 can generate secret keys from two-photon pulses when BB84 cannot. We report the implementation of BB84 and SARG04 protocols using a polarization-encoded weak coherent pulse with an optical fiber quantum channel. We have experimentally investigated the secret key rate of BB84 and SARG04 protocols, and BB84 gave a higher secret key rate than SARG04.

Laser Physics Letters•Jun 27, 2014•12 citations

Effects of depolarizing quantum channels on BB84 and SARG04 quantum cryptography protocols

Y. -C. Jeong, Y. S. Kim, Y. -H. Kim

We report experimental studies on the effect of the depolarizing quantum channel on weak-pulse BB84 and SARG04 quantum cryptography. The experimental results show that, in real world conditions in which channel depolarization cannot be ignored, BB84 should perform better than SARG04 under the most general eavesdropping attack.

arXiv:1002.2285•Laser Physics•Jun 23, 2011•21 citations

Quantum Cryptography on Optical Fiber Networks

Paul D. Townsend

Optical Fiber Technology•Oct 1, 1998•64 citations

Quantum key distribution in real life

Sellami Ali, Abdallah Hassen Ahmed, Mohamed Hadi Habaebi +1 more

Abstract: The quantum key distribution (QKD) technique establishes secret keys shared between two communicating parties. Theoretically, unconditional security provided by QKD is guaranteed by the fundamental laws of quantum physics. in the real life, it is still possible to obtain unconditionally secure QKD, even with (phase randomized) attenuated laser pulses, as theoretically demonstrated by Gottesman-Lo-L¨utkenhaus-Preskill (GLLP). However, one must pay a steep price by placing severe limits on the distance and the key generation rate. These problems were solved using the decoy state method introduced by Hwang. In this paper, we have proposed a method to estimate parameters of the decoy state method based on two decoy state protocol for both BB84 and SARG04. The vacuum and weak decoy state protocol has been introduced as a special case of two decoy states protocol. This method has given different lower bound of the fraction of single-photon counts (y1), the fraction of two-photon counts (y2), the upper bound QBER of single-photon pulses (e1), the upper bound QBER of two-photon pulses (e2) and the lower bound of key generation rate for both BB84 and SARG04. The fiber based QKD systems also have been simulated using the proposed method for BB84 and SARG04. The numerical simulation has shown that the fiber based QKD systems using the proposed method for BB84 are able to achieve both a higher secret key rate and greater secure distance than that of SARG04. Key words: Quantum cryptography Quantum key distribution Decoy state protocol and optical communications

•Oct 1, 2012•1 citation
Abstract: The quantum key distribution (QKD) technique establishes secret keys shared between two communicating parties. Theoretically, unconditional security provided by QKD is guaranteed by the fundamental laws of quantum physics. in the real life, it is still possible to obtain unconditionally secure QKD, even with (phase randomized) attenuated laser pulses, as theoretically demonstrated by Gottesman-Lo-L¨utkenhaus-Preskill (GLLP). However, one must pay a steep price by placing severe limits on the distance and the key generation rate. These problems were solved using the decoy state method introduced by Hwang. In this paper, we have proposed a method to estimate parameters of the decoy state method based on two decoy state protocol for both BB84 and SARG04. The vacuum and weak decoy state protocol has been introduced as a special case of two decoy states protocol. This method has given different lower bound of the fraction of single-photon counts (y1), the fraction of two-photon counts (y2), the upper bound QBER of single-photon pulses (e1), the upper bound QBER of two-photon pulses (e2) and the lower bound of key generation rate for both BB84 and SARG04. The fiber based QKD systems also have been simulated using the proposed method for BB84 and SARG04. The numerical simulation has shown that the fiber based QKD systems using the proposed method for BB84 are able to achieve both a higher secret key rate and greater secure distance than that of SARG04. Key words: Quantum cryptography Quantum key distribution Decoy state protocol and optical communications