Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of the Optical Society of America B

Quantum-mechanical noise in an interferometer: intrinsic uncertainty vs measurement uncertainty (A)

Barbara A. Capron, Murray Sargent

Published Feb 1, 1986• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Quantum-mechanical noise in an interferometer: intrinsic uncertainty vs measurement uncertainty

Wei-Tou Ni

The ultimate limits of accuracies of interferometers come from quantum-mechanical noise according to the quantum theory of measurement. There are two sources of quantum-mechanical measurement noise—the error due to photoncounting statistics and the disturbance of the end mirror positions produced by fluctuating radiation pressure. Photon-counting error decreases with the square root of power. Fluctuating radiation pressure disturbance increases with the square root of power.

•Jun 9, 1986•0 citations

Quantum Noise in the Interferometer Detector

William George Unruh

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1983•39 citations

Effect of quantum noise on measurement accuracy in laser interferometers for the measurement of displacements

L. F. Vitushkin, Michael Z. Smirnov

Доклады Академии наук•Jan 1, 1987•0 citations

Quantum-mechanical noise in an interferometer: Intrinsic uncertainty versus measurement uncertainty

Wei-Tou Ni

In many quantum-mechanical measurements, the total uncertainties (\ensuremath{\sigma}) are greater than or equal to the intrinsic uncertainties (${\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{I}$) of the quantities to be measured; the differences are due to the particular measurement processes chosen. In each of these situations, a measurement uncertainty ${\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{M}$ can be defined as ${\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{M}$=(${\ensuremath{\sigma}}^{2}$-${\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{I}$${\mathrm{}}^{2}$${)}^{1/2}$. A question to ask is whether ${\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{M}$ is independent of the initial quantum state of the system to be measured, i.e., whether ${\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{M}$ is only dependent on the measurement process chosen. For a Michelson interferometer, we extend Loudon's model to show that in the model ${\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{M}$ is only dependent on the measurement process chosen for the case with small radiation-pressure fluctuation. When the intensity and radiation-pressure fluctuation are high, there are cross-correlated terms. Some of these terms are negative and give hope to the possibility of uncertainty reductions for appropriate schemes.

Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields•May 15, 1987•7 citations

Towards a new uncertainty principle: quantum measurement noise

Hans Martens, Willem M. de Muynck

Physics Letters A•Aug 1, 1991•19 citations

Quantum measurements of position, detection of weak classical forces, and interferometric noise

Wei-Tou Ni

We discuss quantum measurements of position and repeated-measurement schemes for monitoring free-mass position to an arbitrary accuracy. Using these schemes, weak classical forces can be monitored to an arbitrary accuracy. To illustrate various measurement uncertainties and intrinsic uncertainties, we consider the case of a Michelson interferometer. In the low-intensity limit, two measurement uncertainties, photon counting error and radiation pressure error, are independent of the intrinsic uncertainty. The uses of squeezed states and number eigenstates are discussed.

IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement•Jun 1, 1987•0 citations
In many quantum-mechanical measurements, the total uncertainties (\ensuremath{\sigma}) are greater than or equal to the intrinsic uncertainties (${\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{I}$) of the quantities to be measured; the differences are due to the particular measurement processes chosen. In each of these situations, a measurement uncertainty ${\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{M}$ can be defined as ${\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{M}$=(${\ensuremath{\sigma}}^{2}$-${\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{I}$2{\mathrm{}}^{2}2)1/2{)}^{1/2})1/2. A question to ask is whether ${\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{M}$ is independent of the initial quantum state of the system to be measured, i.e., whether ${\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{M}$ is only dependent on the measurement process chosen. For a Michelson interferometer, we extend Loudon's model to show that in the model ${\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{M}$ is only dependent on the measurement process chosen for the case with small radiation-pressure fluctuation. When the intensity and radiation-pressure fluctuation are high, there are cross-correlated terms. Some of these terms are negative and give hope to the possibility of uncertainty reductions for appropriate schemes.
We discuss quantum measurements of position and repeated-measurement schemes for monitoring free-mass position to an arbitrary accuracy. Using these schemes, weak classical forces can be monitored to an arbitrary accuracy. To illustrate various measurement uncertainties and intrinsic uncertainties, we consider the case of a Michelson interferometer. In the low-intensity limit, two measurement uncertainties, photon counting error and radiation pressure error, are independent of the intrinsic uncertainty. The uses of squeezed states and number eigenstates are discussed.