Noise is the defining feature of the NISQ era, but it remains unclear if noisy quantum devices are capable of quantum speedups. Quantum supremacy experiments have been a major step forward, but gaps remain between the theory behind these experiments and their actual implementations. In this work we initiate the study of the complexity of quantum random circuit sampling experiments with realistic amounts of noise. Actual quantum supremacy experiments have high levels of uncorrected noise and exponentially decaying fidelities. It is natural to ask if there is any signal of exponential complexity in these highly noisy devices. Surprisingly, we show that it remains hard to compute the output probabilities of noisy random quantum circuits without error correction. More formally, so long as the noise rate of the device is below the error detection threshold, we show it is #P-hard to compute the output probabilities of random circuits with a constant rate of noise per gate. This hardness persists even though these probabilities are exponentially close to uniform. Therefore the small deviations away from uniformity are hard to compute, formalizing an important intuition behind Google's supremacy claim. Interestingly these hardness results also have implications for the complexity of experiments in a low-noise setting. The issue here is that prior hardness results for computing output proba-bilities of random circuits are not robust enough to imprecision to connect with the Stockmeyer argument for hardness of sampling from circuits with constant fidelity. We exponentially improve the robustness of prior results to imprecision, both in the cases of Random Circuit Sampling and BosonSampling. In the latter case we bring the proven hardness within a constant factor in the exponent of the robustness required for hardness of sampling for the first time. We then show that our results are in tension with one another - the high-noise result implies the low-noise result is essentially optimal, even with generalizations of our techniques.Noise is the defining feature of the NISQ era, but it remains unclear if noisy quantum devices are capable of quantum speedups. Quantum supremacy experiments have been a major step forward, but gaps remain between the theory behind these experiments and their actual implementations. In this work we initiate the study of the complexity of quantum random circuit sampling experiments with realistic amounts of noise. Actual quantum supremacy experiments have high levels of uncorrected noise and exponentially decaying fidelities. It is natural to ask if there is any signal of exponential complexity in these highly noisy devices. Surprisingly, we show that it remains hard to compute the output probabilities of noisy random quantum circuits without error correction. More formally, so long as the noise rate of the device is below the error detection threshold, we show it is #P-hard to compute the output probabilities of random circuits with a constant rate of noise per gate. This hardness persists even though these probabilities are exponentially close to uniform. Therefore the small deviations away from uniformity are hard to compute, formalizing an important intuition behind Google's supremacy claim. Interestingly these hardness results also have implications for the complexity of experiments in a low-noise setting. The issue here is that prior hardness results for computing output proba-bilities of random circuits are not robust enough to imprecision to connect with the Stockmeyer argument for hardness of sampling from circuits with constant fidelity. We exponentially improve the robustness of prior results to imprecision, both in the cases of Random Circuit Sampling and BosonSampling. In the latter case we bring the proven hardness within a constant factor in the exponent of the robustness required for hardness of sampling for the first time. We then show that our results are in tension with one another - the high-noise result implies the low-noise result is essentially optimal, even with generalizations of our techniques.

arXiv:2102.01738Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer ScienceFeb 1, 202238 citations

The power of noisy random quantum circuits

Bill Fefferman

Bulletin of the American Physical SocietyMar 16, 20210 citations

Error accumulation in dissipative quantum circuits

Nadir Samos-Sáenz de Buruaga, Rodrigo M. C. Pereira, Karol Życzkowski +2 more

Present-day quantum processors are open systems in which dissipation and decoherence degrade the information carried by a quantum state as it propagates through a circuit. We study this degradation in dissipative random quantum circuits, modeling each two-qubit gate as a diluted unitary that interpolates between the intended unitary operation and a random dissipative quantum channel. Using the fidelity between the ideal and noisy output states as a diagnostic, we show that sufficiently random unitary gates or dissipative Kraus operators lead to a universal decay of the average fidelity. This decay is determined only by the dissipation strength, system size, and circuit depth, while microscopic details of the gates and noise, including the Kraus rank, appear only in subleading corrections to higher moments. We derive a closed-form expression for the average fidelity in terms of three physically meaningful error parameters, dissipation strength, coherent two-qubit gate-error strength, and connectivity-error probability. Finally, we identify the cases when dissipative effects can be reproduced by an unitary-noise model and when dissipation-induced decoherence remains distinguishable from coherent noise at the level of the average fidelity.Present-day quantum processors are open systems in which dissipation and decoherence degrade the information carried by a quantum state as it propagates through a circuit. We study this degradation in dissipative random quantum circuits, modeling each two-qubit gate as a diluted unitary that interpolates between the intended unitary operation and a random dissipative quantum channel. Using the fidelity between the ideal and noisy output states as a diagnostic, we show that sufficiently random unitary gates or dissipative Kraus operators lead to a universal decay of the average fidelity. This decay is determined only by the dissipation strength, system size, and circuit depth, while microscopic details of the gates and noise, including the Kraus rank, appear only in subleading corrections to higher moments. We derive a closed-form expression for the average fidelity in terms of three physically meaningful error parameters, dissipation strength, coherent two-qubit gate-error strength, and connectivity-error probability. Finally, we identify the cases when dissipative effects can be reproduced by an unitary-noise model and when dissipation-induced decoherence remains distinguishable from coherent noise at the level of the average fidelity.

quant-pharXiv:2609.01848Sep 3, 20260 citations

Noise in quantum devices

E. S. R. Gopal

IEE-IERE Proceedings - IndiaJan 1, 19720 citations

Hardware-efficient random circuits to classify noise in a multiqubit system

Jin-Sung Kim, Lev S. Bishop, Antonio D. Corcoles +3 more

In this work, we extend a multiqubit benchmarking technique known as the binned output generation (BOG) in order to discriminate between coherent and incoherent noise sources in the multiqubit regime. While methods exist to discriminate coherent from incoherent noise at the single and few-qubit level, these methods scale poorly beyond a few qubits or must make assumptions about the form of the noise. On the other end of the spectrum, system-level benchmarking techniques exist, but they fail to discriminate between coherent and incoherent noise sources. We experimentally verify the BOG against randomized benchmarking (RB) (the industry standard benchmarking technique) in the two-qubit regime, then apply this technique to a six-qubit linear chain, a regime currently inaccessible to RB. In this experiment, we inject an instantaneous coherent $Z$ -type noise on each qubit and demonstrate that the measured coherent noise scales correctly with the magnitude of the injected noise, while the measured incoherent noise remains unchanged as expected. This demonstrates a robust technique to measure coherent errors in a variety of hardware.In this work, we extend a multiqubit benchmarking technique known as the binned output generation (BOG) in order to discriminate between coherent and incoherent noise sources in the multiqubit regime. While methods exist to discriminate coherent from incoherent noise at the single and few-qubit level, these methods scale poorly beyond a few qubits or must make assumptions about the form of the noise. On the other end of the spectrum, system-level benchmarking techniques exist, but they fail to discriminate between coherent and incoherent noise sources. We experimentally verify the BOG against randomized benchmarking (RB) (the industry standard benchmarking technique) in the two-qubit regime, then apply this technique to a six-qubit linear chain, a regime currently inaccessible to RB. In this experiment, we inject an instantaneous coherent $Z$-type noise on each qubit and demonstrate that the measured coherent noise scales correctly with the magnitude of the injected noise, while the measured incoherent noise remains unchanged as expected. This demonstrates a robust technique to measure coherent errors in a variety of hardware.

arXiv:2104.10221Physical Review AAug 17, 20217 citations

Quantum Noise and the Detection of Squeezed States

Jeffrey H. Shapiro, Prem Kumar, Mari W. Maeda +1 more

Journal of the Optical Society of America BJan 1, 19845 citations

Z

-type noise on each qubit and demonstrate that the measured coherent noise scales correctly with the magnitude of the injected noise, while the measured incoherent noise remains unchanged as expected. This demonstrates a robust technique to measure coherent errors in a variety of hardware.