Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

IEE-IERE Proceedings - India

Noise in quantum devices

E. S. R. Gopal

Published Jan 1, 1972• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1049/iipi.1972.0017

Related papers

Noise of Quantum-Mechanical Amplifiers

M. W. P. Strandberg

Physical Review•Sep 15, 1957•7 citations

A deep learning model for noise prediction on near-term quantum devices

Alexander Zlokapa, Alexandru Gheorghiu

We present an approach for a deep-learning compiler of quantum circuits, designed to reduce the output noise of circuits run on a specific device. We train a convolutional neural network on experimental data from a quantum device to learn a hardware-specific noise model. A compiler then uses the trained network as a noise predictor and inserts sequences of gates in circuits so as to minimize expected noise. We tested this approach on the IBM 5-qubit devices and observed a reduction in output noise of 12.3% (95% CI [11.5%, 13.0%]) compared to the circuits obtained by the Qiskit compiler. Moreover, the trained noise model is hardware-specific: applying a noise model trained on one device to another device yields a noise reduction of only 5.2% (95% CI [4.9%, 5.6%]). These results suggest that device-specific compilers using machine learning may yield higher fidelity operations and provide insights for the design of noise models.

arXiv:2005.10811•May 21, 2020•20 citations

Radiation and noise in quantum electronics

William H. Louisell

•Jan 1, 1964•342 citations

Towards noise engineering: Recent insights in low-frequency excess flux noise of superconducting quantum devices

Sebastian Kempf, Anna Ferring, C. Enss

The comprehensive analysis of low-frequency excess flux noise both in terms of magnetic flux noise SΦ,1/f and energy sensitivity ϵ1∕f of 84 superconducting quantum devices studied at temperatures below 1 K reveals a universal behavior. When analyzing data in terms of ϵ1∕f, we find that noise spectra of independent devices cross each other all at certain crossing frequencies fc. Besides this main result of our paper, we further show that superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) arrays systematically feature higher noise exponents than single SQUIDs and give evidence for a material and device type dependence of low-frequency excess flux noise. The latter results facilitate to engineer the shape of magnetic flux noise spectra and thus to experimentally modify key properties such as coherence or measurement times of superconducting quantum devices.

Applied Physics Letters•Oct 17, 2016•7 citations

Quantum Noise in Conventional Optical Heterodyne Devices

Dechao He, Boya Xie, Xiao, Yu +1 more

By invoking the quantum theory of optical coherence, we theoretically show that the quantum noise in conventional optical heterodyne devices, which were previously identified as usual phase-insensitive amplifiers with additional quantum noise, is similar to that in optical homodyne devices, as verified by experimental data. Albeit more study is demanded to understand this result, it is certain that neither the uncertainty principle nor Caves's theorem for quantum noise of linear amplifiers sets a limit to the quantum noise of heterodyne devices.

arXiv:1301.4787•Jan 21, 2013•0 citations

Quantum Noise

François Chapeau-Blondeau

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2026•0 citations
We present an approach for a deep-learning compiler of quantum circuits, designed to reduce the output noise of circuits run on a specific device. We train a convolutional neural network on experimental data from a quantum device to learn a hardware-specific noise model. A compiler then uses the trained network as a noise predictor and inserts sequences of gates in circuits so as to minimize expected noise. We tested this approach on the IBM 5-qubit devices and observed a reduction in output noise of 12.3% (95% CI [11.5%, 13.0%]) compared to the circuits obtained by the Qiskit compiler. Moreover, the trained noise model is hardware-specific: applying a noise model trained on one device to another device yields a noise reduction of only 5.2% (95% CI [4.9%, 5.6%]). These results suggest that device-specific compilers using machine learning may yield higher fidelity operations and provide insights for the design of noise models.
The comprehensive analysis of low-frequency excess flux noise both in terms of magnetic flux noise SΦ,1/f and energy sensitivity ϵ1∕f of 84 superconducting quantum devices studied at temperatures below 1 K reveals a universal behavior. When analyzing data in terms of ϵ1∕f, we find that noise spectra of independent devices cross each other all at certain crossing frequencies fc. Besides this main result of our paper, we further show that superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) arrays systematically feature higher noise exponents than single SQUIDs and give evidence for a material and device type dependence of low-frequency excess flux noise. The latter results facilitate to engineer the shape of magnetic flux noise spectra and thus to experimentally modify key properties such as coherence or measurement times of superconducting quantum devices.
By invoking the quantum theory of optical coherence, we theoretically show that the quantum noise in conventional optical heterodyne devices, which were previously identified as usual phase-insensitive amplifiers with additional quantum noise, is similar to that in optical homodyne devices, as verified by experimental data. Albeit more study is demanded to understand this result, it is certain that neither the uncertainty principle nor Caves's theorem for quantum noise of linear amplifiers sets a limit to the quantum noise of heterodyne devices.