Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Stimulated Emission Imaging

S. Varma, Simona Patange, Andrew G. York

Published Feb 12, 2020• 2 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Zenodo hosts the archival version of this document; for convenient viewing, please visit andrewgyork.github.io/stimulated_emission_imaging Abstract Stimulated emission is often described as indistinguishable from the stimulating beam, sharing the same phase, frequency, polarization, and direction of travel. What direction does stimulated emission travel when the emitter is pointlike? Pointlike sources typically emit in all directions (a spherical wave), but if the stimulating beam is nearly monodirectional (a plane wave), will the stimulated emission propagate in all directions, or just one? We perform simple experiments to explore this apparent paradox, with an eye towards technological utility. In particular, does stimulated emission encode information about an emitter's location? Can lenses use this stimulated emission to form images of emitter distributions? If so, this suggests a way to combine the high signal rates of transmitted light microscopy with the specificity of fluorescence microscopy.

DOI
10.5281/zenodo.3665824

Related papers

Stimulated emission does not radiate in a pure dipole pattern

Andrew E. S. Barentine, W. E. Moerner

Stimulated emission (StE) remains relatively unused as an image-forming signal despite having potential advantages over fluorescence in speed, coherence, and ultimately resolution. Several ideas for the radiation pattern and directionality of StE remain prevalent, namely, whether a single molecule would radiate StE itself in a pure dipole pattern, or whether its emission direction depends on the driving field. Previous StE imaging has been carried out in transmission, which would collect signal either way. Here, we introduce the StE driving field (the probe) at an angle, using total internal reflection to avoid incident probe light and its specular reflections in our detection path. In this non-collinear detection configuration that also collects some fluorescence from the sample, we observe fluorescence depletion even in the spectral window where an increase in detected signal from StE would be expected if StE radiated like a simple classical dipole. Because simultaneous direct measurement of the fluorescence represents a calibration of the potential size of StE were it spatially patterned like a classical dipole emitter, our study clarifies a critical characteristic of StE for optimal microscope design, optical cooling, and applications using small arrays of emitters.

arXiv:2312.02333•Optica•Mar 5, 2024•2 citations

Quantum-enhanced stimulated emission microscopy

Animesh Datta

Nonlinear optical microscopy techniques have emerged as a set of successful tools for biological imaging. Stimulated emission microscopy belongs to a small subset of pump-probe techniques which can image non-fluorescent samples without requiring fluorescent labelling. However, its sensitivity has been shown to be ultimately limited by the quantum fluctuations in the probe beam. We propose and experimentally implement sub-shot-noise limited stimulated emission microscopy by preparing the probe pulse in an intensity-squeezed state. This technique paves the way for imaging delicate biological samples that have no detectable fluorescence with sensitivity beyond standard quantum fluctuations.

Emerging Imaging and Sensing Technologies for Security and Defence; and Advanced Manufacturing Technologies for Micro- and Nanosystems in Security and Defence•Sep 18, 2020•3 citations

Quantum-enhanced stimulated emission detection for label-free microscopy

Gil Triginer, Helen M. Chrzanowski, Shakib Daryanoosh +6 more

Nonlinear optical microscopy techniques have emerged as a set of successful tools for biological imaging. Stimulated emission microscopy belongs to a small subset of pump–probe techniques, which can image non-fluorescent samples without requiring fluorescent labeling. However, its sensitivity has been shown to be ultimately limited by the quantum fluctuations in the probe beam. We propose and experimentally implement sub-shot-noise limited stimulated emission microscopy by preparing the probe pulse in an intensity-squeezed state. This technique paves the way for imaging delicate biological samples that have no detectable fluorescence with sensitivity beyond standard quantum fluctuations.

arXiv:2004.10733•Applied Physics Letters•Jul 13, 2020•49 citations

Which Way Does Stimulated Emission Go?

J. David Wong-Campos, J. V. Porto, Adam E. Cohen

Is it possible to form an image using light produced by stimulated emission? Here we study light scatter off an assembly of excited chromophores. Due to the Optical Theorem, stimulated emission is necessarily accompanied by excited state Rayleigh scattering. Both processes can be used to form images, though they have different dependencies on scattering direction, wavelength and chromophore configuration. Our results suggest several new approaches to optical imaging using fluorophore excited states.

arXiv:2108.13943•The Journal of Physical Chemistry A•Nov 3, 2021•7 citations

Stimulated emission from single quantum dipoles

Kerry J. Vahala

Whereas the basic features of stimulated emission are easily seen to hold true for ensembles of dipoles, the same is not always true for a single dipole system. For example, symmetry requires that well localized, bound dipoles emit a dipole field which is isotropic in the plane defined by the dipole vector. Indeed, for this case, nothing in the interaction between the dipole and the field contains information on the propagation direction of the field. These observations seem at odds with the highly directional nature of stimulated emission. The authors therefore test for stimulated emission by an explicit calculation considering both a single Rabi type dipole and a damped dipole whose centre-of-mass coordinates are fixed at a point. Remarkably, despite the symmetrical dipole radiation pattern, stimulated emission into the original stimulating wave is shown to occur exactly. An explanation of this effect is then considered by investigating dipoles whose centre-of-mass coordinates are allowed to vary. In this case, photon recoil of the dipole introduces a directional sense to the interaction. In the extreme opposite and trivial case of a highly delocalized dipole (centre-of-mass momentum eigenstates) stimulated emission again occurs exactly. In all intermediate cases, however, stimulated emission occurs only partially or approximately. A condition imposed on a dipole's spatial extent is established for stimulated emission to occur approximately. Finally, the original bound and localized dipole is seen to be a special limiting case of recoiling dipoles for which stimulated emission occurs exactly.

Pure and Applied Optics Journal of the European Optical Society Part A•Sep 1, 1993•6 citations

Some basic properties of stimulated and spontaneous emission: A semiclassical approach

Alan V. Durrant

The coherence and directional properties of stimulated and spontaneous emission can be understood without a knowledge of quantum electrodynamics. This paper presents a semiclassical description of the interaction between a free atom and a weak optical field under conditions of either a stimulated emission or a stimulated absorption resonance. It is shown that, under certain conditions, the stimulated or spontaneous radiation fields emitted from a sample of atoms will propagate in the same direction as the incident beam, will be coherent with the incident beam, and will have the correct phase to provide amplification or attenuation.

American Journal of Physics•Jul 1, 1976•14 citations
Zenodo hosts the archival version of this document; for convenient viewing, please visit andrewgyork.github.io/stimulated_emission_imaging Abstract Stimulated emission is often described as indistinguishable from the stimulating beam, sharing the same phase, frequency, polarization, and direction of travel. What direction does stimulated emission travel when the emitter is pointlike? Pointlike sources typically emit in all directions (a spherical wave), but if the stimulating beam is nearly monodirectional (a plane wave), will the stimulated emission propagate in all directions, or just one? We perform simple experiments to explore this apparent paradox, with an eye towards technological utility. In particular, does stimulated emission encode information about an emitter's location? Can lenses use this stimulated emission to form images of emitter distributions? If so, this suggests a way to combine the high signal rates of transmitted light microscopy with the specificity of fluorescence microscopy.
Stimulated emission (StE) remains relatively unused as an image-forming signal despite having potential advantages over fluorescence in speed, coherence, and ultimately resolution. Several ideas for the radiation pattern and directionality of StE remain prevalent, namely, whether a single molecule would radiate StE itself in a pure dipole pattern, or whether its emission direction depends on the driving field. Previous StE imaging has been carried out in transmission, which would collect signal either way. Here, we introduce the StE driving field (the probe) at an angle, using total internal reflection to avoid incident probe light and its specular reflections in our detection path. In this non-collinear detection configuration that also collects some fluorescence from the sample, we observe fluorescence depletion even in the spectral window where an increase in detected signal from StE would be expected if StE radiated like a simple classical dipole. Because simultaneous direct measurement of the fluorescence represents a calibration of the potential size of StE were it spatially patterned like a classical dipole emitter, our study clarifies a critical characteristic of StE for optimal microscope design, optical cooling, and applications using small arrays of emitters.
Nonlinear optical microscopy techniques have emerged as a set of successful tools for biological imaging. Stimulated emission microscopy belongs to a small subset of pump-probe techniques which can image non-fluorescent samples without requiring fluorescent labelling. However, its sensitivity has been shown to be ultimately limited by the quantum fluctuations in the probe beam. We propose and experimentally implement sub-shot-noise limited stimulated emission microscopy by preparing the probe pulse in an intensity-squeezed state. This technique paves the way for imaging delicate biological samples that have no detectable fluorescence with sensitivity beyond standard quantum fluctuations.
Nonlinear optical microscopy techniques have emerged as a set of successful tools for biological imaging. Stimulated emission microscopy belongs to a small subset of pump–probe techniques, which can image non-fluorescent samples without requiring fluorescent labeling. However, its sensitivity has been shown to be ultimately limited by the quantum fluctuations in the probe beam. We propose and experimentally implement sub-shot-noise limited stimulated emission microscopy by preparing the probe pulse in an intensity-squeezed state. This technique paves the way for imaging delicate biological samples that have no detectable fluorescence with sensitivity beyond standard quantum fluctuations.
Is it possible to form an image using light produced by stimulated emission? Here we study light scatter off an assembly of excited chromophores. Due to the Optical Theorem, stimulated emission is necessarily accompanied by excited state Rayleigh scattering. Both processes can be used to form images, though they have different dependencies on scattering direction, wavelength and chromophore configuration. Our results suggest several new approaches to optical imaging using fluorophore excited states.
Whereas the basic features of stimulated emission are easily seen to hold true for ensembles of dipoles, the same is not always true for a single dipole system. For example, symmetry requires that well localized, bound dipoles emit a dipole field which is isotropic in the plane defined by the dipole vector. Indeed, for this case, nothing in the interaction between the dipole and the field contains information on the propagation direction of the field. These observations seem at odds with the highly directional nature of stimulated emission. The authors therefore test for stimulated emission by an explicit calculation considering both a single Rabi type dipole and a damped dipole whose centre-of-mass coordinates are fixed at a point. Remarkably, despite the symmetrical dipole radiation pattern, stimulated emission into the original stimulating wave is shown to occur exactly. An explanation of this effect is then considered by investigating dipoles whose centre-of-mass coordinates are allowed to vary. In this case, photon recoil of the dipole introduces a directional sense to the interaction. In the extreme opposite and trivial case of a highly delocalized dipole (centre-of-mass momentum eigenstates) stimulated emission again occurs exactly. In all intermediate cases, however, stimulated emission occurs only partially or approximately. A condition imposed on a dipole's spatial extent is established for stimulated emission to occur approximately. Finally, the original bound and localized dipole is seen to be a special limiting case of recoiling dipoles for which stimulated emission occurs exactly.
The coherence and directional properties of stimulated and spontaneous emission can be understood without a knowledge of quantum electrodynamics. This paper presents a semiclassical description of the interaction between a free atom and a weak optical field under conditions of either a stimulated emission or a stimulated absorption resonance. It is shown that, under certain conditions, the stimulated or spontaneous radiation fields emitted from a sample of atoms will propagate in the same direction as the incident beam, will be coherent with the incident beam, and will have the correct phase to provide amplification or attenuation.