Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Pure and Applied Optics Journal of the European Optical Society Part A

Stimulated emission from single quantum dipoles

Kerry J. Vahala

Published Sep 1, 1993• 6 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Whereas the basic features of stimulated emission are easily seen to hold true for ensembles of dipoles, the same is not always true for a single dipole system. For example, symmetry requires that well localized, bound dipoles emit a dipole field which is isotropic in the plane defined by the dipole vector. Indeed, for this case, nothing in the interaction between the dipole and the field contains information on the propagation direction of the field. These observations seem at odds with the highly directional nature of stimulated emission. The authors therefore test for stimulated emission by an explicit calculation considering both a single Rabi type dipole and a damped dipole whose centre-of-mass coordinates are fixed at a point. Remarkably, despite the symmetrical dipole radiation pattern, stimulated emission into the original stimulating wave is shown to occur exactly. An explanation of this effect is then considered by investigating dipoles whose centre-of-mass coordinates are allowed to vary. In this case, photon recoil of the dipole introduces a directional sense to the interaction. In the extreme opposite and trivial case of a highly delocalized dipole (centre-of-mass momentum eigenstates) stimulated emission again occurs exactly. In all intermediate cases, however, stimulated emission occurs only partially or approximately. A condition imposed on a dipole's spatial extent is established for stimulated emission to occur approximately. Finally, the original bound and localized dipole is seen to be a special limiting case of recoiling dipoles for which stimulated emission occurs exactly.

DOI
10.1088/0963-9659/2/5/014

Related papers

Testing stimulated emission photon directions

Jarek Duda

While naively laser only causes excitation of external target, e.g. Rabi cycle, STED microscopy or ASE/SASE/SSA demonstrate it can also stimulate its deexitation, however, under uncommon condition of being prepared as excited. These two causalities are governed by absorption-stimulated emission pair of equations, and swap places in perspective of T/CPT symmetry, however, it means photon direction of stimulated emission should be opposite to usually assumed, allowing for negative radiation pressure $\vec{p}=\langle \vec{E}\times \vec{H}\rangle/c$. This article discusses various arguments and proposes simple direct tests to experimentally verify existence of such backward photon trajectories, complementing consequent forward textbook trajectories. Depending on the results, it could lead to many proposed applications like medical, astronomical or 2WQC more symmetric quantum computers. Alternatively, if unsuccessful, it would require macroscopic violation of CPT symmetry, so far tested probably only in microscopic settings.

arXiv:2409.15399•Sep 23, 2024•0 citations

Exact calculation of stimulated emission driven by pulsed light

Kevin A. Fischer

Stimulated emission can be defined as the process when an incoming photon stimulates an additional quantum of energy from an atom into the same electromagnetic mode as the impinging photon. Hence, the two outgoing photons are identical. In a waveguide or free space, this intuition is typically found through Fermi's Golden rule, however, this does not properly account for the wave-like nature of the photons. Here, I present an exact solution to stimulated emission from a quantum two-level atom that properly accounts for the incoming and outgoing electromagnetic modes. This result is valid over a huge range of incident photon numbers. For a single incident photon, it shows how the photon must properly mode match the two-level system to cause stimulated emission. For a Fock state drive with large photon number, the exact solution shows how a two-level system Rabi oscillates with the traveling Fock mode as it passes by. I additionally use the same formalism to show that stimulated emission by a coherent pulse cannot be understood as an additional photon being emitted into the incident coherent state because the two-level system's state factorizes with the electromagnetic field's coherent state. Recent advances in superconducting circuits make them an ideal platform to test these predictions.

arXiv:1806.04862•OSA Continuum•Oct 12, 2018•11 citations

Absorption and stimulated emission by a thin slab obeying the Lorentz oscillator model

Masud Mansuripur

Abstract In his celebrated 1916–17 papers in which he proposed the A and B coefficients for the spontaneous and stimulated emission of energy quanta from excited atoms, Einstein conjectured that stimulated emission involves the release of individual quanta (later dubbed “photons”) along the direction of an incident photon with the same energy, momentum, phase, and polarization state as that of the incident photon. According to classical electrodynamics, of course, an oscillating dipole must radiate an azimuthally symmetric electromagnetic field around its axis of oscillation. Nevertheless, Einstein suggested that the release of stored energy from excited atoms in the form of discrete quanta (photons) must be directional, and that, in the case of stimulated emission, the direction of the emitted photon must coincide with that of the incident photon. The goal of the present paper is to show that some of the prominent features of absorption and stimulated emission emerge from Maxwellian electrodynamics in conjunction with the simple mass-and-spring model of an atom known as the Lorentz oscillator model.

arXiv:1908.00243•Japanese Journal of Applied Physics•Jul 31, 2019•2 citations

Some basic properties of stimulated and spontaneous emission: A semiclassical approach

Alan V. Durrant

The coherence and directional properties of stimulated and spontaneous emission can be understood without a knowledge of quantum electrodynamics. This paper presents a semiclassical description of the interaction between a free atom and a weak optical field under conditions of either a stimulated emission or a stimulated absorption resonance. It is shown that, under certain conditions, the stimulated or spontaneous radiation fields emitted from a sample of atoms will propagate in the same direction as the incident beam, will be coherent with the incident beam, and will have the correct phase to provide amplification or attenuation.

American Journal of Physics•Jul 1, 1976•14 citations

Stimulated emission does not radiate in a pure dipole pattern

Andrew E. S. Barentine, W. E. Moerner

Stimulated emission (StE) remains relatively unused as an image-forming signal despite having potential advantages over fluorescence in speed, coherence, and ultimately resolution. Several ideas for the radiation pattern and directionality of StE remain prevalent, namely, whether a single molecule would radiate StE itself in a pure dipole pattern, or whether its emission direction depends on the driving field. Previous StE imaging has been carried out in transmission, which would collect signal either way. Here, we introduce the StE driving field (the probe) at an angle, using total internal reflection to avoid incident probe light and its specular reflections in our detection path. In this non-collinear detection configuration that also collects some fluorescence from the sample, we observe fluorescence depletion even in the spectral window where an increase in detected signal from StE would be expected if StE radiated like a simple classical dipole. Because simultaneous direct measurement of the fluorescence represents a calibration of the potential size of StE were it spatially patterned like a classical dipole emitter, our study clarifies a critical characteristic of StE for optimal microscope design, optical cooling, and applications using small arrays of emitters.

arXiv:2312.02333•Optica•Mar 5, 2024•2 citations

Quantum theory of coherent spontaneous and stimulated emissions

Martin E. Smithers, Eugene Y. C. Lu

Photon statistics are obtained from exact closed-form solutions for both spontaneous and stimulated coherent emissions by a large number of two-level atoms in a Dicke state. Depending on the initial excitation level of the atoms, three types of photon statistics are obtained for the emitted radiation field. Moments of the photon number of the emitted field are calculated in the case of initial atomic coherent states as well as Dicke states, and in the case of n-photon stimulating pulses as well as coherent stimulating pulses. In the particular case of an initial "superradiant" Dicke state stimulated by a coherent-radiation field, the emitted radiation pulse is also fully coherent. In other cases the photon distributions undergo large fluctuations.

Physical Review A•Feb 1, 1974•25 citations
Whereas the basic features of stimulated emission are easily seen to hold true for ensembles of dipoles, the same is not always true for a single dipole system. For example, symmetry requires that well localized, bound dipoles emit a dipole field which is isotropic in the plane defined by the dipole vector. Indeed, for this case, nothing in the interaction between the dipole and the field contains information on the propagation direction of the field. These observations seem at odds with the highly directional nature of stimulated emission. The authors therefore test for stimulated emission by an explicit calculation considering both a single Rabi type dipole and a damped dipole whose centre-of-mass coordinates are fixed at a point. Remarkably, despite the symmetrical dipole radiation pattern, stimulated emission into the original stimulating wave is shown to occur exactly. An explanation of this effect is then considered by investigating dipoles whose centre-of-mass coordinates are allowed to vary. In this case, photon recoil of the dipole introduces a directional sense to the interaction. In the extreme opposite and trivial case of a highly delocalized dipole (centre-of-mass momentum eigenstates) stimulated emission again occurs exactly. In all intermediate cases, however, stimulated emission occurs only partially or approximately. A condition imposed on a dipole's spatial extent is established for stimulated emission to occur approximately. Finally, the original bound and localized dipole is seen to be a special limiting case of recoiling dipoles for which stimulated emission occurs exactly.
While naively laser only causes excitation of external target, e.g. Rabi cycle, STED microscopy or ASE/SASE/SSA demonstrate it can also stimulate its deexitation, however, under uncommon condition of being prepared as excited. These two causalities are governed by absorption-stimulated emission pair of equations, and swap places in perspective of T/CPT symmetry, however, it means photon direction of stimulated emission should be opposite to usually assumed, allowing for negative radiation pressure p⃗=⟨E⃗×H⃗⟩/c\vec{p}=\langle \vec{E}\times \vec{H}\rangle/cp​=⟨E×H⟩/c. This article discusses various arguments and proposes simple direct tests to experimentally verify existence of such backward photon trajectories, complementing consequent forward textbook trajectories. Depending on the results, it could lead to many proposed applications like medical, astronomical or 2WQC more symmetric quantum computers. Alternatively, if unsuccessful, it would require macroscopic violation of CPT symmetry, so far tested probably only in microscopic settings.
Stimulated emission can be defined as the process when an incoming photon stimulates an additional quantum of energy from an atom into the same electromagnetic mode as the impinging photon. Hence, the two outgoing photons are identical. In a waveguide or free space, this intuition is typically found through Fermi's Golden rule, however, this does not properly account for the wave-like nature of the photons. Here, I present an exact solution to stimulated emission from a quantum two-level atom that properly accounts for the incoming and outgoing electromagnetic modes. This result is valid over a huge range of incident photon numbers. For a single incident photon, it shows how the photon must properly mode match the two-level system to cause stimulated emission. For a Fock state drive with large photon number, the exact solution shows how a two-level system Rabi oscillates with the traveling Fock mode as it passes by. I additionally use the same formalism to show that stimulated emission by a coherent pulse cannot be understood as an additional photon being emitted into the incident coherent state because the two-level system's state factorizes with the electromagnetic field's coherent state. Recent advances in superconducting circuits make them an ideal platform to test these predictions.
Abstract In his celebrated 1916–17 papers in which he proposed the A and B coefficients for the spontaneous and stimulated emission of energy quanta from excited atoms, Einstein conjectured that stimulated emission involves the release of individual quanta (later dubbed “photons”) along the direction of an incident photon with the same energy, momentum, phase, and polarization state as that of the incident photon. According to classical electrodynamics, of course, an oscillating dipole must radiate an azimuthally symmetric electromagnetic field around its axis of oscillation. Nevertheless, Einstein suggested that the release of stored energy from excited atoms in the form of discrete quanta (photons) must be directional, and that, in the case of stimulated emission, the direction of the emitted photon must coincide with that of the incident photon. The goal of the present paper is to show that some of the prominent features of absorption and stimulated emission emerge from Maxwellian electrodynamics in conjunction with the simple mass-and-spring model of an atom known as the Lorentz oscillator model.
The coherence and directional properties of stimulated and spontaneous emission can be understood without a knowledge of quantum electrodynamics. This paper presents a semiclassical description of the interaction between a free atom and a weak optical field under conditions of either a stimulated emission or a stimulated absorption resonance. It is shown that, under certain conditions, the stimulated or spontaneous radiation fields emitted from a sample of atoms will propagate in the same direction as the incident beam, will be coherent with the incident beam, and will have the correct phase to provide amplification or attenuation.
Stimulated emission (StE) remains relatively unused as an image-forming signal despite having potential advantages over fluorescence in speed, coherence, and ultimately resolution. Several ideas for the radiation pattern and directionality of StE remain prevalent, namely, whether a single molecule would radiate StE itself in a pure dipole pattern, or whether its emission direction depends on the driving field. Previous StE imaging has been carried out in transmission, which would collect signal either way. Here, we introduce the StE driving field (the probe) at an angle, using total internal reflection to avoid incident probe light and its specular reflections in our detection path. In this non-collinear detection configuration that also collects some fluorescence from the sample, we observe fluorescence depletion even in the spectral window where an increase in detected signal from StE would be expected if StE radiated like a simple classical dipole. Because simultaneous direct measurement of the fluorescence represents a calibration of the potential size of StE were it spatially patterned like a classical dipole emitter, our study clarifies a critical characteristic of StE for optimal microscope design, optical cooling, and applications using small arrays of emitters.
Photon statistics are obtained from exact closed-form solutions for both spontaneous and stimulated coherent emissions by a large number of two-level atoms in a Dicke state. Depending on the initial excitation level of the atoms, three types of photon statistics are obtained for the emitted radiation field. Moments of the photon number of the emitted field are calculated in the case of initial atomic coherent states as well as Dicke states, and in the case of n-photon stimulating pulses as well as coherent stimulating pulses. In the particular case of an initial "superradiant" Dicke state stimulated by a coherent-radiation field, the emitted radiation pulse is also fully coherent. In other cases the photon distributions undergo large fluctuations.