Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Scientific Herald of Uzhhorod University Series Physics

The variety of approaches to the problem of the derivation of Dirac equation

В. М. Симулик, T.M. Zajac

Published Dec 18, 2019• 1 citation
Publisher

Abstract

Purpose. The Dirac equation is one of the fundamental equations of modern theoretical physics. It is in service more than 90 years (1928–2018). The application today is much wider than the areas of quantum mechanics, quantum field theory, atomic and nuclear physics, solid state physics. The successful derivation of some equation of mathematical physics is the first step to successful application. In such process the essence of the corresponding model of nature, the mathematical principles and the physical foundations are visualized. Here we deal with the different approaches to the problem of the Dirac equation derivation. Methods. The quantum-mechanical, quantum field-theoretical, group-theoretical, algebraic, symmetrical, statistical, stochastical and numerical approaches are used. Results. The 26 different ways of the Dirac equation derivation are presented. The various physical principles and mathematical formalisms are used. Three original approaches of the authors to the problem are given. They are (i) the generalization of H. Sallhofer derivation, (ii) the obtaining of the massless Dirac equation from the Maxwell equations in maximally symmetrical form, (iii) the derivation of the Dirac equation with nonzero mass from the relativistic quantum mechanics of the fermion-antifermion spin s = 1/2 doublet. In some sense the role of the Dirac equation today is demonstrated. Conclusions. The original investigation of the problem of the Dirac equation derivation is presented. The different approaches, which are based on the various mathematical and physical principles, are considered (26 methods). Therole of the scientists from Uzhhorod is shown. The importance of place of the Dirac equation in modern theoretical physics is discussed.

DOI
10.24144/2415-8038.2019.45.92-103

Related papers

Derivation of the Dirac and Maxwell equations from the first principles of relativistic canonical quantum mechanics

I.Yu. Krivsky, В. М. Симулик, T.M. Zajac +1 more

The derivation of the Dirac and Maxwell equations from the first principles of relativistic canonical quantum mechanics (RCQM) is demonstrated. The formalism of the RCQM is constructed on the basis of a self-consistent system of axioms. The important conclusion, that an arbitrary physical and mathematical information, which contains in the model of RCQM, directly and unambiguously is translated into the corresponding information in the model given by the Dirac equation, is formulated.

International Conference on Mathematical Methods in Electromagnetic Theory•Aug 1, 2012•8 citations

Once more on the derivation of the Dirac equation

В. М. Симулик, I.Yu. Krivsky

A brief review of the different ways of the Dirac equation derivation is given. The foundations of the relativistic canonical quantum mechanics of a fermionic doublet are formulated. In our approach the Dirac equation is derived from the main equation of relativistic canonical quantum mechanics. In the formalism of relativistic canonical quantum mechanics the absence of necessity to appeal for the conception of the negative mass of the antiparticle is shown.

arXiv:1309.0573•Sep 3, 2013•2 citations

The Birth of Quantum Mechanics and the Dirac Equation

Volodimir Simulik, Denys I. Bondar

The year 2025 marked the centennial of quantum mechanics, inaugurated by Heisenberg's matrix formulation and the foundational contributions of Pauli, Schrodinger, and Dirac. Concurrently, 2026 marks the centennial of the Klein - Gordon equation, the second-order relativistic wave equation from which both the Schrodinger and Dirac equations were derived. This article supplements the recent review published in J.Phys. A: Math.Theor.,58 (2025) 053001 by providing a more detailed examination of the formative period 1925 - 1928, with particular attention to contributions that have received insufficient recognition in the standard narrative. We reconstruct Kramers' independent derivation of the Dirac equation - obtained essentially simultaneously with Dirac's own result yet unpublished for seven years - and discuss its relation to Van der Waerden's group-theoretical approach. The role of Charles Galton Darwin in elucidating the physical content of the Dirac equation is also highlighted. In addition, we present two modern derivations not catalogued in the earlier review: one based on Operational Dynamical Modeling, which deduces the Dirac equation from relativistic Ehrenfest relations and the canonical commutation algebra, and one rooted in the Madelung hydrodynamic formulation. Three broad periods of quantum theory development -- foundational, consolidation, and the modern era of quantum information -- are briefly surveyed.

physics.hist-phCross-listedarXiv:2603.15638•Mar 3, 2026•0 citations

Dirac's equation and the nature of quantum field theory

Arkady Plotnitsky

This paper re-examines the key aspects of Dirac's derivation of his relativistic equation for the electron in order advance our understanding of the nature of quantum field theory. Dirac's derivation, the paper argues, follows the key principles behind Heisenberg's discovery of quantum mechanics, which, the paper also argues, transformed the nature of both theoretical and experimental physics vis-a-vis classical physics and relativity. However, the limit theory (a crucial consideration for both Dirac and Heisenberg) in the case of Dirac's theory was quantum mechanics, specifically, Schrodinger's equation, while in the case of quantum mechanics, in Heisenberg's version, the limit theory was classical mechanics. Dirac had to find a new equation, Dirac's equation, along with a new type of quantum variables, while Heisenberg, to find new theory, was able to use the equations of classical physics, applied to different, quantum-mechanical variables. In this respect, Dirac's task was more similar to that of Schrodinger in his work on his version of quantum mechanics. Dirac's equation reflects a more complex character of quantum electrodynamics or quantum field theory in general and of the corresponding (high-energy) experimental quantum physics vis-a-vis that of quantum mechanics and the (low-energy) experimental quantum physics. The final section examines this greater complexity and its implications for fundamental physics.

Physica Scripta•Nov 1, 2012•1 citation

The Schrodinger-Foldy relativistic canonical quantum mechanics and the derivation of the Dirac equation

I.Yu. Krivsky, Simulik, V. M., Lamer, I. L. +1 more

The detailed consideration of the relativistic canonical quantum-mechanical model of an arbitrary spin-multiplet is given. The group-theoretical analysis of the algebra of experimentally observables physical quantities for the spin 1/2 doublet is presented. It is shown that both the Foldy-Wouthuysen equation for the fermionic spin 1/2 doublet and the Dirac equation in its local representation are the consequences of the relativistic canonical quantum mechanics of the corresponding doublet. The mathematically well-defined consideration on the level of modern axiomatic approaches to the field theory is provided. The hypothesis of the antiparticle negative mass is discussed briefly in the section conclusions.

arXiv:1301.6343•Jan 27, 2013•1 citation

Link between the Relativistic Canonical Quantum Mechanics and the Dirac Equation

В. М. Симулик, I.Yu. Krivsky

The foundations of the relativistic canonical quantum mechanics of a fermionic doublet on the basis of the Schrodinger–Foldy equation of motion are formulated. A brief review of the different ways of the Dirac equation derivation is given. The Dirac equation is derived from the Schrodinger–Foldy equation of the relativistic canonical quantum mechanics. It is shown that our model does not need applying of the negative mass concept of the antiparticle.

Universal Journal of Physics and Application•Feb 1, 2014•8 citations
Purpose. The Dirac equation is one of the fundamental equations of modern theoretical physics. It is in service more than 90 years (1928–2018). The application today is much wider than the areas of quantum mechanics, quantum field theory, atomic and nuclear physics, solid state physics. The successful derivation of some equation of mathematical physics is the first step to successful application. In such process the essence of the corresponding model of nature, the mathematical principles and the physical foundations are visualized. Here we deal with the different approaches to the problem of the Dirac equation derivation. Methods. The quantum-mechanical, quantum field-theoretical, group-theoretical, algebraic, symmetrical, statistical, stochastical and numerical approaches are used. Results. The 26 different ways of the Dirac equation derivation are presented. The various physical principles and mathematical formalisms are used. Three original approaches of the authors to the problem are given. They are (i) the generalization of H. Sallhofer derivation, (ii) the obtaining of the massless Dirac equation from the Maxwell equations in maximally symmetrical form, (iii) the derivation of the Dirac equation with nonzero mass from the relativistic quantum mechanics of the fermion-antifermion spin s = 1/2 doublet. In some sense the role of the Dirac equation today is demonstrated. Conclusions. The original investigation of the problem of the Dirac equation derivation is presented. The different approaches, which are based on the various mathematical and physical principles, are considered (26 methods). Therole of the scientists from Uzhhorod is shown. The importance of place of the Dirac equation in modern theoretical physics is discussed.
The year 2025 marked the centennial of quantum mechanics, inaugurated by Heisenberg's matrix formulation and the foundational contributions of Pauli, Schrodinger, and Dirac. Concurrently, 2026 marks the centennial of the Klein - Gordon equation, the second-order relativistic wave equation from which both the Schrodinger and Dirac equations were derived. This article supplements the recent review published in J.Phys. A: Math.Theor.,58 (2025) 053001 by providing a more detailed examination of the formative period 1925 - 1928, with particular attention to contributions that have received insufficient recognition in the standard narrative. We reconstruct Kramers' independent derivation of the Dirac equation - obtained essentially simultaneously with Dirac's own result yet unpublished for seven years - and discuss its relation to Van der Waerden's group-theoretical approach. The role of Charles Galton Darwin in elucidating the physical content of the Dirac equation is also highlighted. In addition, we present two modern derivations not catalogued in the earlier review: one based on Operational Dynamical Modeling, which deduces the Dirac equation from relativistic Ehrenfest relations and the canonical commutation algebra, and one rooted in the Madelung hydrodynamic formulation. Three broad periods of quantum theory development -- foundational, consolidation, and the modern era of quantum information -- are briefly surveyed.
This paper re-examines the key aspects of Dirac's derivation of his relativistic equation for the electron in order advance our understanding of the nature of quantum field theory. Dirac's derivation, the paper argues, follows the key principles behind Heisenberg's discovery of quantum mechanics, which, the paper also argues, transformed the nature of both theoretical and experimental physics vis-a-vis classical physics and relativity. However, the limit theory (a crucial consideration for both Dirac and Heisenberg) in the case of Dirac's theory was quantum mechanics, specifically, Schrodinger's equation, while in the case of quantum mechanics, in Heisenberg's version, the limit theory was classical mechanics. Dirac had to find a new equation, Dirac's equation, along with a new type of quantum variables, while Heisenberg, to find new theory, was able to use the equations of classical physics, applied to different, quantum-mechanical variables. In this respect, Dirac's task was more similar to that of Schrodinger in his work on his version of quantum mechanics. Dirac's equation reflects a more complex character of quantum electrodynamics or quantum field theory in general and of the corresponding (high-energy) experimental quantum physics vis-a-vis that of quantum mechanics and the (low-energy) experimental quantum physics. The final section examines this greater complexity and its implications for fundamental physics.
The detailed consideration of the relativistic canonical quantum-mechanical model of an arbitrary spin-multiplet is given. The group-theoretical analysis of the algebra of experimentally observables physical quantities for the spin 1/2 doublet is presented. It is shown that both the Foldy-Wouthuysen equation for the fermionic spin 1/2 doublet and the Dirac equation in its local representation are the consequences of the relativistic canonical quantum mechanics of the corresponding doublet. The mathematically well-defined consideration on the level of modern axiomatic approaches to the field theory is provided. The hypothesis of the antiparticle negative mass is discussed briefly in the section conclusions.