Electronic bands in crystals are described by an ensemble of Bloch wave functions indexed by momenta defined in the first Brillouin Zone, and their associated energies. In an insulator, an energy gap around the chemical potential separates valence bands from conduction bands. The ensemble of valence bands is then a well defined object, which can possess non-trivial or twisted topological properties. In the case of a twisted topology, the insulator is called a topological insulator. We introduce this notion of topological order in insulators as an obstruction to define the Bloch wave functions over the whole Brillouin Zone using a single phase convention. Several simple historical models displaying a topological order in dimension two are considered. Various expressions of the corresponding topological index are finally discussed.
Electronic bands in crystals are described by an ensemble of Bloch wave functions indexed by momenta defined in the first Brillouin Zone, and their associated energies. In an insulator, an energy gap around the chemical potential separates valence bands from conduction bands. The ensemble of valence bands is then a well defined object, which can possess non-trivial or twisted topological properties. In the case of a twisted topology, the insulator is called a topological insulator. We introduce this notion of topological order in insulators as an obstruction to define the Bloch wave functions over the whole Brillouin Zone using a single phase convention. Several simple historical models displaying a topological order in dimension two are considered. Various expressions of the corresponding topological index are finally discussed.
W HAT THEORETICAL APPROACHES ARE APPROPRIATE for describing topological quantum matter? The answer depends on the type of topological phase we want to study, e.g., non-interacting or interacting, and on the type of information we are interested in, e.g., system-specific properties in the case of a theory designed to provide support for a particular experiment or type of experiment. Non-interacting topological phases can be described within topological band theory using the basic tools of the band theory of solids. However, the complexity of the model, i.e., how much detail has to be included, depends on whether we are only interested in the topological properties of the system or, in addition, we need to consider certain nontopological features. For example, predicting whether or not a specific material is a topological insulator requires detailed knowledge of its band structure, which can be acquired using density functional theory (DFT) methods. Similar treatments may be required to account for certain experimental features involving both topological and non-topological contributions. On the other hand, to understand the classification of topological insulators, it is sufficient to consider “bare bone” effective models, such as continuum Dirac models or simple tight-binding models. Topologically, these descriptions with extremely different levels of complexity are equivalent whenever one can smoothly connect the corresponding Hamiltonians (up to the addition/subtraction of trivial bands) without closing the insulating gap. However, the effective models provide only a crude description of experimentally relevant properties such as energy gaps, band dispersion, and real space properties of boundary states. In some sense, the situation is analogous to the characterization of a given mathematical object within topology, which only deals with properties that are robust against deformations, and geometry, which accounts for properties described by distances, angles, and shapes.
We apply methods of equivariant homotopy theory, which may not previously have found due attention in condensed matter physics, to classify first the fragile/unstable topological phases of 2D crystalline Chern insulator materials, and second the possible topological order of their fractional cousins. We highlight that the phases are given by the equivariant 2-Cohomotopy of the Brillouin torus of crystal momenta (with respect to wallpaper point group actions) -- which, despite the attention devoted to crystalline Chern insulators, seems not to have been considered before. Arguing then that any topological order must be reflected in the adiabatic monodromy of gapped quantum ground states over the covariantized space of these band topologies, we compute the latter in examples where this group is non-abelian, showing that any potential FQAH anyons must be localized in momentum space. We close with an outlook on the relevance for the search for topological quantum computing hardware. Mathematical details are spelled out in a supplement.
What theoretical approaches are appropriate for describing topological quantum matter? The answer depends on the type of topological phase we want to study, e.g., noninteracting or interacting, and on the type of information we are interested in, e.g., generic properties or system-specific properties that are relevant to a particular experiment or type of experiment. Noninteracting topological phases can be described within topological band theory using the basic tools of the band theory of solids. However, the complexity of the model, i.e., how much detail has to be included, depends on whether we are only interested in the topological properties of the system or, in addition, we need to consider certain non-topological features. For example, predicting whether or not a specific material is a topological insulator requires detailed knowledge of its band structure, which can be acquired using density functional theory (DFT) methods. Similar treatments may be required to account for certain experimental features involving both topological and nontopological contributions. On the other hand, to understand the classification of topological insulators, it is sufficient to consider “bare bone” effective models, such as continuum Dirac models or simple tight-binding models. Topologically, these descriptions with extremely different levels of complexity are equivalent whenever one can smoothly connect the corresponding Hamiltonians (up to the addition/subtraction of trivial bands) without closing the bulk gap. However, the effective models provide only a crude description of experimentally relevant properties such as energy gaps, band dispersion, and real space properties of boundary states. In some sense, the situation is analogous to the characterization of a given mathematical object within topology, which only deals with properties that are robust against deformations, and geometry, which accounts for properties described by distances, angles, and shapes.
Topological states of matter are characterized by global topological invariants which change their value across a topological quantum phase transition. It is commonly assumed that the transition between topologically distinct noninteracting gapped phases of fermions is necessarily accompanied by the closing of the band gap as long as the symmetries of the system are maintained. We show that such a quantum phase transition is possible without closing the gap in the case of a three-dimensional topological band insulator. We demonstrate this by calculating the free energy of the minimal model for a topological insulator, the Bernevig-Hughes-Zhang model, and show that as the band curvature continuously varies, a jump between the band-gap minima corresponding to the topologically trivial and nontrivial insulators occurs. Therefore, this first-order phase transition is a generic feature of three-dimensional topological band insulators. For a certain parameter range we predict a reentrant topological phase transition. We discuss our findings in connection with the recent experimental observation of a discontinuous topological phase transition in a family of topological crystalline insulators.
The classification of distinct phases of matter is a central theme in condensed matter physics. A phase of matter can be viewed as an equivalence class of physical states that share a certain set of properties. In the case of topological quantum matter, these properties are associated with topological invariants that take specific values for each equivalence class. Perturbing a gapped state that corresponds to a given topological phase (i.e., smoothly deforming the Hamiltonian of the system) does not affect the topological invariant, as long as the bulk energy gap remains finite. The value of this invariant changes only if the system undergoes a quantum phase transition, which is signaled by the collapse of the gap. Full topological protection can only emerge in interacting systems and requires the presence of long-range entanglement, which is at the origin of intrinsic topological order. However, topological properties protected by symmetries emerge even in noninteracting systems and, perhaps surprisingly, can be described within the framework of good old band theory of solids. Systems belonging to this category are generically called topological insulators, after the class of materials that is largely responsible for the recent surge in research on topological matter. In addition, topological band theory considerations can also be applied to superconductors (and superfluids), as described at the mean-field level using Bogoliubov–de Gennes theory. This chapter summarizes the key ideas behind the topological classification of noninteracting systems and discusses the basic properties of various classes of topological insulators and superconductors. For in-depth discussions and related developments the reader is referred to a number of books [ 54 , 175 , 469 ] and review papers [ 23 , 239 , 240 , 421 ] specifically dedicated to this subject.
The topological classification of electronic band structures is based on symmetry properties of Bloch eigenstates of single-particle Hamiltonians. In parallel, topological field theory has opened the doors to the formulation and characterization of non-trivial phases of matter driven by strong electron-electron interaction. Even though important examples of topological Mott insulators have been constructed, the relevance of the underlying non-interacting band topology to the physics of the Mott phase has remained unexplored. Here, we show that the momentum structure of the Green's function zeros defining the "Luttinger surface" provides a topological characterization of the Mott phase related, in the simplest description, to the one of the single-particle electronic dispersion. Considerations on the zeros lead to the prediction of new phenomena: a topological Mott insulator with an inverted gap for the bulk zeros must possess gapless zeros at the boundary, which behave as a form of "topological antimatter" annihilating conventional edge states. Placing band and Mott topological insulators in contact produces distinctive observable signatures at the interface, revealing the otherwise spectroscopically elusive Green's function zeros.