W HAT THEORETICAL APPROACHES ARE APPROPRIATE for describing topological quantum matter? The answer depends on the type of topological phase we want to study, e.g., non-interacting or interacting, and on the type of information we are interested in, e.g., system-specific properties in the case of a theory designed to provide support for a particular experiment or type of experiment. Non-interacting topological phases can be described within topological band theory using the basic tools of the band theory of solids. However, the complexity of the model, i.e., how much detail has to be included, depends on whether we are only interested in the topological properties of the system or, in addition, we need to consider certain nontopological features. For example, predicting whether or not a specific material is a topological insulator requires detailed knowledge of its band structure, which can be acquired using density functional theory (DFT) methods. Similar treatments may be required to account for certain experimental features involving both topological and non-topological contributions. On the other hand, to understand the classification of topological insulators, it is sufficient to consider “bare bone” effective models, such as continuum Dirac models or simple tight-binding models. Topologically, these descriptions with extremely different levels of complexity are equivalent whenever one can smoothly connect the corresponding Hamiltonians (up to the addition/subtraction of trivial bands) without closing the insulating gap. However, the effective models provide only a crude description of experimentally relevant properties such as energy gaps, band dispersion, and real space properties of boundary states. In some sense, the situation is analogous to the characterization of a given mathematical object within topology, which only deals with properties that are robust against deformations, and geometry, which accounts for properties described by distances, angles, and shapes.
W HAT THEORETICAL APPROACHES ARE APPROPRIATE for describing topological quantum matter? The answer depends on the type of topological phase we want to study, e.g., non-interacting or interacting, and on the type of information we are interested in, e.g., system-specific properties in the case of a theory designed to provide support for a particular experiment or type of experiment. Non-interacting topological phases can be described within topological band theory using the basic tools of the band theory of solids. However, the complexity of the model, i.e., how much detail has to be included, depends on whether we are only interested in the topological properties of the system or, in addition, we need to consider certain nontopological features. For example, predicting whether or not a specific material is a topological insulator requires detailed knowledge of its band structure, which can be acquired using density functional theory (DFT) methods. Similar treatments may be required to account for certain experimental features involving both topological and non-topological contributions. On the other hand, to understand the classification of topological insulators, it is sufficient to consider “bare bone” effective models, such as continuum Dirac models or simple tight-binding models. Topologically, these descriptions with extremely different levels of complexity are equivalent whenever one can smoothly connect the corresponding Hamiltonians (up to the addition/subtraction of trivial bands) without closing the insulating gap. However, the effective models provide only a crude description of experimentally relevant properties such as energy gaps, band dispersion, and real space properties of boundary states. In some sense, the situation is analogous to the characterization of a given mathematical object within topology, which only deals with properties that are robust against deformations, and geometry, which accounts for properties described by distances, angles, and shapes.
What theoretical approaches are appropriate for describing topological quantum matter? The answer depends on the type of topological phase we want to study, e.g., noninteracting or interacting, and on the type of information we are interested in, e.g., generic properties or system-specific properties that are relevant to a particular experiment or type of experiment. Noninteracting topological phases can be described within topological band theory using the basic tools of the band theory of solids. However, the complexity of the model, i.e., how much detail has to be included, depends on whether we are only interested in the topological properties of the system or, in addition, we need to consider certain non-topological features. For example, predicting whether or not a specific material is a topological insulator requires detailed knowledge of its band structure, which can be acquired using density functional theory (DFT) methods. Similar treatments may be required to account for certain experimental features involving both topological and nontopological contributions. On the other hand, to understand the classification of topological insulators, it is sufficient to consider “bare bone” effective models, such as continuum Dirac models or simple tight-binding models. Topologically, these descriptions with extremely different levels of complexity are equivalent whenever one can smoothly connect the corresponding Hamiltonians (up to the addition/subtraction of trivial bands) without closing the bulk gap. However, the effective models provide only a crude description of experimentally relevant properties such as energy gaps, band dispersion, and real space properties of boundary states. In some sense, the situation is analogous to the characterization of a given mathematical object within topology, which only deals with properties that are robust against deformations, and geometry, which accounts for properties described by distances, angles, and shapes.
The classification of distinct phases of matter is a central theme in condensed matter physics. A phase of matter can be viewed as an equivalence class of physical states that share a certain set of properties. In the case of topological quantum matter, these properties are associated with topological invariants that take specific values for each equivalence class. Perturbing a gapped state that corresponds to a given topological phase (i.e., smoothly deforming the Hamiltonian of the system) does not affect the topological invariant, as long as the bulk energy gap remains finite. The value of this invariant changes only if the system undergoes a quantum phase transition, which is signaled by the collapse of the gap. Full topological protection can only emerge in interacting systems and requires the presence of long-range entanglement, which is at the origin of intrinsic topological order. However, topological properties protected by symmetries emerge even in noninteracting systems and, perhaps surprisingly, can be described within the framework of good old band theory of solids. Systems belonging to this category are generically called topological insulators, after the class of materials that is largely responsible for the recent surge in research on topological matter. In addition, topological band theory considerations can also be applied to superconductors (and superfluids), as described at the mean-field level using Bogoliubov–de Gennes theory. This chapter summarizes the key ideas behind the topological classification of noninteracting systems and discusses the basic properties of various classes of topological insulators and superconductors. For in-depth discussions and related developments the reader is referred to a number of books [ 54 , 175 , 469 ] and review papers [ 23 , 239 , 240 , 421 ] specifically dedicated to this subject.
T HE CLASSIFICATION OF DISTINCT PHASES OF MATTER is a central theme in condensed matter physics. A phase of matter can be viewed as an equivalence class of physical states that share a certain set of properties. In the case of topological quantum matter, these properties are associated with topological invariants that take specific values for each equivalence class. Perturbing a gapped state that corresponds to a given topological phase (i.e., smoothly deforming the Hamiltonian of the system) does not affect the topological invariant, as long as the energy gap remains finite. The value of this invariant changes only if the system undergoes a quantum phase transition, which is signaled by the collapse of the gap. Full topological protection can only emerge in interacting systems and requires the presence of long-range entanglement, which is at the origin of intrinsic topological order. However, topological properties protected by symmetries emerge even in noninteracting systems and, perhaps surprisingly, can be described within the framework of good old band theory of solids. Systems belonging to this category are generically called topological insulators, after the class of materials that is largely responsible for the recent surge in research activity on topological matter. In addition, topological band theory considerations can also be applied to superconductors (and superfluids), as described at the mean-field level using Bogoliubov-de Gennes theory. This chapter summaries the key ideas behind the topological classification of noninteracting systems and discusses the basic properties of various classes of topological insulators and superconductors. For in-depth discussions and related developments the reader is referred to a number of books [48, 402, 153] and review papers [211, 212, 357, 22] specifically dedicated to this subject.
The Schrödinger equation is nearly a century old, yet we are still in the midst of uncovering the remarkable phenomena emerging in many-body quantum systems. From superconductivity to anyonic quasiparticles, nature consistently surprises with its rich self-organization. To elucidate and grasp this variety, it is paramount to understand the phases of matter that can occur in many-body ground states, as well as their emergent collective excitations. Of particular interest are topological phases of matter, characterized by exotic excitations or edge phenomena. There exist by now several universal frameworks for gapped systems, i.e., those with an energy gap above the ground state. However, in the last decade, a multitude of gapless quantum wires---effectively one-dimensional systems---have been reported to be topologically non-trivial. A framework for their understanding and classification is missing. In addition to ground state order---topological or otherwise---a more complete picture involves the properties of excitations above the ground state. Alas, little is known about excitations beyond the universal low-energy regime. In part, this is due to a lack of analytical and numerical methods able to describe excitations at finite energies, especially in strongly-interacting systems beyond one dimension. In this thesis, we address these issues: firstly, we build a general understanding of topological phases in one dimension, including both gapped and gapless cases. In particular, we unify previously studied examples into a single framework. Secondly, we develop a novel numerical method for obtaining spectral functions in two dimensions---these give direct insight into the properties of excitations and are moreover experimentally measurable. Using this numerical method, we uncover a variety of robust properties of excitations at finite energies. Part I of this thesis concerns gapped and gapless topological phases in one dimension. In Chapter 2, we first treat the case of non-interacting fermions. Therein, we review the known classification of gapped phases before extending it to the gapless case, showing that exponentially-localized Majorana zero modes can still emerge at the edge when the bulk is gapless. Interacting gapped phases are discussed in Chapter 3, with a focus on symmetry-protected topological order. These have already been classified; our contribution is to provide a non-technical review of this classification as well as showing that many paradigmatic model Hamiltonians can be related to one another. Finally, Chapter 4 introduces the notion of symmetry-enriched quantum criticality, which we propose as a framework for classifying gapless phases. The key message is that in the presence of symmetries, a universality class can divide into distinct phases, characterized by the symmetry action on the low-energy scaling operators. This includes gapless topological phases, with examples hiding in plain sight; we clarify their stability and reinterpret previously studied examples. Part II studies the excitations above the ground states of two-dimensional quantum spin models. The main object of our study is the dynamic spin structure factor; this type of spectral function is reviewed in the first part of Chapter 5. The second part of this chapter introduces a novel matrix-product-state-based algorithm to efficiently compute it, opening a new window on the dynamics of two-dimensional quantum systems. We benchmark this numerical method in Chapter 6 on the exactly-solvable Kitaev model---a paradigmatic topological model realizing a quantum spin liquid. By adding non-integrable Heisenberg perturbations, we identify the first unequivocal theoretical realization of a proximate spin liquid: the ground state becomes conventionally ordered, yet the high-energy spectral properties are structurally similar to those of the nearby Kitaev spin liquid. The latter agrees with aspects of recent inelastic neutron scattering experiments on alpha-RuCl3. In Chapter 7, we turn to one of the oldest models in many-body quantum physics: the spin-1/2 Heisenberg antiferromagnet on the square lattice. Despite its venerable history, there is still disagreement about the physical origin of high-energy spectral features which low-order spin wave theory cannot account for. We provide a simple picture for this strongly-interacting-magnon feature by connecting it to a simple Ising limit. Lastly, Chapter 8 discusses the stability of quasiparticles---collective excitations behaving like a single emergent entity, of which magnons are a prime example. These are often known to be stable at the lowest energies and are presumed to decay whenever this is seemingly allowed by energy and momentum conservation. However, we show that strong interactions can prevent this from happening. We numerically confirm this principle of avoided decay in the (slightly-detuned) Heisenberg antiferromagnet on the triangular lattice. Moreover, we can even identify its fingerprints in existing experimental data on Ba3CoSb2O9 and superfluid helium. In this thesis, we thus enlarge our understanding of quantum phases and their excitations. The identification of the key principles of gapless topological phases in one dimension calls for direct analogues in higher dimensions, waiting to be uncovered. With regard to the robust properties of the excitations identified in this thesis, we are hopeful that these can be extended into a theory of quasiparticle properties away from the universal low-energy regime.
The discovery of integer quantum Hall effect and its subsequent theoretical formulation heralded a new paradigm of thinking in condensed matter physics, which has by now blossomed into the rapidly growing field of topological phases. In this work we investigate several mutually related topics in the framework of topological band theory. In Chapter 2, we study solutions to boundary states on a lattice and see how they are related to the bulk topology. To elicit a real space manifestation of the non-trivial topology, the presence of a physical edge is not strictly necessary. We study two other possibilities, namely the entanglement spectrum associated with an imaginary spatial boundary, and the localization centers of Wannier functions, in Chapters 3,4, and 5. Topological classification through discrete indices is so far possible only for systems described by pure quantum states - in the existing scheme, quantization is lost for systems in mixed states. In Chapter 6, we present a program through which discrete topological indices can be defined for topological band systems at finite temperature, based on Uhlmann's parallel transport of density matrices. The potential of topologocal insulators in realistic applications lies in the existence of Dirac nodes on its surface spectrum. Dirac physics, however, is not exclusive to TI surfaces. In a recently discovered class of materials known as Weyl semimetals, energy nodes which emit linear dispersions also occur in the bulk material. In Chapter 7, we study the possibility of resonance states induced by localized impurities near the nodal energy in Weyl semimetals, which will help us in understanding the stability of density-of-state suppression at the energy nodes. Finally, in Chapter 8, we apply the topological characterization developed for noninteracting particles to a class of interacting spin models in 3D, which are generalizations of Kitaev's honeycomb model, and identify several exotic quantum phases such as spin metals and spin semimetals
States of matter which are described by concepts in topology are of great interest in the community of condensed matter physics. Both from a pure theoretical perspective, where many non-intuitive and mathematically rich results can be found from seemingly simple models, and also since recent experimental developments allows for explicit construction of devices where the underlying topology has observable consequences. This thesis provides a conceptual introduction to the framework describing such topological states of matter (TSM). It starts by explaining ordinary band theory which is followed by a discussion of quantum mechanical symmetries. These two concepts provides a method of classifying all non-interacting fermionic TSM. Following are explicit applications to a few models in one spatial dimension. In the accompanying paper, we study one-dimensional superconductors with Josephson-junctions allowing phase shifts of π. We make a detailed analysis of the junction bound states and their properties in some different settings and compare the behaviour of trivial and topological superconducting junctions. In addition, we provide a phenomenological topological field theory in the low energy limit.