The historic Stern-Gerlach experiment (SGE), which was performed in 1922 in Frankfurt, is reviewed from an experimental point of view. It is shown that the SGE apparatus is a purely classical momentum spectrometer, in which the trajectories of particles are measured. With modern detection devices the passage of each single atom can be identified and its trajectory in the magnetic field precisely determined. At the time of their experiment Stern and Gerlach achieved a hitherto unprecedented momentum resolution corresponding to an energy resolution of one μeV.
The historic Stern-Gerlach experiment (SGE), which was performed in 1922 in Frankfurt, is reviewed from an experimental point of view. It is shown that the SGE apparatus is a purely classical momentum spectrometer, in which the trajectories of particles are measured. With modern detection devices the passage of each single atom can be identified and its trajectory in the magnetic field precisely determined. At the time of their experiment Stern and Gerlach achieved a hitherto unprecedented momentum resolution corresponding to an energy resolution of one μeV.
A thorough motion investigation and analysis was conducted again for the original Stern-Gerlach Experiment(SGE). The analysis is still based on the assumption that the atom passing the SG apparatus is a micromagnet due to the spin of its electron, the atoms in the source beam are with an orientation distribution of its angular momentum vectors, while the spin micromagnet is in the precession induced by an inhomogeneous magnetic field. It is the precession that keeps the silver beam with narrower orientation distribution of its angular momentum vectors after passing through the inhomogeneous magnetic field. The motion relativity was introduced in the SGE between the SG apparatus and the silver source beam, which interpreted all the detection phenomena in the multi-stage SGE. The research provided a new and convincing interpretation to the SGE with full satisfaction based on the classical physics without any mysterious or counter intuitive concepts introduced compared to quantum physics.
Abstract In 1921, Otto Stern conceived the idea for an experiment that would decide between a classical and a quantum description of atomic behavior, as epitomized by the Bohr–Sommerfeld–Debye model of the atom. This model entailed not only the quantization of the magnitude of the orbital electronic angular momentum but also of the projection of the angular momentum on an external magnetic field – the so‐called space quantization. Stern recognized that space quantization would have observable consequences: namely, that the magnetic dipole moment due to the orbital angular momentum would be space quantized as well, taking two opposite values for atoms whose only unpaired electron has just one quantum of orbital angular momentum. When acted upon by a suitable inhomogeneous magnetic field, a beam of such atoms would be split into two beams consisting of deflected atoms with opposite projections of the orbital angular momentum on the magnetic field. In contradistinction, if atoms behaved classically, the atomic beam would only broaden along the field gradient and have maximum intensity at zero deflection, i. e., where there would be a minimum or no intensity for a beam split due to space quantization. Stern anticipated that, although simple in principle, the experiment would be difficult to carry out – and invited Walther Gerlach to team up with him. Gerlach's realism and experimental skills together with his sometimes stubborn determination to make things work proved invaluable for the success of the Stern–Gerlach experiment (SGE). After a long struggle, Gerlach finally saw, on 8 February 1922, the splitting of a beam of silver atoms in a magnetic field. The absence of the concept of electron spin confused and confounded the interpretation of the SGE, as the silver atoms were, in fact, in a 2S state, with zero orbital and spin angular momentum. However, a key quantum feature whose existence the SGE was designed to test – namely space quantization of electronic angular momentum – was robust enough to transpire independent of whether the electronic angular momentum was orbital or due to spin. The SGE entails other key aspects of quantum mechanics such as quantum measurement, state preparation, coherence, and entanglement. Confronted with the outcome of the SGE, Stern noted: “I still have objections to the idea of beauty of quantum mechanics. But she is correct.”
The Stern-Gerlach experiment (SGE) has been known for decades, but a complete theory that explains all facets of it remains enigmatic. In its classic realization, each spin state of an atom follows a unique path or trajectory in an SGE. The enigmatic part is the final output of SGE. Feynman envisaged the outcome to be an entangled state, a superposition of $|\text{spin}\phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}\text{state}\ensuremath{\rangle}\ensuremath{\bigotimes}|\text{corresponding}\phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}\text{path}\ensuremath{\rangle}$. Later works described the final state of SGE as a mixed state, a weighted average of states belonging to separate beams or trajectories. Notably, Schwinger, Englert, and Scully compared the difficulty of obtaining a coherent output (a pure state) to ``putting together Humpty Dumpty'' again. Yet recent experiments using Bose-Einstein condensates indicate the emerging beams are partly coherent, favoring Feynman's description. In this work, we revisit SGE using a recent version of the quantum master equation. We show that both outcomes are probable depending on the time of flight and the timescale of the environmental fluctuations. We predict the output is initially coherent and grows gradually into a mixed state. Moreover, we also estimate how the magnetic-field gradient helps broaden the beam waist. Moreover, our treatment implies that the wave function of an atom passing through a Stern-Gerlach device does not undergo an instantaneous collapse; rather, a gradual decay of coherences results in a mixed state, resulting in an irreversible process.
The classical Stern-Gerlach experiment is analyzed with an emphasis on the spin dynamics. The central question asked is whether there occurs a relaxation of the spin angular momentum during the time the particle passes through the Stern-Gerlach magnet. We examine in particular the transverse relaxation, involving angular momentum exchange between the spin of the particles and the spins of the magnet. A method is presented describing relaxation effects at an individual particle level. This leads to a stochastic equation of motion for the spins. This is coupled to a classical equation of motion for the particle translation. The experimental situation is then modeled through simulations of individual trajectories using two sets of parameter choices and three different sets of initial conditions. The two main conclusions are: (A) if the coupling between the magnet and the spin is solely described by the Zeeman interaction with the average magnetic field the simulations show a clear disagreement with the experimental observation of Stern and Gerlach. (B) If one, on the other hand, also allows for a T(2) relaxation time shorter than the passage time one can obtain a practically quantitative agreement with the experimental observations. These conclusions are at variance with the standard textbook explanation of the Stern-Gerlach experiment.
ABSTRACT The bulk of experiments and observations that lined the path to quantum mechanics amounted to a backlog of data in need of explanation. A notable exception was the Stern–Gerlach experiment (SGE) designed to test the predictions of the old quantum theory as embodied by the 1913–1916 Bohr–Sommerfeld–Debye atom model. After its initial triumphs, such as the explanation of the astrophysically observed spectrum of , this model was frowned upon in some quarters, mainly because of its ad hoc nature. Otto Stern (1888–1969)—and his close colleague and friend, Max von Laue (1879–1960)—even took a vow: “If this nonsense of Bohr should, in the end, prove to be right, we will quit physics.” Stern would go further yet and, in 1920, devise an experiment—the SGE—to disprove Bohr's model. However, contrary to Stern's expectations, the SGE ruled unequivocally in favor of the model and its amendments. Wolfgang Pauli (1900–1958) quipped: “That should convert even the non‐believer Stern.” And it did: Confronted with the outcome of the SGE, Stern noted in 1961: “I still have objections to the idea of beauty of quantum mechanics. But she is correct.” Ironically, the SGE would epitomize quantum mechanics as we know it: whether quantum measurement, state preparation, coherence, or entanglement—in addition to the quantization of angular momentum and its spatial projections—the SGE has it all. It now seems that the SGE may even impact future studies of the relationship of quantum theory to other pillars of physics, most notably, general relativity. The descendants of the SGE include transformative techniques for the study of the quantum properties of nuclear, atomic, molecular, and condensed‐matter systems, with magnetic resonance imaging being among the most widely used. Key Points Edward Pickering; Williamina Fleming; Pickering series; Bohr‐Sommerfeld‐Debye model of the atom; Otto Stern; Stern‐Gerlach experiment; Bohr magneton; Old Quantum Theory; Spin; nuclear magneton; magnetic dipole moment of the proton; matter‐wave duality; Quantum Mechanics.
The bulk of experiments and observations that lined the path to quantum mechanics amounted to a backlog of data in need of explanation. A notable exception was the Stern-Gerlach experiment (SGE) designed to test the predictions of the Old Quantum Theory as embodied by the 1913-1916 Bohr-Sommerfeld-Debye atom model. After its initial triumphs, such as the explanation of the astrophysically observed spectrum of He+, this model was frowned upon in some quarters, mainly because of its ad hoc nature. Otto Stern (1888-1969) – and his close colleague and friend, Max von Laue (1879-1960) – even took a vow: “If this nonsense of Bohr should, in the end, prove to be right, we will quit physics.” Stern would go further yet and, in 1920, devise an experiment – the SGE – to disprove Bohr’s model. However, contrary to Stern’s expectations, the SGE ruled unequivocally in favor of the model and its amendments. Wolfgang Pauli (1900-1958) quipped: “That should convert even the non-believer Stern.” And it did: Confronted with the outcome of the SGE, Stern noted in 1961: “I still have objections to the idea of beauty of quantum mechanics. But she is correct.” Ironically, the SGE would epitomize quantum mechanics as we know it: whether quantum measurement, state preparation, coherence, or entanglement – apart from the quantization of angular momentum and its spatial projections – the SGE has it all. The descendants of the SGE include transformative techniques for the study of the quantum properties of nuclear, atomic, molecular, and condensed-matter systems, with Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) being among the most widely used.