Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical review. B./Physical review. B

Correlation beyond the random phase approximation: A consistent many-body perturbation theory approach

F. Bechstedt

Published Jun 15, 2018• 5 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The correlation energy of an inhomogeneous electron gas is ruled by the density correlation function $L$. It obeys a Bethe-Salpeter equation (BSE), whose kernel is the functional derivative of the particle self-energy. It is solved on equal footing for two-particle and single-particle Green's functions within Hedin's GW approximation. According to the Hartree and exchange-correlation contributions to the kernel, the correlation expression decays into random-phase-approximation (RPA) -like and screened-exchange-like parts. The actual treatment of the screened potential $W$ in the BSE for $L$ leads to different second-order screened exchange corrections (SOSEX). Including correlation in the kernel even yields approximations beyond SOSEX. The progress beyond RPA is illustrated for spinless and spin-polarized homogeneous electron gases, indicating that the screening treatment is substantial.

DOI
10.1103/physrevb.97.241109

Related papers

Static correlation beyond the random phase approximation: Dissociating H2 with the Bethe-Salpeter equation and time-dependent GW

Thomas Olsen, Kristian Sommer Thygesen

We investigate various approximations to the correlation energy of a H2 molecule in the dissociation limit, where the ground state is poorly described by a single Slater determinant. The correlation energies are derived from the density response function and it is shown that response functions derived from Hedin's equations (Random Phase Approximation (RPA), Time-dependent Hartree-Fock (TDHF), Bethe-Salpeter equation (BSE), and Time-Dependent GW) all reproduce the correct dissociation limit. We also show that the BSE improves the correlation energies obtained within RPA and TDHF significantly for intermediate binding distances. A Hubbard model for the dimer allows us to obtain exact analytical results for the various approximations, which is readily compared with the exact diagonalization of the model. Moreover, the model is shown to reproduce all the qualitative results from the ab initio calculations and confirms that BSE greatly improves the RPA and TDHF results despite the fact that the BSE excitation spectrum breaks down in the dissociation limit. In contrast, second order screened exchange gives a poor description of the dissociation limit, which can be attributed to the fact that it cannot be derived from an irreducible response function.

arXiv:1312.5596•The Journal of Chemical Physics•Apr 28, 2014•37 citations

Convergence behavior of the random phase approximation renormalized correlation energy

Jefferson E. Bates, J. Sensenig, Adrienn Ruzsinszky

Based on the random phase approximation (RPA), RPA renormalization [J. E. Bates and F. Furche, J. Chem. Phys. 139, 171103 (2013)] is a robust many-body perturbation theory that works for molecules and materials because it does not diverge as the Kohn-Sham gap approaches zero. Additionally, RPA renormalization enables the simultaneous calculation of RPA and beyond-RPA correlation energies since the total correlation energy is the sum of a series of independent contributions. The first-order approximation (RPAr1) yields the dominant beyond-RPA contribution to the correlation energy for a given exchange-correlation kernel, but systematically underestimates the total beyond-RPA correction. For both the homogeneous electron gas model and real systems, we demonstrate numerically that RPA renormalization beyond first order converges monotonically to the infinite-order beyond-RPA correlation energy for several model exchange-correlation kernels and that the rate of convergence is principally determined by the choice of the kernel and spin polarization of the ground state. The monotonic convergence is rationalized from an analysis of the RPA renormalized correlation energy corrections, assuming the exchange-correlation kernel and response functions satisfy some reasonable conditions. For spin-unpolarized atoms, molecules, and bulk solids, we find that RPA renormalization is typically converged to 1 meV error or less by fourth order regardless of the band gap or dimensionality. Most spin-polarized systems converge at a slightly slower rate, with errors on the order of 10 meV at fourth order and typically requiring up to sixth order to reach 1 meV error or less. Slowest to converge, however, open-shell atoms present the most challenging case and require many higher orders to converge.

Physical review. B./Physical review. B•May 26, 2017•17 citations

Static correlation beyond the random phase approximation:Dissociating H2 with the Bethe-Salpeter equation and time-dependent GW

Thomas Olsen, Kristian Sommer Thygesen

We investigate various approximations to the correlation energy of a H$_2$ molecule in the dissociation limit, where the ground state is poorly described by a single Slater determinant. The correlation energies are derived from the density response function and it is shown that response functions derived from Hedin's equations (Random Phase Approximation (RPA), Time-dependent Hartree-Fock (TDHF), Bethe-Salpeter equation (BSE), and Time-Dependent GW (TDGW)) all reproduce the correct dissociation limit. We also show that the BSE improves the correlation energies obtained within RPA and TDHF significantly for intermediate binding distances. A Hubbard model for the dimer allow us to obtain exact analytical results for the various approximations, which is readily compared with the exact diagonalization of the model. Moreover, the model is shown to reproduce all the qualitative results from the \textit{ab initio} calculations and confirms that BSE greatly improves the RPA and TDHF results despite the fact that the BSE excitation spectrum breaks down in the dissociation limit. In contrast, Second Order Screened Exchange (SOSEX) gives a poor description of the dissociation limit, which can be attributed to the fact that it cannot be derived from an irreducible response function.

•Jan 1, 2014•35 citations

Progress and Challenges with Luttinger-Ward Approaches for Going Beyond DFT

Sohrab Ismail‐Beigi

The well-known and well-used Density Functional Theory (DFT) is a variational theory for the ground-state. There are no guarantees that it delivers good results for excited state properties such as quasiparticle energies or wave function. All that is guaranteed is that the total energy is exact, the chemical potential is correct, and that the eective electronic states (Kohn-Sham states) generate the right electron density at the variational minimum. Luttinger-Ward approaches to electronic structure are attractive as beyond-DFT schemes since, in principle, they oer a variational functional of the one-electron Green’s function that yields both the correct total energy and all one-particle properties at the variational extremum. However, compared to DFT, these methods face a number of additional challenges beyond the familiar problem of choosing an exchange-correlation functional: (a) they have a much greater computational cost compared to DFT, (b) one must choose some set of trial Green’s functions, and (c) one must locate an extremum (not necessarily a minimum). This talk aims both to be pedagogical and to provide a summary of our most recent work in this area. We focus mainly on the random-phase approximation (RPA) for the correlation functional which yields the GW self-energy for the Green’s function. We will describe ecient approaches for computing the RPA correlation energy; how various types of approximations to the correlation energy create a ladder of approximate self-energy operators and what type of physics is included in these approximations (exchange, screening, Hubbard U, etc.); and how the extremization is in fact highly problematic. We will end with some ideas for making practical progress with the extremization and their relation to the successful Quasiparticle Self-consistent GW (QSGW) scheme [1].

•Jan 1, 2012•0 citations

The RPA and the GW approximation for the self-energy

Richard M. Martin, Lucia Reining, David M. Ceperley

Besides the proof of a modified Luttinger–Ward–Klein variational principle and a related self-consistency idea, there is not much new in principle in this paper. L. Hedin, Phys. Rev . 139, A796–823 (1965) Summary In this chapter a set of equations is formulated that determine the self-energy and the one-body Green's function in terms of the screened Coulomb interaction between classical charges. The equations contain a correction to the classical picture in terms of a vertex function. The physical meaning of the various contributions is discussed. The simplest approximation for the vertex yields the random phase approximation for the polarizability and the GW approximation for the self-energy. Various aspects of the GWA are analyzed, with a focus on the physics that is added beyond Hartree– Fock. A brief summary of model cases illustrates the domain of validity and the limits of the GWA. In this chapter we elaborate in more detail on the question of how to calculate the onebody Green's function from a Dyson equation with a self-energy kernel. In the previous chapter a scheme was introduced to design approximations to the self-energy. However, the question of where to stop, which pieces of physics to include and which to neglect, is not yet settled. Of course, there is no unique answer, besides the exact solution, but different strategies can be more or less advantageous in practice. In a system with a few electrons, for example, different aspects will be important than in a system with many electrons. Here we are mostly interested in solids, or more generally in extended systems. In such systems, screening plays an essential role: the interaction between two charges is strongly modified, in general reduced, by the rearrangement of all the other charges. It is therefore most convenient to reformulate the equations such that screening appears explicitly. Some steps in this direction can be found in earlier chapters, in particular in Sec. 8.3, the formulation of the Ψ [ G , W ]-functional of the screened interaction W instead of the Ф[ G , v c ]-functional of the bare v c . In Sec. 10.5 the screened interaction approximation for the self-energy is derived, with the self-energy as a product of the one-body Green's function and the screened interaction W .

Cambridge University Press eBooks•May 31, 2016•0 citations

How screened exchange improves on violations of the Pauli principle in the random phase approximation of jellium

P. Ziesche, Felix Hummel

Within many-body perturbation theory (MBPT) of the spin-unpolarized jellium the second order exchange-term is explicitly renormalized using the Random Phase Approximation (RPA). Regarding total energies this has been studied under the name Second Order Screened Exchange (SOSEX). We study the pair correlation function (PCF) and the structure factor for parallel spins to investigate to what extend the exchange terms correct for violations of the Pauli principle introduced by the RPA. The PCF is directly evaluated for the thermodynamic limit by means of a Monte-Carlo integration of the imaginary frequency propagators of the homogeneous electron gas.

arXiv:1605.08643?context=cond-mat.str-el•May 27, 2016•0 citations
The correlation energy of an inhomogeneous electron gas is ruled by the density correlation function LLL. It obeys a Bethe-Salpeter equation (BSE), whose kernel is the functional derivative of the particle self-energy. It is solved on equal footing for two-particle and single-particle Green's functions within Hedin's GW approximation. According to the Hartree and exchange-correlation contributions to the kernel, the correlation expression decays into random-phase-approximation (RPA) -like and screened-exchange-like parts. The actual treatment of the screened potential WWW in the BSE for LLL leads to different second-order screened exchange corrections (SOSEX). Including correlation in the kernel even yields approximations beyond SOSEX. The progress beyond RPA is illustrated for spinless and spin-polarized homogeneous electron gases, indicating that the screening treatment is substantial.
We investigate various approximations to the correlation energy of a H2 molecule in the dissociation limit, where the ground state is poorly described by a single Slater determinant. The correlation energies are derived from the density response function and it is shown that response functions derived from Hedin's equations (Random Phase Approximation (RPA), Time-dependent Hartree-Fock (TDHF), Bethe-Salpeter equation (BSE), and Time-Dependent GW) all reproduce the correct dissociation limit. We also show that the BSE improves the correlation energies obtained within RPA and TDHF significantly for intermediate binding distances. A Hubbard model for the dimer allows us to obtain exact analytical results for the various approximations, which is readily compared with the exact diagonalization of the model. Moreover, the model is shown to reproduce all the qualitative results from the ab initio calculations and confirms that BSE greatly improves the RPA and TDHF results despite the fact that the BSE excitation spectrum breaks down in the dissociation limit. In contrast, second order screened exchange gives a poor description of the dissociation limit, which can be attributed to the fact that it cannot be derived from an irreducible response function.
Based on the random phase approximation (RPA), RPA renormalization [J. E. Bates and F. Furche, J. Chem. Phys. 139, 171103 (2013)] is a robust many-body perturbation theory that works for molecules and materials because it does not diverge as the Kohn-Sham gap approaches zero. Additionally, RPA renormalization enables the simultaneous calculation of RPA and beyond-RPA correlation energies since the total correlation energy is the sum of a series of independent contributions. The first-order approximation (RPAr1) yields the dominant beyond-RPA contribution to the correlation energy for a given exchange-correlation kernel, but systematically underestimates the total beyond-RPA correction. For both the homogeneous electron gas model and real systems, we demonstrate numerically that RPA renormalization beyond first order converges monotonically to the infinite-order beyond-RPA correlation energy for several model exchange-correlation kernels and that the rate of convergence is principally determined by the choice of the kernel and spin polarization of the ground state. The monotonic convergence is rationalized from an analysis of the RPA renormalized correlation energy corrections, assuming the exchange-correlation kernel and response functions satisfy some reasonable conditions. For spin-unpolarized atoms, molecules, and bulk solids, we find that RPA renormalization is typically converged to 1 meV error or less by fourth order regardless of the band gap or dimensionality. Most spin-polarized systems converge at a slightly slower rate, with errors on the order of 10 meV at fourth order and typically requiring up to sixth order to reach 1 meV error or less. Slowest to converge, however, open-shell atoms present the most challenging case and require many higher orders to converge.
We investigate various approximations to the correlation energy of a H2_22​ molecule in the dissociation limit, where the ground state is poorly described by a single Slater determinant. The correlation energies are derived from the density response function and it is shown that response functions derived from Hedin's equations (Random Phase Approximation (RPA), Time-dependent Hartree-Fock (TDHF), Bethe-Salpeter equation (BSE), and Time-Dependent GW (TDGW)) all reproduce the correct dissociation limit. We also show that the BSE improves the correlation energies obtained within RPA and TDHF significantly for intermediate binding distances. A Hubbard model for the dimer allow us to obtain exact analytical results for the various approximations, which is readily compared with the exact diagonalization of the model. Moreover, the model is shown to reproduce all the qualitative results from the \textit{ab initio} calculations and confirms that BSE greatly improves the RPA and TDHF results despite the fact that the BSE excitation spectrum breaks down in the dissociation limit. In contrast, Second Order Screened Exchange (SOSEX) gives a poor description of the dissociation limit, which can be attributed to the fact that it cannot be derived from an irreducible response function.
The well-known and well-used Density Functional Theory (DFT) is a variational theory for the ground-state. There are no guarantees that it delivers good results for excited state properties such as quasiparticle energies or wave function. All that is guaranteed is that the total energy is exact, the chemical potential is correct, and that the eective electronic states (Kohn-Sham states) generate the right electron density at the variational minimum. Luttinger-Ward approaches to electronic structure are attractive as beyond-DFT schemes since, in principle, they oer a variational functional of the one-electron Green’s function that yields both the correct total energy and all one-particle properties at the variational extremum. However, compared to DFT, these methods face a number of additional challenges beyond the familiar problem of choosing an exchange-correlation functional: (a) they have a much greater computational cost compared to DFT, (b) one must choose some set of trial Green’s functions, and (c) one must locate an extremum (not necessarily a minimum). This talk aims both to be pedagogical and to provide a summary of our most recent work in this area. We focus mainly on the random-phase approximation (RPA) for the correlation functional which yields the GW self-energy for the Green’s function. We will describe ecient approaches for computing the RPA correlation energy; how various types of approximations to the correlation energy create a ladder of approximate self-energy operators and what type of physics is included in these approximations (exchange, screening, Hubbard U, etc.); and how the extremization is in fact highly problematic. We will end with some ideas for making practical progress with the extremization and their relation to the successful Quasiparticle Self-consistent GW (QSGW) scheme [1].
Besides the proof of a modified Luttinger–Ward–Klein variational principle and a related self-consistency idea, there is not much new in principle in this paper. L. Hedin, Phys. Rev . 139, A796–823 (1965) Summary In this chapter a set of equations is formulated that determine the self-energy and the one-body Green's function in terms of the screened Coulomb interaction between classical charges. The equations contain a correction to the classical picture in terms of a vertex function. The physical meaning of the various contributions is discussed. The simplest approximation for the vertex yields the random phase approximation for the polarizability and the GW approximation for the self-energy. Various aspects of the GWA are analyzed, with a focus on the physics that is added beyond Hartree– Fock. A brief summary of model cases illustrates the domain of validity and the limits of the GWA. In this chapter we elaborate in more detail on the question of how to calculate the onebody Green's function from a Dyson equation with a self-energy kernel. In the previous chapter a scheme was introduced to design approximations to the self-energy. However, the question of where to stop, which pieces of physics to include and which to neglect, is not yet settled. Of course, there is no unique answer, besides the exact solution, but different strategies can be more or less advantageous in practice. In a system with a few electrons, for example, different aspects will be important than in a system with many electrons. Here we are mostly interested in solids, or more generally in extended systems. In such systems, screening plays an essential role: the interaction between two charges is strongly modified, in general reduced, by the rearrangement of all the other charges. It is therefore most convenient to reformulate the equations such that screening appears explicitly. Some steps in this direction can be found in earlier chapters, in particular in Sec. 8.3, the formulation of the Ψ [ G , W ]-functional of the screened interaction W instead of the Ф[ G , v c ]-functional of the bare v c . In Sec. 10.5 the screened interaction approximation for the self-energy is derived, with the self-energy as a product of the one-body Green's function and the screened interaction W .
Within many-body perturbation theory (MBPT) of the spin-unpolarized jellium the second order exchange-term is explicitly renormalized using the Random Phase Approximation (RPA). Regarding total energies this has been studied under the name Second Order Screened Exchange (SOSEX). We study the pair correlation function (PCF) and the structure factor for parallel spins to investigate to what extend the exchange terms correct for violations of the Pauli principle introduced by the RPA. The PCF is directly evaluated for the thermodynamic limit by means of a Monte-Carlo integration of the imaginary frequency propagators of the homogeneous electron gas.