The well-known and well-used Density Functional Theory (DFT) is a variational theory for the ground-state. There are no guarantees that it delivers good results for excited state properties such as quasiparticle energies or wave function. All that is guaranteed is that the total energy is exact, the chemical potential is correct, and that the eective electronic states (Kohn-Sham states) generate the right electron density at the variational minimum. Luttinger-Ward approaches to electronic structure are attractive as beyond-DFT schemes since, in principle, they oer a variational functional of the one-electron Green’s function that yields both the correct total energy and all one-particle properties at the variational extremum. However, compared to DFT, these methods face a number of additional challenges beyond the familiar problem of choosing an exchange-correlation functional: (a) they have a much greater computational cost compared to DFT, (b) one must choose some set of trial Green’s functions, and (c) one must locate an extremum (not necessarily a minimum). This talk aims both to be pedagogical and to provide a summary of our most recent work in this area. We focus mainly on the random-phase approximation (RPA) for the correlation functional which yields the GW self-energy for the Green’s function. We will describe ecient approaches for computing the RPA correlation energy; how various types of approximations to the correlation energy create a ladder of approximate self-energy operators and what type of physics is included in these approximations (exchange, screening, Hubbard U, etc.); and how the extremization is in fact highly problematic. We will end with some ideas for making practical progress with the extremization and their relation to the successful Quasiparticle Self-consistent GW (QSGW) scheme [1].
The well-known and well-used Density Functional Theory (DFT) is a variational theory for the ground-state. There are no guarantees that it delivers good results for excited state properties such as quasiparticle energies or wave function. All that is guaranteed is that the total energy is exact, the chemical potential is correct, and that the eective electronic states (Kohn-Sham states) generate the right electron density at the variational minimum. Luttinger-Ward approaches to electronic structure are attractive as beyond-DFT schemes since, in principle, they oer a variational functional of the one-electron Green’s function that yields both the correct total energy and all one-particle properties at the variational extremum. However, compared to DFT, these methods face a number of additional challenges beyond the familiar problem of choosing an exchange-correlation functional: (a) they have a much greater computational cost compared to DFT, (b) one must choose some set of trial Green’s functions, and (c) one must locate an extremum (not necessarily a minimum). This talk aims both to be pedagogical and to provide a summary of our most recent work in this area. We focus mainly on the random-phase approximation (RPA) for the correlation functional which yields the GW self-energy for the Green’s function. We will describe ecient approaches for computing the RPA correlation energy; how various types of approximations to the correlation energy create a ladder of approximate self-energy operators and what type of physics is included in these approximations (exchange, screening, Hubbard U, etc.); and how the extremization is in fact highly problematic. We will end with some ideas for making practical progress with the extremization and their relation to the successful Quasiparticle Self-consistent GW (QSGW) scheme [1].
In principle, the Luttinger-Ward Green's-function formalism allows one to compute simultaneously the total energy and the quasiparticle band structure of a many-body electronic system from first principles. We present approximate and exact expressions for the correlation energy within the GW-random-phase approximation that are more amenable to computation and allow for developing efficient approximations to the self-energy operator and correlation energy. The exact form is a sum over differences between plasmon and interband energies. The approximate forms are based on summing over screened interband transitions. We also demonstrate that blind extremization of such functionals leads to unphysical results: imposing physical constraints on the allowed solutions (Green's functions) is necessary. Finally, we present some relevant numerical results for atomic systems.
Density functional theory (DFT) performs reasonably well for the determination of structural properties of many materials, but fails to predict electronic band gap values accurately. \nSuch a failure of DFT is not unexpected, since there exists no formal justification for interpreting the DFT eigenvalues as addition or removal energies of the many-body system (quasiparticle energies).\nAn alternative approach to the study of exchange-correlation effects in many-particle systems is provided by many-body perturbation theory (MBPT), which defines a rigorous approach to description of excited-state properties based on the Green's function formalism and the concept of quasiparticle electrons. Within MBPT, one can calculate the quasiparticle (QP) energies and the QP amplitudes by approximately solving, within the so-called GW approximation, the set of coupled integro-differential equations proposed by Hedin in 1965.\nThe GW method generally yields significantly better values for QP energies with respect to DFT as it accounts for the dynamic many-body effects in the electron-electron interaction going beyond the mean-field approximation of independent Kohn-Sham particles. The drawback of such an involved approach, however, is its large computational cost, which is mainly due to the evaluation of dielectric matrices, their inversion, and the solution of a non-Hermitian and nonlinear eigenvalue problem. \nThe first part of this PhD research is devoted to the implementation of an efficient and scalable coarse-grained parallel algorithms and the development of state-of-the-art methods to solve the GW equations.\nAll these techniques are then applied to the study of the quasiparticle band structures of SiO2 in the alpha quartz crystalline structure. The effects of the different approximations involved in the theory, the influence of self-consistency, and a systematic analysis of the reliability of the different plasmon-pole models are presented and discussed. \nThe second part of this PhD work is dedicated to the implementation of a methodological approach to the solution of the GW equations based on the so-called projector augmented wave method (PAW) proposed by Blochl in 1994. This new approach permits to remove many of the limitations intrinsic to the use of the pseudopotential technique widely used for ab-initio calculations, allowing one to reach GW results closer to an all-electron implementation while still maintaining computational efficiency, and flexibility. This allows us to achieve a coherent implementation of many different algorithms which enables a detailed comparison of GW calculations not yet performed until now. Results for the quasiparticle band structure and optical spectra of prototype s- and p-compounds are discussed and compared to recent studies reported in the scientific literature (when available).
Besides the proof of a modified Luttinger–Ward–Klein variational principle and a related self-consistency idea, there is not much new in principle in this paper. L. Hedin, Phys. Rev . 139, A796–823 (1965) Summary In this chapter a set of equations is formulated that determine the self-energy and the one-body Green's function in terms of the screened Coulomb interaction between classical charges. The equations contain a correction to the classical picture in terms of a vertex function. The physical meaning of the various contributions is discussed. The simplest approximation for the vertex yields the random phase approximation for the polarizability and the GW approximation for the self-energy. Various aspects of the GWA are analyzed, with a focus on the physics that is added beyond Hartree– Fock. A brief summary of model cases illustrates the domain of validity and the limits of the GWA. In this chapter we elaborate in more detail on the question of how to calculate the onebody Green's function from a Dyson equation with a self-energy kernel. In the previous chapter a scheme was introduced to design approximations to the self-energy. However, the question of where to stop, which pieces of physics to include and which to neglect, is not yet settled. Of course, there is no unique answer, besides the exact solution, but different strategies can be more or less advantageous in practice. In a system with a few electrons, for example, different aspects will be important than in a system with many electrons. Here we are mostly interested in solids, or more generally in extended systems. In such systems, screening plays an essential role: the interaction between two charges is strongly modified, in general reduced, by the rearrangement of all the other charges. It is therefore most convenient to reformulate the equations such that screening appears explicitly. Some steps in this direction can be found in earlier chapters, in particular in Sec. 8.3, the formulation of the Ψ [ G , W ]-functional of the screened interaction W instead of the Ф[ G , v c ]-functional of the bare v c . In Sec. 10.5 the screened interaction approximation for the self-energy is derived, with the self-energy as a product of the one-body Green's function and the screened interaction W .
In this lecture we present many-body perturbation theory as a method to determine quasiparticle excitations in solids, especially electronic band structures, accurately from first principles.The main ingredient is the electronic self-energy that, in principle, contains all many-body exchange and correlation effects beyond the Hartree potential.As its exact mathematical expression is unknown, approximations must be used in practical calculations.The approximation is obtained using a systematic algebraic approach on the basis of Green function techniques.It constitutes an expansion of the self-energy up to linear order in the screened Coulomb potential, which describes the interaction between the quasiparticles and includes dynamic screening through the creation of exchange-correlation holes around the bare particles.The implementation of the approximation relies on a perturbative treatment starting from density functional theory.Besides a detailed mathematical discussion we focus on the underlying physical concepts and show some illustrative applications.
The correlation energy of an inhomogeneous electron gas is ruled by the density correlation function L. It obeys a Bethe-Salpeter equation (BSE), whose kernel is the functional derivative of the particle self-energy. It is solved on equal footing for two-particle and single-particle Green's functions within Hedin's GW approximation. According to the Hartree and exchange-correlation contributions to the kernel, the correlation expression decays into random-phase-approximation (RPA) -like and screened-exchange-like parts. The actual treatment of the screened potential W in the BSE for L leads to different second-order screened exchange corrections (SOSEX). Including correlation in the kernel even yields approximations beyond SOSEX. The progress beyond RPA is illustrated for spinless and spin-polarized homogeneous electron gases, indicating that the screening treatment is substantial.
We calculate the interacting bandgap energy of a solid within the random-phase approximation (RPA) to density functional theory (DFT). The interacting bandgap energy is defined as ${E}_{g}={E}^{\mathrm{RPA}}(N+1)+{E}^{\mathrm{RPA}}(N\ensuremath{-}1)\ensuremath{-}2{E}^{\mathrm{RPA}}(N)$, where ERPA(N) is the total DFT-RPA energy of the N-electron system. We compare the interacting bandgap energy with the Kohn-Sham bandgap energy, which is the difference between the conduction and valence band edges in the Kohn-Sham band structure. We show that they differ by an unrenormalized ``G0W0'' self-energy correction (i.e., a GW self-energy correction computed using Kohn-Sham orbitals and energies as input). This provides a well-defined and meaningful interpretation to G0W0 quasiparticle bandgap calculations, but questions the physics behind the renormalization factors in the expression of the bandgap energy. We also separate the kinetic from the Coulomb contributions to the DFT-RPA bandgap energy, and discuss the related problem of the derivative discontinuity in the DFT-RPA functional. Last we discuss the applicability of our results to other functionals based on many-body perturbation theory.