Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Non-orthogonality of statistical matrices and violations of the second law of thermodynamics

PierGianLuca Porta Mana

Published Aug 31, 2004• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Violation of the second law of thermodynamics in the quantum microworld

Vladislav Čápek, Jiří Bok

Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications•Feb 1, 2001•22 citations

Distinguishability of non-orthogonal density matrices does not imply violations of the second law

PierGianLuca Porta Mana

The hypothetical possibility of distinguishing preparations described by non-orthogonal density matrices does not necessarily imply a violation of the second law of thermodynamics, as was instead stated by von Neumann. On the other hand, such a possibility would surely mean that the particular density-matrix space (and related Hilbert space) adopted would not be adequate to describe the hypothetical new experimental facts. These points are shown by making clear the distinction between physical preparations and the density matrices which represent them, and then comparing a "quantum" thermodynamic analysis given by Peres with a "classical" one given by Jaynes.

arXiv:quant-ph/0408193•Aug 31, 2004•0 citations

Third law of thermodynamics and quantum-statistical systems

Miodrag L. Kulić, Davidović-Ristovski, G. S., Ristovski, Lj. M.

•Jan 1, 1980•0 citations

On distinguishability, orthogonality, and violations of the second law: contradictory assumptions, contrasting pieces of knowledge

PierGianLuca Porta Mana, A. Maansson, Gunnar G. Bjork

Two statements by von Neumann and a thought-experiment by Peres prompts a discussion on the notions of one-shot distinguishability, orthogonality, semi-permeable diaphragm, and their thermodynamic implications. In the first part of the paper, these concepts are defined and discussed, and it is explained that one-shot distinguishability and orthogonality are contradictory assumptions, from which one cannot rigorously draw any conclusion, concerning e.g. violations of the second law of thermodynamics. In the second part, we analyse what happens when these contradictory assumptions comes, instead, from _two_ different observers, having different pieces of knowledge about a given physical situation, and using incompatible density matrices to describe it.

arXiv:quant-ph/0505229•May 31, 2005•1 citation

The application of quantum statistical thermodynamics

Jurij Avsec, Milan Marčič

AIAA Thermophysics Conference•Jun 19, 2000•0 citations

Probability, Entropy, and Quantum

Wojciech H. Zurek

The second law of thermodynamics imposes severe constraints on the formal structure of quantum theory. In particular, that law would be violated if it were possible to distinguish non-orthogonal states or if SchrOdinger's equation were nonlinear.

CRC Press eBooks•Mar 8, 2018•0 citations
The hypothetical possibility of distinguishing preparations described by non-orthogonal density matrices does not necessarily imply a violation of the second law of thermodynamics, as was instead stated by von Neumann. On the other hand, such a possibility would surely mean that the particular density-matrix space (and related Hilbert space) adopted would not be adequate to describe the hypothetical new experimental facts. These points are shown by making clear the distinction between physical preparations and the density matrices which represent them, and then comparing a "quantum" thermodynamic analysis given by Peres with a "classical" one given by Jaynes.
Two statements by von Neumann and a thought-experiment by Peres prompts a discussion on the notions of one-shot distinguishability, orthogonality, semi-permeable diaphragm, and their thermodynamic implications. In the first part of the paper, these concepts are defined and discussed, and it is explained that one-shot distinguishability and orthogonality are contradictory assumptions, from which one cannot rigorously draw any conclusion, concerning e.g. violations of the second law of thermodynamics. In the second part, we analyse what happens when these contradictory assumptions comes, instead, from _two_ different observers, having different pieces of knowledge about a given physical situation, and using incompatible density matrices to describe it.