Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Superfluidity and Superconductivity

Norman J. M. Horing

Published Jul 27, 2017• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Abstract Chapter 13 addresses Bose condensation in superfluids (and superconductors), which involves the field operator ψ having a c-number component (<ψ(x,t)>≠0), challenging number conservation. The nonlinear Gross-Pitaevskii equation is derived for this condensate wave function <ψ>=ψ−ψ˜, facilitating identification of the coherence length and the core region of vortex motion. The noncondensate Green’s function G˜1(1,1′)=−i<(ψ˜(1)ψ˜+(1′))+> and the nonvanishing anomalous correlation function F˜∗(2,1′)=−i<(ψ˜+(2)ψ˜+(1′))+> describe the dynamics and elementary excitations of the non-condensate states and are discussed in conjunction with Landau’s criterion for viscosity. Associated concepts of off-diagonal long-range order and the interpretation of <ψ> as a superfluid order parameter are also introduced. Anderson’s Bose-condensed state, as a phase-coherent wave packet superposition of number states, resolves issues of number conservation. Superconductivity involves bound Cooper pairs of electrons capable of Bose condensation and superfluid behavior. Correspondingly, the two-particle Green’s function has a term involving a product of anomalous bound-Cooper-pair condensate wave functions of the type F(1,2)=−i<(ψ(1)ψ(2))+>≠0, such that G2(1,2;1′,2′)=F(1,2)F+(1′,2′)+G˜2(1,2;1′,2′). Here, G˜2 describes the dynamics/excitations of the non-superfluid-condensate states, while nonvanishing F,F+ represent a phase-coherent wave packet superposition of Cooper-pair number states and off-diagonal long range order. Employing this form of G2 in the G1-equation couples the condensed state with the non-condensate excitations. Taken jointly with the dynamical equation for F(1,2), this leads to the Gorkov equations, encompassing the Bardeen–Cooper–Schrieffer (BCS) energy gap, critical temperature, and Bogoliubov-de Gennes eigenfunction Bogoliubons. Superconductor thermodynamics and critical magnetic field are discussed. For a weak magnetic field, the Gorkov-equations lead to Ginzburg–Landau theory and a nonlinear Schrödinger-like equation for the pair wave function and the associated supercurrent, along with identification of the Cooper pair density. Furthermore, Chapter 13 addresses the apparent lack of gauge invariance of London theory with an elegant variational analysis involving re-gauging the potentials, yielding a manifestly gauge invariant generalization of the London equation. Consistency with the equation of continuity implies the existence of Anderson’s acoustic normal mode, which is supplanted by the plasmon for Coulomb interaction. Type II superconductors and the penetration (and interaction) of quantized magnetic flux lines are also discussed. Finally, Chapter 13 addresses Josephson tunneling between superconductors.

DOI
10.1093/oso/9780198791942.003.0013

Related papers

Number-Phase Fluctuations in Isolated Superconductors

Xiaotian Si, Wataru Kohno, Takafumi Kita

We improve the Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer wave function with a fixed particle number so as to incorporate many-body correlations beyond the mean-field treatment. It is shown that the correlations lower the ground-state energy far more than Cooper-pair condensation in the weak-coupling region. Moreover, they naturally bring a superposition over the number of condensed particles. Thus, Cooper-pair condensation is special among the various bound-state formations of quantum mechanics in that number fluctuations are necessarily present in the condensate through the dynamical exchange of particles with the non-condensate reservoir. On the basis of this result, we propose $\varDelta N_{\rm con}\cdot \varDelta ϕ\gtrsim 1$ as the uncertainty relation relevant to the number-phase fluctuations in superconductors and superfluids, where the number of condensed particles $N_{\rm con}$ is used instead of the total particle number $N$. The formula implies that a macroscopic phase $ϕ$ can be established even in number-fixed superconductors and superfluids since $\varDelta N_{\rm con}\gg 1$.

arXiv:1809.03708•Journal of the Physical Society of Japan•Sep 10, 2018•2 citations

Bosonization of Cooper pairs and novel Bose-liquid superconductivity and superfluidity in high-$T_c$ cuprates and other systems

Safarali Dzhumanov

The criteria for bosonization of Cooper pairs and novel Bose-liquid superconductivity and superfluidity in high-$T_c$ cuprates and other pseudogap matters are formulated by using the uncertainty principle and the boson mean field theory. We argue that the BCS-type s- or d-wave superconductivity occurring in the fermionic limit of Cooper pairs (which exist in ordinary metals and heavily overdoped cuprates with large Fermi energies) is not characteristic of underdoped to overdoped cuprates with low Fermi energies. The superconducting order parameter in high-$T_c$ cuprates and other pseudogap matters cannot be determined as the BCS-like (s- or d-wave) gap. We show that the unconventional superconductivity/superfluidity occurring in the bosonic limit of Cooper pairs exists in low Fermi energy systems where the bosonic Cooper pairs are formed at a pseudogap temperature T* above the uperconducting/superfluid transition temperature $T_c$ and then such bosons condenses into a Bose superfluid at $T_c$. The pair condensation of attracting bosons occurs at $T_c$ and then their single particle condensation sets in at $T_c^*$ lower than $T_c$ (in three dimensions (3D)) or at T=0 (in two dimensions (2D)). The coherent single particle and pair condensates of bosons exist as two distinct superfluid phases below $T_c$. By solving the mean field equations for high-$T_c$ cuprates, the novel superconducting states (i.e., a vortex-like state existing below the temperature $T_v=T^{2D}_c$ lower than T* but higher than $T_c=T^{3D}_c$ and two superconducting phases below $T_c$) and their properties characterized by the boson superfluid stiffness are determined and compared with the key experimental findings. The novel Bose-liquid superconductivity and superfluidity exists also in other exotic superconductors/superfluids, including quantum liquids, atomic Fermi gases and low-density nuclear matter.

arXiv:1709.02110•Sep 7, 2017•0 citations

Number-Phase Fluctuations in Isolated Superconductors

嘯天 司

the interaction.In other words, the correlations lower the ground-state energy relatively far more than Cooper-pair condensation for g ≪ 1.This fact implies that, formally speaking, Cooper-pair condensation should be studied only after the correlations effects have been incorporated.We incorporate the correlation effects to show explicitly that the correlations produce finite non-condensed particles in the ground-state, which work as a particle reservoir for the condensate to naturally yield the superposition, in exactly the same way as in the case of interacting Bose-Einstein condensates.[10] Thus, the superposition is a real physical entity that exists in any isolated superconductor or superfluid.Note in this context that the superposition and coherence have so far been discussed mostly in terms of condensed particles alone.[5,7,11,12] This thesis is organized as follows; We will discuss the improved ground-wave function with many-body correlations.Section 2 presents formulation.Section 3 gives numerical results.Section 4 presents concluding remarks.We also present details that deriving the formalism from Appendix.

•Mar 25, 2019•0 citations

Superconductor superfluid density from the Bardeen–Cooper–Schrieffer/Bose crossover theory

Israel Chávez, M. Grether, MANUEL DE LLANO

Abstract The superfluid density $$n_{s}(T)$$ n s ( T ) of a superconductor is calculated based on the generalized Bose–Einstein condensation (GBEC) theory that addresses a fully-interacting ternary boson-fermion gas mixture of free electrons as fermions, plus two-electron Cooper pairs (2eCPs) and also, explicitly, two-hole Cooper pairs (2hCPs), both as bosons. Here we consider two special cases (i) 100%–0% (i.e., with no condensed 2hCPs) and (ii) 0%–100% (i.e., with no condensed 2eCPs). Subsumed in GBEC are the Bardeen–Cooper–Schrieffer (BCS) and Bose–Einstein condensation (BEC) theories along with the BCS-BEC crossover theory extended with 2hCPs. We find that in the weak-coupling regime $$n_{s}(0)$$ n s ( 0 ) agrees with data from the Uemura et al. (2004) graph for several elemental SCs by taking in 3D with a quadratic energy-dispersion relation while in 2D with a linear relation are much too far below the data. In the strong-coupling regime the linear behavior of critical temperature $$T_{c}$$ T c vs $$n_{s}(0)$$ n s ( 0 ) obtained here is just as Božović et al. (2016) found. However, in 2D with a linear relation accounting for 0%–100%, $$n_{s}(T)/n_{s}(0)$$ n s ( T ) / n s ( 0 ) compares well with some high- $$T_{c}$$ T c -cuprate SC data between the two coupling regimes.

SN Applied Sciences•Jun 13, 2022•0 citations

Quantum vortex dynamics in the counterflowing Bose–Einstein condensate

Sergey K. Nemirovskii

The aim of this paper is to derive the equations of motion of quantum vortices in a weakly non-ideal Bose–Einstein condensate (BEC) at finite temperatures and in the presence of macroscopic superfluid and normal velocities. The motivation for this work is that the dynamics of quantum vortices in superfluid helium has been studied at the phenomenological level, and a number of issues require clarification, which can be addressed by studying the corresponding problem in BEC. In BEC, quantum vortices are located at points where the macroscopic wave function (MWF) ψ(r,T), which describes the BEC dynamics, vanishes ψ(r,T)=0. The intersection of the surfaces Reψ(r,T)=0 and Imψ(r,T)=0 forms a one-dimensional line, which is just the quantum vortex line. During the evolution of the MWF, the position of the zero surfaces changes, that is, the vortex lines move. Conversely, the motion of these vortex filaments determines the evolution of the MWF. Thus, there is a mutual correspondence, and the quantity ψ(r,T) can be considered as a functional of the entire vortex configuration, i.e., {s(ξ,t)}. This viewpoint allows us to derive the equations of motion for vortices from the Gross–Pitaevskii equation (GPE), which describes the dynamics of MWF. The key finding is the confirmation that the equation derived from the fundamental quantum description (the GPE) for a BEC has the same mathematical structure as the equation derived from macroscopic, phenomenological reasoning for superfluid helium.

Physics of Fluids•Feb 1, 2026•0 citations

Interaction Effects

Hui Zhai

1. Define Bose-Einstein condensation in an interacting boson system in term of macroscopic occupation. 2. Introduce the Gross-Pitaevskii equation and its applicable conditions. 3. Derive the hydrodynamic equations and various physical consequences of the hydrodynamics with or without harmonic trap. 4. Introduce sound wave and emphasize the difference between the wave behavior and the diffusive behavior. 5. Introduce the criterion for superfluidity and determine the superfluid critical velocity. 6. Introduce two-fluid hydrodynamics. 7. Introduce the Bogoliubov theory. 8. Introduce various concepts related to quasi-particle, including ground state as vacuum of quasi-particles, the zero-point energy of quasi-particle, quasi-particle lifetime and vacuum fluctuation. 9. Introduce healing length as the characteristic length scale for low-energy physics of an interacting Bose condensate. 10. Summarize the difference between an interacting and non-interacting Bose condensate. 11. Introduce the Bragg spectroscopy. 12. Show that the Bogoliubov theory fails in one-dimension due to the infrared divergence. 13. Discuss the basic idea of the Bethe-ansatz solution and the Tonks-Girardeau limit. 14. Introduce scale invariant quantum gases. 15. Introduce the Josephson effect and the self-trapping as two different transport phenomena driven by phase coherence. 16. Discuss the conjugate relation between the relative phase fluctuation and the relative particle number fluctuation, and show strong enough phase fluctuation renders the system into a Fock state. 17. Discuss an example of quantum measurement that can project two independent condensates to a coherent superposition state. 18. Discuss interference effects in density and density-density correlations. 19. Discuss the relation between the instability of the Sch\"odinger Cat state and the stability of symmetry breaking.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Jan 30, 2021•0 citations
Abstract Chapter 13 addresses Bose condensation in superfluids (and superconductors), which involves the field operator ψ having a c-number component (<ψ(x,t)>≠0), challenging number conservation. The nonlinear Gross-Pitaevskii equation is derived for this condensate wave function <ψ>=ψ−ψ˜, facilitating identification of the coherence length and the core region of vortex motion. The noncondensate Green’s function G˜1(1,1′)=−i<(ψ˜(1)ψ˜+(1′))+> and the nonvanishing anomalous correlation function F˜∗(2,1′)=−i<(ψ˜+(2)ψ˜+(1′))+> describe the dynamics and elementary excitations of the non-condensate states and are discussed in conjunction with Landau’s criterion for viscosity. Associated concepts of off-diagonal long-range order and the interpretation of <ψ> as a superfluid order parameter are also introduced. Anderson’s Bose-condensed state, as a phase-coherent wave packet superposition of number states, resolves issues of number conservation. Superconductivity involves bound Cooper pairs of electrons capable of Bose condensation and superfluid behavior. Correspondingly, the two-particle Green’s function has a term involving a product of anomalous bound-Cooper-pair condensate wave functions of the type F(1,2)=−i<(ψ(1)ψ(2))+>≠0, such that G2(1,2;1′,2′)=F(1,2)F+(1′,2′)+G˜2(1,2;1′,2′). Here, G˜2 describes the dynamics/excitations of the non-superfluid-condensate states, while nonvanishing F,F+ represent a phase-coherent wave packet superposition of Cooper-pair number states and off-diagonal long range order. Employing this form of G2 in the G1-equation couples the condensed state with the non-condensate excitations. Taken jointly with the dynamical equation for F(1,2), this leads to the Gorkov equations, encompassing the Bardeen–Cooper–Schrieffer (BCS) energy gap, critical temperature, and Bogoliubov-de Gennes eigenfunction Bogoliubons. Superconductor thermodynamics and critical magnetic field are discussed. For a weak magnetic field, the Gorkov-equations lead to Ginzburg–Landau theory and a nonlinear Schrödinger-like equation for the pair wave function and the associated supercurrent, along with identification of the Cooper pair density. Furthermore, Chapter 13 addresses the apparent lack of gauge invariance of London theory with an elegant variational analysis involving re-gauging the potentials, yielding a manifestly gauge invariant generalization of the London equation. Consistency with the equation of continuity implies the existence of Anderson’s acoustic normal mode, which is supplanted by the plasmon for Coulomb interaction. Type II superconductors and the penetration (and interaction) of quantized magnetic flux lines are also discussed. Finally, Chapter 13 addresses Josephson tunneling between superconductors.
We improve the Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer wave function with a fixed particle number so as to incorporate many-body correlations beyond the mean-field treatment. It is shown that the correlations lower the ground-state energy far more than Cooper-pair condensation in the weak-coupling region. Moreover, they naturally bring a superposition over the number of condensed particles. Thus, Cooper-pair condensation is special among the various bound-state formations of quantum mechanics in that number fluctuations are necessarily present in the condensate through the dynamical exchange of particles with the non-condensate reservoir. On the basis of this result, we propose ΔNcon⋅Δϕ≳1\varDelta N_{\rm con}\cdot \varDelta ϕ\gtrsim 1ΔNcon​⋅Δϕ≳1 as the uncertainty relation relevant to the number-phase fluctuations in superconductors and superfluids, where the number of condensed particles NconN_{\rm con}Ncon​ is used instead of the total particle number NNN. The formula implies that a macroscopic phase ϕϕϕ can be established even in number-fixed superconductors and superfluids since ΔNcon≫1\varDelta N_{\rm con}\gg 1ΔNcon​≫1.
Bosonization of Cooper pairs and novel Bose-liquid superconductivity and superfluidity in high-TcT_cTc​ cuprates and other systems
The criteria for bosonization of Cooper pairs and novel Bose-liquid superconductivity and superfluidity in high-TcT_cTc​ cuprates and other pseudogap matters are formulated by using the uncertainty principle and the boson mean field theory. We argue that the BCS-type s- or d-wave superconductivity occurring in the fermionic limit of Cooper pairs (which exist in ordinary metals and heavily overdoped cuprates with large Fermi energies) is not characteristic of underdoped to overdoped cuprates with low Fermi energies. The superconducting order parameter in high-TcT_cTc​ cuprates and other pseudogap matters cannot be determined as the BCS-like (s- or d-wave) gap. We show that the unconventional superconductivity/superfluidity occurring in the bosonic limit of Cooper pairs exists in low Fermi energy systems where the bosonic Cooper pairs are formed at a pseudogap temperature T* above the uperconducting/superfluid transition temperature TcT_cTc​ and then such bosons condenses into a Bose superfluid at TcT_cTc​. The pair condensation of attracting bosons occurs at TcT_cTc​ and then their single particle condensation sets in at Tc∗T_c^*Tc∗​ lower than TcT_cTc​ (in three dimensions (3D)) or at T=0 (in two dimensions (2D)). The coherent single particle and pair condensates of bosons exist as two distinct superfluid phases below TcT_cTc​. By solving the mean field equations for high-TcT_cTc​ cuprates, the novel superconducting states (i.e., a vortex-like state existing below the temperature Tv=Tc2DT_v=T^{2D}_cTv​=Tc2D​ lower than T* but higher than Tc=Tc3DT_c=T^{3D}_cTc​=Tc3D​ and two superconducting phases below TcT_cTc​) and their properties characterized by the boson superfluid stiffness are determined and compared with the key experimental findings. The novel Bose-liquid superconductivity and superfluidity exists also in other exotic superconductors/superfluids, including quantum liquids, atomic Fermi gases and low-density nuclear matter.
the interaction.In other words, the correlations lower the ground-state energy relatively far more than Cooper-pair condensation for g ≪ 1.This fact implies that, formally speaking, Cooper-pair condensation should be studied only after the correlations effects have been incorporated.We incorporate the correlation effects to show explicitly that the correlations produce finite non-condensed particles in the ground-state, which work as a particle reservoir for the condensate to naturally yield the superposition, in exactly the same way as in the case of interacting Bose-Einstein condensates.[10] Thus, the superposition is a real physical entity that exists in any isolated superconductor or superfluid.Note in this context that the superposition and coherence have so far been discussed mostly in terms of condensed particles alone.[5,7,11,12] This thesis is organized as follows; We will discuss the improved ground-wave function with many-body correlations.Section 2 presents formulation.Section 3 gives numerical results.Section 4 presents concluding remarks.We also present details that deriving the formalism from Appendix.
Abstract The superfluid density ns(T)n_{s}(T)ns​(T) n s ( T ) of a superconductor is calculated based on the generalized Bose–Einstein condensation (GBEC) theory that addresses a fully-interacting ternary boson-fermion gas mixture of free electrons as fermions, plus two-electron Cooper pairs (2eCPs) and also, explicitly, two-hole Cooper pairs (2hCPs), both as bosons. Here we consider two special cases (i) 100%–0% (i.e., with no condensed 2hCPs) and (ii) 0%–100% (i.e., with no condensed 2eCPs). Subsumed in GBEC are the Bardeen–Cooper–Schrieffer (BCS) and Bose–Einstein condensation (BEC) theories along with the BCS-BEC crossover theory extended with 2hCPs. We find that in the weak-coupling regime ns(0)n_{s}(0)ns​(0) n s ( 0 ) agrees with data from the Uemura et al. (2004) graph for several elemental SCs by taking in 3D with a quadratic energy-dispersion relation while in 2D with a linear relation are much too far below the data. In the strong-coupling regime the linear behavior of critical temperature TcT_{c}Tc​ T c vs ns(0)n_{s}(0)ns​(0) n s ( 0 ) obtained here is just as Božović et al. (2016) found. However, in 2D with a linear relation accounting for 0%–100%, ns(T)/ns(0)n_{s}(T)/n_{s}(0)ns​(T)/ns​(0) n s ( T ) / n s ( 0 ) compares well with some high- TcT_{c}Tc​ T c -cuprate SC data between the two coupling regimes.
The aim of this paper is to derive the equations of motion of quantum vortices in a weakly non-ideal Bose–Einstein condensate (BEC) at finite temperatures and in the presence of macroscopic superfluid and normal velocities. The motivation for this work is that the dynamics of quantum vortices in superfluid helium has been studied at the phenomenological level, and a number of issues require clarification, which can be addressed by studying the corresponding problem in BEC. In BEC, quantum vortices are located at points where the macroscopic wave function (MWF) ψ(r,T), which describes the BEC dynamics, vanishes ψ(r,T)=0. The intersection of the surfaces Reψ(r,T)=0 and Imψ(r,T)=0 forms a one-dimensional line, which is just the quantum vortex line. During the evolution of the MWF, the position of the zero surfaces changes, that is, the vortex lines move. Conversely, the motion of these vortex filaments determines the evolution of the MWF. Thus, there is a mutual correspondence, and the quantity ψ(r,T) can be considered as a functional of the entire vortex configuration, i.e., {s(ξ,t)}. This viewpoint allows us to derive the equations of motion for vortices from the Gross–Pitaevskii equation (GPE), which describes the dynamics of MWF. The key finding is the confirmation that the equation derived from the fundamental quantum description (the GPE) for a BEC has the same mathematical structure as the equation derived from macroscopic, phenomenological reasoning for superfluid helium.
1. Define Bose-Einstein condensation in an interacting boson system in term of macroscopic occupation. 2. Introduce the Gross-Pitaevskii equation and its applicable conditions. 3. Derive the hydrodynamic equations and various physical consequences of the hydrodynamics with or without harmonic trap. 4. Introduce sound wave and emphasize the difference between the wave behavior and the diffusive behavior. 5. Introduce the criterion for superfluidity and determine the superfluid critical velocity. 6. Introduce two-fluid hydrodynamics. 7. Introduce the Bogoliubov theory. 8. Introduce various concepts related to quasi-particle, including ground state as vacuum of quasi-particles, the zero-point energy of quasi-particle, quasi-particle lifetime and vacuum fluctuation. 9. Introduce healing length as the characteristic length scale for low-energy physics of an interacting Bose condensate. 10. Summarize the difference between an interacting and non-interacting Bose condensate. 11. Introduce the Bragg spectroscopy. 12. Show that the Bogoliubov theory fails in one-dimension due to the infrared divergence. 13. Discuss the basic idea of the Bethe-ansatz solution and the Tonks-Girardeau limit. 14. Introduce scale invariant quantum gases. 15. Introduce the Josephson effect and the self-trapping as two different transport phenomena driven by phase coherence. 16. Discuss the conjugate relation between the relative phase fluctuation and the relative particle number fluctuation, and show strong enough phase fluctuation renders the system into a Fock state. 17. Discuss an example of quantum measurement that can project two independent condensates to a coherent superposition state. 18. Discuss interference effects in density and density-density correlations. 19. Discuss the relation between the instability of the Sch\"odinger Cat state and the stability of symmetry breaking.