Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Pancharatnam, Bargmann and Berry phases-a retrospective

Narasimhaiengar Mukunda

Published Jan 1, 2000• 1 citation
OpenAlex

Related papers

Pancharatnam Phase and Berry Phase

Michele Cini

UNITEXT for physics•Jan 1, 2018•0 citations

Pancharatnam Phase and Berry Phase

Michele Cini

UNITEXT for physics•Jan 1, 2024•0 citations

Berry's phase and the Pancharatnam angle - some recent observations

Ravi Baijulal Bhandari

•Jan 1, 1989•1 citation

Geometric phase from Aharonov–Bohm to Pancharatnam–Berry and beyond

Eliahu Cohen, Hugo Larocque, Frédéric Bouchard +3 more

arXiv:1912.12596•Nature Reviews Physics•Jun 27, 2019•333 citations

Deciphering Pancharatnam’s discovery of geometric phase: retrospective

Luis A. Garza-Soto, Nathan A. Hagen, Dorilian Lopez-Mago

While Pancharatnam discovered the geometric phase in 1956, his work was not widely recognized until its endorsement by Berry in 1987, after which it received wide appreciation. However, because Pancharatnam's paper is unusually difficult to follow, his work has often been misinterpreted as referring to an evolution of states of polarization, just as Berry's work focused on a cycle of states, even though this consideration does not appear in Pancharatnam's work. We walk the reader through Pancharatnam's original derivation and show how Pancharatnam's approach connects to recent work in geometric phase. It is our hope to make this widely cited classic paper more accessible and better understood.

arXiv:2301.04359•Journal of the Optical Society of America A•Mar 22, 2023•17 citations

Pancharatnam-Berry phase in neutrino mixing

T. M. Manosh, N. Shaji, R. B. Thayyullathil +1 more

The Pancharatnam - Berry phase (PBP) of purely geometric origin appears as a reparametrization invariant quantity of ray Space. In this article, we investigate the properties exhibited by PBP in neutrino mixing. We map the neutrino flavour modes to independent flavour vacuum states and compute PBP using Bargmann invariant. We derive the exact formula for PBP in two flavour approximation using the kinematic approach. Our result reproduces previous results of Blasone et al. under cyclic condition. Inspired by the work of Mukunda and Simon, we investigate the total and dynamical phases separately. This method leads us to identify the existence of nodal points in the mixing parameter space. At nodal points, PBP changes by a value $π$, and it originates from the total phase. We report the direct relation between nodal points and MSW resonance, giving physical meaning to nodal points. Our analysis shows the ability of PBP to differentiate between different mass hierarchies and set numerical bounds to $Δm^2$ by changing total energy. We extend our studies to three flavour model and found that PBP is sensitive to the Dirac $CP$ phase ($δ_{CP}$). Using our $N$-qubit architecture of the $N$-flavour neutrino model, one can immediately study the dynamical characteristics like mode entanglement between neutrino flavour modes.

arXiv:2104.12632•Apr 26, 2021•0 citations
While Pancharatnam discovered the geometric phase in 1956, his work was not widely recognized until its endorsement by Berry in 1987, after which it received wide appreciation. However, because Pancharatnam's paper is unusually difficult to follow, his work has often been misinterpreted as referring to an evolution of states of polarization, just as Berry's work focused on a cycle of states, even though this consideration does not appear in Pancharatnam's work. We walk the reader through Pancharatnam's original derivation and show how Pancharatnam's approach connects to recent work in geometric phase. It is our hope to make this widely cited classic paper more accessible and better understood.
The Pancharatnam - Berry phase (PBP) of purely geometric origin appears as a reparametrization invariant quantity of ray Space. In this article, we investigate the properties exhibited by PBP in neutrino mixing. We map the neutrino flavour modes to independent flavour vacuum states and compute PBP using Bargmann invariant. We derive the exact formula for PBP in two flavour approximation using the kinematic approach. Our result reproduces previous results of Blasone et al. under cyclic condition. Inspired by the work of Mukunda and Simon, we investigate the total and dynamical phases separately. This method leads us to identify the existence of nodal points in the mixing parameter space. At nodal points, PBP changes by a value πππ, and it originates from the total phase. We report the direct relation between nodal points and MSW resonance, giving physical meaning to nodal points. Our analysis shows the ability of PBP to differentiate between different mass hierarchies and set numerical bounds to Δm2Δm^2Δm2 by changing total energy. We extend our studies to three flavour model and found that PBP is sensitive to the Dirac CPCPCP phase (δCPδ_{CP}δCP​). Using our NNN-qubit architecture of the NNN-flavour neutrino model, one can immediately study the dynamical characteristics like mode entanglement between neutrino flavour modes.