Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2104.12632

Pancharatnam-Berry phase in neutrino mixing

T. M. Manosh, N. Shaji, R. B. Thayyullathil, Titus K. Mathew

Published Apr 26, 2021• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The Pancharatnam - Berry phase (PBP) of purely geometric origin appears as a reparametrization invariant quantity of ray Space. In this article, we investigate the properties exhibited by PBP in neutrino mixing. We map the neutrino flavour modes to independent flavour vacuum states and compute PBP using Bargmann invariant. We derive the exact formula for PBP in two flavour approximation using the kinematic approach. Our result reproduces previous results of Blasone et al. under cyclic condition. Inspired by the work of Mukunda and Simon, we investigate the total and dynamical phases separately. This method leads us to identify the existence of nodal points in the mixing parameter space. At nodal points, PBP changes by a value $π$, and it originates from the total phase. We report the direct relation between nodal points and MSW resonance, giving physical meaning to nodal points. Our analysis shows the ability of PBP to differentiate between different mass hierarchies and set numerical bounds to $Δm^2$ by changing total energy. We extend our studies to three flavour model and found that PBP is sensitive to the Dirac $CP$ phase ($δ_{CP}$). Using our $N$-qubit architecture of the $N$-flavour neutrino model, one can immediately study the dynamical characteristics like mode entanglement between neutrino flavour modes.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2104.12632

Related papers

Noncyclic phase for neutrino oscillation

Xiang‐Bin Wang, L. C. Kwek, Yong Liu +1 more

We provide explicit formulas for the noncyclic phases or Pancharatnam phases of neutrino oscillations. Since the Pancharatnam phase is a generalization of the Berry phase, our results generalize the previous findings for the Berry phase in a recent paper [M. Blasone, P. A. Henning, and G. Vitiello, Phys. Lett. B 466 262 (1999)]. Unlike the Berry phase, the noncyclic phase offers a distinctive advantage in terms of measurement and prediction. In particular, for three-flavor mixing, our explicit formula offers an alternative means of determining the CP-violating phase. Our results can also be extended easily to explore the noncyclic phase associated with neutron-antineutron oscillations.

arXiv:hep-ph/0006204•Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields•Feb 5, 2001•23 citations

Geometric phase of neutrinos: Differences between Dirac and Majorana neutrinos

Antonio Capolupo, S. M. Giampaolo, Beatrix C. Hiesmayr +1 more

We analyze the non-cyclic geometric phase for neutrinos. We find that the geometric phase and the total phase associated to the mixing phenomenon provide a theoretical tool to distinguish between Dirac and Majorana neutrinos. Our results hold for neutrinos propagating in vacuum and through the matter. We feed the values of the experimental parameters in our formulas in order to make contact with experiments. Although it remains an open question how the geometric phase of neutrinos could be detected, our theoretical results may open new scenarios in the investigation of the neutrino nature.

arXiv:1610.08679•Physics Letters B•Mar 8, 2018•27 citations

The Pancharatnam-Berry Phase: Theoretical and Experimental Aspects

Francisco De

In 1984 Berry addressed a quantum system undergoing a unitary and cyclic evolution under the action of a time-dependent Hamiltonian (M. V. Berry, 1984). The process was supposed to be adiabatic, meaning that the time scale of the system’s evolution was much shorter than the time scale of the changing Hamiltonian. Until Berry’s study, it was assumed that for a cyclic Hamiltonian the quantum state would acquire only so-called dynamical phases, deprived of physical meaning. Such phases could be eliminated by redefining the quantum state through a “gauge” transformation of the form |ψ〉 → eiα |ψ〉. However, Berry discovered that besides the dynamical, there was an additional phase that could not be “gauged away” and whose origin was geometric or topological. It depended on the path that |ψ〉 describes in the parameter space spanned by those parameters to which the Hamiltonian owed its time dependence. Berry’s discovery was the starting point for a great amount of investigations that brought to light topological aspects of both quantum and classical systems. Berry’s phase was soon recognized as a special case of more general phases that showed up when dealing with topological aspects of different systems. For example, the Aharonov-Bohm phase could be understood as a geometric phase. The rotation angle acquired by a parallel-transported vector after completing a closed loop in a gravitationally curved space-time region, is also a geometric, Berry-like phase. Another example is the precession of the plane of oscillation of a Foucault pendulum. Berry’s original formulation was directly applicable to the case of a spin-1/2 system evolving under the action of a slowly varying magnetic field that undergoes cyclic changes. A spin-1/2 system is a special case of a two-level system. Another instances are two-level atoms and polarized light, so that also in these cases we should expect to find geometric phases. In fact, the first experimental test of Berry’s phase was done using polarized, classical light (A. Tomita, 1986). Pancharatnam (S. Pancharatnam, 1956) anticipated Berry’s phase when he proposed, back in 1956, how to decide whether two polarization states are “in phase”. Pancharatnam’s prescription is an operational one, based upon observing whether the intensity of the interferogram formed by two polarized beams has maximal intensity. In that case, the two polarized beams are said to be “in phase”. Such a definition is analogous to the definition of distant parallelism in differential geometry. Polarized states can be subjected to different transformations which could be cyclic or not, adiabatic or not, unitary or not. The Pancharatnam-Berry Phase: Theoretical and Experimental Aspects

InTech eBooks•Feb 24, 2012•16 citations

Geometric Phases in Two-Level Mixing: From Neutral Mesons to Holonomic Qubits and Topological Majorana Modes

Swarup Sangiri, Utpal Sarkar, A Taraphder

We investigate the geometric structure of a Hermitian two-level mixing Hamiltonian motivated by neutral meson oscillations and its connections with qubit, fermionic, and topological descriptions. Mapping the Hamiltonian to an effective qubit representation, we analyze the geometric phase associated with cyclic parameter evolution on the Bloch sphere. Without identifying the complex mixing phase with a physical CP-violation observable, we interpret it as a CP-like geometric parameter controlling the azimuthal orientation of the Hamiltonian vector and its reversal under phase conjugation. Third-order Bargmann invariants constructed from the eigenstates yield an associated discrete phase whose dependence on the mixing parameters is examined alongside the continuous geometric construction. The cyclic evolution is also represented as a single-qubit $R_z$ phase operation and expressed through Majorana bilinears. Extending the construction to the momentum-dependent Bogoliubov-de Gennes Hamiltonian of the Kitaev chain, we relate momentum-space winding to the topological regimes and the quantized Berry (Zak) phase in the real-parameter model, while the corresponding Bargmann construction approaches the global phase in the continuum limit. Together, these results provide a geometric perspective connecting phase structure, qubit operations, fermionic representations, and momentum-space topology within related two-level Hamiltonians.

hep-phCross-listedarXiv:2609.06857•Sep 8, 2026•0 citations

Analysis of neutrino oscillation parameters in the light on quantum entanglement

Rajrupa Banerjee, Papia Panda, Rukmani Mohanta +1 more

NNumerous neutrino experiments have confirmed the phenomenon of neutrino oscillation, providing direct evidence of the quantum mechanical nature of neutrinos. In this work, we investigate the entanglement properties of neutrino flavor states within the framework of three-flavor neutrino oscillation using two major entanglement measures: entanglement of formation (EOF) and concurrence, utilizing the DUNE experimental setup. Our findings indicate that the maximally entangled state appears between ν μ and ν τ whereas, ν e behaves as a nearly separable state. To further explore the nature of bipartite entanglement, we introduce the concept of the monogamy of entanglement, which allows us to investigate the distinction between genuine three-flavor entanglement and bipartite entanglement. Our analysis confirms that the three-flavor neutrino system forms a bipartite entanglement structure, adhering to the Coffman-Kundu-Wootters (CKW) inequality. Additionally, we implement a minimization procedure to find the best-fit values of the oscillation parameters that correspond to the concurrence minima at the two specific energy points where the concurrence reaches its lowest values. Using these best-fit values, we probe three fundamental unknowns in neutrino oscillation: CP violation sensitivity, neutrino mass hierarchy, and the octant issue of θ 23 , across two distinct energy points. Our results manifest that while the best-fit values obtained through concurrence minimization show slightly reduced sensitivity to CP violation compared to current best-fit values, they exhibit greater sensitivity to the mass hierarchy. Furthermore, the study reveals a maximal mixing angle for the atmospheric sector.

arXiv:2410.05727•Nuclear Physics B•Dec 18, 2025•5 citations

Quantum-circuit simulation of three-flavor neutrino oscillations: vacuum, matter, and CP diagnostics

Daming Li

We simulate three-flavor neutrino oscillations on two-qubit quantum circuits. The flavor space is embedded as $\ket{00}=ν_e$, $\ket{01}=ν_μ$, $\ket{10}=ν_τ$ with the $\ket{11}$ channel kept inert, and the input mixing parameters (NuFIT~5.3, normal ordering, with SK-atm) follow the global fit. We verify three physical settings against analytic or exact references: vacuum propagation, reproduced by a mass-eigenstate phase circuit to $\sim 10^{-16}$; constant-density Mikheev--Smirnov--Wolfenstein (MSW) matter effects, showing resonant flavor conversion when the matter potential $A$ crosses $Δm^2_{31}$; and varying-density (supernova shock-shell) propagation by slicing plus second-order Suzuki--Trotter splitting, with per-slice Trotter error $\sim 10^{-6}$ and total accuracy $\sim 10^{-4}$ against the continuous profile. We report a Suzuki--Trotter precision--resource calibration varying order, step number, and matrix/probability error. It delimits brute-force Trotterization on solar baselines: we quantify both standard alternatives, coherence averaging and adiabatic MSW. We also compute quantum-information diagnostics from the same model parameters, namely mode entanglement and the CP asymmetry. Finally, we extend the framework to open quantum systems via a Lindblad master equation with dephasing and absorptive channels. These results provide a reproducible link between low-energy oscillation observables and quantum-information measures.

quant-pharXiv:2609.30875•Sep 28, 2026•0 citations
The Pancharatnam - Berry phase (PBP) of purely geometric origin appears as a reparametrization invariant quantity of ray Space. In this article, we investigate the properties exhibited by PBP in neutrino mixing. We map the neutrino flavour modes to independent flavour vacuum states and compute PBP using Bargmann invariant. We derive the exact formula for PBP in two flavour approximation using the kinematic approach. Our result reproduces previous results of Blasone et al. under cyclic condition. Inspired by the work of Mukunda and Simon, we investigate the total and dynamical phases separately. This method leads us to identify the existence of nodal points in the mixing parameter space. At nodal points, PBP changes by a value πππ, and it originates from the total phase. We report the direct relation between nodal points and MSW resonance, giving physical meaning to nodal points. Our analysis shows the ability of PBP to differentiate between different mass hierarchies and set numerical bounds to Δm2Δm^2Δm2 by changing total energy. We extend our studies to three flavour model and found that PBP is sensitive to the Dirac CPCPCP phase (δCPδ_{CP}δCP​). Using our NNN-qubit architecture of the NNN-flavour neutrino model, one can immediately study the dynamical characteristics like mode entanglement between neutrino flavour modes.
We provide explicit formulas for the noncyclic phases or Pancharatnam phases of neutrino oscillations. Since the Pancharatnam phase is a generalization of the Berry phase, our results generalize the previous findings for the Berry phase in a recent paper [M. Blasone, P. A. Henning, and G. Vitiello, Phys. Lett. B 466 262 (1999)]. Unlike the Berry phase, the noncyclic phase offers a distinctive advantage in terms of measurement and prediction. In particular, for three-flavor mixing, our explicit formula offers an alternative means of determining the CP-violating phase. Our results can also be extended easily to explore the noncyclic phase associated with neutron-antineutron oscillations.
We analyze the non-cyclic geometric phase for neutrinos. We find that the geometric phase and the total phase associated to the mixing phenomenon provide a theoretical tool to distinguish between Dirac and Majorana neutrinos. Our results hold for neutrinos propagating in vacuum and through the matter. We feed the values of the experimental parameters in our formulas in order to make contact with experiments. Although it remains an open question how the geometric phase of neutrinos could be detected, our theoretical results may open new scenarios in the investigation of the neutrino nature.
In 1984 Berry addressed a quantum system undergoing a unitary and cyclic evolution under the action of a time-dependent Hamiltonian (M. V. Berry, 1984). The process was supposed to be adiabatic, meaning that the time scale of the system’s evolution was much shorter than the time scale of the changing Hamiltonian. Until Berry’s study, it was assumed that for a cyclic Hamiltonian the quantum state would acquire only so-called dynamical phases, deprived of physical meaning. Such phases could be eliminated by redefining the quantum state through a “gauge” transformation of the form |ψ〉 → eiα |ψ〉. However, Berry discovered that besides the dynamical, there was an additional phase that could not be “gauged away” and whose origin was geometric or topological. It depended on the path that |ψ〉 describes in the parameter space spanned by those parameters to which the Hamiltonian owed its time dependence. Berry’s discovery was the starting point for a great amount of investigations that brought to light topological aspects of both quantum and classical systems. Berry’s phase was soon recognized as a special case of more general phases that showed up when dealing with topological aspects of different systems. For example, the Aharonov-Bohm phase could be understood as a geometric phase. The rotation angle acquired by a parallel-transported vector after completing a closed loop in a gravitationally curved space-time region, is also a geometric, Berry-like phase. Another example is the precession of the plane of oscillation of a Foucault pendulum. Berry’s original formulation was directly applicable to the case of a spin-1/2 system evolving under the action of a slowly varying magnetic field that undergoes cyclic changes. A spin-1/2 system is a special case of a two-level system. Another instances are two-level atoms and polarized light, so that also in these cases we should expect to find geometric phases. In fact, the first experimental test of Berry’s phase was done using polarized, classical light (A. Tomita, 1986). Pancharatnam (S. Pancharatnam, 1956) anticipated Berry’s phase when he proposed, back in 1956, how to decide whether two polarization states are “in phase”. Pancharatnam’s prescription is an operational one, based upon observing whether the intensity of the interferogram formed by two polarized beams has maximal intensity. In that case, the two polarized beams are said to be “in phase”. Such a definition is analogous to the definition of distant parallelism in differential geometry. Polarized states can be subjected to different transformations which could be cyclic or not, adiabatic or not, unitary or not. The Pancharatnam-Berry Phase: Theoretical and Experimental Aspects
We investigate the geometric structure of a Hermitian two-level mixing Hamiltonian motivated by neutral meson oscillations and its connections with qubit, fermionic, and topological descriptions. Mapping the Hamiltonian to an effective qubit representation, we analyze the geometric phase associated with cyclic parameter evolution on the Bloch sphere. Without identifying the complex mixing phase with a physical CP-violation observable, we interpret it as a CP-like geometric parameter controlling the azimuthal orientation of the Hamiltonian vector and its reversal under phase conjugation. Third-order Bargmann invariants constructed from the eigenstates yield an associated discrete phase whose dependence on the mixing parameters is examined alongside the continuous geometric construction. The cyclic evolution is also represented as a single-qubit RzR_zRz​ phase operation and expressed through Majorana bilinears. Extending the construction to the momentum-dependent Bogoliubov-de Gennes Hamiltonian of the Kitaev chain, we relate momentum-space winding to the topological regimes and the quantized Berry (Zak) phase in the real-parameter model, while the corresponding Bargmann construction approaches the global phase in the continuum limit. Together, these results provide a geometric perspective connecting phase structure, qubit operations, fermionic representations, and momentum-space topology within related two-level Hamiltonians.
NNumerous neutrino experiments have confirmed the phenomenon of neutrino oscillation, providing direct evidence of the quantum mechanical nature of neutrinos. In this work, we investigate the entanglement properties of neutrino flavor states within the framework of three-flavor neutrino oscillation using two major entanglement measures: entanglement of formation (EOF) and concurrence, utilizing the DUNE experimental setup. Our findings indicate that the maximally entangled state appears between ν μ and ν τ whereas, ν e behaves as a nearly separable state. To further explore the nature of bipartite entanglement, we introduce the concept of the monogamy of entanglement, which allows us to investigate the distinction between genuine three-flavor entanglement and bipartite entanglement. Our analysis confirms that the three-flavor neutrino system forms a bipartite entanglement structure, adhering to the Coffman-Kundu-Wootters (CKW) inequality. Additionally, we implement a minimization procedure to find the best-fit values of the oscillation parameters that correspond to the concurrence minima at the two specific energy points where the concurrence reaches its lowest values. Using these best-fit values, we probe three fundamental unknowns in neutrino oscillation: CP violation sensitivity, neutrino mass hierarchy, and the octant issue of θ 23 , across two distinct energy points. Our results manifest that while the best-fit values obtained through concurrence minimization show slightly reduced sensitivity to CP violation compared to current best-fit values, they exhibit greater sensitivity to the mass hierarchy. Furthermore, the study reveals a maximal mixing angle for the atmospheric sector.
We simulate three-flavor neutrino oscillations on two-qubit quantum circuits. The flavor space is embedded as ∣00⟩=νe\ket{00}=ν_e∣00⟩=νe​, ∣01⟩=νμ\ket{01}=ν_μ∣01⟩=νμ​, ∣10⟩=ντ\ket{10}=ν_τ∣10⟩=ντ​ with the ∣11⟩\ket{11}∣11⟩ channel kept inert, and the input mixing parameters (NuFIT~5.3, normal ordering, with SK-atm) follow the global fit. We verify three physical settings against analytic or exact references: vacuum propagation, reproduced by a mass-eigenstate phase circuit to ∼10−16\sim 10^{-16}∼10−16; constant-density Mikheev--Smirnov--Wolfenstein (MSW) matter effects, showing resonant flavor conversion when the matter potential AAA crosses Δm312Δm^2_{31}Δm312​; and varying-density (supernova shock-shell) propagation by slicing plus second-order Suzuki--Trotter splitting, with per-slice Trotter error ∼10−6\sim 10^{-6}∼10−6 and total accuracy ∼10−4\sim 10^{-4}∼10−4 against the continuous profile. We report a Suzuki--Trotter precision--resource calibration varying order, step number, and matrix/probability error. It delimits brute-force Trotterization on solar baselines: we quantify both standard alternatives, coherence averaging and adiabatic MSW. We also compute quantum-information diagnostics from the same model parameters, namely mode entanglement and the CP asymmetry. Finally, we extend the framework to open quantum systems via a Lindblad master equation with dephasing and absorptive channels. These results provide a reproducible link between low-energy oscillation observables and quantum-information measures.