Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Berry's phase and the Pancharatnam angle - some recent observations

Ravi Baijulal Bhandari

Published Jan 1, 1989• 1 citation
OpenAlex

Related papers

Pancharatnam Phase and Berry Phase

Michele Cini

UNITEXT for physics•Jan 1, 2024•0 citations

Pancharatnam Phase and Berry Phase

Michele Cini

UNITEXT for physics•Jan 1, 2018•0 citations

Pancharatnam, Bargmann and Berry phases-a retrospective

Narasimhaiengar Mukunda

•Jan 1, 2000•1 citation

Geometric phase from Aharonov–Bohm to Pancharatnam–Berry and beyond

Eliahu Cohen, Hugo Larocque, Frédéric Bouchard +3 more

arXiv:1912.12596•Nature Reviews Physics•Jun 27, 2019•333 citations

Pancharatnam-Berry Phase in Quantum Optics

Sarbani Chatterjee

Resonance•Mar 6, 2024•1 citation

Deciphering Pancharatnam’s discovery of geometric phase: retrospective

Luis A. Garza-Soto, Nathan A. Hagen, Dorilian Lopez-Mago

While Pancharatnam discovered the geometric phase in 1956, his work was not widely recognized until its endorsement by Berry in 1987, after which it received wide appreciation. However, because Pancharatnam's paper is unusually difficult to follow, his work has often been misinterpreted as referring to an evolution of states of polarization, just as Berry's work focused on a cycle of states, even though this consideration does not appear in Pancharatnam's work. We walk the reader through Pancharatnam's original derivation and show how Pancharatnam's approach connects to recent work in geometric phase. It is our hope to make this widely cited classic paper more accessible and better understood.

arXiv:2301.04359•Journal of the Optical Society of America A•Mar 22, 2023•17 citations
While Pancharatnam discovered the geometric phase in 1956, his work was not widely recognized until its endorsement by Berry in 1987, after which it received wide appreciation. However, because Pancharatnam's paper is unusually difficult to follow, his work has often been misinterpreted as referring to an evolution of states of polarization, just as Berry's work focused on a cycle of states, even though this consideration does not appear in Pancharatnam's work. We walk the reader through Pancharatnam's original derivation and show how Pancharatnam's approach connects to recent work in geometric phase. It is our hope to make this widely cited classic paper more accessible and better understood.