Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

The algebraic foundations of Dirac notation and path integrals are examined. It is shown that a formulation of quantum mechanics on the basis of the theory of C* alge- bras permits these questions to be analyzed from a common standpoint.

O. G. Mishnev

Published Jan 1, 1982• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

In connection with the existence of irreducible representations of commutation relations which are not equivalent from the unitary standpoint, with a number of degrees of freedom 3N = ~, it is pertinent to study the algebraic foundations of quantum mechanics for the case 3N < ~, i.e., under the applicability conditions of von Neumann's theorem of the unitary equivalence of any representations of commutation relations to the direct sum of Schr~dinger relations. One reason for this situation is that the discussion often involves the limit N--~ V-+~ N/V==-!,so that Von Neumann's theorem does not apply. It is thus interesting to examine the process by which a Hilbert space arises from purely algebraic postulates, without direct appeal to the GNS construction. As we will show below, this question is intimately related to the basis for Dirac notation; we will also see that the well-known representation of the transition amplitude <xt x'l'L~ by a path integral and thus the Feynman construction of quantum mechanics can be given an algebraic footing. These aspects of our results are closely related to a study by Berezin [i], who does not work from the C* algebra of R generated by commutation relations, as we will do, but from representations of the algebras of functions defined in a phase space. We will not attempt to treat the problem in its most general form in this paper. The proofs will be given for some simple examples, but the necessary generalizations are easily made. i. We make a transition from the Weyl basis in the C* algebra of R, X(q p) to the coordiA hate basis D(~ y) and we write the latter out explicitly (h = i)

Related papers

A Review of The Algebraic Approaches to Quantum Mechanics. Appraisals on Their Theoretical Relevance

Antonino Drago

I review the various algebraic foundations of quantum mechanics. They have been suggested since the birth of this theory till up to last year. They are the following ones: Heisenberg-Born-Jordan (1925), Weyl (1928), Dirac (1930), von Neumann (1936), Segal (1947), T.F. Jordan (1986), Morchio and Strocchi (2009) and Buchholz and Fregenhagen (2019). Three cases are stressed: 1) the misinterpretation of Dirac foundation; 2) von Neumann conversion from the analytic approach of Hilbert space to the algebraic approach of the rings of operators; 3) the recent foundation of quantum mechanics upon the algebra of perturbation Lagrangians. Moreover, historical considerations on the go-and-stop path performed by the algebraic approach in the history of QM are offered. The level of formalism has increased from the mere introduction of matrices till up to group theory and C*-algebras. But there was no progress in approaching closer the foundations of physics; therefore the problem of discovering an algebraic formulation of QM organized as a problem-based theory and making use of no more than constructive mathematics is open.

arXiv:2102.00861•Jan 29, 2021•0 citations

Unified Dirac-Von Neumann Formulation of Quantum Mechanics. I. Mathematical Theory

A. R. Marlow

In this paper the results from various areas of mathematical research which are necessary for a consistent unification of the Dirac and von Neumann formulations of quantum mechanics are collected and presented as a single synthesis. For this purpose, direct integral decompositions of Hilbert space must be introduced into Dirac's formulation of spectral theory and representation theory; true unit vectors in the direct integral decomposition spaces replace unnormalizable vectors of infinite length. It then becomes clear that families of modified Dirac projection operators are simply related to the Radon-Nikodym derivative of von Neumann spectral measures. In terms of these mathematical preliminaries a second paper will present the more physical aspects of the resulting unified formulation of quantum mechanics.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Jun 1, 1965•12 citations

Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics

Fumitomo Maeda

Although• quantum mechanics has achieved great success in the explanation of physical phenomena, the mathematics used in quantum mechanics is not rigorous.Unrigorous treatments occur in the case of continuous spectrum.In a Hilbert • space, let A be a self-adjoint operator.When we define the eigenvalue and the eigenelement by the ' ' relation Af=J.f, (1) ' ' h d -. -f(q)=).f(q)2m dq has solutions 2,ri f(q)=ce"Aq for any ;.., But these are not quadratically integrable.E. Hellinger and H. Weyi< 0 have already investigated the problem of continuous spectrum and introduced the " eigendifferential."But they are concerned with a special problem, i. e. bounded quadratic forms and solutions of differential equation.In respect of generality, they do not satisfy.< 2 > E. Fues< 3 > and some other writers<" have used this conception " eigendifferential " in quantum mechanics.But the treatments are either complicated or not rigorous.J. v. Neumann< 5 > has proved that in Hilbert space, for any selfadjoint operator A, there exists a resolution of identity E(;..) such that Af= J:and he has applied this theory to quantum mechanics.Although his theory gave a rigorous mathematical foundation to quantum mechanics, it did not give any interpretation to the representation theory of Dirac's form.Recently I investigated the "theory of vector-valued set functions."This theory removes the difficulties in the treatement of continuous spectrum, and gives a rigorous interpretation to the representation theory.< 5 > The vector-valued set function q(U) is a function of set U, and its functional value is an element (vector) in the Hilbert ,space, (1) E. Hellinger [l], 231-271.H. Weyl [1], 238-251.(2) T. Carlemann used this conception "eigendifferential" in the treatise of singular integral equations.Cf.T. Carlemann [1].(3) E. Fues [1], 295-303.(4) For example, L. de Broglie [2], 140-159.(5) J. v. Neumann [1], 53-121.(6) F. Maeda [2], [5], [6].A summary of the theory of vector-valued set functions is given in the first part Qf the present paper.(1) G. Temple has formulated a principle of quantum theory in which projective operators are given priority over self-adjoint operators.(C(.G. Temple [1)).But. the .whole discussion differs from that of my present paper.

Hiroshima Mathematical Journal•Jan 1, 1937•48 citations

Quantum mechanics, functional integrals

Lowell S. Brown

Quantum field theories are quantum mechanical systems with an infinite number of degrees of freedom. We start this book with a review of quantum mechanics in a form that is particularly suited for the field theory generalization. This form utilizes the Heisenberg picture and the functional integral representation of probability amplitudes — the transformation functions of Dirac. Some time will be spent developing and discussing the functional or path integral representation of quantum mechanics since this will enable us to learn a new formalism in a simple and familiar physical context — we won't have to learn too many new things all at once. The functional formulation will be illustrated by applying it at some length to the harmonic oscillator which is not only the simplest (and exactly soluble) non-trivial quantum system but which is also the dynamics of a single mode of a free field theory. The purpose of this review of quantum mechanics is to introduce in the simplest form much of the notation and methods used later in the book. Throughout this chapter we will explicitly work only with systems that have a single degree of freedom (one coordinate variable). The extension to systems with several degrees of freedom is straightforward.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Sep 10, 1992•0 citations

Is the C*-Algebraic Approach to Quantum Mechanics an Alternative Formulation to the Dominant One?

Antonino Drago

Since 1947 a foundation of Quantum Mechanics (QM) on functional analysis was suggested by Segal. By defining the C*-algebra of the observables, then the Gelfand-Naimark-Segal theorem faithfully represents this algebra into Hilbert space. In the 70’s Emch has reiterated this formulation and improved it. Recently Strocchi improved it even more. First, he suggested an axiomatization of the paradigmatic Dirac-von Neumann’s formulation of QM to which he addresses two basic criticisms, i.e. a weak linkage with the experimental basis of theoretical physics and the obscurity about the separation mark between classical mechanics and QM. Afterwards, through an analysis of the experimental basis of a physical theory he suggests an explanation of Segal’s restriction of the operators to be bounded. Eventually, he represents this algebra into Hilbert space and at last, by means of Weyl algebra he obtains the symmetries of the dynamics of a particle theory. In fact, several characteristic features of this formulation correspond to those determined by the two choices which are the alternative ones to the choices of the dominant formulation. It is a problem-based theory, since it starts rather from than axioms a problem (i.e. the indeterminacy); then, it argues through both doubly negated propositions and an ad absurdum proof. Moreover, its theoretical development is similar to that of an alternative classical theory since it put, before the geometry, the algebra; the bounded operators are represented by a polynomial algebra; which pertains to constructive mathematics. Eventually, he obtains the symmetries of the theory. The problems to be overcome in order to accurately re-construct his formulation according to the two alternative choices which are listed. It is concluded that rather an alternative role, it plays a complementary role to the paradigmatic formulation.

Advances in Historical Studies•Jan 1, 2018•1 citation

Mathematical Formalism of Quantum Mechanics

Reinhold A. Bertlmann, Nicolai Friis

Abstract In this chapter we present the mathematical framework of describing wave functions as vectors in a Hilbert space and observables as Hermitian operators on such a vector space. We describe the mathematical formulation of these ideas for finite and infinite-dimensional cases via the Dirac notation, and discuss the example of the Hilbert space of photon polarization. Important classes of linear operators on Hilbert spaces are discussed, including projectors, Hermitian and self-adjoint operators, as well as unitary operators. As an important centre piece for the mathematical language of quantum mechanics we present the spectral theorem. We discuss the subtleties of this framework in infinite dimensions, giving a brief overview of the distributional aspects of quantum mechanics and the conceptually important problem of finding self-adjoint extensions via the Weyl-von Neumann theorem

•Sep 7, 2023•0 citations
In connection with the existence of irreducible representations of commutation relations which are not equivalent from the unitary standpoint, with a number of degrees of freedom 3N = , it is pertinent to study the algebraic foundations of quantum mechanics for the case 3N < , i.e., under the applicability conditions of von Neumann's theorem of the unitary equivalence of any representations of commutation relations to the direct sum of Schrdinger relations. One reason for this situation is that the discussion often involves the limit N-- V-+~ N/V==-!,so that Von Neumann's theorem does not apply. It is thus interesting to examine the process by which a Hilbert space arises from purely algebraic postulates, without direct appeal to the GNS construction. As we will show below, this question is intimately related to the basis for Dirac notation; we will also see that the well-known representation of the transition amplitude <xt x'l'L~ by a path integral and thus the Feynman construction of quantum mechanics can be given an algebraic footing. These aspects of our results are closely related to a study by Berezin [i], who does not work from the C* algebra of R generated by commutation relations, as we will do, but from representations of the algebras of functions defined in a phase space. We will not attempt to treat the problem in its most general form in this paper. The proofs will be given for some simple examples, but the necessary generalizations are easily made. i. We make a transition from the Weyl basis in the C* algebra of R, X(q p) to the coordiA hate basis D(~ y) and we write the latter out explicitly (h = i)
I review the various algebraic foundations of quantum mechanics. They have been suggested since the birth of this theory till up to last year. They are the following ones: Heisenberg-Born-Jordan (1925), Weyl (1928), Dirac (1930), von Neumann (1936), Segal (1947), T.F. Jordan (1986), Morchio and Strocchi (2009) and Buchholz and Fregenhagen (2019). Three cases are stressed: 1) the misinterpretation of Dirac foundation; 2) von Neumann conversion from the analytic approach of Hilbert space to the algebraic approach of the rings of operators; 3) the recent foundation of quantum mechanics upon the algebra of perturbation Lagrangians. Moreover, historical considerations on the go-and-stop path performed by the algebraic approach in the history of QM are offered. The level of formalism has increased from the mere introduction of matrices till up to group theory and C*-algebras. But there was no progress in approaching closer the foundations of physics; therefore the problem of discovering an algebraic formulation of QM organized as a problem-based theory and making use of no more than constructive mathematics is open.
In this paper the results from various areas of mathematical research which are necessary for a consistent unification of the Dirac and von Neumann formulations of quantum mechanics are collected and presented as a single synthesis. For this purpose, direct integral decompositions of Hilbert space must be introduced into Dirac's formulation of spectral theory and representation theory; true unit vectors in the direct integral decomposition spaces replace unnormalizable vectors of infinite length. It then becomes clear that families of modified Dirac projection operators are simply related to the Radon-Nikodym derivative of von Neumann spectral measures. In terms of these mathematical preliminaries a second paper will present the more physical aspects of the resulting unified formulation of quantum mechanics.
Although• quantum mechanics has achieved great success in the explanation of physical phenomena, the mathematics used in quantum mechanics is not rigorous.Unrigorous treatments occur in the case of continuous spectrum.In a Hilbert • space, let A be a self-adjoint operator.When we define the eigenvalue and the eigenelement by the ' ' relation Af=J.f, (1) ' ' h d -. -f(q)=).f(q)2m dq has solutions 2,ri f(q)=ce"Aq for any ;.., But these are not quadratically integrable.E. Hellinger and H. Weyi< 0 have already investigated the problem of continuous spectrum and introduced the " eigendifferential."But they are concerned with a special problem, i. e. bounded quadratic forms and solutions of differential equation.In respect of generality, they do not satisfy.< 2 > E. Fues< 3 > and some other writers<" have used this conception " eigendifferential " in quantum mechanics.But the treatments are either complicated or not rigorous.J. v. Neumann< 5 > has proved that in Hilbert space, for any selfadjoint operator A, there exists a resolution of identity E(;..) such that Af= J:and he has applied this theory to quantum mechanics.Although his theory gave a rigorous mathematical foundation to quantum mechanics, it did not give any interpretation to the representation theory of Dirac's form.Recently I investigated the "theory of vector-valued set functions."This theory removes the difficulties in the treatement of continuous spectrum, and gives a rigorous interpretation to the representation theory.< 5 > The vector-valued set function q(U) is a function of set U, and its functional value is an element (vector) in the Hilbert ,space, (1) E. Hellinger [l], 231-271.H. Weyl [1], 238-251.(2) T. Carlemann used this conception "eigendifferential" in the treatise of singular integral equations.Cf.T. Carlemann [1].(3) E. Fues [1], 295-303.(4) For example, L. de Broglie [2], 140-159.(5) J. v. Neumann [1], 53-121.(6) F. Maeda [2], [5], [6].A summary of the theory of vector-valued set functions is given in the first part Qf the present paper.(1) G. Temple has formulated a principle of quantum theory in which projective operators are given priority over self-adjoint operators.(C(.G. Temple [1)).But. the .whole discussion differs from that of my present paper.
Quantum field theories are quantum mechanical systems with an infinite number of degrees of freedom. We start this book with a review of quantum mechanics in a form that is particularly suited for the field theory generalization. This form utilizes the Heisenberg picture and the functional integral representation of probability amplitudes — the transformation functions of Dirac. Some time will be spent developing and discussing the functional or path integral representation of quantum mechanics since this will enable us to learn a new formalism in a simple and familiar physical context — we won't have to learn too many new things all at once. The functional formulation will be illustrated by applying it at some length to the harmonic oscillator which is not only the simplest (and exactly soluble) non-trivial quantum system but which is also the dynamics of a single mode of a free field theory. The purpose of this review of quantum mechanics is to introduce in the simplest form much of the notation and methods used later in the book. Throughout this chapter we will explicitly work only with systems that have a single degree of freedom (one coordinate variable). The extension to systems with several degrees of freedom is straightforward.
Since 1947 a foundation of Quantum Mechanics (QM) on functional analysis was suggested by Segal. By defining the C*-algebra of the observables, then the Gelfand-Naimark-Segal theorem faithfully represents this algebra into Hilbert space. In the 70’s Emch has reiterated this formulation and improved it. Recently Strocchi improved it even more. First, he suggested an axiomatization of the paradigmatic Dirac-von Neumann’s formulation of QM to which he addresses two basic criticisms, i.e. a weak linkage with the experimental basis of theoretical physics and the obscurity about the separation mark between classical mechanics and QM. Afterwards, through an analysis of the experimental basis of a physical theory he suggests an explanation of Segal’s restriction of the operators to be bounded. Eventually, he represents this algebra into Hilbert space and at last, by means of Weyl algebra he obtains the symmetries of the dynamics of a particle theory. In fact, several characteristic features of this formulation correspond to those determined by the two choices which are the alternative ones to the choices of the dominant formulation. It is a problem-based theory, since it starts rather from than axioms a problem (i.e. the indeterminacy); then, it argues through both doubly negated propositions and an ad absurdum proof. Moreover, its theoretical development is similar to that of an alternative classical theory since it put, before the geometry, the algebra; the bounded operators are represented by a polynomial algebra; which pertains to constructive mathematics. Eventually, he obtains the symmetries of the theory. The problems to be overcome in order to accurately re-construct his formulation according to the two alternative choices which are listed. It is concluded that rather an alternative role, it plays a complementary role to the paradigmatic formulation.
Abstract In this chapter we present the mathematical framework of describing wave functions as vectors in a Hilbert space and observables as Hermitian operators on such a vector space. We describe the mathematical formulation of these ideas for finite and infinite-dimensional cases via the Dirac notation, and discuss the example of the Hilbert space of photon polarization. Important classes of linear operators on Hilbert spaces are discussed, including projectors, Hermitian and self-adjoint operators, as well as unitary operators. As an important centre piece for the mathematical language of quantum mechanics we present the spectral theorem. We discuss the subtleties of this framework in infinite dimensions, giving a brief overview of the distributional aspects of quantum mechanics and the conceptually important problem of finding self-adjoint extensions via the Weyl-von Neumann theorem