Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Hiroshima Mathematical Journal

Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics

Fumitomo Maeda

Published Jan 1, 1937• 48 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Although• quantum mechanics has achieved great success in the explanation of physical phenomena, the mathematics used in quantum mechanics is not rigorous.Unrigorous treatments occur in the case of continuous spectrum.In a Hilbert • space, let A be a self-adjoint operator.When we define the eigenvalue and the eigenelement by the ' ' relation Af=J.f, (1) ' ' h d -. -f(q)=).f(q)2m dq has solutions 2,ri f(q)=ce"Aq for any ;.., But these are not quadratically integrable.E. Hellinger and H. Weyi< 0 have already investigated the problem of continuous spectrum and introduced the " eigendifferential."But they are concerned with a special problem, i. e. bounded quadratic forms and solutions of differential equation.In respect of generality, they do not satisfy.< 2 > E. Fues< 3 > and some other writers<" have used this conception " eigendifferential " in quantum mechanics.But the treatments are either complicated or not rigorous.J. v. Neumann< 5 > has proved that in Hilbert space, for any selfadjoint operator A, there exists a resolution of identity E(;..) such that Af= J:and he has applied this theory to quantum mechanics.Although his theory gave a rigorous mathematical foundation to quantum mechanics, it did not give any interpretation to the representation theory of Dirac's form.Recently I investigated the "theory of vector-valued set functions."This theory removes the difficulties in the treatement of continuous spectrum, and gives a rigorous interpretation to the representation theory.< 5 > The vector-valued set function q(U) is a function of set U, and its functional value is an element (vector) in the Hilbert ,space, (1) E. Hellinger [l], 231-271.H. Weyl [1], 238-251.(2) T. Carlemann used this conception "eigendifferential" in the treatise of singular integral equations.Cf.T. Carlemann [1].(3) E. Fues [1], 295-303.(4) For example, L. de Broglie [2], 140-159.(5) J. v. Neumann [1], 53-121.(6) F. Maeda [2], [5], [6].A summary of the theory of vector-valued set functions is given in the first part Qf the present paper.(1) G. Temple has formulated a principle of quantum theory in which projective operators are given priority over self-adjoint operators.(C(.G. Temple [1)).But. the .whole discussion differs from that of my present paper.

DOI
10.32917/hmj/1558576822

Related papers

Quantum Scattering Theory

Harish Parthasarathy

After a fairly rigorous mathematical formulation of quantum mechanics based on transformation theory by Dirac in which he cast Heisenberg’s matrix mechanics and Schrodinger’s wave mechanics on a common operator theoretic setting and successfully explained their equivalence, it was John Von Neumann in monumental treatise “Mathematical foundations of quantum mechanics” who proved the spectral theorem for all self adjoint operators in an infinite dimensional Hilbert space and thereby cast the masterly work of Dirac “The principles of quantum mechanics“ in a way that even pure mathematicians were able to understand. Dirac in his book had also indicated the work of Jordan and Heisenberg on quantum scattering theory but without the modern method of wave operators. Lippmann and Schwinger gave a more rigorous discussion of scattering theory via the introduction of free particle states and scattered states. Actually, free particle states are not square integrable and hence cannot strictly be termed as states. However by the use of wave operators the equations of Lippmann and Schwinger could be made rigorous using the setting of the continuous spectrum of a self-adjoint opearator introduced by Von Neumann, Crucial to this development is the notion of the domain of definition of an unbounded operator. This leads to the fact that the wave operators that appear in scattering theory are not defined on all vectors but usually on those vectors that belong to the continuous spectrum of the free particle Hamiltonian. Today scattering theory is a well developed subject and the interested reader can get a good grasp of this subject from the books 1 Tosio Kato, “Perturbation theory for linear operators”, Springer. 2 Werner O. Amrein, “Hilbert space methods in quantum mechanics”, CRC press, 2012.

CRC Press eBooks•Sep 14, 2022•7 citations

Dirac space

Gaisi Takeuti

As is well-known, Dirac [1 gave a very elegant foundation of quantum mechanics, which contained however some self-contradictory concepts from the mathematical point of view.J. von Neumann gave another foundation of the theory based upon his spectral theory of self-adjoint operators of Hilbert space.However the whole spec- tral theory is in fact not necessary and what Dirac actually needs 1 d is only that the self-adjoint operators t. and could be put in i dt diagonal forms.There is also another justification of "improper" iunctions introduced by Dirac to put these operators in the diagonal forms by means of the theory of distributions of L. Schwartz.But

Proceedings of the Japan Academy Series A Mathematical Sciences•Jan 1, 1962•6 citations

Application of nonstandard analysis to quantum mechanics

M. O. Farrukh

Quantum mechanics is formulated using a nonstandard Hilbert space. The concept of an eigen vector of a linear operator, which applies to standard as well as nonstandard Hilbert spaces, is replaced by the more general concept of an ultra eigen vector, which applies to nonstandard Hilbert spaces alone. Ultra eigen vectors corresponding to all spectral points of internal self−adjoint operators are proved to exist. This result enables us to set up a formalism which is equally valid for the discrete, as well as the continuous spectrum. Finally, Dirac’s formalism is reproduced, in a rigorous form within the nonstandard Hilbert space structure.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Feb 1, 1975•30 citations

Mathematical Formalism of Quantum Mechanics

Reinhold A. Bertlmann, Nicolai Friis

Abstract In this chapter we present the mathematical framework of describing wave functions as vectors in a Hilbert space and observables as Hermitian operators on such a vector space. We describe the mathematical formulation of these ideas for finite and infinite-dimensional cases via the Dirac notation, and discuss the example of the Hilbert space of photon polarization. Important classes of linear operators on Hilbert spaces are discussed, including projectors, Hermitian and self-adjoint operators, as well as unitary operators. As an important centre piece for the mathematical language of quantum mechanics we present the spectral theorem. We discuss the subtleties of this framework in infinite dimensions, giving a brief overview of the distributional aspects of quantum mechanics and the conceptually important problem of finding self-adjoint extensions via the Weyl-von Neumann theorem

•Sep 7, 2023•0 citations

Unbounded Self-Adjoint Operators And Quadratic Forms

Gerald W Johnson, Michel L Lapidus

Abstract The object of this book is to present the new quantum mechanics in a unified representation which, so far as it is possible and useful, is mathematically rigorous [A]presentation of the mathematical tools necessary for the purposes of this theory will be given, i.e., a theory of Hilbert spaces and the so-called Hermitian [or self-adjoint] operators. To this end, an accurate introduction to unbounded operators is also necessary; that is, an extension of the theory beyond its classical limits (developed by Hilbert and E. Hellinger, F. Riesz, E. Schmidt, 0. Toeplitz). The following may be said regarding the method employed in this type of treatment: as a rule, calculations should be performed with the operators themselves (which represent physical quantities) and not with the matrices, which, after the introduction of a (special and arbitrary) coordinate system in Hilbert space, result from them. This “coordinate free” (i.e., invariant) method, with its strongly geometric language, possesses noticeable formal advantages.

•Mar 16, 2000•0 citations

Introduction

Giacomo Mauro D’Ariano, Giulio Chiribella, Paolo Perinotti

Quantum theory is the soul of contemporary physics. It was discovered in an adventurous way, under the urge to solve the puzzles posed by atomic spectra and blackbody radiation. But after its invention, it immediately became clear that it was not just a theory of specific physical systems: it was rather a new language of universal applicability. Already in 1928, the theory had received solid mathematical foundations by Hilbert, von Neumann, and Nordheim, and this work was brought to completion in the monumental work of von Neumann, in the form that we still study nowadays. The theory is extraordinarily successful, and its predictions have been confirmed to an astonishing level of precision in a large spectrum of experiments. However, almost 90 years after von Neumann's book, quantum theory remains mysterious. Its mathematical formulation – based on Hilbert spaces and self-adjoint operators – is far from having an intuitive interpretation. The association of physical systems to Hilbert spaces whose unit vectors represent pure states, the representation of transformations by unitary operators and of observables by self-adjoint operators – all such postulates look artificial and ad hoc . A slightly more operational approach is provided by the C * -algebraic formulation of quantum theory – still, this formulation relies on the assumption that observables form an algebra , where the physical meanings of the multiplication and the sum are far from clear. In short, the postulates of quantum theory impose mathematical structures without providing any simple reason for this choice: the mathematics of Hilbert spaces is adopted as a magic blackbox that “works well” at producing experimental predictions. However, in a satisfactory axiomatization of a physical theory the mathematical structures should emerge as a consequence of postulates that have a direct physical interpretation. By this we mean postulates referring, e.g., to primitive notions like physical system, measurement, or process, rather than notions like, e.g., Hilbert space, C * -algebra, unit vector, or selfadjoint operator. The crucial question thus remains unanswered: why quantum theory? Which are the principles at the basis of the theory? A case that is often invoked in contrast is that of Special Relativity theory, which directly follows from the simple understandable principle of relativity.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Nov 2, 2016•0 citations
Although• quantum mechanics has achieved great success in the explanation of physical phenomena, the mathematics used in quantum mechanics is not rigorous.Unrigorous treatments occur in the case of continuous spectrum.In a Hilbert • space, let A be a self-adjoint operator.When we define the eigenvalue and the eigenelement by the ' ' relation Af=J.f, (1) ' ' h d -. -f(q)=).f(q)2m dq has solutions 2,ri f(q)=ce"Aq for any ;.., But these are not quadratically integrable.E. Hellinger and H. Weyi< 0 have already investigated the problem of continuous spectrum and introduced the " eigendifferential."But they are concerned with a special problem, i. e. bounded quadratic forms and solutions of differential equation.In respect of generality, they do not satisfy.< 2 > E. Fues< 3 > and some other writers<" have used this conception " eigendifferential " in quantum mechanics.But the treatments are either complicated or not rigorous.J. v. Neumann< 5 > has proved that in Hilbert space, for any selfadjoint operator A, there exists a resolution of identity E(;..) such that Af= J:and he has applied this theory to quantum mechanics.Although his theory gave a rigorous mathematical foundation to quantum mechanics, it did not give any interpretation to the representation theory of Dirac's form.Recently I investigated the "theory of vector-valued set functions."This theory removes the difficulties in the treatement of continuous spectrum, and gives a rigorous interpretation to the representation theory.< 5 > The vector-valued set function q(U) is a function of set U, and its functional value is an element (vector) in the Hilbert ,space, (1) E. Hellinger [l], 231-271.H. Weyl [1], 238-251.(2) T. Carlemann used this conception "eigendifferential" in the treatise of singular integral equations.Cf.T. Carlemann [1].(3) E. Fues [1], 295-303.(4) For example, L. de Broglie [2], 140-159.(5) J. v. Neumann [1], 53-121.(6) F. Maeda [2], [5], [6].A summary of the theory of vector-valued set functions is given in the first part Qf the present paper.(1) G. Temple has formulated a principle of quantum theory in which projective operators are given priority over self-adjoint operators.(C(.G. Temple [1)).But. the .whole discussion differs from that of my present paper.
After a fairly rigorous mathematical formulation of quantum mechanics based on transformation theory by Dirac in which he cast Heisenberg’s matrix mechanics and Schrodinger’s wave mechanics on a common operator theoretic setting and successfully explained their equivalence, it was John Von Neumann in monumental treatise “Mathematical foundations of quantum mechanics” who proved the spectral theorem for all self adjoint operators in an infinite dimensional Hilbert space and thereby cast the masterly work of Dirac “The principles of quantum mechanics“ in a way that even pure mathematicians were able to understand. Dirac in his book had also indicated the work of Jordan and Heisenberg on quantum scattering theory but without the modern method of wave operators. Lippmann and Schwinger gave a more rigorous discussion of scattering theory via the introduction of free particle states and scattered states. Actually, free particle states are not square integrable and hence cannot strictly be termed as states. However by the use of wave operators the equations of Lippmann and Schwinger could be made rigorous using the setting of the continuous spectrum of a self-adjoint opearator introduced by Von Neumann, Crucial to this development is the notion of the domain of definition of an unbounded operator. This leads to the fact that the wave operators that appear in scattering theory are not defined on all vectors but usually on those vectors that belong to the continuous spectrum of the free particle Hamiltonian. Today scattering theory is a well developed subject and the interested reader can get a good grasp of this subject from the books 1 Tosio Kato, “Perturbation theory for linear operators”, Springer. 2 Werner O. Amrein, “Hilbert space methods in quantum mechanics”, CRC press, 2012.
As is well-known, Dirac [1 gave a very elegant foundation of quantum mechanics, which contained however some self-contradictory concepts from the mathematical point of view.J. von Neumann gave another foundation of the theory based upon his spectral theory of self-adjoint operators of Hilbert space.However the whole spec- tral theory is in fact not necessary and what Dirac actually needs 1 d is only that the self-adjoint operators t. and could be put in i dt diagonal forms.There is also another justification of "improper" iunctions introduced by Dirac to put these operators in the diagonal forms by means of the theory of distributions of L. Schwartz.But
Quantum mechanics is formulated using a nonstandard Hilbert space. The concept of an eigen vector of a linear operator, which applies to standard as well as nonstandard Hilbert spaces, is replaced by the more general concept of an ultra eigen vector, which applies to nonstandard Hilbert spaces alone. Ultra eigen vectors corresponding to all spectral points of internal self−adjoint operators are proved to exist. This result enables us to set up a formalism which is equally valid for the discrete, as well as the continuous spectrum. Finally, Dirac’s formalism is reproduced, in a rigorous form within the nonstandard Hilbert space structure.
Abstract In this chapter we present the mathematical framework of describing wave functions as vectors in a Hilbert space and observables as Hermitian operators on such a vector space. We describe the mathematical formulation of these ideas for finite and infinite-dimensional cases via the Dirac notation, and discuss the example of the Hilbert space of photon polarization. Important classes of linear operators on Hilbert spaces are discussed, including projectors, Hermitian and self-adjoint operators, as well as unitary operators. As an important centre piece for the mathematical language of quantum mechanics we present the spectral theorem. We discuss the subtleties of this framework in infinite dimensions, giving a brief overview of the distributional aspects of quantum mechanics and the conceptually important problem of finding self-adjoint extensions via the Weyl-von Neumann theorem
Abstract The object of this book is to present the new quantum mechanics in a unified representation which, so far as it is possible and useful, is mathematically rigorous [A]presentation of the mathematical tools necessary for the purposes of this theory will be given, i.e., a theory of Hilbert spaces and the so-called Hermitian [or self-adjoint] operators. To this end, an accurate introduction to unbounded operators is also necessary; that is, an extension of the theory beyond its classical limits (developed by Hilbert and E. Hellinger, F. Riesz, E. Schmidt, 0. Toeplitz). The following may be said regarding the method employed in this type of treatment: as a rule, calculations should be performed with the operators themselves (which represent physical quantities) and not with the matrices, which, after the introduction of a (special and arbitrary) coordinate system in Hilbert space, result from them. This “coordinate free” (i.e., invariant) method, with its strongly geometric language, possesses noticeable formal advantages.
Quantum theory is the soul of contemporary physics. It was discovered in an adventurous way, under the urge to solve the puzzles posed by atomic spectra and blackbody radiation. But after its invention, it immediately became clear that it was not just a theory of specific physical systems: it was rather a new language of universal applicability. Already in 1928, the theory had received solid mathematical foundations by Hilbert, von Neumann, and Nordheim, and this work was brought to completion in the monumental work of von Neumann, in the form that we still study nowadays. The theory is extraordinarily successful, and its predictions have been confirmed to an astonishing level of precision in a large spectrum of experiments. However, almost 90 years after von Neumann's book, quantum theory remains mysterious. Its mathematical formulation – based on Hilbert spaces and self-adjoint operators – is far from having an intuitive interpretation. The association of physical systems to Hilbert spaces whose unit vectors represent pure states, the representation of transformations by unitary operators and of observables by self-adjoint operators – all such postulates look artificial and ad hoc . A slightly more operational approach is provided by the C * -algebraic formulation of quantum theory – still, this formulation relies on the assumption that observables form an algebra , where the physical meanings of the multiplication and the sum are far from clear. In short, the postulates of quantum theory impose mathematical structures without providing any simple reason for this choice: the mathematics of Hilbert spaces is adopted as a magic blackbox that “works well” at producing experimental predictions. However, in a satisfactory axiomatization of a physical theory the mathematical structures should emerge as a consequence of postulates that have a direct physical interpretation. By this we mean postulates referring, e.g., to primitive notions like physical system, measurement, or process, rather than notions like, e.g., Hilbert space, C * -algebra, unit vector, or selfadjoint operator. The crucial question thus remains unanswered: why quantum theory? Which are the principles at the basis of the theory? A case that is often invoked in contrast is that of Special Relativity theory, which directly follows from the simple understandable principle of relativity.