CRC Press eBooks

The Schrodinger picture

Dževad Belkić

Published Jan 15, 2020• 0 citations

Abstract

On the level of quantum phenomena, there is no precise possibility of separating an examined physical system from a measuring instrument. This fact lends support to the assertion that the evolution of a quantum system ceases to be rigorously causal from the moment when the system is subjected to investigation. A quantum measurement is special in that it always causes a jump in the system under study to an eigenstate of the considered variable. Possible interactions between the measuring and measured objects will be neglected, so that a given quantum system, which is free from any disturbances, e.g. measurements or other perturbations, will evolve in a rigorously predictable manner. Globally speaking, a quantum-mechanical scheme of description of physical phenomena can be summarized by introducing the so-called Schrödinger picture. A physical field is obtained when a given physical feature is attributed to each point of a space in which the process under study is developing.

DOI: 10.1201/9780429146497-7

Related papers

The quantum world and the completeness of quantum mechanics

James T. Cushing

What does not satisfy me in that theory [quantum mechanics], from the standpoint of principle, is its attitude towards that which appears to me to be the programmatic aim of all physics: the complete description of any (individual) real situation (as it supposedly exists irrespective of any act of observation or substantiation). Albert Einstein, Reply to Criticisms [This] implies the impossibility of any sharp separation between the behaviour of atomic objects and the interaction with the measuring instruments which serve to define the conditions under which the phenomena appear . In fact, the individuality of the typical quantum effects finds its proper expression in the circumstance that any attempt of subdividing the phenomena will demand a change in the experimental arrangement introducing new possibilities of interaction between objects and measuring instruments which in principle cannot be controlled. Consequently, evidence obtained under different experimental conditions cannot be comprehended within a single picture, but must be regarded as complementary in the sense that only the totality of the phenomena exhausts the possible information about the objects. Indeed the finite interaction between object and measuring agencies conditioned by the very existence of the quantum of action entails – because of the impossibility of controlling the reaction of the object on the measuring instruments, if these are to serve their purpose – the necessity of a final renunciation of the classical idea of causality and a radical revision of our attitude towards the problem of physical reality. […]

Cambridge University Press eBooksJan 29, 19980 citations

Measurements and paradoxes

Keith Hannabuss

Abstract We noted in Section 6.5 that quantum measurements change the system which is measured. The abrupt change of state caused by a measurement is quite different from the steady evolution described by Schrodinger’s equation, and this shows up particularly clearly if we imagine carrying out frequent repeated measurements on an evolving system.

Mar 20, 19970 citations

Time evolution of quantum systems

Dževad Belkić

In non-relativistic quantum mechanics, there exist several different ways of describing the time dependence of dynamics of physical systems. Of particular importance for quantum scattering theory are the Schrodinger, Heisenberg and Dirac pictures. For establishing a connection between quantum mechanical formalisms and classical mechanics, as well as for investigating relativistic solutions, the Heisenberg picture appears to be the most convenient. This picture of quantum mechanics is particularly adapted for the examination of free fields. The customary wave-mechanical version of quantum theory is obtained if we choose, e.g., in the framework of the Schrodinger picture to work with the coordinate representation. Possible results of measurements on a quantum system are called eigenvalues. To each of the latter values corresponds one or more eigenstates. An eigenstate is degenerate when more than one eigenstate correspond to a single eigenvalue.

CRC Press eBooksJan 15, 20200 citations

Quantum Measurement

Bob Coecke, Aleks Kissinger

A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it. – Max Planck, 1936 The only way quantum theory allows us to interact with quantum systems is via quantum processes. Thus, the only way we can extract information about the state of a quantum system is to apply some non-deterministic process and observe which of the branches happened. For that reason, many people refer to the act of applying certain quantum processes as measurement and sometimes even as observation . A consequence of this unfortunate terminology is that one of the most touted ‘strange’ features of quantum theory is often misleadingly described as follows: ‘The mere act of observing a quantum state changes it.’ ‘Misleading’, since the concept of measurement described in the previous paragraph is far from the passive concept of observation familiar from our macroscopic world, but is rather a non-trivial process that will almost always drastically affect the quantum state. So, the mysterious aspect of quantum theory is not that ‘observation’ alters the quantum state but, rather, that it is impossible, even in principle, to ‘observe’ a quantum system in the classical sense. Given this fundamental restriction on how we can extract information from a quantum system, what can we learn about that system by means of a quantum process? The answer is, in fact, very little! First, performing a particular measurement could, for the vast majority of quantum states, yield any outcome i with a non-zero probability. In that case, obtaining an outcome i doesn't tell us much about what the state of the system was. Second, we say ‘was’, because the measurement will moreover irreversibly change the state according to the outcome. So rather than revealing the state of a system, a quantum measurement typically erases that state from history! Nonetheless, these quantum measurements are crucial to quantum theory since they constitute the only interface between us, in our classical world, and the quantum world. The great insight of the quantum computing community is that the non-deterministic changes induced by these quantum measurements are not a nuisance, but rather an extremely useful resource.

Cambridge University Press eBooksMar 16, 20170 citations

Are quantum-mechanical-like models possible, or necessary, outside quantum physics?

Arkady Plotnitsky

This article examines some experimental conditions that invite and possibly require recourse to quantum-mechanical-like mathematical models (QMLMs), models based on the key mathematical features of quantum mechanics, in scientific fields outside physics, such as biology, cognitive psychology, or economics. In particular, I consider whether the following two correlative features of quantum phenomena that were decisive for establishing the mathematical formalism of quantum mechanics play similarly important roles in QMLMs elsewhere. The first is the individuality and discreteness of quantum phenomena, and the second is the irreducibly probabilistic nature of our predictions concerning them, coupled to the particular character of the probabilities involved, as different from the character of probabilities found in classical physics. I also argue that these features could be interpreted in terms of a particular form of epistemology that suspends and even precludes a causal and, in the first place, realist description of quantum objects and processes. This epistemology limits the descriptive capacity of quantum theory to the description, classical in nature, of the observed quantum phenomena manifested in measuring instruments. Quantum mechanics itself only provides descriptions, probabilistic in nature, concerning numerical data pertaining to such phenomena, without offering a physical description of quantum objects and processes. While QMLMs share their use of the quantum-mechanical or analogous mathematical formalism, they may differ by the roles, if any, the two features in question play in them and by different ways of interpreting the phenomena they considered and this formalism itself. This article will address those differences as well.

Physica ScriptaDec 1, 201421 citations

On the Formulation of the Measurement Problem

Glenn Layne Stoner

A brief note arguing that the quantum measurement problem, as ordinarily formulated, may be ill-posed. The paper suggests that the Schrödinger equation is being asked to explain the emergence of a definite historical record, although it was constructed to describe the unitary evolution of quantum states.

Jul 3, 20260 citations