Abstract We noted in Section 6.5 that quantum measurements change the system which is measured. The abrupt change of state caused by a measurement is quite different from the steady evolution described by Schrodinger’s equation, and this shows up particularly clearly if we imagine carrying out frequent repeated measurements on an evolving system.
Abstract We noted in Section 6.5 that quantum measurements change the system which is measured. The abrupt change of state caused by a measurement is quite different from the steady evolution described by Schrodinger’s equation, and this shows up particularly clearly if we imagine carrying out frequent repeated measurements on an evolving system.
A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it. – Max Planck, 1936 The only way quantum theory allows us to interact with quantum systems is via quantum processes. Thus, the only way we can extract information about the state of a quantum system is to apply some non-deterministic process and observe which of the branches happened. For that reason, many people refer to the act of applying certain quantum processes as measurement and sometimes even as observation . A consequence of this unfortunate terminology is that one of the most touted ‘strange’ features of quantum theory is often misleadingly described as follows: ‘The mere act of observing a quantum state changes it.’ ‘Misleading’, since the concept of measurement described in the previous paragraph is far from the passive concept of observation familiar from our macroscopic world, but is rather a non-trivial process that will almost always drastically affect the quantum state. So, the mysterious aspect of quantum theory is not that ‘observation’ alters the quantum state but, rather, that it is impossible, even in principle, to ‘observe’ a quantum system in the classical sense. Given this fundamental restriction on how we can extract information from a quantum system, what can we learn about that system by means of a quantum process? The answer is, in fact, very little! First, performing a particular measurement could, for the vast majority of quantum states, yield any outcome i with a non-zero probability. In that case, obtaining an outcome i doesn't tell us much about what the state of the system was. Second, we say ‘was’, because the measurement will moreover irreversibly change the state according to the outcome. So rather than revealing the state of a system, a quantum measurement typically erases that state from history! Nonetheless, these quantum measurements are crucial to quantum theory since they constitute the only interface between us, in our classical world, and the quantum world. The great insight of the quantum computing community is that the non-deterministic changes induced by these quantum measurements are not a nuisance, but rather an extremely useful resource.
Prevention of a quantum system's time evolution by repetitive, frequent measurements of the system's state has been called the quantum Zeno effect (or paradox). Here we investigate theoretically and numerically the effect of repeated measurements on the quantum dynamics of multilevel systems that exhibit the quantum localization of classical chaos. The analysis is based on the wave function and Schr\"odinger equation, without introduction of the density matrix. We show how the quantum Zeno effect in simple few-level systems can be recovered and understood by formal modeling the effect of measurement on the dynamics by randomizing the phases of the measured states. This analysis is extended to investigate the dynamics of multilevel systems driven by an intense external force and affected by frequent measurements. We show that frequent measurements of such quantum systems results in delocalization of the quantum suppression of classical chaos. This result is the opposite of the quantum Zeno effect. The phenomenon of delocalization of the quantum suppression and restoration of quasi-classical time evolution of these systems, owing to repetitive frequent measurements, can therefore be called the quantum anti-Zeno effect. From this analysis we furthermore conclude that frequently or continuously observable quasiclassical systems evolve basically in a classical manner.
State collapse is a very peculiar process, and I will have a lot more to say about it through this book. However, it is not the only way that quantum states can change. For most of the time, the various quantum systems in nature wander about the universe not being involved in experiments, yet clearly things can and do change. Any self-respecting theory must be capable of describing the ordinary business of a world in which things interact with one another, change, and develop. Part of our dealings in this chapter will be to develop the machinery that quantum theory uses to portray the changes of ordinary development and the, rather more mysterious, changes due to measurement.
Abstract This book describes one approach to resolving the ‘measurement problem’ of standard quantum theory (SQT), by changing the Schrodinger equation’s evolution of the wave function. The wave function of SQT does not describe reality. For example, the wave function corresponding to a completed experiment is the sum of terms describing the different experimental outcomes whereas one of these outcomes is what appears in Nature, The rules of SQT respond to this deficiency by imposing an ill-defined ‘collapse postulate.’ The prior smooth evolution of the wave function according to Schrodinger’s equation is replaced by an abrupt ‘jump’ to one of the outcomes. When, why, how are unanswered questions. I have added a term to Schrodinger’s equation, obtaining a theory (which I named the ‘Continuous Spontaneous Localization’ theory, or CSL) that answers these questions. The term has a random field in it: each field makes the sum of terms evolve to one of the terms. The collection of all possible fields produces the (Born rule) probabilistic predictions of SQT. Thus, CSL does something SQT does not: it describes the occurrence of events. But, it is a different theory than SQT, so it predicts different results for some carefully crafted experiments. CSL has now existed for over three decades. While no experiment as yet has proven CSL true, no experiment has conflicted with it either. In this book I have aimed to give a clear exposition of CSL and its consequences, accessible to anyone who has studied SQT.
We analyzed the effect of frequent measurements on the quantum systems that are chaotic in the classical limit. It is shown that the delta-kicked rotator, a well-known example of quantum chaos, is too special to be used as a testing ground for the effects of the repeated measurements. The abrupt change of state vectors by the \ensuremath{\delta}-function kick singular interruptions causes a quantum anti-Zeno effect. However, in more realistic rotators with interaction potentials of continuous time dependence, the quantum Zeno effect prevails.