I propose now to examine Bohr's informal theory of measurement from a somewhat more formal point of view, and to consider how his theory relates to the orthodox theory of measurement in quantum mechanics. This is a difficult task, since Bohr nowhere discusses the theory of measurement in formal terms. My discussion, therefore, will be less closely tied to Bohr's own statements. I shall also consider some important objections to the theory. The objective-values theory of measurement Before we look into this theory, it will be useful to have a brief sketch of some of the relevant formal elements of quantum mechanics. In the Hilbert space formulation of quantum mechanics the measurable physical properties (‘observables’) of an object are represented by linear Hermitian operators A , B , … which have complete orthonormal sets of eigenvalues a n , b n , … corresponding to the subspaces (closed linear manifolds) of a Hilbert space H . These operators are in one-to-one correspondence with the projection measures P A , P B , … on the Hilbert space such that P A = Σ n a n P n , where P n are the projections of the eigenvectors ψ n belonging to the eigenvalues a n of A , and a n are discrete, non-degenerate values (for simplicity I shall deal only with operators which have such values, and shall denote observables and the corresponding operators by the same symbols).
I propose now to examine Bohr's informal theory of measurement from a somewhat more formal point of view, and to consider how his theory relates to the orthodox theory of measurement in quantum mechanics. This is a difficult task, since Bohr nowhere discusses the theory of measurement in formal terms. My discussion, therefore, will be less closely tied to Bohr's own statements. I shall also consider some important objections to the theory. The objective-values theory of measurement Before we look into this theory, it will be useful to have a brief sketch of some of the relevant formal elements of quantum mechanics. In the Hilbert space formulation of quantum mechanics the measurable physical properties (‘observables’) of an object are represented by linear Hermitian operators A , B , … which have complete orthonormal sets of eigenvalues a n , b n , … corresponding to the subspaces (closed linear manifolds) of a Hilbert space H . These operators are in one-to-one correspondence with the projection measures P A , P B , … on the Hilbert space such that P A = Σ n a n P n , where P n are the projections of the eigenvectors ψ n belonging to the eigenvalues a n of A , and a n are discrete, non-degenerate values (for simplicity I shall deal only with operators which have such values, and shall denote observables and the corresponding operators by the same symbols).
The newly revised edition of this well-known book categorizes prevalent views on measurement as described by quantum mechanics, discusses basics agreed to by many who on other issues disagree, and describes some of the problems. Although many paragraphs rest unchanged from the first (1991) edition, results found since 1991 are used to reorganize and sharpen the focus of the book, so that even the old paragraphs are now understood differently and more clearly. One advance in the second edition is a new and more general no-go theorem; another is separation of formal derivations from interpretation. The dozen or so definitions essential to following the book even casually are stated clearly. By this means the authors succeed pretty well in achieving their stated desire to make the book comprehensible to those who do not share their philosophic predispositions. While I differ in philosophy from the authors, attending to their discussion uncovered weaknesses in my own thinking and improved it. The mathematical language of quantum mechanics expresses a system under measurement by states (as rays in a Hilbert space) and a hamiltonian operator, distinct from the apparatus that produces outcomes, which is expressed by a positive operator-valued (POV) measure. In this way quantum language separates state preparation from state measurement. Often the Hilbert space is viewed as a tensor product of subspaces, allowing further conceptual separations. The authors take the stance that quantum mechanics calls for splitting the empirical world into parts, the most essential being (1) objective systems S (to be observed) and (2) apparatus A (preparation and registration devices that produces outcomes (or, as the authors write, definite pointer values) of the observed system). In some interpretations, one or both of an observer and an environment appear as additional parts. What is to be included in the system S versus the apparatus A is not specified by the language, but is open to the theoretician; a probe, for example, can be analysed as either part of the apparatus or as part of the system, as was discussed by von Neumann in work cited by the authors. With what should a theory of measurement be concerned? A broad division of approaches is defined by how one answers the question: should one try to do away with the cut between measuring apparatus and system? The authors phrase this as a choice of REFERENT, a term which in my mind puts them on shaky semantic ground; anyway The Quantum Theory of Measurement is concerned with implications of the `yes'. The book unfolds with the power of a tragedy, in which the logical consequences lead, step-by-step, to the statement and proof of theorem 6.2.1, which, roughly speaking, asserts the non-existence of a solution to the problem of getting definite pointer values from measuring apparatus that exhibits the superposition demanded by its description as a quantum system. Possible responses to this theorem are discussed, among them the many-worlds interpretation and a modification of quantum mechanics that elevates decoherence to a principle. Citations of the literature are thorough, and many points of view are crisply summarized. The book is indispensable to both those who work in the broad direction chosen by the authors and to those who wish to set any other direction in context.
The quantities in physics that can be measured are conventionally denoted observables : entities that can be observed (directly or indirectly) and to which a value in appropriate units can be assigned. Examples include position, momentum, and energy. Unlike in classical physics, the concept of an observable in quantum theory possesses a significance beyond that of the measurable: to each observable there corresponds a unique operator in an abstract, linear vector space. These operators (and others) govern all aspects of quantum systems. Quantum operators act on abstract vectors in the linear space. Especially important are the eigenvectors and eigenvalues of these operators, in particular because some of the eigenvectors are the quantum states mentioned in the preceding chapters. Furthermore, for any operator that is the mathematical image of an observable, its eigenvalues constitute the entire set of values that measurement of the observable can yield . Finally, from the quantum states one can obtain the probabilities for the occurrence of events in the microscopic world, for example, the most likely value that measurement of an observable will yield. The concepts of operators and eigenvalue problems, as well as those of quantal probabilities, of Hermiticity, and of complete sets, were encountered and exemplified in the preceding chapter using the language of differential equations. While much of quantum mechanics could be presented in terms of this language alone, certain fundamental concepts (spin, for instance) cannot be, and it eventually becomes necessary to consider quantum mechanics as a theoretical framework embedded in that abstract linear vector space known as a Hilbert space.
Quantum measurement theory forms one of the fundamental pillars of quantum mechanics and quantum in formation science. This work presents a theoretical study of quantum measurement and projective operators, emphasizing their mathematical structure, physical interpretation, and computational significance. The frame work of Hilbert spaces, state vectors, linear operators, and Hermitian observables is explored to describe the evolution and observation of quantum systems. Projective measurement operators are analyzed through eigen value decomposition and projection postulates, illustrating how quantum states collapse into orthogonal basis states after measurement. The probabilistic nature of measurement outcomes, governed by Born’s rule, is dis cussed along with the role of orthonormal bases and completeness relations. Furthermore, the paper highlights the importance of projection operators in quantum computing, quantum communication, and quantum algorithm de sign. Applications in qubit state discrimination, entanglement verification, and quantum error correction are also examined. This theoretical framework provides a strong mathematical foundation for understanding the principles of quantum measurements and their relevance in modern quantum technologies.
Linear algebra is the natural mathematical language of quantum mechanics. For this reason, the present chapter starts with a review of Hilbert spaces for vectors and operators. We introduce vector and Hilbert spaces along with inner products and metrics. The Dirac notation is developed for the Euclidean vector spaces as a starting point for the concepts of complete orthonormal sets of vectors, closure, dual vector spaces, and adjoint operators. The Dirac delta function in various forms and the principal part is introduced in Appendix 5 as an essential tool. The chapter turns to the main use of Dirac notation for function spaces; the concepts of norm, inner product, and closure are discussed. Fourier, Cosine, and Sine series are discussed as examples of expansions in complete orthonormal sets of functions. Although Hilbert spaces are interesting mathematical objects with important physical applications, the study of linear algebra remains incomplete without a study of linear operators (i.e., linear transformations). In fact, the set of linear transformations itself forms a vector space and therefore has a basis set. The basis set for the operator is linked with the basis sets for the spaces that it operates between. The linear operator can be discussed as an abstract operator or through an isomorphism as a matrix or as a generalized expansion in operator space. A Hermitian (a.k.a., self-adjoint) operator produces a basis set within a Hilbert space. The basis set comes from the eigenvector equation for the particular operator. The fact that a Hermitian operator produces a complete set (of orthornomal vectors) has special importance for quantum mechanics. Observables such as energy or momentum correspond to Hermitian operators. Complete sets make it possible to represent every possible result of a measurement of the observable by an object (vector) in the theory. The Hermitian operators have real eigenvalues which represent the results of the measurement.
This paper is concerned with the description of the process of measurement within the context of a quantum theory of the physical world. It is noted that quantum mechanics permits a quasi-classical description (classical in the limited sense implied by the correspondence principle of Bohr) of those macroscopic phenomena in terms of which the observer forms his perceptions. Thus, the process of measurement in quantum mechanics can be understood on the quasi-classical level by transcribing from the strictly classical observables of Newtonian physics to their quasi-classical counterparts the known rules for the measurement of the former. The remaining physical problem is the delineation of the circumstances in which the correlation of a peculiarly quantum mechanical observable A with a classically measurable observable B can result in a significant measurement of A. This is undertaken within the context of quantum theory. The resulting clarification of the process of measurement has important implications relative to the philosophic interpretation of quantum mechanics.