In the first section we discuss the stationary solutions for a laser with an injected signal, the active counterpart of the optical bistability analyzed in Chapter 11. Next, in Section 13.2 we consider another very interesting system, namely a laser with a saturable absorber, a free-running laser in which the optical cavity contains a passive medium in addition to the active medium. The single-mode model for this system can be constructed by combining the single-mode models for the free-running laser and for optical bistability. The discussion is then focussed on its stationary states. In Section 13.3 we return to the single-mode model for optical bistability and, by introducing an appropriate “cubic limit” on the parameters in play, we derive a cubic model for dispersive optical bistability with two-level atoms. The stationary equation for such a model formally coincides with that derived and discussed for a Kerr medium in Section 11.2. In the last section we start from the equations for a quadratic nonlinear medium in the degenerate configuration derived in Chapter 6 and combine them with the appropriate boundary conditions for the two field envelopes in play, assuming that the quadratic medium is contained in a ring cavity as happens in an optical parametric oscillator or in second-harmonic generation in a cavity. Next, by introducing the low-transmission limit and the single-mode limit we derive a two-mode model that describes the dynamics of a degenerate optical parametric oscillator or of second-harmonic generation in a cavity. Finally, for the case of a parametric oscillator we illustrate extensively the stationary solutions of the equations. A laser with an injected signal From a technical point of view, this system is interesting because of the possibility of stabilizing the frequency and the phase of separate lasers by taking advantage of the known affinity of nonlinear oscillators to lock onto a periodic forcing element. In 1972 Spencer and Lamb [125] predicted the possibility of bistable behavior in a laser with an injected signal before the surge of interest in optical bistability in the passive configuration.
In the first section we discuss the stationary solutions for a laser with an injected signal, the active counterpart of the optical bistability analyzed in Chapter 11. Next, in Section 13.2 we consider another very interesting system, namely a laser with a saturable absorber, a free-running laser in which the optical cavity contains a passive medium in addition to the active medium. The single-mode model for this system can be constructed by combining the single-mode models for the free-running laser and for optical bistability. The discussion is then focussed on its stationary states. In Section 13.3 we return to the single-mode model for optical bistability and, by introducing an appropriate “cubic limit” on the parameters in play, we derive a cubic model for dispersive optical bistability with two-level atoms. The stationary equation for such a model formally coincides with that derived and discussed for a Kerr medium in Section 11.2. In the last section we start from the equations for a quadratic nonlinear medium in the degenerate configuration derived in Chapter 6 and combine them with the appropriate boundary conditions for the two field envelopes in play, assuming that the quadratic medium is contained in a ring cavity as happens in an optical parametric oscillator or in second-harmonic generation in a cavity. Next, by introducing the low-transmission limit and the single-mode limit we derive a two-mode model that describes the dynamics of a degenerate optical parametric oscillator or of second-harmonic generation in a cavity. Finally, for the case of a parametric oscillator we illustrate extensively the stationary solutions of the equations. A laser with an injected signal From a technical point of view, this system is interesting because of the possibility of stabilizing the frequency and the phase of separate lasers by taking advantage of the known affinity of nonlinear oscillators to lock onto a periodic forcing element. In 1972 Spencer and Lamb [125] predicted the possibility of bistable behavior in a laser with an injected signal before the surge of interest in optical bistability in the passive configuration.
This chapter concludes the discussion about temporal instabilities and self-oscillations, considering the instabilities that arise in the systems analyzed in Chapter 13, with the exception of optical bistability, which has been discussed separately in Chapter 11. Section 25.1 focuses on the laser with an injected signal. As already mentioned in Section 13.1, in this system self-pulsing instabilities are rather ubiquitous, and on exploring the parameter space one meets an extremely rich variety of oscillatory behaviors. For example, under extremely high-gain conditions, breathing, spiking and chaos have been identified over various ranges of the driving field strength [294]. In this section we show some results that arise under parametric conditions that are more accessible experimentally. We illustrate especially the coexistence, for the same parametric values, of different oscillatory behaviors that are reached by starting from different initial conditions. On the other hand, Section 25.2 deals with a laser with a saturable absorber. In this system even the full scenario of stationary intensity solutions in the single-mode model is very complex. For the sake of simplicity, in this section we focus on a simpler rate-equation model that is obtained from the single-mode model of Eqs. (13.13)–(13.17) by adiabatically eliminating the atomic polarization of both active and passive medium. As in Chapter 13, we assume that the atomic transition frequencies are equal and also coincide with a cavity frequency. In this way all the variables in the model can be assumed real, and the linearization around the stationary solution described in Section 13.2 leads to a cubic eigenvalue equation. The spontaneous oscillations which arise from this instability are called repetitive passive Q-switching in the literature. Section 25.3 considers the stability of the stationary solutions of the degenerate optical parametric oscillator described in Section 13.4 and outlines the scenario of period doubling and chaos that arises under appropriate parametric conditions.
In Chapter 9 we discussed the case of a nonlinear cavity containing an active medium. In this framework, the outstanding phenomenon which arises is laser emission, and we calculated the stationary solutions for the ring laser. In this chapter, instead, we turn our attention to the passive nonlinear cavity and in this framework the outstanding phenomenon is optical bistability , i.e. the existence of two distinct stable stationary states that coexist for the same fixed values of the parameters in play. This phenomenon can arise also in the case of an active system contained in a cavity, as we have already noted in Section 9.1 and as we will discuss further in connection with the laser with injected signal, but it became popular from the studies of nonlinear passive optical cavities in the 1970s and 1980s. In contrast to the laser case, in the passive configuration we use an input coherent field, which is injected into the cavity. We discussed this case in Chapter 8 and derived a general equation for the transmission of the cavity (Eq. (8.23)), which we used for an empty cavity and for a linear cavity in Sections 8.4 and 8.5, respectively. In this chapter we will discuss the full nonlinear configuration. It is customary to identify two extreme cases of optical bistability called absorptive optical bistability and dispersive or refractive optical bistability . In both cases an essential ingredient to obtain the bistable behavior is the feedback action exerted by the mirrors of the cavity. In the purely absorptive configuration, in which there is exact resonance among the frequencies of the input field, of the atoms and of the cavity, the other essential ingredient is the saturable nonlinearity of the absorption. In the dispersive case, instead, the main feature is the nonlinearity of the refractive index. These two cases will be illustrated in Sections 11.1 and 11.2, respectively, both “exactly” and in the low-transmission limit.
Three elements, introduced in Part I of the book, play a key role in the book itself. The first is the derivation of the Maxwell–Bloch equations, which is carried out in Chapters 2–4. In particular the derivation of the field-envelope equation, discussed in Section 3.1, is explained with special care. The derivation is based, of course, on the slowly varying envelope approximation and on the paraxial approximation. In textbooks these two approximations are usually discussed separately and rather briefly. We show that the two approximations are intimately connected, and only in this way it is possible to demonstrate that, while the second-order derivatives with respect to time and to the longitudinal coordinate z can be neglected, the second-order derivatives with respect to the transverse coordinates x and y must be kept. It is also possible to demonstrate that the term ∇ ( ∇ · E ) in the Maxwell wave equation for the electric field can indeed be neglected. An additional bonus of this approach is that, once one has shown in detail the derivation of the envelope equation in the simplest context, it becomes straightforward to generalize it to the more complex cases of frequency dispersion in the background refractive index (Section 5.4) and of quadratic and cubic nonlinearities (Chapters 6 and 7). The second key element is the use of a multiple limit in the parameters, which in the literature is called the mean-field limit or uniform-field limit, whereas in this book we prefer to name it more precisely the low-transmission limit . This plays a central role when we derive modal equations and single-mode models from sets of equations with propagation. In this way one avoids, for example, steps like the phenomenological introduction of a damping term in the field equation(s) to describe the escape of photons from the cavity, and derives the damping from the boundary conditions of the cavity in a transparent way (Chapters 12 and 14).
Introduction The transient behavior of nonlinear optical resonators which display bistability and its reaction to fluctuations of system parameters are of extreme importance in all possible applications of these devices. Moreover, however, studies on these processes may give insight into some more general aspects of the behavior of nonlinear dynamical systems. In fact it has been emphasized in the early stages of the development of the field that optically bistable systems, in a suitable model, may exhibit a first-order phase transition (Bonifacio and Lugiato, 1978). Since the threshold behavior of a laser can be described as an example of a second-order phase transition (Haken, 1964,1975; see also Haken, 1977), optical bistability in (passive) nonlinear resonators complements nicely lasers as nonlinear dissipative systems in optics. Both types of optical systems are easily accessible to measurements, and the time scales coming into play are convenient for detailed experimental studies of the dynamics. It is worth mentioning that there is a close connection between laser operation and optical bistability in nonlinear (passive) resonators (see Lugiato, 1984). The standard single-mode laser model with distributed losses (Haken, 1970; Sargent, Scully and Lamb, 1974) can be generalized to include the effect of an external field that continuously drives the atoms within the optical resonator. The standard model of absorptive bistability, the Bonifacio–Lugiato model, is a special case of this generalized model. It represents the situation of a pumping mechanism being absent.
In the last chapter, we examined the effect of cubic nonlinearity on selfrefraction of an optical beam. We have also seen that the presence of a quadratic nonlinearity can also contribute to change in the profile of a Gaussian beam in a crystal. In this chapter we will see how the effect of nonlinearity, alongwith the proper feedback, can give rise to optical bistability and hysteresis. This is not unexpected as hysteresis and bistability are also observed in nonlinear electronic circuits with feedback, such as in the Schmitt trigger, as well as in hybrid optical devices, such as an acoustooptic device with feedback (Banerjee and Poon, 1991). In what follows, we will examine two different types of optically bistable devices based on optical nonlinearities. The first is a nonlinear ring resonator comprising a two-level gain medium as the nonlinear element. We will treat both absorptive and dispersive bistability. Absorptive bistability is the case when the incident optical frequency is close to or equal to the transition frequency of the atoms from one level to another. In this case, the absorption coefficient becomes a nonlinear function of the incident intensity. On the other hand, if the frequencies are far apart, the medium behaves like a Kerr-type material and the system exhibits what is called dispersive bistability. In this case the material can be modeled by an effective n2 or v (3), meaning that the refractive index becomes a nonlinear function of the optical intensity. The second configurationwewill examine is a linear-nonlinear interface. In this case, the interface provides the feedback due to refractive index mismatch. In fact, the reflection coefficient (as well as the transmission coefficient) is modified due to the nonlinearity, which, as we shall see later, is responsible for demonstrating optical switching and bistability.
In the previous chapter we examined nonlinear propagation in a two-level medium, which leads to amplification or absorption of the radiation field. As we will see further on in this volume, when the medium is placed in an optical cavity one realizes a laser in the case of amplification or an optically bistable system in the absorptive configuration. On the other hand, the nonlinear response of the atomic polarization to the electric field leads to further fascinating scenarios [29, 51–60]. For example, a field with central ω 0 can generate harmonic components with central frequencies 2 ω 0 , 3 ω 0 etc., processes that are called second-harmonic generation, third-harmonic generation etc. Furthermore, the interaction of two fields with central frequencies ω 1 and ω 2 , with ω 1 > ω 2 , can generate components with central frequency ω 1 + ω 2 (sum-frequency generation) and ω 1 − ω 2 (difference-frequency generation). Such phenomena have not yet appeared in this volume because we have assumed that the electric field corresponds to a narrow frequency band around a central frequency ω 0 only, whereas to describe them it is necessary to assume that the electric field is the superposition of a number of frequency bands. In this chapter we will provide a description of the basic elements which are necessary to describe these phenomena and we will discuss a small number of them for the case of materials with a quadratic nonlinearity, referring to textbooks in nonlinear optics for the description of other phenomena. The following chapter is devoted, instead, to the case of materials with cubic nonlinearities. The starting point of nonlinear optics is the expansion of the atomic polarization in powers of the electric field, when the electric field is not too intense. In our treatment in Chapter 5 we saw that the expansion of the nonlinear susceptibility contains only even powers of the electric field (see Eq. (5.27)), and therefore the expansion of the polarization includes only odd powers.