Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

AIP conference proceedings

Cryptanalysis on Cheng et al. protocol

Tejeshwari Thakur

Published Jan 1, 2016• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1063/1.4952487

Related papers

Cryptanalysis and Improvement of Ye et al’s Quantum Private Comparison Protocol

Wanqing Wu, Qing-yu Cai, Wu Shuomei +1 more

International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Mar 16, 2019•5 citations

Cryptanalysis of Secure Message Transmission Protocols with Feedback

Qiushi Yang, Yvo Desmedt

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2010•15 citations

Cryptanalysis of the Wu–Varadhrajan fair exchange protocol

Olivier Markowitch, Shahrokh Saeednia

Information Processing Letters•Jun 2, 2003•0 citations

New Results - Cryptographic protocols

Régis Dupont, Andreas Enge, Javier Herranz +3 more

•Jan 1, 2006•0 citations

An Improvement of Certification-based One-Round Tripartite Key Agreement Protocols

Kambombo Mtong, Eun‐Jun Yoon

Key agreement protocols allow multi-parties exchanging public information to create a common secret key that is known only to those entities over an insecure network. Since Joux first published the pairing-based one round tripartite key agreement protocol, many authenticated protocols have been proposed. Unfortunately, many of them have been broken while others have been shown to be deficient in some desirable security attributes. In 2004, Cheng et al. presented two protocols aimed at strengthening Shim’s certificate-based and Zhang et al.’s tripartite identitybased protocols. This paper reports that 1) In Cheng et al.’s identity-based protocol, an adversary can extract long-term private keys of all the parties involved; and 2) Cheng et al.’s certificationbased protocol is weak against key integrity attacks. This paper suggests possible remedies for the security flaws in both protocols and then presents a modified Cheng et al.’s identity-based, oneround tripartite protocol that is more secure than the original protocol.

IEIE Transactions on Smart Processing and Computing•Oct 1, 2013•0 citations

More realistic analyses of cryptographic protocols

裕俊 竹部

•Jan 1, 2013•0 citations
Key agreement protocols allow multi-parties exchanging public information to create a common secret key that is known only to those entities over an insecure network. Since Joux first published the pairing-based one round tripartite key agreement protocol, many authenticated protocols have been proposed. Unfortunately, many of them have been broken while others have been shown to be deficient in some desirable security attributes. In 2004, Cheng et al. presented two protocols aimed at strengthening Shim’s certificate-based and Zhang et al.’s tripartite identitybased protocols. This paper reports that 1) In Cheng et al.’s identity-based protocol, an adversary can extract long-term private keys of all the parties involved; and 2) Cheng et al.’s certificationbased protocol is weak against key integrity attacks. This paper suggests possible remedies for the security flaws in both protocols and then presents a modified Cheng et al.’s identity-based, oneround tripartite protocol that is more secure than the original protocol.