Introduction In our discussion of the classical electromagnetic field we found it convenient to describe the field by a complex amplitude, both in the frequency and in the time domains. The complex representation is convenient partly because it contains information about the magnitude and about the phase of the electromagnetic disturbance, and partly because of its analytic properties. These features turn out to be particularly useful for the description of the optical coherence properties of the field. We shall see that an analogous quantum state of the field exists, leading to an interesting representation that is also particularly useful for the treatment of optical coherence. This coherent-state representation leads to a close correspondence between the quantum and classical correlation functions. The coherent states of the field come as close as possible to being classical states of definite complex amplitude. We shall find that coherent states turn out to be particularly appropriate for the description of the electromagnetic fields generated by coherent sources, like lasers and parametric oscillators; indeed it turns out that the field produced by any deterministic current source is in a coherent state. In the following sections we shall examine some of the properties of coherent states, and then go on to discuss representations based on these states. Coherent states were first discovered in connection with the quantum harmonic oscillator by Schrödinger (1926), who referred to them as states of minimum uncertainty product.
Introduction In our discussion of the classical electromagnetic field we found it convenient to describe the field by a complex amplitude, both in the frequency and in the time domains. The complex representation is convenient partly because it contains information about the magnitude and about the phase of the electromagnetic disturbance, and partly because of its analytic properties. These features turn out to be particularly useful for the description of the optical coherence properties of the field. We shall see that an analogous quantum state of the field exists, leading to an interesting representation that is also particularly useful for the treatment of optical coherence. This coherent-state representation leads to a close correspondence between the quantum and classical correlation functions. The coherent states of the field come as close as possible to being classical states of definite complex amplitude. We shall find that coherent states turn out to be particularly appropriate for the description of the electromagnetic fields generated by coherent sources, like lasers and parametric oscillators; indeed it turns out that the field produced by any deterministic current source is in a coherent state. In the following sections we shall examine some of the properties of coherent states, and then go on to discuss representations based on these states. Coherent states were first discovered in connection with the quantum harmonic oscillator by Schrödinger (1926), who referred to them as states of minimum uncertainty product.
Following the development of the quantum theory of radiation and with the advent of the laser, the states of the field that most nearly describe a classical electromagnetic field were widely studied. In order to realize such ‘classical’ states, we will consider the field generated by a classical monochromatic current, and find that the quantum state thus generated has many interesting properties and deserves to be called a coherent state . An important consequence of the quantization of the radiation field is the associated uncertainty relation for the conjugate field variables. It therefore appears reasonable to propose that the wave function which corresponds most closely to the classical field must have minimum uncertainty for all times subject to the appropriate simple harmonic potential. In this chapter we show that a displaced simple harmonic oscillator ground state wave function satisfies this property and the wave packet oscillates sinusoidally in the oscillator potential without changing shape as shown in Fig. 2.1. This coherent wave packet always has minimum uncertainty, and resembles the classical field as nearly as quantum mechanics permits. The corresponding state vector is the coherent state |α〉, which is the eigenstate of the positive frequency part of the electric field operator, or, equivalently, the eigenstate of the destruction operator of the field. Classically an electromagnetic field consists of waves with welldefined amplitude and phase. Such is not the case when we treat the field quantum mechanically.
The elementary quantum theory of quasi-classical states for mechanical harmonic oscillators is applied to the radiation oscillators describing light, and thus used to define quasi-classical states of light. These states are called “coherent”, because the expectation value of any normally ordered product of creation and annihilation operators factorizes for them. A theoretical discussion of possible sources for coherent states is followed by experimental evidence for their existence. The mathematical properties of coherent states, e.g., nonorthogonality and overcompleteness, are explained in order to use them to represent states and operators. These representations provide a suitable replacement for the classical phase space description of light, which is forbidden by the uncertainty principle. The quantum phase space approach leads to the definition of the Wigner distribution, the Q-function, the P-function, and Gaussian mixed states.
This chapter is devoted to coherent states. Generally speaking, a wave function of a system of identical particles does not have to have a certain number of particles. It can be a superposition of states with different numbers of particles. We have already encountered this in Chapters 5 and 6 when we studied superconductivity and superfluidity. Another important example of states with no well-defined number of particles is given by coherent states . In a way, these states are those which most resemble classical ones: the uncertainty in conjugated variables (such as position and momentum) is minimal for both variables, and their time-evolution is as close to classical trajectories as one can get. Coherent states of radiation are relatively easy to achieve. They arise if we excite the electromagnetic field with classical currents. We look in detail at the coherent state of a single-mode oscillator and all its properties. The coherent state turns out to be an eigenfunction of the annihilation operator, the distribution of photon numbers is Poissonian, and it provides an optimal wave function describing a classical electromagnetic wave. We come back to our simple model of the laser and critically revise it with our knowledge of coherent states, and estimate the time at which the laser retains its optical coherence. We then derive Maxwell–Bloch equations that combine the master equation approach to the lasing (as outlined in Chapter 9) with the concept of coherence.
In this chapter we shall be using the formalism of Chapter 4 to describe some properties of the quantized free electromagnetic field, emphasizing the analogies and differences with classical electromagnetism. The analogies explain why classical optics was so successful, to the extent that, even though light was not quantized, it was able to describe almost all known optical phenomena up until the 1970s. The differences highlight typical quantum behaviour, with no classical equivalent, which lies at the heart of modern quantum optics. The chapter begins by presenting formal ways of describing the main components of quantum optics experiments, namely, photodetectors and semi-reflecting mirrors. One can then understand homodyne detection, used to measure field quadrature components, even at optical frequencies for which no detector is fast enough to follow the oscillations of the field itself. Section 5.2 deals with the quantum vacuum where, in contrast to the classical vacuum, radiation has properties, in particular, fluctuations, with which one can associate physical effects. We then discuss in Section 5.3 some quantum radiation states in the simple case where a single mode l of the field is excited (non-vacuum). We introduce the idea of a quasiclassical state, or coherent state, used to make the link with classical optics. We shall also study other states, those with a definite number of photons, or squeezed states, which exhibit typically quantum properties, quite inconceivable in classical electromagnetism, and we shall show how these properties can be understood by reference to the Heisenberg relations, with an extremely useful graphical representation.
Wigner representation In classical optics (Born and Wolf, 1999), the state of the electromagnetic oscillator is perfectly described by the statistics of the classical amplitude α . The amplitude may be completely fixed (then the field is coherent), or α may fluctuate (then the field is partially coherent or incoherent). In classical optics as well as in classical mechanics, we can characterize the statistics of the complex amplitude?or, equivalently, the statistics of the components position q and momentum p introducing a phase space distribution W ( q , p ). (As explained in Section 3.1, the real and the imaginary part of the complex amplitude α can be regarded as the position and the momentum of the electromagnetic oscillator.) The distribution W ( q , p ) quantifies the probability of finding a particular pair of q and p values in their simultaneous measurement. Knowing the phase space probability distribution, all statistical quantities of the electromagnetic oscillator can be predicted by calculation. In this sense the phase space distribution describes the state in classical physics. All this is much more subtle in quantum mechanics. First of all, Heisenberg's uncertainty principle prevents us from observing position momentum simultaneously and precisely. So it seems there is no point in thinking about quantum phase space. But wait! In quantum mechanics we cannot directly observe quantum states either. Nevertheless, we are legitimately entitled to use the concept of states as if they were existing entities (whatever they are). We use their properties to predict the statistics of observations.
In Chapter 4, we introduced the concept of the photon number representation of the electromagnetic (EM) field that is based on the number states, the eigenstates of the Hamiltonian of the EM field. However, this is not the only possible representation, in fact not always the most convenient. In this chapter, we introduce the concept of phase space representations of a quantum system which is in a state described by the density operator ρˆ. The density operator of a given system encodes classical as well as non-classical (quantum) properties of the system. How to distinguish these two kinds of properties is of basic importance in quantum optics. Therefore, we shall address this issue by using representations of the density operator that are based on the parametric space of complex eigenvalues of the annihilation operator aˆ in a coherent state |α〉. We first determine what we mean by the density operator of a quantum system and discuss its basic properties. Next, we introduce different representations of the density operator in terms of coherent state projectors |α〉〈α|. The representations show that a state of the EM field or of an arbitrary quantum system may be regarded as a mixture of coherent states. Along the way, we will learn how to find the P , Q and Wigner representations of the density operator, what are their properties, how to interpret the properties and how to calculate relations between the different representations. Most importantly, certain field states exhibit non- classical features and these non-classical features can be manifested in the phase space representations. Accordingly, we will learn how the representations are very convenient tools to describe quantum states of simple systems.