Cryptanalysis and Improvement of a New Identity-based Key Exchange Protocol

Zhou Xiao-juan

Published Jan 1, 2010• 1 citation

Abstract

This paper extended the definition of key-compromise-impersonate attack according to a new kind of identity-based key exchange protocol presented by Wang in 2007,then showed that this protocol can't resist the extending key-compromise-impersonate attack.This paper also conducted a detailed analysis on the flaw.To avoid this shortcoming,an improvement of the identity-based protocol was proposed based on the original scheme.

Related papers

Impersonation Attack on Two Identity-Based Authenticated Key Exchange Protocols

Shiwu Zhang, Qingfeng Cheng, Xuekui Wang

In 2009, Holbl et al. proposed two new identity-based authenticated key exchange protocols and claimed that their protocols can withstand various attacks. In this paper, we will show that Holbl et al.'s protocols cannot resist basic impersonation attack. It also means that their protocols are vulnerable to key compromise impersonation (KCI) attacks. Furthermore, we propose improvements of their protocols with impersonation attack resilience and KCI resilience.

WASE International Conference on Information EngineeringAug 1, 20107 citations

Provably secure identity-based authenticated key agreement protocol and its application

Shuai Shao, Bin Tian, Xin Wang +1 more

We point out the RYY+ identity-based (ID-based) key agreement protocol is vulnerable to Key-compromise impersonation (KCI) attack and Intermediate results leakage (IRL) attack. Then we give the improved protocol which provides KCI and IRL resistance. The novel protocol is provably secure under the gap Bilinear Diffie-Hellman assumption in the seCK model, which enhances the adversary's queries comparing with previous ID based AKE models. The proposed scheme also has an advantage over most previous schemes on security and efficiency.

IEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing and Intelligence Systems (CCIS)Oct 1, 20120 citations

An Improved Provably Secure Identity-Based Authenticated Key Agreement Protocol

Yang Li, Jianming Zhu, Wei Zhang +1 more

We revisit the identity-based (ID-based) key agreement protocol due to Wang et al. The protocol is highly efficient and suitable for practical applications except being vulnerable to Intermediate results leakage (IRL) and Key-compromise impersonation (KCI) attack. We propose an improved protocol following the Full Dual Exponential Challenge Response (FDCR-1) scheme to ensure the signature change every time. We also prove it to be secure in the strengthened extended Canetti -- Krawczyk (seCK) model provides better support for adversary's query than previous. In addition, the improved protocol also has an advantage over most existing protocols on security and efficiency.

International Conference on Management of e-Commerce and e-GovernmentOct 1, 20140 citations

Cryptanalysis and improvement of two certificateless three-party authenticated key agreement protocols

Haiyan Sun, Qiaoyan Wen, Hua Zhang +2 more

Recently, two certificateless three-party authenticated key agreement protocols were proposed, and both protocols were claimed they can meet the desirable security properties including forward security, key compromise impersonation resistance and so on. Through cryptanalysis, we show that one neither meets forward security and key compromise impersonation resistance nor resists an attack by an adversary who knows all users' secret values, and the other cannot resist key compromise impersonation attack. Finally, we propose improved protocols to make up two original protocols' security weaknesses, respectively. Further security analysis shows that our improved protocols can remove such security weaknesses.

arXiv:1301.5091Jan 22, 20132 citations

Enhancing CK-Model for Key Compromise Impersonation Resilience and Identity-based Key Exchange.

Robert W. Zhu, Xiaojian Tian, Duncan S. Wong

Abstract. In 2001, Canetti and Krawczyk proposed a security model (CKmodel) for authentication protocols. They also gave an indistinguishabilitybased definition for key exchange protocols. Since then the model has almost exclusively been used for analyzing key exchange protocols, although it can be applied to authentication protocols in general. The model not only captures a large class of attacks but also provides a modular approach to the design of authentication protocols. However, the model does not capture the property of Key Compromise Impersonation (KCI) Resilience. Until now, analysis concerning this property has mostly been done heuristically and restricted to key exchange protocols only. Previous attempts on formalizing KCI have mostly been done in some ad hoc manner and additional proofs have to be given specifically for the security of KCI resilience. In this paper, we propose an extension to the CK-model, which allows, for the first time, the KCI attacks to be considered in authentication protocols in general, rather than restricted to key exchange protocols, and no more additional proofs are required specifically for KCI security. With the revival of interest in identity-based (ID-based) cryptography, there have been many new ID-based key exchange protocols proposed. Despite the fact that some of them have been proven in some restricted versions of a model proposed by Bellare and Rogaway in 1993 and some others have been proven in the original CK-model, there is no rigorous model specifically for ID-based key exchange security. In particular, forward secrecy against compromised Key Generation Server (KGS-FS) has never been captured even though this notion is more important and stronger than the perfect forward secrecy in ID-based key exchange. For this, we further extend our model to ID-based setting and capture the property of KGS-FS for ID-based key exchange security. 1

Jan 1, 20055 citations

Analysis of Two Authenticated Key Exchange Protocols

Qingfeng Cheng, Guangguo Han, Chuangui Ma

The design of secure authenticated key exchange (AKE) protocols has always been a notorious hard problem. Many famous AKE protocols have been found flaws since they were finished. In this paper, we analyze two AKE protocols, which were proposed by Hassan et al. in 2007 and 2008. Then we present key compromise impersonation attack and ephemeral key compromise attack to their two AKE protocols.

International Conference on Multimedia Information Networking and SecurityJan 1, 20092 citations