Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Bulletin of the American Physical Society

Nonlinear optical SU(1,1) interferometer using four-wave mixing in Rb

Prasoon Gupta, Brian E. Anderson, Travis Horrom, Paul D. Lett

Published May 26, 2016• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Quantum Enhancement of Optical Measurements using Four-wave Mixing in Rb vapor

Irina V. Novikova, Nikunj Prajapati, Savannah L. Cuozzo +4 more

Using four-wave mixing in hot Rb vapor, we demonstrate the production of two-mode intensity squeezing between beams with significantly different optical angular momenta and an all-optical polarization-based truncated SU(1,1) interferometer for alloptical quantum-enhanced imaging and sensing.

Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics•Jan 1, 2020•0 citations

Precision phase measurements with an SU(1,1) interferometer using 4-wave mixing in hot Rb85 vapors

Prasoon Gupta, Brian Anderson, Travis Horrom +1 more

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Jun 9, 2015•0 citations

SU(2) and SU(1,1) interferometers

Bernard Yurke, S. L. McCall, John R. Klauder

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1988•35 citations

Phase sensing beyond the standard quantum limit with a variation on the SU(1,1) interferometer

Brian E. Anderson, Prasoon Gupta, Bonnie L. Schmittberger +4 more

An SU(1,1) interferometer replaces the beamsplitters in a Mach-Zehnder interferometer with nonlinear interactions and offers the potential of achieving high phase sensitivity in applications with low optical powers. We present a novel variation in which the second nonlinear interaction is replaced with balanced homodyne detection. The phase-sensing quantum state is a two-mode squeezed state produced by seeded four-wave-mixing in Rb vapor. Measurements as a function of operating point show that even with $\approx35~\%$ loss this device can surpass the standard quantum limit by 4~dB.

arXiv:1610.06891•Optica•Jun 30, 2017•168 citations

An Atomic SU(1, 1) Interferometer via Spin-Changing Collisions

Robert J. Lewis-Swan

Springer theses•Jan 1, 2016•2 citations

SU(1,1) interferometry via four-wave mixing in Rb

Travis Horrom, Brian E. Anderson, Prasoon Gupta +1 more

Quantum-enhanced precision measurements have emerged as one of the most useful applications of quantum optics. Exploiting quantum states of light and quantum processes, classical measurement limits can be surpassed, leading to improvements in areas including clocks, spectroscopy, magnetometry, and imaging. One measurement where straightforward quantum enhancements are possible is phase sensing with an interferometer. One can inject squeezed vacuum states into the dark port of the beamsplitter in a traditional interferometer to reduce the quantum noise and reach phase sensitivities beyond the shot noise limit. An alternate approach is to replace the beamsplitters of an interferometer with nonlinear parametric amplifiers, which produce nonclassical states of light that can be used to surpass classical performance. This so called SU(1,1) interferometer can theoretically approach sensitivities that scale as 1/n, the Heisenberg limit where n is the interior phase sensing photon number, compared to the shot noise limit of 1/ √ n for a traditional interferometer [1]. I will present our group’s experimental progress in testing a Mach-Zender SU(1,1) interferometer using four-wave mixers (4WMs) in hot Rb atoms as the parametric beamsplitters. The 4WM process generates entangled twin beams which serve as the two arms of the interferometer, and are then recombined in a second 4WM cell, resulting in a phase-sensitive output. We will extend the work done on this interferometer [2, 3] by performing a detailed analysis of the output signal to noise through homodyne measurements, and will attempt to observe the better-than-shot-noise scaling of the sensitivity. We will also consider the various difficulties of this optical interferometer such as the susceptibility to loss and imperfect mode-matching within the interferometer. Our group is also considering an analogous SU(1,1) interferometer in a cold atom system. Collisions in a spinor Bose-Einstein condensate of sodium atoms give rise to a 4WM process that produces spin states of the atoms which are entangled in atom number. These interactions can be controlled to set up an SU(1,1) atom interferometer, where the relevant measurements are now atomic population differences rather than photon intensities. These enhancements can lead to drastic improvements in atomic spin interferometry [3, 4].

•Jan 1, 2015•3 citations
An SU(1,1) interferometer replaces the beamsplitters in a Mach-Zehnder interferometer with nonlinear interactions and offers the potential of achieving high phase sensitivity in applications with low optical powers. We present a novel variation in which the second nonlinear interaction is replaced with balanced homodyne detection. The phase-sensing quantum state is a two-mode squeezed state produced by seeded four-wave-mixing in Rb vapor. Measurements as a function of operating point show that even with ≈35 %\approx35~\%≈35 % loss this device can surpass the standard quantum limit by 4~dB.
Quantum-enhanced precision measurements have emerged as one of the most useful applications of quantum optics. Exploiting quantum states of light and quantum processes, classical measurement limits can be surpassed, leading to improvements in areas including clocks, spectroscopy, magnetometry, and imaging. One measurement where straightforward quantum enhancements are possible is phase sensing with an interferometer. One can inject squeezed vacuum states into the dark port of the beamsplitter in a traditional interferometer to reduce the quantum noise and reach phase sensitivities beyond the shot noise limit. An alternate approach is to replace the beamsplitters of an interferometer with nonlinear parametric amplifiers, which produce nonclassical states of light that can be used to surpass classical performance. This so called SU(1,1) interferometer can theoretically approach sensitivities that scale as 1/n, the Heisenberg limit where n is the interior phase sensing photon number, compared to the shot noise limit of 1/ √ n for a traditional interferometer [1]. I will present our group’s experimental progress in testing a Mach-Zender SU(1,1) interferometer using four-wave mixers (4WMs) in hot Rb atoms as the parametric beamsplitters. The 4WM process generates entangled twin beams which serve as the two arms of the interferometer, and are then recombined in a second 4WM cell, resulting in a phase-sensitive output. We will extend the work done on this interferometer [2, 3] by performing a detailed analysis of the output signal to noise through homodyne measurements, and will attempt to observe the better-than-shot-noise scaling of the sensitivity. We will also consider the various difficulties of this optical interferometer such as the susceptibility to loss and imperfect mode-matching within the interferometer. Our group is also considering an analogous SU(1,1) interferometer in a cold atom system. Collisions in a spinor Bose-Einstein condensate of sodium atoms give rise to a 4WM process that produces spin states of the atoms which are entangled in atom number. These interactions can be controlled to set up an SU(1,1) atom interferometer, where the relevant measurements are now atomic population differences rather than photon intensities. These enhancements can lead to drastic improvements in atomic spin interferometry [3, 4].