Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Springer theses

An Atomic SU(1, 1) Interferometer via Spin-Changing Collisions

Robert J. Lewis-Swan

Published Jan 1, 2016• 2 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-319-41048-7_5

Related papers

Spin change collisions in crossed atomic beams

D. Beck, U. Henkel, A.J. Schultz

Physics Letters A•Jul 1, 1968•8 citations

SU(2) and SU(1,1) interferometers

Bernard Yurke, S. L. McCall, John R. Klauder

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1988•35 citations

Integrable active atom interferometry

Michael Kästner, Vincent Menet, Johannes N. Kriel

Abstract Active interferometers are designed to enhance phase sensitivity beyond the standard quantum limit by generating entanglement inside the interferometer. An atomic version of such a device can be constructed by means of a spinor Bose–Einstein condensate with an F = 1 groundstate manifold in which spin-changing collisions (SCCs) create entangled pairs of m = ±1 atoms. We use Bethe Ansatz techniques to find exact eigenstates and eigenvalues of the Hamiltonian that models such SCCs. Using these results, we express the interferometer’s phase sensitivity, Fisher information, and Hellinger distance in terms of the Bethe rapidities. By evaluating these expressions we study scaling properties and the interferometer’s performance under the full Hamiltonian that models the SCCs, i.e., without the idealising approximations of earlier works that force the model into the framework of SU(1,1) interferometry.

arXiv:2007.13128•New Journal of Physics•Dec 1, 2020•3 citations

Atomic interferometry with spin-orbit-coupled spin-1 Bose-Einstein condensates

Anonymous, Junying Wu, Josep Cabedo +4 more

Physical Review A•Sep 23, 2026•0 citations

Spinor Bose-Einstein condensate interferometer within the undepleted pump approximation: Role of the initial state

Jianwen Jie, Qingze Guan, D. Blume

Most interferometers operate with photons or dilute, noncondensed cold atom clouds in which collisions are strongly suppressed. Spinor Bose-Einstein condensates (BECs) provide an alternative route toward realizing three-mode interferometers; in this realization, spin-changing collisions provide a resource that generates mode entanglement. Working in the regime where the pump mode, i.e., the $m=0$ hyperfine state, has a much larger population than the side or probe modes ($m=\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}1$ hyperfine states), $f=1$ spinor BECs approximate SU(1,1) interferometers. We derive analytical expressions within the undepleted pump approximation for the phase sensitivity of such an SU(1,1) interferometer for two classes of initial states: pure Fock states and coherent spin states. The interferometer performance is analyzed for initial states without seeding, with single-sided seeding, and with double-sided seeding. The validity regime of the undepleted pump approximation is assessed by performing quantum calculations for the full spin Hamiltonian. Our analytical results and the associated dynamics are expected to guide experiments as well as numerical studies that explore regimes where the undepleted pump approximation makes quantitatively or qualitatively incorrect predictions.

arXiv:1907.06974•Physical Review A•Oct 11, 2019•14 citations

SU(1,1) interferometry via four-wave mixing in Rb

Travis Horrom, Brian E. Anderson, Prasoon Gupta +1 more

Quantum-enhanced precision measurements have emerged as one of the most useful applications of quantum optics. Exploiting quantum states of light and quantum processes, classical measurement limits can be surpassed, leading to improvements in areas including clocks, spectroscopy, magnetometry, and imaging. One measurement where straightforward quantum enhancements are possible is phase sensing with an interferometer. One can inject squeezed vacuum states into the dark port of the beamsplitter in a traditional interferometer to reduce the quantum noise and reach phase sensitivities beyond the shot noise limit. An alternate approach is to replace the beamsplitters of an interferometer with nonlinear parametric amplifiers, which produce nonclassical states of light that can be used to surpass classical performance. This so called SU(1,1) interferometer can theoretically approach sensitivities that scale as 1/n, the Heisenberg limit where n is the interior phase sensing photon number, compared to the shot noise limit of 1/ √ n for a traditional interferometer [1]. I will present our group’s experimental progress in testing a Mach-Zender SU(1,1) interferometer using four-wave mixers (4WMs) in hot Rb atoms as the parametric beamsplitters. The 4WM process generates entangled twin beams which serve as the two arms of the interferometer, and are then recombined in a second 4WM cell, resulting in a phase-sensitive output. We will extend the work done on this interferometer [2, 3] by performing a detailed analysis of the output signal to noise through homodyne measurements, and will attempt to observe the better-than-shot-noise scaling of the sensitivity. We will also consider the various difficulties of this optical interferometer such as the susceptibility to loss and imperfect mode-matching within the interferometer. Our group is also considering an analogous SU(1,1) interferometer in a cold atom system. Collisions in a spinor Bose-Einstein condensate of sodium atoms give rise to a 4WM process that produces spin states of the atoms which are entangled in atom number. These interactions can be controlled to set up an SU(1,1) atom interferometer, where the relevant measurements are now atomic population differences rather than photon intensities. These enhancements can lead to drastic improvements in atomic spin interferometry [3, 4].

•Jan 1, 2015•3 citations
Abstract Active interferometers are designed to enhance phase sensitivity beyond the standard quantum limit by generating entanglement inside the interferometer. An atomic version of such a device can be constructed by means of a spinor Bose–Einstein condensate with an F = 1 groundstate manifold in which spin-changing collisions (SCCs) create entangled pairs of m = ±1 atoms. We use Bethe Ansatz techniques to find exact eigenstates and eigenvalues of the Hamiltonian that models such SCCs. Using these results, we express the interferometer’s phase sensitivity, Fisher information, and Hellinger distance in terms of the Bethe rapidities. By evaluating these expressions we study scaling properties and the interferometer’s performance under the full Hamiltonian that models the SCCs, i.e., without the idealising approximations of earlier works that force the model into the framework of SU(1,1) interferometry.
Most interferometers operate with photons or dilute, noncondensed cold atom clouds in which collisions are strongly suppressed. Spinor Bose-Einstein condensates (BECs) provide an alternative route toward realizing three-mode interferometers; in this realization, spin-changing collisions provide a resource that generates mode entanglement. Working in the regime where the pump mode, i.e., the m=0m=0m=0 hyperfine state, has a much larger population than the side or probe modes ($m=\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}1$ hyperfine states), f=1f=1f=1 spinor BECs approximate SU(1,1) interferometers. We derive analytical expressions within the undepleted pump approximation for the phase sensitivity of such an SU(1,1) interferometer for two classes of initial states: pure Fock states and coherent spin states. The interferometer performance is analyzed for initial states without seeding, with single-sided seeding, and with double-sided seeding. The validity regime of the undepleted pump approximation is assessed by performing quantum calculations for the full spin Hamiltonian. Our analytical results and the associated dynamics are expected to guide experiments as well as numerical studies that explore regimes where the undepleted pump approximation makes quantitatively or qualitatively incorrect predictions.
Quantum-enhanced precision measurements have emerged as one of the most useful applications of quantum optics. Exploiting quantum states of light and quantum processes, classical measurement limits can be surpassed, leading to improvements in areas including clocks, spectroscopy, magnetometry, and imaging. One measurement where straightforward quantum enhancements are possible is phase sensing with an interferometer. One can inject squeezed vacuum states into the dark port of the beamsplitter in a traditional interferometer to reduce the quantum noise and reach phase sensitivities beyond the shot noise limit. An alternate approach is to replace the beamsplitters of an interferometer with nonlinear parametric amplifiers, which produce nonclassical states of light that can be used to surpass classical performance. This so called SU(1,1) interferometer can theoretically approach sensitivities that scale as 1/n, the Heisenberg limit where n is the interior phase sensing photon number, compared to the shot noise limit of 1/ √ n for a traditional interferometer [1]. I will present our group’s experimental progress in testing a Mach-Zender SU(1,1) interferometer using four-wave mixers (4WMs) in hot Rb atoms as the parametric beamsplitters. The 4WM process generates entangled twin beams which serve as the two arms of the interferometer, and are then recombined in a second 4WM cell, resulting in a phase-sensitive output. We will extend the work done on this interferometer [2, 3] by performing a detailed analysis of the output signal to noise through homodyne measurements, and will attempt to observe the better-than-shot-noise scaling of the sensitivity. We will also consider the various difficulties of this optical interferometer such as the susceptibility to loss and imperfect mode-matching within the interferometer. Our group is also considering an analogous SU(1,1) interferometer in a cold atom system. Collisions in a spinor Bose-Einstein condensate of sodium atoms give rise to a 4WM process that produces spin states of the atoms which are entangled in atom number. These interactions can be controlled to set up an SU(1,1) atom interferometer, where the relevant measurements are now atomic population differences rather than photon intensities. These enhancements can lead to drastic improvements in atomic spin interferometry [3, 4].