Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review A

Response to "Comment on `Proposed molecular test of local hidden-variables theories' "

Abner Shimony

Published Oct 1, 1984• 7 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Several criticisms by Santos are answered. Objections are raised against a variant analysis which he proposed. Two cogent objections by Pritchard against Lo and Shimony are mentioned.Received 4 May 1984DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.30.2130©1984 American Physical Society

DOI
10.1103/physreva.30.2130

Related papers

Response to ‘‘Comment on ‘Binary formation of NaNe quasibound molecules observed in spin relaxation in Na’ ’’

F. A. Franz, A. Sieradzan

We discuss several points not considered in the preceding Comment on our earlier work, which tend to refute the Comment.Received 26 November 1984DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.31.4022©1985 American Physical Society

Physical Review A•Jun 1, 1985•2 citations

Comment on "How to make quantum mechanics look like a hidden-variable theory and vice versa"

Peter W. Milonni

The hidden-variable theory considered by Scully is discussed in the context of photon polarization correlations.Received 17 January 1984DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.32.1040©1985 American Physical Society

Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields•Aug 15, 1985•5 citations

Experimental Test of a Hidden-Variable Quantum Theory

Costas D. Papaliolios

Received 31 January 1967DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.18.622©1967 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•Apr 10, 1967•52 citations

Comment on "Proposed molecular test of local hidden-variables theories"

Emilio Santos

Lo and Shimony have proposed a molecular test of local hidden-variables theories, which should eliminate a loophole arising in all tests dealing with photons. It is pointed out that the proposed correction for accidental coincidences invalidates the test. Conditions for the reliability of the experiment are stated.

Physical Review A•Oct 1, 1984•11 citations

Comment on "Bell's Theorem: Does the Clauser-Horne Inequality Hold for All Local Theories?"

Michael Horne, Abner Shimony

Received 5 December 1983DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.53.1296©1984 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•Sep 24, 1984•5 citations

Comment on "Bell's Theorem: Does the Clauser-Horne Inequality Hold for All Local Theories?"

Anupam Garg, A. J. Leggett

Received 29 November 1983DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.53.1019©1984 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•Sep 3, 1984•5 citations
Several criticisms by Santos are answered. Objections are raised against a variant analysis which he proposed. Two cogent objections by Pritchard against Lo and Shimony are mentioned.Received 4 May 1984DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.30.2130©1984 American Physical Society