Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review Letters

Comment on "Bell's Theorem: Does the Clauser-Horne Inequality Hold for All Local Theories?"

Michael Horne, Abner Shimony

Published Sep 24, 1984• 5 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Received 5 December 1983DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.53.1296©1984 American Physical Society
DOI
10.1103/physrevlett.53.1296

Related papers

Comment on "Bell's Theorem: Does the Clauser-Horne Inequality Hold for All Local Theories?"

Anupam Garg, A. J. Leggett

Received 29 November 1983DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.53.1019©1984 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•Sep 3, 1984•5 citations

Comment on "Bell's Theorem as a Nonlocality Property of Quantum Theory"

P. A. Moldauer

Received 17 December 1982DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.50.701©1983 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•Feb 28, 1983•2 citations

Comment on "Contractive States and the Standard Quantum Limit for Monitoring Free-Mass Positions"

K. Wódkiewicz

Received 7 November 1983DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.52.787©1984 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•Feb 27, 1984•11 citations

Publisher's Note: Tsirelson bounds for generalized Clauser-Horne-Hold inequalities [Phys. Rev. A73, 022110 (2006)]

Stephanie Wehner

Received 28 February 2006DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.73.039907©2006 American Physical Society

Physical Review A•Mar 15, 2006•0 citations

Comment on ‘‘Does quantum mechanics violate the Bell inequalities?’’

Alastair I. M. Rae

A Comment on the Letter by E. Santos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 1388 (1991).Received 17 April 1991DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.2700©1992 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•Apr 27, 1992•6 citations

Comment on ‘‘Does quantum mechanics violate the Bell inequalities?’’

Y. Ben-Aryeh, Aharon Postan

A Comment on the Letter by E. Santos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 1388 (1991).Received 10 June 1991DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.2701©1992 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•Apr 27, 1992•4 citations