We present in this paper a set of postulates for a physical system and deduce from these the main general features of the quantum theory of stationary states. Our theory is strictly operational in the sense that only the observables of the physical system are involved in the postulates. The collection of all bounded self-adj oint operators on a Hilbert space, which has previously been used as a mathematical model for the observables in quantum mechanics, satisfy the postulates, as do a variety of considerably more general mathematical structures. We show that for any two observables there exists a pure state of the system (this term being defined essentially as done by von Neumann and Weyl) in which they have different (expectation) values. Each observable has a spectral resolution, and a state of the system induces, in a natural way, a probability distribution on the range of spectral values of each observable. A number of observables are simultaneously observable if and only if they commute (although the product of two observables is not defined in general, a reasonable notion of commutativity can be introduced). Inasmuch as Hilbert space plays no role in our theory, our proofs are necessarily of a different character from the proofs of these results for the case of the system of all bounded selfadjoint operators. Actually, Hilbert space appears to be somewhat inadequate as a state space even for the latter system, in that there exist pure states of the system which cannot be represented in the usual way by rays of the Hilbert space. The postulates are partly algebraic and partly metric. The algebraic postulates require essentially that an observable can be multiplied by real numbers and raised to integral powers, and that any two observables can be added. It is assumed that the usual algebraic laws are satisfied so that (1) the observables can be treated like the elements of a linear space, and (2) the usual rules for dealing with polynomials in one variable with real coefficients remain valid when the variable is replaced by an observable. It is not assumed that two observables have a product. The metric postulates require that for each observable there be defined a kind of maximum numerical value, which plays the part of a norm, and has various properties in accord with its physical significance. While this norm is quite essential to the development of the theory, an interesting consequence of the theory is that the norm can be (uniquely) defined in a purely algebraic fashion. This shows that the objective features of a physical system,-the spectral values and probability distributions of the observables, and the pure states,-are completely determined by the algebra of observables, i.e., by the rules for addition, scalar multiplication, and powers, of observables.
We present in this paper a set of postulates for a physical system and deduce from these the main general features of the quantum theory of stationary states. Our theory is strictly operational in the sense that only the observables of the physical system are involved in the postulates. The collection of all bounded self-adj oint operators on a Hilbert space, which has previously been used as a mathematical model for the observables in quantum mechanics, satisfy the postulates, as do a variety of considerably more general mathematical structures. We show that for any two observables there exists a pure state of the system (this term being defined essentially as done by von Neumann and Weyl) in which they have different (expectation) values. Each observable has a spectral resolution, and a state of the system induces, in a natural way, a probability distribution on the range of spectral values of each observable. A number of observables are simultaneously observable if and only if they commute (although the product of two observables is not defined in general, a reasonable notion of commutativity can be introduced). Inasmuch as Hilbert space plays no role in our theory, our proofs are necessarily of a different character from the proofs of these results for the case of the system of all bounded selfadjoint operators. Actually, Hilbert space appears to be somewhat inadequate as a state space even for the latter system, in that there exist pure states of the system which cannot be represented in the usual way by rays of the Hilbert space. The postulates are partly algebraic and partly metric. The algebraic postulates require essentially that an observable can be multiplied by real numbers and raised to integral powers, and that any two observables can be added. It is assumed that the usual algebraic laws are satisfied so that (1) the observables can be treated like the elements of a linear space, and (2) the usual rules for dealing with polynomials in one variable with real coefficients remain valid when the variable is replaced by an observable. It is not assumed that two observables have a product. The metric postulates require that for each observable there be defined a kind of maximum numerical value, which plays the part of a norm, and has various properties in accord with its physical significance. While this norm is quite essential to the development of the theory, an interesting consequence of the theory is that the norm can be (uniquely) defined in a purely algebraic fashion. This shows that the objective features of a physical system,-the spectral values and probability distributions of the observables, and the pure states,-are completely determined by the algebra of observables, i.e., by the rules for addition, scalar multiplication, and powers, of observables.
The Hilbert-Space Description By the static description of a physical system we mean the rules that assign specified mathematical objects to the states and to the physical quantities of the system, and the prescriptions for calculating the probability distribution of the possible values of every physical quantity when the state of the system is given. In the usual Hilbert-space formulation of quantum mechanics, to each physical system is attached a separable Hilbert space (generally infinite-dimensional) over the complex field. To every physical quantity is associated a linear, self-adjoint, not necessarily bounded operator on. If one deals with a strictly quantum system, then the converse is also generally assumed: every self-adjoint operator on represents some physical quan- tity. The restriction “strictly quantum” is necessary: if the system retains some nonquantum (i.e. classical) feature, so that it requires the algorithm of so-called “superselection rules” (see Chapter 5), then there are self-adjoint operators on that do not represent physical quantities. It should also be stressed that even in the strictly quantum case, most of the self-adjoint operators actually do not represent “interesting” physical quantities: only a few of them represent physical quantities that are useful and meaningful for the description of the physical system (e.g., energy, momentum, position, angular momentum). Therefore, by asserting that every self-adjoint operator on corresponds to some physical quantity we mean there is no a priori impossibility of devising such a correspondence, but we do not claim that this correspondence is present in the real work of experimental physics.
Quantum theory is the soul of contemporary physics. It was discovered in an adventurous way, under the urge to solve the puzzles posed by atomic spectra and blackbody radiation. But after its invention, it immediately became clear that it was not just a theory of specific physical systems: it was rather a new language of universal applicability. Already in 1928, the theory had received solid mathematical foundations by Hilbert, von Neumann, and Nordheim, and this work was brought to completion in the monumental work of von Neumann, in the form that we still study nowadays. The theory is extraordinarily successful, and its predictions have been confirmed to an astonishing level of precision in a large spectrum of experiments. However, almost 90 years after von Neumann's book, quantum theory remains mysterious. Its mathematical formulation – based on Hilbert spaces and self-adjoint operators – is far from having an intuitive interpretation. The association of physical systems to Hilbert spaces whose unit vectors represent pure states, the representation of transformations by unitary operators and of observables by self-adjoint operators – all such postulates look artificial and ad hoc . A slightly more operational approach is provided by the C * -algebraic formulation of quantum theory – still, this formulation relies on the assumption that observables form an algebra , where the physical meanings of the multiplication and the sum are far from clear. In short, the postulates of quantum theory impose mathematical structures without providing any simple reason for this choice: the mathematics of Hilbert spaces is adopted as a magic blackbox that “works well” at producing experimental predictions. However, in a satisfactory axiomatization of a physical theory the mathematical structures should emerge as a consequence of postulates that have a direct physical interpretation. By this we mean postulates referring, e.g., to primitive notions like physical system, measurement, or process, rather than notions like, e.g., Hilbert space, C * -algebra, unit vector, or selfadjoint operator. The crucial question thus remains unanswered: why quantum theory? Which are the principles at the basis of the theory? A case that is often invoked in contrast is that of Special Relativity theory, which directly follows from the simple understandable principle of relativity.
The authors present briefly the basic notions of the quantum formalism: pure and mixed states; quantum observables; quantum probability; Born’s rule, superposition, and ‘state collapse’; the projection postulate (von Neumann–Lüders postulate); Dirac’s ket and bra-vector notations; elements of quantum information theory and quantum logic; Schrödinger’s and von Neumann’s equations; unitary dynamics; and positive operator valued measures. They also define the basic mathematical notions related to the quantum formalism: Hilbert space; scalar product; norm; Hermitian operator (matrix); projector; and unitary operator and adjoint operator. This chapter may be useful for newcomers to the field, but for those readers who have preliminary knowledge about quantum mechanics (QM) they can proceed directly to advanced chapters. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
In the present paper I show how it is possible to derive the Hilbert space formulation of Quantum Mechanics from a comprehensive definition of physical experiment and assuming experimental accessibility and simplicity as specified by five simple Postulates. This accomplishes the program presented in form of conjectures in the previous paper. Pivotal roles are played by the local observability principle, which reconciles the holism of nonlocality with the reductionism of local observation, and by the postulated existence of informationally complete observables and of a symmetric faithful state. This last notion allows one to introduce an operational definition for the real version of the “adjoint”—i. e. the transposition—from which one can derive a real Hilbert‐space structure via either the Mackey‐Kakutani or the Gelfand‐Naimark‐Segal constructions. Here I analyze in detail only the Gelfand‐Naimark‐Segal construction, which leads to a real Hilbert space structure analogous to that of (classes of generally unbounded) selfadjoint operators in Quantum Mechanics. For finite dimensions, general dimensionality theorems that can be derived from a local observability principle, allow us to represent the elements of the real Hilbert space as operators over an underlying complex Hilbert space (see, however, a still open problem at the end of the paper). The route for the present operational axiomatization was suggested by novel ideas originated from Quantum Tomography.
This chapter reminds, without entering into details, the main mathematical concepts and results relevant for finite system quantum mechanics. The basic postulates single out a Hilbert space of wave functions with self-adjoint linear operators corresponding to observables as was originally discovered by von Neumann. The chapter connects the contemporary terminology of linear Hilbert space operators with quantum physics. Important concepts like linear operators, measures, self-adjointness, spectral measures, density matrices, and tensor products are discussed and illustrated in the light of observables, probability for quantum systems and composite systems. A first example of a useful algebra of observables, the Weyl algebra, is described in detail and linked to the classical phase space of a point particle.
I discuss a set of strong, but probabilistically intelligible, axioms from which one can {\em almost} derive the appratus of finite dimensional quantum theory. Stated informally, these require that systems appear completely classical as restricted to a single measurement, that different measurements, and likewise different pure states, be equivalent (up to the action of a compact group of symmetries), and that every state be the marginal of a bipartite non-signaling state perfectly correlating two measurements. This much yields a mathematical representation of measurements and states that is already very suggestive of quantum mechanics. In particular, in any theory satisfying these axioms, measurements can be represented by orthonormal subsets of, and states, by vectors in, an ordered real Hilbert space -- in the quantum case, the space of Hermitian operators, with its usual tracial inner product. One final postulate (a simple minimization principle, still in need of a clear interpretation) forces the positive cone of this space to be homogeneous and self-dual and hence, to be the the state space of a formally real Jordan algebra. From here, the route to the standard framework of finite-dimensional quantum mechanics is quite short.