Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Communications in Theoretical Physics

Comments on “Double-Wave Theory”

Zhu Zhen-he

Published Mar 15, 2003• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Some falsehoods of the so-called double-wave theory (DWT) are pointed out. The logic and the origin of the DWT, and three of the four fundamental hypotheses of DWT are criticized. It is expounded that the hypothesis of two wave functions is unreasonable, the hypothesized Hamiltonian differs from the actually used Hamiltonian, and the hypothesized expression of measured values or mean values of mechanical quantities is wrong and does not express the measured values or mean values at all.

DOI
10.1088/0253-6102/39/3/304

Related papers

Criticism on Two Fundamental Hypotheses of “Double-wave Theory”

Zhu Zhen-he

Some falsehoods of the so-called double-wave theory (DWT) are pointed out. Two of the four fundamental hypotheses of DWT are criticized. It is expounded that the hypothesis of two wave functions is unreasonable; and the hypothesized expression of measured values or mean values of mechanical quantities is wrong and does not express the measured values or mean values at all.

Zhongyang Minzu Daxue xuebao•Jan 1, 2002•0 citations

Absurd Results from the Expression of Expectation Values of “Double—Wave Theory”

朱振和

Two of the four fundamental hypotheses of the double-wave theory(DWT) are criticized.It is expounded that the hypothesis of two wavefunctions is unreasonable and the hypothesized expression of measured values or expectation values of mechanical quantities is incorrect and does not express the measured values or expectation values at all.This expression can lead to some absurd results.

Chinese Physics Letters•Jan 1, 2003•0 citations

Absurd Results from the Expression of Expectation Values of ``Double-Wave Theory''

Zhu Zhen-he

Two of the four fundamental hypotheses of the double-wave theory (DWT) are criticized. It is expounded that the hypothesis of two wavefunctions is unreasonable and the hypothesized expression of measured values or expectation values of mechanical quantities is incorrect and does not express the measured values or expectation values at all. This expression can lead to some absurd results.

Chinese Physics Letters•Dec 9, 2002•5 citations

Undulatory Theory with Paraconsistent Logic (Part I): Quantum Logical Model with Two Wave Functions

João Inácio da Silva Filho

Paraconsistent logic (PL) is a non-classical logic that accepts contradiction in its foundations. It can be represented in the form of paraconsistent annotated logic with annotation of two values (PAL2v). When used to model quantum phenomena, PAL2v is called paraquantum logic (PQL). In this work, the concept of PQL is applied to create a logical model presenting the fundamental principles of quantum mechanics that support particle-wave theory. This study uses the well-known Young’s double-slit experiment, wherein quantum phenomena appear when a monochromatic light beam passes through the two slits. We focused on a reference point located between the slits, where we observed the effects of two types of wave interferences in a region defined as a two-wave region (2W region). Considering that the effect in this 2W region is very similar to that studied by Huygens, we adopt a paraquantum logical model in which a particle (or quantum) is represented by two wave functions. The two wave functions result in four State Vectors (Ket, Bra,,) in the PQL Lattice that express the symmetry and the entanglement of Quantum Mechanics. The constructed model adapts well to the quantum phenomena, is strongly consistent, and can be considered as an innovative form of analysis in the field of quantum mechanics. Based on this model, we present in two parts (Part I and Part II) the comparative analysis of values found in SchrÖdinger’s equation and probabilistic models of wave-particle theory using Bonferroni inequality.

Journal of Quantum Information Science•Jan 1, 2016•7 citations

INTERPRETATION OF WAVE MECHANICS

Louis de Broglie

A restatement is made of the interpretation of the wave mechanic by the double-solution theory. Some results recently obtained are specially made obvious, in connection with new points of view, which commanded attention since 1954-1955. (auth)

•Dec 1, 1959•1 citation

The Wave Function Must Represent a Physical Wave

The Einstein relationship, the de Broglie relationship, and the Born rule are considered fundamental in quantum mechanics, yet in mathematical logic, as usually written, they are not self-consistent [1]. On the other hand, each has had great success individually at predicting the outcome of experiments. It is shown here that the lack of self-consistency can be remedied if it is assumed the wave is physical, and the equation for the wave, and not the particle, is actually the Schrödinger equation.

Journal of Mathematical Techniques and Computational Mathematics•Jul 2, 2024•0 citations
Some falsehoods of the so-called double-wave theory (DWT) are pointed out. The logic and the origin of the DWT, and three of the four fundamental hypotheses of DWT are criticized. It is expounded that the hypothesis of two wave functions is unreasonable, the hypothesized Hamiltonian differs from the actually used Hamiltonian, and the hypothesized expression of measured values or mean values of mechanical quantities is wrong and does not express the measured values or mean values at all.
Paraconsistent logic (PL) is a non-classical logic that accepts contradiction in its foundations. It can be represented in the form of paraconsistent annotated logic with annotation of two values (PAL2v). When used to model quantum phenomena, PAL2v is called paraquantum logic (PQL). In this work, the concept of PQL is applied to create a logical model presenting the fundamental principles of quantum mechanics that support particle-wave theory. This study uses the well-known Young’s double-slit experiment, wherein quantum phenomena appear when a monochromatic light beam passes through the two slits. We focused on a reference point located between the slits, where we observed the effects of two types of wave interferences in a region defined as a two-wave region (2W region). Considering that the effect in this 2W region is very similar to that studied by Huygens, we adopt a paraquantum logical model in which a particle (or quantum) is represented by two wave functions. The two wave functions result in four State Vectors (Ket, Bra,,) in the PQL Lattice that express the symmetry and the entanglement of Quantum Mechanics. The constructed model adapts well to the quantum phenomena, is strongly consistent, and can be considered as an innovative form of analysis in the field of quantum mechanics. Based on this model, we present in two parts (Part I and Part II) the comparative analysis of values found in SchrÖdinger’s equation and probabilistic models of wave-particle theory using Bonferroni inequality.
The Einstein relationship, the de Broglie relationship, and the Born rule are considered fundamental in quantum mechanics, yet in mathematical logic, as usually written, they are not self-consistent [1]. On the other hand, each has had great success individually at predicting the outcome of experiments. It is shown here that the lack of self-consistency can be remedied if it is assumed the wave is physical, and the equation for the wave, and not the particle, is actually the Schrödinger equation.