Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review A

Tunneling delays in frustrated total internal reflection

George M. Gehring, Andreas C. Liapis, Robert W. Boyd

Published Mar 22, 2012• 14 citations
Publisher

Abstract

We demonstrate a direct relationship between tunneling delays in a one-dimensional potential barrier and the delays observed in frustrated total internal reflection. Expressions relating the group delays in these two cases have been formulated in the past [A. M. Steinberg and R. Y. Chiao, Phys. Rev. A 49, 3283 (1994)], but only for certain limits of the normalized particle energy $E/{V}_{0}$. Here, we derive a single expression relating these two group delays that is valid for arbitrary particle energy by decomposing the group delay into dwell-time and self-interference components. This decomposition also explains why the predicted delay differs in the limiting cases observed by Steinberg and Chiao.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.85.032122

Related papers

Tunneling delay times in one and two dimensions

Aephraim M. Steinberg, R. Y. Chiao

We demonstrate that although the well-known analogy between the time-independent solutions for two-dimensional tunneling (e.g., frustrated total internal reflection) and tunneling through a one-dimensional potential barrier cannot, in general, be extended to the time domain, there are certain limits in which the delay times for the two problems obey a simple relationship. In particular, when an effective mass is chosen such that ${\mathit{mc}}^{2}$=\ensuremath{\Elzxh}\ensuremath{\omega}, the ``classical'' traversal times for allowed transmission become identical for a photon of energy \ensuremath{\Elzxh}\ensuremath{\omega} traversing an air gap between regions of index n and for a particle of mass m traversing the analogous square barrier of height ${\mathit{V}}_{0}$ in one dimension. The quantum-mechanical group delays are also identical, given this effective mass, both for E\ensuremath{\approxeq}${\mathit{V}}_{0}$ (\ensuremath{\theta}\ensuremath{\approxeq}${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\theta}}}_{\mathit{c}}$) and for E\ensuremath{\gg}${\mathit{V}}_{0}$ (\ensuremath{\theta}\ensuremath{\ll}${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\theta}}}_{\mathit{c}}$). (For a smoothly varying potential or index of refraction, the agreement persists for all values of E where the WKB approximation applies.) The same relation serves to equate the quantum-mechanical ``dwell'' times for any values of E and ${\mathit{V}}_{0}$. On the other hand, in the ``deep tunneling'' limit, E\ensuremath{\ll}${\mathit{V}}_{0}$ (\ensuremath{\theta}\ensuremath{\approxeq}\ensuremath{\pi}/2), one must choose ${\mathit{mc}}^{2}$=${\mathit{n}}^{2}$\ensuremath{\Elzxh}\ensuremath{\omega} in order to make the group delays equal for the two problems. These equivalences simplify certain calculations, and the two-dimensional analogy may also be useful for geometrically visualizing the tunneling process and the anomalously small group delays known to occur in the opaque limit. We also demonstrate that the equality of the group delays for transmission and reflection for lossless barriers follows from a simple intuitive argument based on time-reversal invariance, and discuss the extension of the result to the case of lossy barriers.

Physical Review A•May 1, 1994•210 citations

Tunneling delay time in frustrated total internal reflection

Herbert G. Winful, Chao Zhang

The group delay in frustrated total internal reflection (FTIR) is shown to equal the dwell time plus a self-interference delay. The self-interference delay originates from the energy stored in the overlap between incident and reflected waves above the interface. The group delay in FTIR for finite beams is thus shown to be the lifetime of stored energy in the gap between the prisms and in the partial standing wave above the gap. As in other manifestations of tunneling the saturation of group delay with barrier length (Hartman effect) is explained by the saturation of stored energy in the region defined. No superluminal propagation is implied.

Physical Review A•Feb 23, 2009•23 citations

Single-Photon Measurement of the Hartman Effect in Frustrated Total Internal Reflection

Andreas C. Liapis, George M. Gehring, Svetlana G. Lukishova +1 more

Using fourth-order interference, we have measured the single-photon tunneling delay in frustrated total internal reflection. The results are explained in terms of a dwell-time interpretation of the Hartman effect.

International Conference on Quantum Information•Jan 1, 2011•1 citation

The meaning of group delay in barrier tunnelling: a re-examination of superluminal group velocities

Herbert G. Winful

We show that the group delay in tunnelling is not a traversal time but a lifetime of stored energy or stored probability escaping through both ends of the barrier. Because it is a lifetime associated with both forward (transmitted) and backward (reflected) fluxes, it cannot be used to define a group velocity for forward transit in cases where a wavepacket is mostly reflected. For photonic tunnelling barriers the group delay is identical to the dwell time which is also a property of an entire wavefunction with reflected and transmitted components. Theoretical predictions and experimental reports of superluminal group velocities in barrier tunnelling are re-interpreted.

arXiv:quant-ph/0601085•New Journal of Physics•Jun 13, 2006•65 citations

Delay Time and the Hartman Effect in Quantum Tunneling

Herbert G. Winful

A general relation between the group delay and the dwell time is derived for quantum tunneling. It is shown that the group delay is equal to the dwell time plus a self-interference delay. The Hartman effect in quantum tunneling is explained on the basis of saturation of the integrated probability density (or number of particles) under the barrier.

Physical Review Letters•Dec 23, 2003•234 citations

Tunneling time in the case of frustrated total reflection

Daniela Mugnai, Anedio Ranfagni, Laura Ronchi

The tunneling time is here investigated by means of an electromagnetic model, for a system where a gap, between two parallel planes, acts as a classically-forbidden region for an impinging pulse with incidence angle larger than the critical angle. In all cases of frustrated total reflection we obtain a superluminal behavior both for phase and group delays.

arXiv:physics/0111192•Nov 27, 2001•2 citations
We demonstrate a direct relationship between tunneling delays in a one-dimensional potential barrier and the delays observed in frustrated total internal reflection. Expressions relating the group delays in these two cases have been formulated in the past [A. M. Steinberg and R. Y. Chiao, Phys. Rev. A 49, 3283 (1994)], but only for certain limits of the normalized particle energy E/V0E/{V}_{0}E/V0​. Here, we derive a single expression relating these two group delays that is valid for arbitrary particle energy by decomposing the group delay into dwell-time and self-interference components. This decomposition also explains why the predicted delay differs in the limiting cases observed by Steinberg and Chiao.
We demonstrate that although the well-known analogy between the time-independent solutions for two-dimensional tunneling (e.g., frustrated total internal reflection) and tunneling through a one-dimensional potential barrier cannot, in general, be extended to the time domain, there are certain limits in which the delay times for the two problems obey a simple relationship. In particular, when an effective mass is chosen such that mc2{\mathit{mc}}^{2}mc2=\ensuremath{\Elzxh}\ensuremath{\omega}, the ``classical'' traversal times for allowed transmission become identical for a photon of energy \ensuremath{\Elzxh}\ensuremath{\omega} traversing an air gap between regions of index n and for a particle of mass m traversing the analogous square barrier of height V0{\mathit{V}}_{0}V0​ in one dimension. The quantum-mechanical group delays are also identical, given this effective mass, both for E\ensuremath{\approxeq}V0{\mathit{V}}_{0}V0​ (\ensuremath{\theta}\ensuremath{\approxeq}${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\theta}}}_{\mathit{c}}$) and for E\ensuremath{\gg}V0{\mathit{V}}_{0}V0​ (\ensuremath{\theta}\ensuremath{\ll}${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\theta}}}_{\mathit{c}}$). (For a smoothly varying potential or index of refraction, the agreement persists for all values of E where the WKB approximation applies.) The same relation serves to equate the quantum-mechanical ``dwell'' times for any values of E and V0{\mathit{V}}_{0}V0​. On the other hand, in the ``deep tunneling'' limit, E\ensuremath{\ll}V0{\mathit{V}}_{0}V0​ (\ensuremath{\theta}\ensuremath{\approxeq}\ensuremath{\pi}/2), one must choose mc2{\mathit{mc}}^{2}mc2=n2{\mathit{n}}^{2}n2\ensuremath{\Elzxh}\ensuremath{\omega} in order to make the group delays equal for the two problems. These equivalences simplify certain calculations, and the two-dimensional analogy may also be useful for geometrically visualizing the tunneling process and the anomalously small group delays known to occur in the opaque limit. We also demonstrate that the equality of the group delays for transmission and reflection for lossless barriers follows from a simple intuitive argument based on time-reversal invariance, and discuss the extension of the result to the case of lossy barriers.
The group delay in frustrated total internal reflection (FTIR) is shown to equal the dwell time plus a self-interference delay. The self-interference delay originates from the energy stored in the overlap between incident and reflected waves above the interface. The group delay in FTIR for finite beams is thus shown to be the lifetime of stored energy in the gap between the prisms and in the partial standing wave above the gap. As in other manifestations of tunneling the saturation of group delay with barrier length (Hartman effect) is explained by the saturation of stored energy in the region defined. No superluminal propagation is implied.
We show that the group delay in tunnelling is not a traversal time but a lifetime of stored energy or stored probability escaping through both ends of the barrier. Because it is a lifetime associated with both forward (transmitted) and backward (reflected) fluxes, it cannot be used to define a group velocity for forward transit in cases where a wavepacket is mostly reflected. For photonic tunnelling barriers the group delay is identical to the dwell time which is also a property of an entire wavefunction with reflected and transmitted components. Theoretical predictions and experimental reports of superluminal group velocities in barrier tunnelling are re-interpreted.