Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review A

Tunneling delay times in one and two dimensions

Aephraim M. Steinberg, R. Y. Chiao

Published May 1, 1994• 210 citations
Publisher

Abstract

We demonstrate that although the well-known analogy between the time-independent solutions for two-dimensional tunneling (e.g., frustrated total internal reflection) and tunneling through a one-dimensional potential barrier cannot, in general, be extended to the time domain, there are certain limits in which the delay times for the two problems obey a simple relationship. In particular, when an effective mass is chosen such that ${\mathit{mc}}^{2}$=\ensuremath{\Elzxh}\ensuremath{\omega}, the ``classical'' traversal times for allowed transmission become identical for a photon of energy \ensuremath{\Elzxh}\ensuremath{\omega} traversing an air gap between regions of index n and for a particle of mass m traversing the analogous square barrier of height ${\mathit{V}}_{0}$ in one dimension. The quantum-mechanical group delays are also identical, given this effective mass, both for E\ensuremath{\approxeq}${\mathit{V}}_{0}$ (\ensuremath{\theta}\ensuremath{\approxeq}${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\theta}}}_{\mathit{c}}$) and for E\ensuremath{\gg}${\mathit{V}}_{0}$ (\ensuremath{\theta}\ensuremath{\ll}${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\theta}}}_{\mathit{c}}$). (For a smoothly varying potential or index of refraction, the agreement persists for all values of E where the WKB approximation applies.) The same relation serves to equate the quantum-mechanical ``dwell'' times for any values of E and ${\mathit{V}}_{0}$. On the other hand, in the ``deep tunneling'' limit, E\ensuremath{\ll}${\mathit{V}}_{0}$ (\ensuremath{\theta}\ensuremath{\approxeq}\ensuremath{\pi}/2), one must choose ${\mathit{mc}}^{2}$=${\mathit{n}}^{2}$\ensuremath{\Elzxh}\ensuremath{\omega} in order to make the group delays equal for the two problems. These equivalences simplify certain calculations, and the two-dimensional analogy may also be useful for geometrically visualizing the tunneling process and the anomalously small group delays known to occur in the opaque limit. We also demonstrate that the equality of the group delays for transmission and reflection for lossless barriers follows from a simple intuitive argument based on time-reversal invariance, and discuss the extension of the result to the case of lossy barriers.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.49.3283

Related papers

Tunneling delays in frustrated total internal reflection

George M. Gehring, Andreas C. Liapis, Robert W. Boyd

We demonstrate a direct relationship between tunneling delays in a one-dimensional potential barrier and the delays observed in frustrated total internal reflection. Expressions relating the group delays in these two cases have been formulated in the past [A. M. Steinberg and R. Y. Chiao, Phys. Rev. A 49, 3283 (1994)], but only for certain limits of the normalized particle energy $E/{V}_{0}$. Here, we derive a single expression relating these two group delays that is valid for arbitrary particle energy by decomposing the group delay into dwell-time and self-interference components. This decomposition also explains why the predicted delay differs in the limiting cases observed by Steinberg and Chiao.

Physical Review A•Mar 22, 2012•14 citations

Some important aspects of the tunneling phenomenon through quantum structures

E. Polatdemir

Tunneling phenomenon is one of the wondrous events that take place particularly in quantum mechanics and it has no counterpart in classical physics. We focus on its two important implications : tunneling time and tunneling probability. There has been no consensus on tunneling times among the tunneling time community for last seven decades. So far, most of the attempts to calculate tunneling times have apparently been centered on a simple rectangular barrier example. We implement the tunneling times with the most widely accepted approach, which is using physical Larmor clock, into a nonsymmetrical barrier and a double barrier. It results in different and unique insights into the usual understanding of tunneling time. Three characteristics tunneling time expressions are thoroughly studied in these quantum structures. The difference between dwell time and phase-delay time is once again approved. The unique characteristics of the phase-delay time, which was thought to be exactly similar to dwell time when we assign higher energies to the particles, is also revealed in the nonsymmetrical barrier that it should actually be regarded as a distinct feature from the dwell time. The singularity of reflection time in rectangular barrier is no longer valid in nonsymmetrical barrier. The finiteness of reflection time fairly shows that different quantum structures might bear some taboo breaking results. Since a double barrier involves much more complicated features and calculations, the calculation of tunneling times under this barrier is praiseworthy. The dwell time is the most crucial, troublesome and distinctive tunneling time element to look into for a double barrier. Besides the dwell and phase-delay time, we also calculate the three characteristic times as well as the reflection time for a double barrier. Another area that we study within the context of tunneling phenomenon is the tunneling probability. Recently, there has been ground shaking attempts in modifying the conventional WKB formulae. We follow one of the modified versions of WKB formulae in order to be able to calculate the tunneling probability through different quantum structures where conventional WKB formulae fail. These generalized WKB connection formulae are applied to some complex quantum potentials by seeking aid from the Green's function and the path integral approach. One of the biggest problems in quantum mechanics (visualization) is partially overcome through implementing the method of diagrammatic representations that make the life easier in understanding the events happening in the quantum world when we attempt to calculate the transmission and reflection probabilities. This part therefore has a pedagogical sense too in terms of interpreting the results in a diagrammatic way with the help of the path integral approach.

•Jan 1, 2002•0 citations

Tunneling times: a critical review

E. H. Hauge, Jon Andreas Støvneng

The old question of "How long does it take to tunnel through a barrier?" has acquired new urgency with the advent of techniques for the fabrication of semiconductor structures in the nanometer range. For the restricted problem of tunneling in a scattering configuration, a coherent picture is now emerging. The dwell time ${\ensuremath{\tau}}_{D}$ has the status of an exact statement of the time spent in a region of space, averaged over all incoming particles. The phase times ${\ensuremath{\tau}}_{T}^{\ensuremath{\phi}}$ and ${\ensuremath{\tau}}_{R}^{\ensuremath{\phi}}$ are defined separately for transmitted and reflected particles. They are asymptotic statements on completed scattering events and include self-interference delays as well as the time spent in the barrier. Consequently, neither the dwell time nor the phase times can answer the question of how much time a transmitted (alternatively, reflected) particle spent in the barrier region. Our discussion of this question relies on a few simple criteria: (1) The average duration of a physical process must be real. (2) Since transmission and reflection are mutually exclusive events, the times ${\ensuremath{\tau}}_{T}$ and ${\ensuremath{\tau}}_{R}$ spent in the barrier region are, if they exist, conditional averages. Consequently, they must obey the identity ${\ensuremath{\tau}}_{D}=T{\ensuremath{\tau}}_{T}+R{\ensuremath{\tau}}_{R}$, where $T$ and $R$ are the transmission and reflection probabilities, respectively. The existence of this identity distinguishes tunneling in a scattering configuration from tunneling out of a metastable state. (3) Any proposed ${\ensuremath{\tau}}_{T}$ and ${\ensuremath{\tau}}_{R}$ must meet every requirement that can be constructed from ${\ensuremath{\tau}}_{D}$. On the basis of (2), the naively extrapolated phase times, as well as the B\"uttiker-Landauer time, must be rejected. The local Larmor times, as introduced by Baz', satisfy (2), but not every criterion of type (3). The local Larmor clock is therefore unreliable. The asymptotic Larmor clock shows the phase times, as it should. Finally, the inverse characteristic frequency of an oscillating barrier cannot always be defined. It is shown not to represent the duration of the tunneling process. This leaves the dwell time and the phase times as the only well-established times in this context. It also leaves open the question of the length of time a transmitted particle spends in the barrier region. It is not clear that a generally valid answer to this question exists.

Reviews of Modern Physics•Oct 1, 1989•1,074 citations

Time delay in tunneling: Transmission and reflection time delays

Wojciech Jaworski, David M. Wardlaw

The problem of time delay in one-dimensional quantum-mechanical scattering by a potential barrier is studied in the framework of time-dependent scattering theory. It is shown how the concept of sojourn time can be used to define three separate time delays: the time delay for transmission through the barrier, the time delay for reflection, and the total time delay (i.e., averaged over transmission and reflection). In addition to the anticipated dependence on the S matrix and its energy derivative, the time delays depend on certain parameters which can be interpreted as describing positions of detectors in a gedanken-experiment measurement. The problem of defining separate time delays for transmission and reflection appears to be rooted in the foundations of quantum theory and its interpretation.

Physical Review A•Apr 1, 1988•69 citations

Model studies of tunneling time

Z.-H. Huang, Paul H. Cutler, T. E. Feuchtwang +3 more

The precise definition and physical interpretation of a tunneling time is a fundamental problem in quantum mechanics. The lack of a well-defined time operator in quantum theory precludes the calculation of time in terms of an expectation value. Consequently, model calculations and simulation studies have been proposed and used to determine the time for a particle to traverse a quantum-mechanical barrier. The results offer both qualitatively and quantitatively, disparate predictions. One of the more commonly used approaches is the phase method, which we have applied to several one-dimensional model potentials to show that the tunneling time is characterized by the ratio of the typical decay length in the barrier to the incident velocity, τ∼(1/κ)/v0. We also show that the phase and the spin precession methods are equivalent when the magnetic field is applied throughout the space containing the particle wave function and the tunneling barrier. In principle, the spin precession method can be regarded as an operational definition of the tunneling time. It also has been shown that a tunneling time can be defined operationally for a time-dependent barrier, for which the model calculations predict a tunneling time given by the mean barrier width divided by the magnitude of the imaginary velocity of the particle in the barrier, τ∼d/‖v‖. This pseudokinematic result has been inferred by magnetic field dependent tunneling through heterostructures and computer simulation of wave packet tunneling through one-dimensional square barriers. Other tunneling time theories predict one or the other of the above mentioned characteristic times; several theories predict both. We interpret these different results for τ to mean that a tunneling time is not uniquely defined as a function of particle energy and the barrier shape unless the process in which the tunneling is involved is also specified. That is, the tunneling time is a meaningful and unique concept only for particular tunneling processes or definite operational procedures.

Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A Vacuum Surfaces and Films•Jan 1, 1990•12 citations

Group Delay in Semiconductor Structures with Energy Dependent Effective Mass

S. Lj. S. KOČINAC, V. Milanović

We investigate tunneling times of a particle with energy dependent effective mass for a one-dimensional real potential.General relations between phase, group and dwell times are obtained for a desired potential shape.For the textbook case of a real rectangular potential barrier the explicit relations for relevant times are derived, which reveal that the nonparabolicity, depending on the energy of incident particle, may substantially increase the group time in realistic structures.Further, we extend this theory to the case of absorptive media described by complex potentials, via introduction of a new absorptive tunneling time τa.Depending on whether the short wavelength or long wavelength limit is considered, maximization of τ a results in a very different shape of a complex rectangular potential.

Acta Physica Polonica A•Nov 1, 2007•2 citations
We demonstrate that although the well-known analogy between the time-independent solutions for two-dimensional tunneling (e.g., frustrated total internal reflection) and tunneling through a one-dimensional potential barrier cannot, in general, be extended to the time domain, there are certain limits in which the delay times for the two problems obey a simple relationship. In particular, when an effective mass is chosen such that mc2{\mathit{mc}}^{2}mc2=\ensuremath{\Elzxh}\ensuremath{\omega}, the classical'' traversal times for allowed transmission become identical for a photon of energy \ensuremath{\Elzxh}\ensuremath{\omega} traversing an air gap between regions of index n and for a particle of mass m traversing the analogous square barrier of height ${\mathit{V}}_{0}$ in one dimension. The quantum-mechanical group delays are also identical, given this effective mass, both for E\ensuremath{\approxeq}${\mathit{V}}_{0}$ (\ensuremath{\theta}\ensuremath{\approxeq}${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\theta}}}_{\mathit{c}}$) and for E\ensuremath{\gg}${\mathit{V}}_{0}$ (\ensuremath{\theta}\ensuremath{\ll}${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\theta}}}_{\mathit{c}}$). (For a smoothly varying potential or index of refraction, the agreement persists for all values of E where the WKB approximation applies.) The same relation serves to equate the quantum-mechanical dwell'' times for any values of E and V0{\mathit{V}}_{0}V0​. On the other hand, in the ``deep tunneling'' limit, E\ensuremath{\ll}V0{\mathit{V}}_{0}V0​ (\ensuremath{\theta}\ensuremath{\approxeq}\ensuremath{\pi}/2), one must choose mc2{\mathit{mc}}^{2}mc2=n2{\mathit{n}}^{2}n2\ensuremath{\Elzxh}\ensuremath{\omega} in order to make the group delays equal for the two problems. These equivalences simplify certain calculations, and the two-dimensional analogy may also be useful for geometrically visualizing the tunneling process and the anomalously small group delays known to occur in the opaque limit. We also demonstrate that the equality of the group delays for transmission and reflection for lossless barriers follows from a simple intuitive argument based on time-reversal invariance, and discuss the extension of the result to the case of lossy barriers.
We demonstrate a direct relationship between tunneling delays in a one-dimensional potential barrier and the delays observed in frustrated total internal reflection. Expressions relating the group delays in these two cases have been formulated in the past [A. M. Steinberg and R. Y. Chiao, Phys. Rev. A 49, 3283 (1994)], but only for certain limits of the normalized particle energy E/V0E/{V}_{0}E/V0​. Here, we derive a single expression relating these two group delays that is valid for arbitrary particle energy by decomposing the group delay into dwell-time and self-interference components. This decomposition also explains why the predicted delay differs in the limiting cases observed by Steinberg and Chiao.
Tunneling phenomenon is one of the wondrous events that take place particularly in quantum mechanics and it has no counterpart in classical physics. We focus on its two important implications : tunneling time and tunneling probability. There has been no consensus on tunneling times among the tunneling time community for last seven decades. So far, most of the attempts to calculate tunneling times have apparently been centered on a simple rectangular barrier example. We implement the tunneling times with the most widely accepted approach, which is using physical Larmor clock, into a nonsymmetrical barrier and a double barrier. It results in different and unique insights into the usual understanding of tunneling time. Three characteristics tunneling time expressions are thoroughly studied in these quantum structures. The difference between dwell time and phase-delay time is once again approved. The unique characteristics of the phase-delay time, which was thought to be exactly similar to dwell time when we assign higher energies to the particles, is also revealed in the nonsymmetrical barrier that it should actually be regarded as a distinct feature from the dwell time. The singularity of reflection time in rectangular barrier is no longer valid in nonsymmetrical barrier. The finiteness of reflection time fairly shows that different quantum structures might bear some taboo breaking results. Since a double barrier involves much more complicated features and calculations, the calculation of tunneling times under this barrier is praiseworthy. The dwell time is the most crucial, troublesome and distinctive tunneling time element to look into for a double barrier. Besides the dwell and phase-delay time, we also calculate the three characteristic times as well as the reflection time for a double barrier. Another area that we study within the context of tunneling phenomenon is the tunneling probability. Recently, there has been ground shaking attempts in modifying the conventional WKB formulae. We follow one of the modified versions of WKB formulae in order to be able to calculate the tunneling probability through different quantum structures where conventional WKB formulae fail. These generalized WKB connection formulae are applied to some complex quantum potentials by seeking aid from the Green's function and the path integral approach. One of the biggest problems in quantum mechanics (visualization) is partially overcome through implementing the method of diagrammatic representations that make the life easier in understanding the events happening in the quantum world when we attempt to calculate the transmission and reflection probabilities. This part therefore has a pedagogical sense too in terms of interpreting the results in a diagrammatic way with the help of the path integral approach.
The old question of "How long does it take to tunnel through a barrier?" has acquired new urgency with the advent of techniques for the fabrication of semiconductor structures in the nanometer range. For the restricted problem of tunneling in a scattering configuration, a coherent picture is now emerging. The dwell time ${\ensuremath{\tau}}_{D}$ has the status of an exact statement of the time spent in a region of space, averaged over all incoming particles. The phase times ${\ensuremath{\tau}}_{T}^{\ensuremath{\phi}}$ and ${\ensuremath{\tau}}_{R}^{\ensuremath{\phi}}$ are defined separately for transmitted and reflected particles. They are asymptotic statements on completed scattering events and include self-interference delays as well as the time spent in the barrier. Consequently, neither the dwell time nor the phase times can answer the question of how much time a transmitted (alternatively, reflected) particle spent in the barrier region. Our discussion of this question relies on a few simple criteria: (1) The average duration of a physical process must be real. (2) Since transmission and reflection are mutually exclusive events, the times ${\ensuremath{\tau}}_{T}$ and ${\ensuremath{\tau}}_{R}$ spent in the barrier region are, if they exist, conditional averages. Consequently, they must obey the identity ${\ensuremath{\tau}}_{D}=T{\ensuremath{\tau}}_{T}+R{\ensuremath{\tau}}_{R}$, where TTT and RRR are the transmission and reflection probabilities, respectively. The existence of this identity distinguishes tunneling in a scattering configuration from tunneling out of a metastable state. (3) Any proposed ${\ensuremath{\tau}}_{T}$ and ${\ensuremath{\tau}}_{R}$ must meet every requirement that can be constructed from ${\ensuremath{\tau}}_{D}$. On the basis of (2), the naively extrapolated phase times, as well as the B\"uttiker-Landauer time, must be rejected. The local Larmor times, as introduced by Baz', satisfy (2), but not every criterion of type (3). The local Larmor clock is therefore unreliable. The asymptotic Larmor clock shows the phase times, as it should. Finally, the inverse characteristic frequency of an oscillating barrier cannot always be defined. It is shown not to represent the duration of the tunneling process. This leaves the dwell time and the phase times as the only well-established times in this context. It also leaves open the question of the length of time a transmitted particle spends in the barrier region. It is not clear that a generally valid answer to this question exists.
The problem of time delay in one-dimensional quantum-mechanical scattering by a potential barrier is studied in the framework of time-dependent scattering theory. It is shown how the concept of sojourn time can be used to define three separate time delays: the time delay for transmission through the barrier, the time delay for reflection, and the total time delay (i.e., averaged over transmission and reflection). In addition to the anticipated dependence on the S matrix and its energy derivative, the time delays depend on certain parameters which can be interpreted as describing positions of detectors in a gedanken-experiment measurement. The problem of defining separate time delays for transmission and reflection appears to be rooted in the foundations of quantum theory and its interpretation.
The precise definition and physical interpretation of a tunneling time is a fundamental problem in quantum mechanics. The lack of a well-defined time operator in quantum theory precludes the calculation of time in terms of an expectation value. Consequently, model calculations and simulation studies have been proposed and used to determine the time for a particle to traverse a quantum-mechanical barrier. The results offer both qualitatively and quantitatively, disparate predictions. One of the more commonly used approaches is the phase method, which we have applied to several one-dimensional model potentials to show that the tunneling time is characterized by the ratio of the typical decay length in the barrier to the incident velocity, τ∼(1/κ)/v0. We also show that the phase and the spin precession methods are equivalent when the magnetic field is applied throughout the space containing the particle wave function and the tunneling barrier. In principle, the spin precession method can be regarded as an operational definition of the tunneling time. It also has been shown that a tunneling time can be defined operationally for a time-dependent barrier, for which the model calculations predict a tunneling time given by the mean barrier width divided by the magnitude of the imaginary velocity of the particle in the barrier, τ∼d/‖v‖. This pseudokinematic result has been inferred by magnetic field dependent tunneling through heterostructures and computer simulation of wave packet tunneling through one-dimensional square barriers. Other tunneling time theories predict one or the other of the above mentioned characteristic times; several theories predict both. We interpret these different results for τ to mean that a tunneling time is not uniquely defined as a function of particle energy and the barrier shape unless the process in which the tunneling is involved is also specified. That is, the tunneling time is a meaningful and unique concept only for particular tunneling processes or definite operational procedures.
We investigate tunneling times of a particle with energy dependent effective mass for a one-dimensional real potential.General relations between phase, group and dwell times are obtained for a desired potential shape.For the textbook case of a real rectangular potential barrier the explicit relations for relevant times are derived, which reveal that the nonparabolicity, depending on the energy of incident particle, may substantially increase the group time in realistic structures.Further, we extend this theory to the case of absorptive media described by complex potentials, via introduction of a new absorptive tunneling time τa.Depending on whether the short wavelength or long wavelength limit is considered, maximization of τ a results in a very different shape of a complex rectangular potential.