Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Spin-1 vector boson structure of free spin-1/2 quantum field

Piotr Garbaczewski

Published Jan 1, 1975• 1 citation
OpenAlex

Abstract

Construction of a Fock representation of the CAR algebra in a given Fock representation of the CCR algebra is extended to include physically admissible quantum fields: an example of a free spin-1/2 quantum field constructed from a spin-1 vector boson quantum field is considered. (auth)

Related papers

CAR on Fock spaces

Jan Dereziński, Christian Gérard

CAR on Fock spacesThis chapter is devoted to the study of Fock representations of the canonical anticommutation relations, a basic tool of quantum many-body theory and quantum field theory.It is parallel to Chap. 9, where Fock CCR representations were studied.The basic framework is almost the same as in Chap.9. Throughout this chapter Z is a Hilbert space, called the one-particle space.We will consider the Fock CAR representation acting on the fermionic Fock space Γ a (Z).As in Sect.1.3, we introduce the space Y = Re(Z ⊕ Z) := {(z, z) : z ∈ Z}, which will serve as the dual phase space of our system.Recall that in the bosonic case we equipped Y with the structure of the Kähler space consisting of the anti-involution j, the Euclidean scalar product • and the symplectic form ω: j(z, z) := (iz, iz), (13.1) (z, z) • (w, w) := 2Re(z|w), (13.2) (z, z)•ω(w, w) := 2Im(z|w) = -(z, z) • j(w, w).(13.3)In our presentation of the fermionic case, we will need the Kähler anti-involution j.The symplectic form ω will not be used.Instead of the scalar product (13.2) we will use another scalar product,Again we will avoid identifing Z with Y. CY is identified with Z ⊕ Z by the mapY # , the space dual to Y, is canonically identified with Re(Z ⊕ Z) by using the scalar product (9.2), and CY # is identified with Z ⊕ Z. Fock CAR representationConsider the fermionic Fock space Γ a (Z).Recall that, for z ∈ Z, a * (z), resp.a(z) denote the corresponding creation, resp.annihilation operators defined in Sect.3.4.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Nov 4, 2022•0 citations

Orthogonal invariance of the CAR on Fock spaces

Jan Dereziński, Christian Gérard

Orthogonal invariance of the CAR on Fock spacesIn this chapter we continue our study of the orthogonal invariance of the CAR.This invariance was already investigated in Chap.14.However, whereas in Chap.14 we used the representation-independent framework of CAR algebras, in this chapter we will consider Fock CAR representations in any dimensions.Therefore, to some extent, this chapter can be viewed as a continuation of Chap.13 about Fock CAR representations.Note also that this chapter is parallel to Chap.11 about the symplectic invariance of the CCR on a Fock space.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Nov 4, 2022•0 citations

Galilei covariance and quasi-free representations of Fermi fields

K. Kraus, H -G Stark

Some quasi-free irreducible representations of the CAR algebra of a non-relativistic free Fermi field are constructed, which are covariant under certain subgroups of the extended Galilei group. The construction of fully covariant (but reducible) representations as direct integrals of partially covariant ones is described. This method is also applicable to arbitrary C*-algebras and other covariance groups.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Jul 1, 1982•2 citations

Quantization of spinor fields

Piotr Garbaczewski

Influenced by Klauder’s investigations on the same subject, we study the question of correspondence principle for Dirac fields, looking for its formulation without use of Grassman algebras. We prove that with each Fermi operator (the series with respect to asymptotic free fields): Ω (ψ,ψ̄): one can associate the functional ΩC(ψC, ψ̄C) with respect to classical spinor fields. Here the projector 1F and the Hilbert (Fock) space ℱF=1FℱB are given such that the identity 1F: ΩC(ψB, ψ̄B): 1FℱF = :Ω (ψ, ψ̄):ℱF defines the mediating boson level, where coherent state expectation values of operator expressions are in order: 〈:ΩC(ψB, ψ̄B):〉=ΩC(ψC, ψ̄C). For proofs we employ functional differentiation (resp. integration) methods, especially in connection with the use of functional representations of the CCR and CAR algebras.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Mar 1, 1978•18 citations

On the Wave Aspect of Relativistic Quantum Fields

M. Omote, S. Kamefuchi

In the state-vector space for relativistic quantum fields a new set of basis vectors are introduced, which are taken to be eigenstates of the field operators themselves. The corresponding eigenvalues are then interpreted as representing matter waves associated with the respective quantum fields. The representation, based on such basis vectors, or the wave-representation naturally emphasizes the wave aspect of the system, in contrast with the usual, Fock or particle-representation emphasizing the particle aspect. For the case of a relativistic, free neutral scalar field, the wave-representation is explicitly constructed, and its mathematical properties as well as physical implications are studied in detail. It is expected that such an approach will find useful applications, e.g., in quantum optics.

arXiv:hep-th/0510182•Progress of Theoretical Physics•May 1, 2006•0 citations

On the Wave aspect of Relativistic Quantum Fields

Omote, M, Kamefuchi, S

In the state-vector space for relativistic quantum fields a new set of basis vectors are introduced, which are taken to be eigenstates of the field operators themselves. The corresponding eigenvalues are then interpreted as representing matter waves associated with the respective quantum fields. The representation, based on such basis vectors, or the wave-representation naturally emphasizes the wave aspect of the system, in contrast with the usual, Fock or particle-representation emphasizing the particle aspect. For the case of a relativistic, free neutral field, the wave-representation is explicitly constructed, and its mathematical properties as well as physical implications are studied in detail. It is expected that such an approach will find useful applications, e.g., in quantum optics.

•Oct 21, 2005•0 citations
CAR on Fock spacesThis chapter is devoted to the study of Fock representations of the canonical anticommutation relations, a basic tool of quantum many-body theory and quantum field theory.It is parallel to Chap. 9, where Fock CCR representations were studied.The basic framework is almost the same as in Chap.9. Throughout this chapter Z is a Hilbert space, called the one-particle space.We will consider the Fock CAR representation acting on the fermionic Fock space Γ a (Z).As in Sect.1.3, we introduce the space Y = Re(Z ⊕ Z) := {(z, z) : z ∈ Z}, which will serve as the dual phase space of our system.Recall that in the bosonic case we equipped Y with the structure of the Kähler space consisting of the anti-involution j, the Euclidean scalar product • and the symplectic form ω: j(z, z) := (iz, iz), (13.1) (z, z) • (w, w) := 2Re(z|w), (13.2) (z, z)•ω(w, w) := 2Im(z|w) = -(z, z) • j(w, w).(13.3)In our presentation of the fermionic case, we will need the Kähler anti-involution j.The symplectic form ω will not be used.Instead of the scalar product (13.2) we will use another scalar product,Again we will avoid identifing Z with Y. CY is identified with Z ⊕ Z by the mapY # , the space dual to Y, is canonically identified with Re(Z ⊕ Z) by using the scalar product (9.2), and CY # is identified with Z ⊕ Z. Fock CAR representationConsider the fermionic Fock space Γ a (Z).Recall that, for z ∈ Z, a * (z), resp.a(z) denote the corresponding creation, resp.annihilation operators defined in Sect.3.4.
Orthogonal invariance of the CAR on Fock spacesIn this chapter we continue our study of the orthogonal invariance of the CAR.This invariance was already investigated in Chap.14.However, whereas in Chap.14 we used the representation-independent framework of CAR algebras, in this chapter we will consider Fock CAR representations in any dimensions.Therefore, to some extent, this chapter can be viewed as a continuation of Chap.13 about Fock CAR representations.Note also that this chapter is parallel to Chap.11 about the symplectic invariance of the CCR on a Fock space.
Influenced by Klauder’s investigations on the same subject, we study the question of correspondence principle for Dirac fields, looking for its formulation without use of Grassman algebras. We prove that with each Fermi operator (the series with respect to asymptotic free fields): Ω (ψ,ψ̄): one can associate the functional ΩC(ψC, ψ̄C) with respect to classical spinor fields. Here the projector 1F and the Hilbert (Fock) space ℱF=1FℱB are given such that the identity 1F: ΩC(ψB, ψ̄B): 1FℱF = :Ω (ψ, ψ̄):ℱF defines the mediating boson level, where coherent state expectation values of operator expressions are in order: 〈:ΩC(ψB, ψ̄B):〉=ΩC(ψC, ψ̄C). For proofs we employ functional differentiation (resp. integration) methods, especially in connection with the use of functional representations of the CCR and CAR algebras.
In the state-vector space for relativistic quantum fields a new set of basis vectors are introduced, which are taken to be eigenstates of the field operators themselves. The corresponding eigenvalues are then interpreted as representing matter waves associated with the respective quantum fields. The representation, based on such basis vectors, or the wave-representation naturally emphasizes the wave aspect of the system, in contrast with the usual, Fock or particle-representation emphasizing the particle aspect. For the case of a relativistic, free neutral scalar field, the wave-representation is explicitly constructed, and its mathematical properties as well as physical implications are studied in detail. It is expected that such an approach will find useful applications, e.g., in quantum optics.
In the state-vector space for relativistic quantum fields a new set of basis vectors are introduced, which are taken to be eigenstates of the field operators themselves. The corresponding eigenvalues are then interpreted as representing matter waves associated with the respective quantum fields. The representation, based on such basis vectors, or the wave-representation naturally emphasizes the wave aspect of the system, in contrast with the usual, Fock or particle-representation emphasizing the particle aspect. For the case of a relativistic, free neutral field, the wave-representation is explicitly constructed, and its mathematical properties as well as physical implications are studied in detail. It is expected that such an approach will find useful applications, e.g., in quantum optics.