In this thesis the structure and properties of imprecise quantum measurements are investigated. The starting point for this investigation is the representation of a quantum observable as a normalized positive operator measure. A general framework to describe measurement inaccuracy is presented. Requirements for accurate measurements are discussed, and the relation of inaccuracy to some optimality criteria is studied. A characterization of covariant observables is given in the case when they are imprecise versions of a sharp observable. Also the properties of such observables are studied. The case of position and momentum observables is studied. All position and momentum observables are characterized, and the joint positionmomentum measurements are discussed.
In this thesis the structure and properties of imprecise quantum measurements are investigated. The starting point for this investigation is the representation of a quantum observable as a normalized positive operator measure. A general framework to describe measurement inaccuracy is presented. Requirements for accurate measurements are discussed, and the relation of inaccuracy to some optimality criteria is studied. A characterization of covariant observables is given in the case when they are imprecise versions of a sharp observable. Also the properties of such observables are studied. The case of position and momentum observables is studied. All position and momentum observables are characterized, and the joint positionmomentum measurements are discussed.
This thesis addresses two forms of quantum uncertainty. In part I, we focus on preparation uncertainty, an expression of the fact that there are sets of observables for which the induced probability distributions are not simultaneously sharp in any state. We exactly characterise the preparation uncertainty regions for several finite dimensional case studies, including a new derivation of the preparation uncertainty region for the Pauli observables of qubits, and two qutrit case studies which have not previously been addressed in the literature. We also consider the variance based preparation uncertainty for position and momentum observables for the well known “particle in a box” system. We see that the appropriate momentum observable is not given by the spectral measure of a self-adjoint operator, although the position observable is. The box system lacks the phase-space symmetry used to determine the free particle and particle on a ring systems so determining the box uncertainty region is rather more difficult than in these cases. We give upper and lower bounds on the boundary of the uncertainty region, and show that our upper bound is exact in an interval.
In part II we turn our attention to measurement uncertainty, exploring the space of compatible joint approximations to incompatible target observables. We prove a general theorem, which shows that, for a broad class of figures of merit, the optimal compatible approximations to covariant targets are themselves covariant. This substantially simplifies the problem of determining measurement uncertainty regions for covariant observables, since the space of covariant compatible approximations is smaller than the space of all compatible approximations. We employ this theorem to derive measurement uncertainty regions for three mutually orthogonal Pauli observables, and for the quantum Fourier pair acting in any finite dimension.
The questions studied in this thesis are centered around the moment operators of a quantum observable, the latter being represented by a normalized positive operator measure. The moment operators of an observable are physically relevant, in the sense that these operators give, as averages, the moments of the outcome statistics for the measurement of the observable. The main questions under consideration in this work arise from the fact that, unlike a projection valued observable of the von Neumann formulation, a general positive operator measure cannot be characterized by its first moment operator. The possibility of characterizing certain observables by also involving higher moment operators is investigated and utilized in three different cases: a characterization of projection valued measures among all the observables is given, a quantization scheme for unbounded classical variables using translation covariant phase space operator measures is presented, and, finally, a mathematically rigorous description is obtained for the measurements of rotated quadratures and phase space observables via the high amplitude limit in the balanced homodyne and eight-port homodyne detectors, respectively. In addition, the structure of the covariant phase space operator measures, which is essential for the above quantization, is analyzed in detail in the context of a (not necessarily unimodular) locally compact group as the phase space.
This thesis is concerned with several topics related to concept of incompatibility of quan- tum observables. The operational description of quantum theory is given, in which incom- patibility is expressed in terms of joint measurability. A connection between symmetric informationally complete positive operator-valued measures and mutually unbiased bases is given, and examples of this connection holding based on investigations in Mathematica are presented. An extension of the Arthurs-Kelly measurement model is then given, where the measured observable is calculated, thereby generalising the results given previously in the literature. It is shown that in the case of prior correlations between measurement probes there exists the possibility that a measurement of both probes leads to marginal observables with smaller statistical spread than if measurements are performed on the individual probes. This concept is then highlighted by considering two probe states that allow for this reduction in spread, and the required conditions for success are given. Fi- nally, error-error relations for incompatible dichotomic qubit observables are considered in the case of state-dependent and independent error measures. Quantities that arise in the state-independent measures case, which were previously presented geometrically, have been given operational meaning, and optimal approximating schemes in both cases are compared. Limitations regarding the state-dependent optimal approximations, and experimental work built upon this construction are also discussed.
The focus of the present investigation is uncertainty relations for quantum particles, which quantify the fundamental limitations on some of their properties due to their incompatibility. In the first, longer part, we are concerned with preparational uncertainty \nrelations, while in the second we touch upon measurement inequalities through a generalisation of a model of joint measurement of position and momentum. \nSpecifically, starting from a triple of canonical operators, we prove product and sum inequalities for their variances with bounds larger than those following from combining the pairwise ones. We extend these results to N observables for a quantum particle and prove uncertainty relations for the sums and products of their variances \nin terms of the commutators. \nFurthermore, we present a general theory of preparational uncertainty relations for a quantum particle in one dimension and derive conditions for a smooth function of the second moments to assume a lower bound. The Robertson-Schroedinger inequality \nis found to be of special significance and we geometrically study the space of second moments. We prove new uncertainty relations for various functions of the variances and covariance of position and momentum of a quantum particle. Some of our findings are shown to extend to more than one spatial degree of freedom and we derive \nvarious types of inequalities. \nFinally, we propose a generalisation of the Arthurs-Kelly model of joint measurement of position and momentum to incorporate the case of more than two observables and derive joint-measurement inequalities for the statistics of the probes. For the case of \nthree canonical observables and suitable definitions of error and disturbance we obtain a number of error-error-error and error-error-disturbance inequalities and show that the lower bound is identical to the preparational one.
In standard formulations of the uncertainty principle, two fundamental features are typically cast as impossibility statements: two noncommuting observables cannot in general both be sharply defined (for the same state), nor can they be measured jointly. The pioneers of quantum mechanics were acutely aware and puzzled by this fact, and it motivated Heisenberg to seek a mitigation, which he formulated in his seminal paper of 1927. He provided intuitive arguments to show that the values of, say, the position and momentum of a particle can at least be unsharply defined, and they can be measured together provided some approximation errors are allowed. Only now, nine decades later, a working theory of approximate joint measurements is taking shape, leading to rigorous and experimentally testable formulations of associated error tradeoff relations. Here we briefly review this new development, explaining the concepts and steps taken in the construction of optimal joint approximations of pairs of incompatible observables. As a case study, we deduce measurement uncertainty relations for qubit observables using two distinct error measures. We provide an operational interpretation of the error bounds and discuss some of the first experimental tests of such relations.