Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Preparation and Measurement Uncertaintyin Quantum Mechanics

Oliver Reardon-Smith

Published Jul 31, 2019• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

This thesis addresses two forms of quantum uncertainty. In part I, we focus on preparation uncertainty, an expression of the fact that there are sets of observables for which the induced probability distributions are not simultaneously sharp in any state. We exactly characterise the preparation uncertainty regions for several finite dimensional case studies, including a new derivation of the preparation uncertainty region for the Pauli observables of qubits, and two qutrit case studies which have not previously been addressed in the literature. We also consider the variance based preparation uncertainty for position and momentum observables for the well known “particle in a box” system. We see that the appropriate momentum observable is not given by the spectral measure of a self-adjoint operator, although the position observable is. The box system lacks the phase-space symmetry used to determine the free particle and particle on a ring systems so determining the box uncertainty region is rather more difficult than in these cases. We give upper and lower bounds on the boundary of the uncertainty region, and show that our upper bound is exact in an interval. In part II we turn our attention to measurement uncertainty, exploring the space of compatible joint approximations to incompatible target observables. We prove a general theorem, which shows that, for a broad class of figures of merit, the optimal compatible approximations to covariant targets are themselves covariant. This substantially simplifies the problem of determining measurement uncertainty regions for covariant observables, since the space of covariant compatible approximations is smaller than the space of all compatible approximations. We employ this theorem to derive measurement uncertainty regions for three mutually orthogonal Pauli observables, and for the quantum Fourier pair acting in any finite dimension.

Related papers

Simplifying measurement uncertainty with quantum symmetries

Oliver Reardon-Smith

Determining the measurement uncertainty region is a difficult problem for generic sets of observables. For this reason the literature on exact measurement uncertainty regions is focused on symmetric sets of observables, where the symmetries are used to simplify the calculation. We provide a framework to systematically exploit available symmetries, formulated in terms of covariance, to simplify problems of measurement uncertainty. Our key result is that for a wide range figures of merit the optimal compatible approximations of covariant target observables are themselves covariant. This substantially simplifies the problem of determining measurement uncertainty regions for cases where it applies, since the space of covariant observables is typically much smaller than that of all observables. An intermediate result, which may be applicable more broadly, is the existence and characterisation of a covariantisation map, mapping observables to covariant observables. Our formulation is applicable to finite outcome observables on separable Hilbert spaces. We conjecture that the restriction of finite outcomes may be lifted, and explore some of the features a generalisation must have. We demonstrate the theorem by deriving measurement uncertainty regions for three mutually orthogonal Pauli observables, and for phase space observables in arbitrary finite dimensions.

arXiv:1909.05055•Sep 11, 2019•1 citation

Uncertainty relations for quantum particles

Σπυρίδων Κεχριμπάρης

The focus of the present investigation is uncertainty relations for quantum particles, which quantify the fundamental limitations on some of their properties due to their incompatibility. In the first, longer part, we are concerned with preparational uncertainty \nrelations, while in the second we touch upon measurement inequalities through a generalisation of a model of joint measurement of position and momentum. \nSpecifically, starting from a triple of canonical operators, we prove product and sum inequalities for their variances with bounds larger than those following from combining the pairwise ones. We extend these results to N observables for a quantum particle and prove uncertainty relations for the sums and products of their variances \nin terms of the commutators. \nFurthermore, we present a general theory of preparational uncertainty relations for a quantum particle in one dimension and derive conditions for a smooth function of the second moments to assume a lower bound. The Robertson-Schroedinger inequality \nis found to be of special significance and we geometrically study the space of second moments. We prove new uncertainty relations for various functions of the variances and covariance of position and momentum of a quantum particle. Some of our findings are shown to extend to more than one spatial degree of freedom and we derive \nvarious types of inequalities. \nFinally, we propose a generalisation of the Arthurs-Kelly model of joint measurement of position and momentum to incorporate the case of more than two observables and derive joint-measurement inequalities for the statistics of the probes. For the case of \nthree canonical observables and suitable definitions of error and disturbance we obtain a number of error-error-error and error-error-disturbance inequalities and show that the lower bound is identical to the preparational one.

•Dec 1, 2015•1 citation

Measurement uncertainty: the problem of characterising optimal error bounds

Tom Bullock, Paul Busch

In standard formulations of the uncertainty principle, two fundamental features are typically cast as impossibility statements: two noncommuting observables cannot in general both be sharply defined (for the same state), nor can they be measured jointly. The pioneers of quantum mechanics were acutely aware and puzzled by this fact, and it motivated Heisenberg to seek a mitigation, which he formulated in his seminal paper of 1927. He provided intuitive arguments to show that the values of, say, the position and momentum of a particle can at least be unsharply defined, and they can be measured together provided some approximation errors are allowed. Only now, nine decades later, a working theory of approximate joint measurements is taking shape, leading to rigorous and experimentally testable formulations of associated error tradeoff relations. Here we briefly review this new development, explaining the concepts and steps taken in the construction of optimal joint approximations of pairs of incompatible observables. As a case study, we deduce measurement uncertainty relations for qubit observables using two distinct error measures. We provide an operational interpretation of the error bounds and discuss some of the first experimental tests of such relations.

•Dec 1, 2015•1 citation

Measurement uncertainty relations

Paul Busch, PEKKA J. LAHTI, Reinhard F. Werner

Measurement uncertainty relations are quantitative bounds on the errors in an approximate joint measurement of two observables. They can be seen as a generalization of the error/disturbance tradeoff first discussed heuristically by Heisenberg. Here we prove such relations for the case of two canonically conjugate observables like position and momentum, and establish a close connection with the more familiar preparation uncertainty relations constraining the sharpness of the distributions of the two observables in the same state. Both sets of relations are generalized to means of order α rather than the usual quadratic means, and we show that the optimal constants are the same for preparation and for measurement uncertainty. The constants are determined numerically and compared with some bounds in the literature. In both cases, the near-saturation of the inequalities entails that the state (resp. observable) is uniformly close to a minimizing one.

arXiv:1312.4392•Journal of Mathematical Physics•Apr 1, 2014•88 citations

Measurement uncertainty relations: characterising optimal error bounds for qubits

Tom Bullock, Paul Busch

Abstract In standard formulations of the uncertainty principle, two fundamental features are typically cast as impossibility statements: two noncommuting observables cannot in general both be sharply defined (for the same state), nor can they be measured jointly. The pioneers of quantum mechanics were acutely aware and puzzled by this fact, and it motivated Heisenberg to seek a mitigation, which he formulated in his seminal paper of 1927. He provided intuitive arguments to show that the values of, say, the position and momentum of a particle can at least be unsharply defined, and they can be measured together provided some approximation errors are allowed. Only now, nine decades later, a working theory of approximate joint measurements is taking shape, leading to rigorous and experimentally testable formulations of associated error tradeoff relations. Here we briefly review this new development, explaining the concepts and steps taken in the construction of optimal joint approximations of pairs of incompatible observables. As a case study, we deduce measurement uncertainty relations for qubit observables using two distinct error measures. We provide an operational interpretation of the error bounds and discuss some of the first experimental tests of such relations.

arXiv:1512.00104•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•May 23, 2018•13 citations

Measurement uncertainty relations: characterising optimal error bounds for qubits : Topical Review

Paul Busch, Tom Bullock

In standard formulations of the uncertainty principle, two fundamental features are typically cast as impossibility statements: two noncommuting observables cannot in general both be sharply defined (for the same state), nor can they be measured jointly. The pioneers of quantum mechanics were acutely aware and puzzled by this fact, and it motivated Heisenberg to seek a mitigation, which he formulated in his seminal paper of 1927. He provided intuitive arguments to show that the values of, say, the position and momentum of a particle can at least be unsharply defined, and they can be measured together provided some approximation errors are allowed. Only now, nine decades later, a working theory of approximate joint measurements is taking shape, leading to rigorous and experimentally testable formulations of associated error tradeoff relations. Here we briefly review this new development, explaining the concepts and steps taken in the construction of optimal joint approximations of pairs of incompatible observables. As a case study, we deduce measurement uncertainty relations for qubit observables using two distinct error measures. We provide an operational interpretation of the error bounds and discuss some of the first experimental tests of such relations.

•Jul 13, 2018•0 citations
This thesis addresses two forms of quantum uncertainty. In part I, we focus on preparation uncertainty, an expression of the fact that there are sets of observables for which the induced probability distributions are not simultaneously sharp in any state. We exactly characterise the preparation uncertainty regions for several finite dimensional case studies, including a new derivation of the preparation uncertainty region for the Pauli observables of qubits, and two qutrit case studies which have not previously been addressed in the literature. We also consider the variance based preparation uncertainty for position and momentum observables for the well known “particle in a box” system. We see that the appropriate momentum observable is not given by the spectral measure of a self-adjoint operator, although the position observable is. The box system lacks the phase-space symmetry used to determine the free particle and particle on a ring systems so determining the box uncertainty region is rather more difficult than in these cases. We give upper and lower bounds on the boundary of the uncertainty region, and show that our upper bound is exact in an interval.
In part II we turn our attention to measurement uncertainty, exploring the space of compatible joint approximations to incompatible target observables. We prove a general theorem, which shows that, for a broad class of figures of merit, the optimal compatible approximations to covariant targets are themselves covariant. This substantially simplifies the problem of determining measurement uncertainty regions for covariant observables, since the space of covariant compatible approximations is smaller than the space of all compatible approximations. We employ this theorem to derive measurement uncertainty regions for three mutually orthogonal Pauli observables, and for the quantum Fourier pair acting in any finite dimension.
Determining the measurement uncertainty region is a difficult problem for generic sets of observables. For this reason the literature on exact measurement uncertainty regions is focused on symmetric sets of observables, where the symmetries are used to simplify the calculation. We provide a framework to systematically exploit available symmetries, formulated in terms of covariance, to simplify problems of measurement uncertainty. Our key result is that for a wide range figures of merit the optimal compatible approximations of covariant target observables are themselves covariant. This substantially simplifies the problem of determining measurement uncertainty regions for cases where it applies, since the space of covariant observables is typically much smaller than that of all observables. An intermediate result, which may be applicable more broadly, is the existence and characterisation of a covariantisation map, mapping observables to covariant observables. Our formulation is applicable to finite outcome observables on separable Hilbert spaces. We conjecture that the restriction of finite outcomes may be lifted, and explore some of the features a generalisation must have. We demonstrate the theorem by deriving measurement uncertainty regions for three mutually orthogonal Pauli observables, and for phase space observables in arbitrary finite dimensions.
The focus of the present investigation is uncertainty relations for quantum particles, which quantify the fundamental limitations on some of their properties due to their incompatibility. In the first, longer part, we are concerned with preparational uncertainty \nrelations, while in the second we touch upon measurement inequalities through a generalisation of a model of joint measurement of position and momentum. \nSpecifically, starting from a triple of canonical operators, we prove product and sum inequalities for their variances with bounds larger than those following from combining the pairwise ones. We extend these results to N observables for a quantum particle and prove uncertainty relations for the sums and products of their variances \nin terms of the commutators. \nFurthermore, we present a general theory of preparational uncertainty relations for a quantum particle in one dimension and derive conditions for a smooth function of the second moments to assume a lower bound. The Robertson-Schroedinger inequality \nis found to be of special significance and we geometrically study the space of second moments. We prove new uncertainty relations for various functions of the variances and covariance of position and momentum of a quantum particle. Some of our findings are shown to extend to more than one spatial degree of freedom and we derive \nvarious types of inequalities. \nFinally, we propose a generalisation of the Arthurs-Kelly model of joint measurement of position and momentum to incorporate the case of more than two observables and derive joint-measurement inequalities for the statistics of the probes. For the case of \nthree canonical observables and suitable definitions of error and disturbance we obtain a number of error-error-error and error-error-disturbance inequalities and show that the lower bound is identical to the preparational one.
In standard formulations of the uncertainty principle, two fundamental features are typically cast as impossibility statements: two noncommuting observables cannot in general both be sharply defined (for the same state), nor can they be measured jointly. The pioneers of quantum mechanics were acutely aware and puzzled by this fact, and it motivated Heisenberg to seek a mitigation, which he formulated in his seminal paper of 1927. He provided intuitive arguments to show that the values of, say, the position and momentum of a particle can at least be unsharply defined, and they can be measured together provided some approximation errors are allowed. Only now, nine decades later, a working theory of approximate joint measurements is taking shape, leading to rigorous and experimentally testable formulations of associated error tradeoff relations. Here we briefly review this new development, explaining the concepts and steps taken in the construction of optimal joint approximations of pairs of incompatible observables. As a case study, we deduce measurement uncertainty relations for qubit observables using two distinct error measures. We provide an operational interpretation of the error bounds and discuss some of the first experimental tests of such relations.
Measurement uncertainty relations are quantitative bounds on the errors in an approximate joint measurement of two observables. They can be seen as a generalization of the error/disturbance tradeoff first discussed heuristically by Heisenberg. Here we prove such relations for the case of two canonically conjugate observables like position and momentum, and establish a close connection with the more familiar preparation uncertainty relations constraining the sharpness of the distributions of the two observables in the same state. Both sets of relations are generalized to means of order α rather than the usual quadratic means, and we show that the optimal constants are the same for preparation and for measurement uncertainty. The constants are determined numerically and compared with some bounds in the literature. In both cases, the near-saturation of the inequalities entails that the state (resp. observable) is uniformly close to a minimizing one.
Abstract In standard formulations of the uncertainty principle, two fundamental features are typically cast as impossibility statements: two noncommuting observables cannot in general both be sharply defined (for the same state), nor can they be measured jointly. The pioneers of quantum mechanics were acutely aware and puzzled by this fact, and it motivated Heisenberg to seek a mitigation, which he formulated in his seminal paper of 1927. He provided intuitive arguments to show that the values of, say, the position and momentum of a particle can at least be unsharply defined, and they can be measured together provided some approximation errors are allowed. Only now, nine decades later, a working theory of approximate joint measurements is taking shape, leading to rigorous and experimentally testable formulations of associated error tradeoff relations. Here we briefly review this new development, explaining the concepts and steps taken in the construction of optimal joint approximations of pairs of incompatible observables. As a case study, we deduce measurement uncertainty relations for qubit observables using two distinct error measures. We provide an operational interpretation of the error bounds and discuss some of the first experimental tests of such relations.
In standard formulations of the uncertainty principle, two fundamental features are typically cast as impossibility statements: two noncommuting observables cannot in general both be sharply defined (for the same state), nor can they be measured jointly. The pioneers of quantum mechanics were acutely aware and puzzled by this fact, and it motivated Heisenberg to seek a mitigation, which he formulated in his seminal paper of 1927. He provided intuitive arguments to show that the values of, say, the position and momentum of a particle can at least be unsharply defined, and they can be measured together provided some approximation errors are allowed. Only now, nine decades later, a working theory of approximate joint measurements is taking shape, leading to rigorous and experimentally testable formulations of associated error tradeoff relations. Here we briefly review this new development, explaining the concepts and steps taken in the construction of optimal joint approximations of pairs of incompatible observables. As a case study, we deduce measurement uncertainty relations for qubit observables using two distinct error measures. We provide an operational interpretation of the error bounds and discuss some of the first experimental tests of such relations.