This thesis is concerned with several topics related to concept of incompatibility of quan- tum observables. The operational description of quantum theory is given, in which incom- patibility is expressed in terms of joint measurability. A connection between symmetric informationally complete positive operator-valued measures and mutually unbiased bases is given, and examples of this connection holding based on investigations in Mathematica are presented. An extension of the Arthurs-Kelly measurement model is then given, where the measured observable is calculated, thereby generalising the results given previously in the literature. It is shown that in the case of prior correlations between measurement probes there exists the possibility that a measurement of both probes leads to marginal observables with smaller statistical spread than if measurements are performed on the individual probes. This concept is then highlighted by considering two probe states that allow for this reduction in spread, and the required conditions for success are given. Fi- nally, error-error relations for incompatible dichotomic qubit observables are considered in the case of state-dependent and independent error measures. Quantities that arise in the state-independent measures case, which were previously presented geometrically, have been given operational meaning, and optimal approximating schemes in both cases are compared. Limitations regarding the state-dependent optimal approximations, and experimental work built upon this construction are also discussed.
This thesis is concerned with several topics related to concept of incompatibility of quan- tum observables. The operational description of quantum theory is given, in which incom- patibility is expressed in terms of joint measurability. A connection between symmetric informationally complete positive operator-valued measures and mutually unbiased bases is given, and examples of this connection holding based on investigations in Mathematica are presented. An extension of the Arthurs-Kelly measurement model is then given, where the measured observable is calculated, thereby generalising the results given previously in the literature. It is shown that in the case of prior correlations between measurement probes there exists the possibility that a measurement of both probes leads to marginal observables with smaller statistical spread than if measurements are performed on the individual probes. This concept is then highlighted by considering two probe states that allow for this reduction in spread, and the required conditions for success are given. Fi- nally, error-error relations for incompatible dichotomic qubit observables are considered in the case of state-dependent and independent error measures. Quantities that arise in the state-independent measures case, which were previously presented geometrically, have been given operational meaning, and optimal approximating schemes in both cases are compared. Limitations regarding the state-dependent optimal approximations, and experimental work built upon this construction are also discussed.
In standard formulations of the uncertainty principle, two fundamental features are typically cast as impossibility statements: two noncommuting observables cannot in general both be sharply defined (for the same state), nor can they be measured jointly. The pioneers of quantum mechanics were acutely aware and puzzled by this fact, and it motivated Heisenberg to seek a mitigation, which he formulated in his seminal paper of 1927. He provided intuitive arguments to show that the values of, say, the position and momentum of a particle can at least be unsharply defined, and they can be measured together provided some approximation errors are allowed. Only now, nine decades later, a working theory of approximate joint measurements is taking shape, leading to rigorous and experimentally testable formulations of associated error tradeoff relations. Here we briefly review this new development, explaining the concepts and steps taken in the construction of optimal joint approximations of pairs of incompatible observables. As a case study, we deduce measurement uncertainty relations for qubit observables using two distinct error measures. We provide an operational interpretation of the error bounds and discuss some of the first experimental tests of such relations.
Abstract In standard formulations of the uncertainty principle, two fundamental features are typically cast as impossibility statements: two noncommuting observables cannot in general both be sharply defined (for the same state), nor can they be measured jointly. The pioneers of quantum mechanics were acutely aware and puzzled by this fact, and it motivated Heisenberg to seek a mitigation, which he formulated in his seminal paper of 1927. He provided intuitive arguments to show that the values of, say, the position and momentum of a particle can at least be unsharply defined, and they can be measured together provided some approximation errors are allowed. Only now, nine decades later, a working theory of approximate joint measurements is taking shape, leading to rigorous and experimentally testable formulations of associated error tradeoff relations. Here we briefly review this new development, explaining the concepts and steps taken in the construction of optimal joint approximations of pairs of incompatible observables. As a case study, we deduce measurement uncertainty relations for qubit observables using two distinct error measures. We provide an operational interpretation of the error bounds and discuss some of the first experimental tests of such relations.
This thesis concerns how attempting to measure certain fundamental properties
of a physical theory can lead us to new insights. The idea of general probabilistic
models is introduced and developed, in order to provide a way to be able to
consider and compare different theories. A measure of incompatibility of two
observables is defined, through the amount of smearing needed to make them
jointly measureable. This measure is then used to characterise the degree of
incompatibility that exists in a given theory. Quantum theory is then shown
to be as incompatible as any other theory, but only in a very course grained
sense. A related way of measuring the strength of incompatibility of a pair
of observables is then shown to put a bound on a measure of the strength of
non-local correlations. The notion of steering, or remote ensemble preparation,
is then shown to be a sufficient condition for the saturation of that bound.
Examples are considered that demonstrate that the given sufficient notion of
steering is not necessary, and it is proposed how the measures can be modified
in cases where the link does not hold. The idea of formulating measures of
error and disturbance associated with a measurement device is discussed. The
notion of a direct test of error or disturbance is used to analyse current proposed
measures, and show their shortcomings.
Decoherence, when viewed in the Heisenberg picture, can turn incompatible measurements into jointly measurable ones. This provides an observable-level description of emergent classicality in terms of the incompatibility destroyed by a noise channel. The corresponding loss of incompatibility can be captured by the channel's \emph{compatibility region}---the observables in a probe class that become jointly measurable with every noisy observable. The geometry and volume of this region provide a refined operational way to compare noise channels. We apply this framework to decoherence channels, each of which acts by Schur multiplication with extreme points of the convex set of unit-diagonal positive semidefinite matrices. Restricting to extremals eliminates convex mixing and reveals subtle phase-dependent decoherence effects thar are not captured by damping rates or conventional coherence quantifiers. Such channels have a rigid dilation structure described by a rank-one operator frame, which reduces joint measurability to a positivity test, making the compatibility region analytically tractable, and its volume computable from the frame's Gram matrix. If the frame can be normalised to a minimal informationally complete (MIC) POVM, the compatibility region acquires a geometric interpretation in the associated probability representation of the quantum state space, familiar with Qbism. Among maximal-rank extremals, those associated with symmetric informationally complete (SIC) POVMs maximise the compatibility volume and hence destroy the greatest amount of incompatibility, providing an operational characterisation of the special role of SICs in terms of joint measurability. This leads to a new formulation of the well-known SIC existence problem as a joint measurability question for noisy mutually unbiased bases.
Recent theoretical developments are reviewed concentrating on the description of optimal generalised quantum measurement processes in physical systems with finite dimensional Hilbert spaces. Based on a self contained presentation of the required underlying quantum theoretical concepts this review particularly addresses recently explored basic theoretical properties and possible applications of informationally complete symmetric generalised measurements, a concept unifying the description of numerous so far largely separately explored measurement scenarios, such as measurements based on complete systems of mutually unbiased bases or symmetric informationally complete measurements. The recent results concerning the construction and existence of these informationally complete symmetric generalised measurements may also shed new light on still open questions concerning some of their special cases, such as the existence of complete sets of mutually unbiased bases in Hilbert spaces of non-prime power dimensions.
In standard formulations of the uncertainty principle, two fundamental features are typically cast as impossibility statements: two noncommuting observables cannot in general both be sharply defined (for the same state), nor can they be measured jointly. The pioneers of quantum mechanics were acutely aware and puzzled by this fact, and it motivated Heisenberg to seek a mitigation, which he formulated in his seminal paper of 1927. He provided intuitive arguments to show that the values of, say, the position and momentum of a particle can at least be unsharply defined, and they can be measured together provided some approximation errors are allowed. Only now, nine decades later, a working theory of approximate joint measurements is taking shape, leading to rigorous and experimentally testable formulations of associated error tradeoff relations. Here we briefly review this new development, explaining the concepts and steps taken in the construction of optimal joint approximations of pairs of incompatible observables. As a case study, we deduce measurement uncertainty relations for qubit observables using two distinct error measures. We provide an operational interpretation of the error bounds and discuss some of the first experimental tests of such relations.